Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Springer Hydrogeology ((SPRINGERHYDRO))

Abstract

Key practical issues concerning adaptation to climate change with respect to groundwater (and water in general) are who actually makes water supply decisions, the role of government in water supply planning, how decisions are made, to what extent and how is climate change information received and acted upon, and the time frame used for planning and capital investments. Water management decisions in the water sector still largely fall within the realm of water users and suppliers, who are responsible for finding means to meet their own water needs (and those of their customers), operating under the purview of governmental agencies that have regulatory authority over water use. Governmental agencies also perform or sponsor research, provide educational services, and may build and operate large-scale water infrastructure. The degree to which climate change adaptation is a consideration of a water utility or other public or private organization depends upon organizational priorities, which are largely driven by organizational leadership engagement. Projected anthropogenic climate change impacts with respect to groundwater for the common 20 to 50-year planning periods are likely small relative to natural climate variability and increases in demands due to population growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adger WN, Arnell NW, Tompkins EL (2005) Successful adaptation to climate change across scales. Glob Environ Change 15(2):77–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN, Agrawala S, Mirza MMQ, Conde C, O’Brien K, Pulhin J, Pulwarty R, Smit B, Takahashi K (2007) Assessment of adaptation practices, options, constraints and capacity. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK, pp 717–743

    Google Scholar 

  • ADWR (2016) Fourth management plan tucson active management area, 13 May 2016. Arizona Department of Water Resources. https://new.azwater.gov/ama/management-plan/fourth-management-plan. Accessed 7 June 2020

  • ADWR (n.d.a) Overview of the Arizona groundwater management code. Arizona Department of Water Resources. http://www.azwater.gov/AzDWR/WaterManagement/documents/Groundwater_Code.pdf. Accessed 7 June 2020

  • ADWR (n.d.b) Assured and adequate water supply. Arizona Department of Water Resources. https://new.azwater.gov/aaws. Accessed 7 June 2020

  • Aladjem DRE, Nikkel ME (2016) California groundwater management: laboratories of local implementation or state command and control? Environ Law News 25(2):3–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen RG, Pruitt WO (1986) Rational use of the FAO Blaney-Criddle formula. J Irrig Drainage Eng 112(2):139–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archie KM, Dilling L, Milford JB, Pampel FC (2014) Unpacking the ‘information barrier’: comparing perspectives on information as a barrier to climate change adaptation in the interior mountain West. J Environ Manage 133:397–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker Z, Ekstrom J, Bedsworth L (2018) Climate information? Embedding climate futures within temporalities of California water management. Environ Sociol 4(4):419–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates B, Kundzewicz Z, Wu S, Palutikof JP (eds) (2008) Climate change and water. IPCC technical paper VI. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC Secretariat, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • BEBR (n.d.) Bureau of economic and business research. https://www.bebr.ufl.edu/. Accessed 7 June 2020

  • Biesbroek GR, Klostermann JE, Termeer CJ, Kabat P (2013) On the nature of barriers to climate change adaptation. Reg Environ Change 13(5):1119–1129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaney HF, Criddle WD (1950) Determining water requirements in irrigated area from climatological irrigation data. US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloetscher F, Hammer NH, Berry L (2014) How climate change will affect water utilities. J Am Water Works Assoc 106(8):176–192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boardman A, Greenberg D, Vining A, Weimer D (1996) Cost-benefit analysis: concepts and practice. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Bockel L (2009) How to mainstream climate change adaptation and mitigation into agriculture policies. In: EASYPol. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/docs/up/easypol/778/mainstream_clim_change_adaptation_agric_policies_slides_077en.pdf. Accessed 6 June 2020

  • Brouwer C, Heibloem M (1986) Irrigation water management: irrigation water needs. In: FAO irrigation water management training manual no. 3. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Burch S (2010) Transforming barriers into enablers of action on climate change: insights from three municipal case studies in British Columbia, Canada. Glob Environ Change 20(2):287–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carriker R (2006) Comprehensive planning for growth management in Florida (Document FE642). University of Florida IFAS Extension, Gainesville

    Google Scholar 

  • Choy J (2015) 7 lessons in groundwater management from the Grand Canyon State. Sanford University, Water in the West. http://waterinthewest.stanford.edu/news-events/news-press-releases/7-lessons-groundwater-management-grand-canyon-state. Accessed 7 June 2020

  • CDWR (n.d.a) SGMA groundwater management. https://water.ca.gov/Programs/Groundwater-Management/SGMA-Groundwater-Management. Accessed 7 June 2020

  • CDWR (n.d.b) Adjudicated areas. https://water.ca.gov/Programs/Groundwater-Management/SGMA-Groundwater-Management/Adjudicated-Areas. Accessed 7 June 2020

  • Danilenko A, Dickson E, Jacobsen M (2010) Climate change and urban water utilities: challenges and opportunities (water working notes no. 24). World Bank, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis J, Borisova T, Olexa MT (2018) An overview of Florida water policy framework and institutions. University of Florida IFAS Extension, Gainesville

    Google Scholar 

  • Dieter CA, Maupin MA (2017) Public supply and domestic water use in the United States, 2015. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2017–1131

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly K, Cooley H (2015) Water use trends. Pacific Institute, Oakland, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Economist Intelligence Unit (2012) Water for all? A study of water utilities’ preparedness to meet supply challenges to 2030. The Economist, Economist Intelligence Unit, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekstrom J, Moser S (2012) Climate change impacts, vulnerabilities, and adaptation in the San Francisco Bay area. Publication number CEC-500-2012-071. California Energy Commission, Sacramento

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekstrom JA, Bedsworth L, Fencl A (2017) Gauging climate preparedness to inform adaptation needs: local level adaptation in drinking water quality in CA, USA. Clim Change 140(3–4):467–481

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Engle NL (2013) The role of drought preparedness in building and mobilizing adaptive capacity in states and their community water systems. Clim Change 118(2):291–306

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman DL, Ingram HM (2009) Making science useful to decision makers: climate forecasts, water management, and knowledge networks. Weather Clim Soc 1:9–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FloridaWCA (2020) The Florida Water & Climate Alliance (FloridaWCA). http://www.floridawca.org/. Accessed 12 Jan 2020

  • Frederick KD (1997) Adapting to climate impacts on the supply and demand for water. Clim Change 37(1):141–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorelick SM, Zheng C (2015) Global change and the groundwater management challenge. Water Resour Res 51:3031–3051

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Harou JJ, Pulido-Velazquez M, Rosenberg DE, Medellín-Azuara J, Lund JR, Howitt RE (2009) Hydro-economic models: concepts, design, applications, and future prospects. J Hydrol 375(3–4):627–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt CD, Stone RC, Tait AB (2017) Improving the use of climate information in decision-making. Nat Clim Change 7(9):614–616

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Huber-Lee A, Schwartz C, Sieber J, Goldstein J, Purkey D, Young C, Soderstrom E, Henderson J, Raucher R (2006) Decision support systems for sustainable water supply planning. AWWA Research Foundation, Denver, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan D (2006) Understanding decision support systems: a tool for analyzing complex systems. Southwest Hydrol 5(4):16–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay R, Scheuer K, Dix B, Bruguera M, Wong A, Kim J (2018) Overcoming organizational barriers to implementing local government adaptation strategies (CNRA-CCA4-2018-005), California’s fourth climate change assessment. California Natural Resources Agency, Sacramento

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenney S (2019) Purifying water: responding to public opposition to the implementation of direct potable reuse in California. J UCLA J Environ Law and Policy 37(1):85–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein RJT, Huq S, Denton F, Downing TE, Richels RG, Robinson JB, Toth FL (2007) Inter-relationships between adaptation and mitigation. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK, pp 745–777

    Google Scholar 

  • Korten T (2015) In Florida, officials ban term ‘climate change’. Florida Center for Investigative Reporting. https://fcir.org/2015/03/08/in-florida-officials-ban-term-climate-change/. Accessed 8 Feb 2020

  • Kundzewicz ZW, Mata LJ, Arnell NW, Döll P, Jimenez B, Miller K, Oki T, Şen Z, Shiklomanov I (2008) The implications of projected climate change for freshwater resources and their management. Hydrol Sci J 53(1):3–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loucks DP, Gladwell JS (1999) Sustainability criteria for water resources systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Mace RE, Petrossian R, Bradley R, Mullican WF, Christian L (2008) A streetcar named desired future conditions: the new groundwater availability for Texas (revised). In: Proceedings state bar of Texas, the changing face of water rights in Texas, 8–9 May 2008, Bastrop, Texas. http://www.twdb.texas.gov/groundwater/docs/Streetcar.pdf. Accessed 7 June 2020

  • Maliva RG, Missimer TM (2012) Arid land water evaluation and management. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moser SC, Ekstrom JA (2010) A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(51):22026–22031

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moser SC, Ekstrom JA (2012) Identifying and overcoming barriers to climate change adaptation in San Francisco Bay. Results from case studies. White paper for the California Energy Commission’s California Climate Change Center (July 2012), Sacramento

    Google Scholar 

  • NOAA (n.d) About the regional integrated sciences and assessments program. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. https://cpo.noaa.gov/Meet-the-Divisions/Climate-and-Societal-Interactions/RISA/About-RISA. Accessed 7 June 2020

  • Pahl-Wostl C, Craps M, Dewulf A, Mostert E, Tabara D, Taillieu T (2007) Social learning and water resources management. Ecol Soc 12(2):5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penner G, Cavanaugh M (2010) Political analysis: the legacy of toilet to tap, 4 Aug 2010. KPBS. https://www.kpbs.org/news/2010/aug/04/political-analysis-legacy-toilet-tap/. Accessed 7 June 2020

  • Pulido-Velazquez M, Marques GF, Harou JJ, Lund JR (2016) Hydroeconomic models as decision support tools for conjunctive management of surface and groundwater. In: Jakeman AJ, Barreteau O, Hunt RJ, Rinaudo JD, Ross A(eds) Integrated groundwater management. Springer Nature, Cham, pp 693–710

    Google Scholar 

  • Purkey DR, Huber-Lee A (2006) A DSS for long-term water utility planning. Southwest Hydrol 5(4):18–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Raucher K, Raucher R, Ozekin K, Wegner K (2018) The opportunities and needs of water utility professionals as community climate–water leaders. Weather, Clim Soc 10(1):51–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sieber J, Purkey D (2011) WEAP: Water evaluation and planning system. User guide. Stockholm Environment Institute, US Center, Somerville, MA. http://weap21.org/downloads/WEAP_User_Guide.pdf

  • Smit B, Wandel J (2006) Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Glob Environ Change 16(3):282–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith JW (2017) Focus: San Diego will recycle sewage into drinking water, mayor declares, 10 May 2017. The San Diego Union Tribune. https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/environment/sd-me-pure-water-recycling-20170510-story.html. Accessed 7 June 2020

  • Staudenmaier LW (2006) Arizona groundwater law. The Water Rep 33:1–10, Nov 2006

    Google Scholar 

  • TCEQ (n.d.) What is a groundwater conservation district (GCD)? Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. https://www.tceq.texas.gov/assets/public/permitting/watersupply/groundwater/maps/gcd_text.pdf. Accessed 7 June 2020

  • TWDB (2017) 2017 State water plan. Water for Texas. TWDB, Austin. http://www.twdb.texas.gov/waterplanning/swp/2017/doc/SWP17-Water-for-Texas.pdf

  • TWDB (2018) Regional water planning in Texas. Texas Water Development Board, Austin. https://www.twdb.texas.gov/waterplanning/rwp/index.as

  • TWDB (n.d.) Desired future conditions. http://www.twdb.texas.gov/groundwater/management_areas/DFC.asp. Accessed 6 June 2020

  • Vörösmarty CJ, Green P, Salisbury J, Lammers RB (2000) Global water resources: vulnerability from climate change and population growth. Science 289(5477):284–288

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • White DD, Corley EA, White MS (2008) Water managers’ perceptions of the science–policy interface in Phoenix, Arizona: Implications for an emerging boundary organization. Soc Nat Resour 21(3):230–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman R (2015) San Diego to spearhead direct potable water reuse, 19th Jan 2015. In: Water world. https://www.waterworld.com/international/wastewater/article/16200909/san-diego-to-spearhead-direct-potable-water-reuse. Accessed 7 June 2020

  • World Bank (2010) Climate change and urban water utilities: challenges and opportunities. P-Notes issue 50 (June 2010). The World Bank, Washington D.C. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/472251468338472294/pdf/558280BRI0PNOT1Box349457B001PUBLIC1.pdf. Accessed 7 June 2020

  • WUCA (2020) Water Utility Climate Alliance. https://www.wucaonline.org/. Accessed 20 Jan 2020

  • Yates D, Miller K (2011) Climate change in water utility planning: decision analytic approaches. Water Research Foundation and University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, Denver

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates D, Sieber J, Purkey D, Huber-Lee A (2005) WEAP21—A demand-, priority-, and preference-driven water planning model. Water Int 30(4):487–500

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Maliva .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Maliva, R. (2021). Groundwater Management and Adaptation Decision Making Process. In: Climate Change and Groundwater: Planning and Adaptations for a Changing and Uncertain Future. Springer Hydrogeology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66813-6_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics