Skip to main content

Pricing Decisions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Marketing Management

Part of the book series: Springer Texts in Business and Economics ((STBE))

  • 6254 Accesses

Abstract

Much of pricing theory is derived from economics, especially from supply and demand theory. This information is encapsulated in the famous demand and supply curves. The price is set by the point where the curves intersect. The degree to which demand is susceptible to price changes (price elasticity of demand) is another concept borrowed from economics but very useful to marketers.

Again in theory, but rarely in practice, these curves can be obtained from statistical analysis of historical data, survey research, and experimentation. Rather less theoretically, factors affecting the pricing policies of a specific organization include organization factors, product life cycle, product portfolio, product line pricing, segmentation and positioning, and branding. Factors derived from customers are demand, benefits, value, and distribution channels. Of these, perceived value is especially important because it defines what the customer should be prepared to pay.

Pricing new products offers a different set of challenges. In general, the two main opposing strategies are:

  • Skimming—High price, to skim off the short-term profit

  • Penetration—Low price, to maximize long-term market share

Practical pricing policies for existing brands may include cost-plus pricing, target pricing, historical pricing, product line pricing, competitive pricing, market-based pricing, and selective pricing. The price can also be a major factor in determining a product’s or service’s image, ranging from quality price to budget price.

A wide range of discounts may be offered: trade, quantity, cash, allowances, seasonal, promotional, and individual.

Prices may also be set at levels that are judged to be “psychologically” appropriate ($9.95, for instance). Other ways of achieving a price effect may lie with other parts of the offer, such as product bundling, at one extreme, and charging separately for “options,” at the other. Alternatively, price may be negotiated, as it often is in capital goods markets.

Organizations may resort to price competition for several reasons, including volume sales, other stimuli, and minor brands. On the other hand, the dangers of initiating a price war include low-quality image, temporary advantage, and profit loss.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wyner, G. A. (2002). Get serious about pricing. Marketing Research, 14, 4–6.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lee, W. A. (2003). Visa, MC offer advice to Amex: Lower interchange. American Banker, p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Webster, F. E., Jr., & Wind, Y. (1972). Organizational buying behavior. New York: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  4. European Commission. (n.d.). Developments and forecasts of growing consumerism. https://ec.europa.eu/knowledge4policy/foresight/topic/growing-consumerism/more-developments-relevant-growing-consumerism_en. Accessed 11 July 2020.

  5. Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (2011). A behavioral theory of the firm (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Romeo, J. (2002). Keeping tabs on software yields efficiency and savings. ENR: Engineering News-Record, 29–30.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Erickson, G. M., & Johannson, J. K. (1985). The role of price in multi-attribute product evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 195–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. PROS (2020). Distributor markup and profit margins in the supply chain. https://resources.pros.com/blog/distributor-pricing-profit-margins-pricing-markups. Accessed 27 July 2020.

  9. “Flying Dinosaurs”. Economist (February 8, 2003), p. 62.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Norland, E. (2019). Trade war costs to consumers, companies and nations. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/brandsuite/cme-group/trade-war-costs-consumers-companies-nations/index.html. Accessed 27 July 2020.

  11. Leonhardt, M. (2019). Trump’s tariffs on Chinese products might impact your Christmas shopping budget after all. CNBC. https://www.cnbc.com/2019/08/21/how-trumps-tariffs-on-more-chinese-products-affects-you.html. Accessed 27 July 2020.

  12. “Peak Pricing ‘Not the Answer,’” USA. Today (August 13, 1998), p. 13A.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kotabe, M., & Swan, K. S. (1994). Offshore sourcing: Reaction, maturation, and consolidation of U.S. multinationals. Journal of International Business Studies, 25, 115–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. “Top 15 Home PCs”. PC World (March 2001), p. 182–183.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dvorak, J.C. (2002, March 12). Inside track. PC Magazine, p. 67.

    Google Scholar 

  16. “Selling software: Priceless”. Economist (April 8, 1995), p. 61.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Oxenfeldt, A. R. (1979). The differential method of pricing. European Journal of Marketing, 13(4), 199–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Oxenfeldt, A. R., & Kelly, A. O. (1986). Pricing consumer products and services. In V. P. Buell (Ed.), Handbook of modern marketing (2nd ed., pp. 30–1–30–15). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Metz, C. (2000, September 19). Duron vs. Celeron. PC Magazine, p. 40.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ziegler, J. A. (2004, April 19). If dealers don’t reform F&I, someone else will. Automotive News, p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hauf, C. H. (1994). Price, quality, and consumers’ behavior. Journal of Consumer Policy, 17, 335–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. ALDI. (2020). Our brands. https://www.aldi.co.uk/our-brands. Accessed 14 July 2020.

  23. CISION PR Newswire. (2020). ALDI earns ‘grocery value leader’ title for 10th year running. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/aldi-earns-grocery-value-leader-title-for-10th-year-running-301093582.html. Accessed 14 July 2020.

  24. “Eyeway Robbery”. Business Week (February 27, 1995), p. 48.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Greco, S. (1997). Are your prices right? Inc., 88–89.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Smith, S. D. (2003). Wired bundles. Money, p. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  28. “Airlines Quick to Set Fair Increases”. Travel Weekly (May 19, 2003), p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Alavi, S., Bornemann, T., & Wieseke, J. (2015). Gambled price discounts: A remedy to the negative side effects of regular price discounts. Journal of Marketing, 79(2), 62–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devinney, T. M. (1988). Issues in pricing: Theory and research. Lexington: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao, H., Zhang, Y., & Mittal, V. (2017). How does local-global identity affect price sensitivity? Journal of Marketing, 81(3), 62–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habel, J., Schons, L. M., Alavi, S., & Wieseke, J. (2016). Warm glow or extra charge? The ambivalent effect of corporate social responsibility activities on customers’ perceived price fairness. Journal of Marketing, 80(1), 84–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, R., & Chernev, A. (2013). Low prices are just the beginning: Price image in retail management. Journal of Marketing, 77(6), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holden, R., & Nagle, T. (1998). Kamikaze pricing. Marketing Management, 7, 30–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowell, J., & Yager, L. (1994). Pricing and markets: U.S. and Japanese responses to currency fluctuations. Santa Monica: Rand Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanuri, V. K., & Andrews, M. (2019). The unintended consequences of price-based service recovery incentives. Journal of Marketing, 83(5), 57–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, W. I. Y., Deleersnyder, B., & Gedenk, K. (2019). Price promotions and popular events. Journal of Marketing, 83(1), 73–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. Y., Natter, M., & Spann, M. (2009). Pay what you want: A new participative pricing mechanism. Journal of Marketing, 73(1), 44–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kübler, R., Pauwels, K., Yildirim, G., & Fandrich, T. (2018). App popularity: Where in the world are consumers most sensitive to price and user ratings? Journal of Marketing, 82(5), 20–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H., Lalwani, A. K., & Wang, J. J. (2020). Price no object!: The impact of power distance belief on consumers’ price sensitivity. Journal of Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0022242920929718.

  • Marn, M. V., Roegner, E. V., & Zawada, C. C. (2003). The power of pricing. McKinsey Quarterly, 1, 26–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M. H., & Morris, G. (1990). Market-oriented pricing: Strategies for management. New York: Quorum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagle, T. T. (2002). A tale of two prices. Marketing Management, 11, 27–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagle, T. T., & Cressman, G. E., Jr. (2002). Don’t just set prices, manage them. Marketing Management, 11, 29–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olivares, M. M. R., Wittkowski, K., Aspara, J., Falk, T., & Mattila, P. (2018). Relational price discounts: Consumers’ metacognitions and nonlinear effects of initial discounts on customer retention. Journal of Marketing, 82(1), 115–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratchford, B. T., & Gupta, P. (1990). On the implementation of price-quality relations. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 389–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayport, J. F. (1999). Case study: Information on a silver platter. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 13, 29–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H., & Dolan, R. J. (1998). Price customization. Marketing Management, 7, 11–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Z., Sun, S., Lalwani, A. K., & Janakiraman, N. (2019). How does consumers’ local and global identity influence price-perceived quality associations? The role of perceived quality variance. Journal of Marketing, 83(3), 145–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael R. Czinkota .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Czinkota, M.R., Kotabe, M., Vrontis, D., Shams, S.M.R. (2021). Pricing Decisions. In: Marketing Management. Springer Texts in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66916-4_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics