Abstract
The Esquiline district of Rome has gone through important changes over the last decades, due to the strong presence of immigrants, mainly from China and Bangladesh, whose shops and performative ethnicity have radically modified both the place experience and the relational tissue of this central area of the city, adjacent to the Termini railway station. Newspapers, TV programs and a number of websites depict the Esquiline as a symbol of urban and social decay, often associated with immigrants. Scientific research seems to support this rhetoric of decay, when speaking of the Esquiline as an example of how marginality, in the time of globalization, can no longer be ascribed to the centre-periphery pattern, but to different, contingent, and contextual forms. But according to historical inhabitants, gentrified residents, immigrants, stakeholders and institutional actors, how is living at the Esquiline? Is it really a place of degradation and “central marginality”? What perceptions, emotions, feelings, and opinions do local inhabitants and actors associate with the district? What makes the Esquiline an attractive space to inhabit or to carry out economic, cultural or social activities? This contribution provides the results of a research, whose aim was to answer those research questions by using semi-structured interviews.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, P. C. (2017). Geographies of media and communication I: Metaphysics of encounter. Progress in Human Geography, 41(3), 365–374.
Agnew, J., & Boiling, K. (1993). Two Romes or more? The use and abuse of the center-periphery metaphor. Urban Geography, 14(2), 119–144.
Aitken, S., & Valentine, G. (2006). Ways of knowing and ways of doing geographic research. In S. Aitken & G. Valentine (Eds.), Approaches to human geography (pp. 1–12). London: Sage.
Amin, A. (2006). The good city. Urban Studies, 43(5–6), 1009–1023.
Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (2017). Seeing like a city. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
Anderson, B. (2019). Cultural geography II: The force of representations. Progress in Human Geography, 43(6), 1120–1132.
Attili, G. (2007). Rappresentare la città dei migranti. Storie di vita e pianificazione urbana. Milano, Jaca Book.
Banini, T. (2017). Proposing a theoretical framework for local territorial identities: Concepts, questions and pitfalls. Territorial Identity and Development, 2(2), 16–23.
Banini, T. (a cura di). (2019). Il rione Esquilino di Roma. Letture, rappresentazioni e pratiche di uno spazio urbano polisemico. Roma: Edizioni Nuova Cultura.
Barnett, C. (2003). Culture and democracy: Media, space and representation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Carbone, V. (2019). Dallo spazio ai luoghi dell’Esquilino. In V. Carbone, G. Carrus, & F. Pompeo (a cura di), Giornata della ricerca 2019 del Dipartimento di Scienze della Formazione (pp. 273–278). Roma: Roma Tre Press.
Carbone, V., & Di Sandro, M. (2018). Esquilino. Per un etnico socialmente desiderabile. In IDOS (a cura di), Osservatorio Romano sulle Migrazioni. Tredicesimo Rapporto (pp. 259–264). Roma: IDOS.
Clough Marinaro, I., & Solimene, M. (2020). Navigating the (in)formal city: Roma, urban life and governance in Rome. Cities, 96, 1–6.
Craine, J. (2016). Media geography. In B. Warf (Ed.), Geography. Oxford Bibliographies, Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/page/289#2. Accessed 28.03.2020.
Cristaldi, F. (2002). Multiethnic Rome: Towards residential segregation? GeoJournal, 58, 81–90.
Cristaldi, F. (2012). Immigrazione e territorio: la segregazione residenziale nelle aree metropolitane. Geotema, 43-44-45, 17–28.
Daya, S. (2019). Words and worlds: Textual representation and new materialism. Cultural Geographies, 26(3), 361–377.
Demeritt, D. (1996). Social theory and the reconstruction of science and geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 21(3), 484–503.
Dittmer, J. (2014). Narrating urban assemblages: Chris ware and building stories. Social and Cultural Geography, 15(5), 477–503.
Ek, R. (2006). Media studies, geographical imaginations and relational space. In J. Falkheimer & A. Jansson (Eds.), Geographies of communication: The spatial turn in media studies (pp. 45–66). Publisher: Nordicom.
Fincher, R., & Jacobs, J. M. (Eds.). (1998). Cities of difference. Guilford Press.
Garofalo, M. V. (2019). L’Esquilino tra le pagine dei quotidiani. In T. Banini (a cura di), op. cit. (pp. 113–117).
Georgiou, M. (2013). Media and the city: Cosmopolitanism and difference. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hall, S. (1997). The work of representation. In Id., Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices (pp. 15–74). London: Sage.
Jacobs, J. M. (2012). Urban geographies I: Still thinking cities relationally. Progress in Human Geography, 36(3), 412–422.
King. (Ed.). (1996). Representing the city: Ethnicity, capital and culture in the 21st century metropolis. New York: New York University Press.
Koch, R., & Latham, A. (2014). Representing and imagining the city. In R. Paddison & E. McCann (Eds.), Cities and social change: Encounters with contemporary Urbanism (pp. 14–32). London and New York: Sage.
Kraftl, P., & Horton, J. (2009). Urban representation/imagination. In R. Kitchin & N. Thrift (Eds.), International encyclopaedia of human geography (pp. 94–100). Oxford: Elsevier Science.
Loda, M. (2012). Geografia sociale. Storia, teoria e metodi di ricerca. Roma: Carocci.
Longhurst, R. (2012). Semi-structured interviews and focus groups. In N. Clifford, S. French, & G. Valentine (Eds.), Key methods in geography (pp. 103–115). London: Sage.
Massey, D. (1993). Power geometry and a progressive sense of place. In J. Bird, et al. (Eds.), Mapping the futures: Local culture, global change (pp. 59–69). London and New York: Routledge.
Matejskova, T., & Leitner, H. (2011). Urban encounters with difference: The contact hypothesis and immigrant integration projects in eastern Berlin. Social and Cultural Geography, 12, 717–741.
McQuire, S. (2016). Geomedia: Networked cities and the future of public space. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Millington, N. (2009). Urban representation. In R. Kitchin & N. Thrift (Eds.), International encyclopedia of human geography (Vol. 12, pp. 111–118). Oxford: Elsevier.
Morelli, R., Sonnino, E., & Travaglini, C. M. (a cura di). (2003). Introduzione. in Id. (a cura di), I territori di Roma. Storie, popolazioni, geografie (pp. 11–19). Roma: Università di Roma La Sapienza-Tor Vergata-Roma Tre.
Mudu, P. (2006). Patterns of segregation in contemporary Rome. Urban Geography, 27(5), 422–440.
Musacchio, C. (2019). Luoghi di aggregazione (pp. 103–107). Vivere l’Esquilino (pp. 108-112). In T. Banini (a cura di), op. cit., 2019.
Musterd, S., Marcinczak, S., & van Ham, M. (2017). Socioeconomic segregation in European capital cities: Increasing separation between poor and rich. Urban Geography, 38(7), 1062–1083.
Natter, W., & Jones, J. P. (1997). Identity, Space, and other Uncertainties. In G. Benko & U. Strohmayer (Eds.), Space and social theory: Interpreting modernity and postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell.
Peterson, M. (2017). Living with difference in hyper-diverse areas: How important are encounters in semi-public spaces? Social and Cultural Geography, 18(8), 1067–1085.
Pitrone, M. C., Martire, F., & Fazzi, G. (a cura di). (2012). Come ci vedono e ci raccontano. Rappresentazioni sociali degli immigrati cinesi a Roma. Milano: Franco Angeli.
Protasi, M. R. (2010). Esquiliae-Esquilino. Storia e identità di un rione romano dalle origini ai giorni nostri. In B. Marin, M. Boiteux, & M. Caffiero (a cura di), I luoghi della città. Roma moderna e contemporanea (pp. 76–101). Roma: École française de Rome.
Raco, M., & Tasan-Kok, T. (2019). Governing urban diversity: Multi-scalar representations, local contexts, dissonant narratives. European Urban and Regional Studies, 26(3), 230–238.
Sassen, S. (1996). Rebuilding the global city: Economy, ethnicity and space. In A. D. King (Ed.), op. cit. (pp. 23–42).
Scarpelli, F. (a cura di). (2009). Il rione incompiuto. Antropologia urbana dell’Esquilino. Roma: CISU.
Sciortino, G., & Colombo, A. (2010). The flows and the flood: The public discourse on immigration in Italy. Journal of Modern Studies, 9(1), 94–113.
Seronde Babonaux, A. M. (1983). Roma. Dalla città alla metropoli. Roma: Editori Riuniti.
Slater, T. (2011). Gentrification of the city. In G. Bridge & S. Watson (Eds.), The New Blackwell companion to the city (pp. 571–585). Oxford: Blackwell.
Soja, E. (1996). Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and other real-and-imagined places. Oxford: Blackwell.
Tuan, Y.-F. (1991). Language and the making of place: A narrative-descriptive approach. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 81, 684–696.
Vertovec, S. (2007). Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(6), 1024–1054.
Wacquant, L. (2007). Territorial stigmatization in the age of advanced marginality. Thesis Eleven, 91(1), 66–77.
Warren, S., & Jones, P. (2018). Cultural policy, governance and urban diversity: Resident perspectives from Birmingham, UK. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 109(1), 22–35.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Banini, T. (2021). Living at the Esquilino: Representations and Self-Representations of a Multi-ethnic Central District in Rome. In: Banini, T., Ilovan, OR. (eds) Representing Place and Territorial Identities in Europe. GeoJournal Library, vol 127. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66766-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66766-5_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-66765-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-66766-5
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)