Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Product and Service Decisions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Marketing Management

Part of the book series: Springer Texts in Business and Economics ((STBE))

  • 6436 Accesses

Abstract

The good or service as seen by the consumer constitutes much more than just a physical core product; all the intangibles that accompany the product form the package. The product audit is used to explore what this package comprises. The Ansoff Matrix looks at the four main growth strategies and demonstrates the increase in risk as a company moves from penetration of the known market to diversification into a totally unknown market.

The theory of the product life cycle says that the stages of introduction, growth, maturity, decline, and postmortem that a product goes through are to be reflected in the corresponding marketing mix. Even though most attention is focused on new product launches, most products are in the maturity stage, where they need careful management attention to either prolong their life cycle or to lead to graceful retirement.

A popular theoretical tool for structuring product portfolios is the Boston Consulting Group Matrix. Its four quadrants are based on market share and market growth: problem children (or question marks), stars, cash cows, and dogs. Because of its assumption of a significant product life cycle and economies of scale, the Boston Matrix may have less relevance than its advocates suggest. In any event, use of the matrix requires a sound understanding of the complex interrelationship between market growth rate and relative share.

The development of a product mix needs to consider both the width and depth of product lines and may require line stretching or line rationalization. In doing so, the firm must carefully consider the implications of such product policies on sales, profits, and relationships with customers and suppliers.

When using a strategy of market expansion, the firm must consider whether and how to standardize or adapt its products. In addition, attention must be devoted to packaging. No longer simply driven by product protection, packaging must reflect market requirements, promotional opportunities, and distribution considerations.

Services, whether related to goods or pure services, have distinctive features. In particular, they are more dependent on people, which necessitate more, and higher, standards of management. The intangibility of services means that the associated physical elements may be used for promotion, and strong branding is important. The lack of storage capacity may require new efforts at smoothing out demand fluctuations through personnel management or pricing strategies.

Overall, even though all elements of the marketing mix are equally important, the product is the most visible component and serves as the focal point for all marketing mix aspects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cooper, R. G. (1994). New products: The factors that drive success. International Marketing Review, 11(1), 60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Guttman, M. (1995). Why the stars orbit planet Hollywood. U.S. News and World Report, p. 60.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blois, K. (1987). Marketing for non-profit organizations. In M. J. Baker (Ed.), The marketing book (p. 45). Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  4. MBN. (2020). Market development. https://marketbusinessnews.com/financial-glossary/market-development/. Accessed 15 June 2020.

  5. “The Critical Questions for Diversification Success”. Harvard Business Review (November/December 1997), 97.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Markides, C. C. (1997). To diversify or not to diversify. Harvard Business Review, 75(6), 93–99.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 116.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Drucker, P. (2006). Managing for results. New York: Butterworth Heinemann, HarperBusiness.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lusch, R. F., & Lusch, V. N. (1999). Principles of marketing. New York: Kent.

    Google Scholar 

  10. “A tale of two conglomerates”. Economist (November 18, 1995), 20.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Air France. (n.d). Air France, KLM, Delta and Virgin Atlantic launch world’s leading partnership. https://corporate.airfrance.com/en/news/air-france-klm-delta-and-virgin-atlantic-launch-worlds-leading-partnership. Accessed 17 June 2020.

  12. Polli, R., & Cook, V. (1969). Validity of the product life cycle. Journal of Business Management, 42(4), 28.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Robinson, W. T., & Fomell, C. (1985). Sources of market pioneer advantage in consumer goods industries. Journal of Marketing Research, 22, 305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Vesey, J. T. (1992). Time-to-market: Put speed in product development. Industrial Marketing Management, 21(2), 151–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Robertson, T. F. (1993). How to reduce market penetration cycle times. Sloan Management Review, 35(1), 87–96.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Porter, M. E. (1998). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gaimon, C., & Singhal, V. (1992). Flexibility and the choice of manufacturing facilities under short product life cycles. European Journal of Operational Research, 60(2), 211–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lazer, W., & Shaw, E. H. (1986). The product life cycle. In V. P. Buell (Ed.), Handbook of modem marketing (2nd ed., p. 34). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Roche, E. (1999). Product development: Why line extensions often backfire. Harvard Business Review, 77, 19–21.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sheth, J. N., & Sisodia, R. S. (1999). Revisiting marketing’s lawlike generalizations. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(1), 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Handheld, R. B., & Pannesi, R. T. (1994). Managing component life cycles in dynamic technological environments. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 30(2), 20–27.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Vemon, R. (1966). International investment and international trade in the product cycle. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80, 190–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Klein, A. (1999). Kodak is rolling out digital photo processing on CD-ROM disks. Wall Street Journal, A4.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Czinkota, M. R., Ronkainen, I., & Moffett, M. (2003). International business update 2003 (pp. 129–133). Cincinnati: Thomson-South-Western Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Enis, B. M., Lagarce, R., & Prell, A. E. (1977). Extending the product life cycle. Business Horizons, 20, 46–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Watkins, T. (1986). The economics of the brand: A marketing analysts (p. 146). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dhalla, N. K., & Yuspeh, S. (1976). Forget the product life cycle concept. Harvard Business Review, 54, 102.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Paley, N. (1994). Changing channels. Sales and Marketing Management, 146, 30–32.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bayus, B. L. (1994). Are product life cycles really getting shorter. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11, 300–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Alberts, W. W. (1989). The experience curve doctrine reconsidered. Journal of Marketing, 53, 36–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Boston Consulting Group. (1970). Perspectives on experience.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Woo, C. Y., & Cooper, A. C. (1988). The surprising case for low market share. In D. E. Gumpert (Ed.), The marketing renaissance (pp. 106–113). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hellofs, L. L., & Jacobson, R. (1999). Market share and customers’ perceptions of quality: When can firms grow their way to higher versus lower quality? Journal of Marketing, 63(1), 16–25.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. A. (1987). Cross-cultural strategies. Journal of Business Strategy, 7, 28–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lipman, J. (1988). Marketers turn sour on global sales pitch Harvard guru makes. Wall Street Journal, 1, 13.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Cavusgil, S. T., & Zou, S. (1994). Marketing strategy—Performance relationship: An investigation of the empirical link in export and market ventures. Journal of Marketing, 58, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. “Think Global, Act Local,” Jetro Monitor 6 (September 1991), 3.

    Google Scholar 

  38. “Winning in the world market”. Washington, DC: American Business Conference, November 1987, p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Shostack, G. L. (1987). Service positioning through structural change. Journal of Marketing, 51, 38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zeithaml, V., Parasuraman, A., & Berry, L. L. (1990). Delivering quality service: Balancing customer perceptions and expectations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Hemmasi, M., Strong, K. C., & Taylor, S. A. (1994). Measuring service quality for strategic planning and analysis in service firms. Journal of Applied Business Research, 10(4), 24–34.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Zeithaml, V., Parasuraman, A., & Berry, L. L. (1990). Delivering quality service (p. 159). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Erramilli, M. K., & Rao, C. P. (1993). Service firms’ international entry-mode choice: A modified transaction-cost analysis approach. Journal of Marketing, 57, 19–38.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Smith, S. C. (1999). What does the future hold for pony cars? Car and Driver, 45(2), 52–69.

    Google Scholar 

  45. www.levistrauss.com/index_hr.html

  46. Parker-Pope, T. (1999). P&G Cleaning products get on fast track. Wall Street Journal, B6.

    Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Christofi, C., Vrontis, D., & Leonidou, E. (2014). Product innovation and cause related marketing success: A conceptual framework and a research agenda. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 32(2), 174–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chryssochoidis, G. (2003). Rolling out new products across international markets. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cillo, P., Griffith, D. A., & Rubera, G. (2018). The new product portfolio innovativeness-Stock returns relationship: The role of large individual investors’ culture. Journal of Marketing, 82(6), 49–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. G., Edgett, S. J., & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (2001). Portfolio management for new products (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Perseus Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao, W., Ji, L., Liu, Y., & Sun, Q. (2020). Branding cultural products in international markets: A study of Hollywood movies in China. Journal of Marketing, 84(3), 86–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, A. (2003). Services marketing and management. London: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kalaignanam, K., Kushwaha, T., & Swartz, T. A. (2017). The differential impact of new product development “make/buy” choices on immediate and future product quality: Insights from the automobile industry. Journal of Marketing, 81(6), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamleitner, B., Thürridl, C., & Martin, B. A. S. (2019). A Cinderella story: How past identity salience boosts demand for repurposed products. Journal of Marketing, 83(6), 76–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovelock, C., & Wirtz, J. (2004). Principles of service marketing: People, technology, strategy (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovelock, C., & Wirtz, J. (2016). Services marketing: People, technology, strategy (8th ed.). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, G., & Reilly, R. (2003). Blockbusters: The five keys to developing great new products. New York: HarperBusiness.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macrae, C., Gordon, W., & Mitchell, A. (2009). Mapping intangible assets. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paharia, N., & Swaminathan, V. (2019). Who is wary of user design? The role of power-distance beliefs in preference for user-designed products. Journal of Marketing, 83(3), 91–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, A., Saboo, A. R., & Kumar, V. (2018). Investigating the influence of characteristics of the new product introduction process on firm value: The case of the pharmaceutical industry. Journal of Marketing, 82(5), 66–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, R., Wuyts, S., & Mallapragada, G. (2018). Corporate board interlocks and new product introductions. Journal of Marketing, 82(1), 132–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunder, S., Kim, K. H., & Yorkston, E. A. (2019). What drives herding behaviour in online ratings? The role of rater experience, product portfolio, and diverging opinions. Journal of Marketing, 83(6), 93–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrontis, D., & Papasolomou, I. (2007). Brand and product building: The case of the Cyprus Wine industry. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 16(2/3), 159–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winterich, K. P., Nenkov, G. Y., & Gonzales, G. E. (2019). Knowing what it makes: How product transformation salience increases recycling. Journal of Marketing, 83(4), 21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate School and McDonough School, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA

    Michael R. Czinkota

  2. International Business and Strategy, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK

    Michael R. Czinkota

  3. Professor of Marketing and International Business, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan

    Masaaki Kotabe

  4. University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, USA

    Masaaki Kotabe

  5. Professor of Strategic Marketing Management, Vice Rector for Faculty and Research, University of Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus

    Demetris Vrontis

  6. Senior Lecturer in Marketing, Newcastle Business School, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

    S. M. Riad Shams

Authors
  1. Michael R. Czinkota
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Masaaki Kotabe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Demetris Vrontis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S. M. Riad Shams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael R. Czinkota .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Czinkota, M.R., Kotabe, M., Vrontis, D., Shams, S.M.R. (2021). Product and Service Decisions. In: Marketing Management. Springer Texts in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66916-4_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation