Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An Integrative Framework of Family Firms and Foreign Entry Strategies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Family Firm Internationalization

  • 628 Accesses

Abstract

While there is a vast amount of research on entry mode in general and family firms’ internationalisation, little attention has been paid to family firms’ foreign entry strategies. Integrating contributions to transaction cost theory and resource-based view from both streams of research, this chapter provides an integrative framework to guide further the development of the research on how family firms choose between different entry modes. Moreover, it identifies gaps in the literature and highlights some research questions based on the framework provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdellatif, M., Amann, B., & Jaussaud, J. (2010). Family versus nonfamily business: A comparison of international strategies. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 1(2), 108–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguilera, R. V., Marano, V., & Haxhi, I. (2019). International corporate governance: A review and opportunities for future research. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(4), 457–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E., & Gatignon, H. (1986). Modes of foreign entry: A transaction cost analysis and propositions. Journal of International Business Studies, 17(3), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding-family ownership, corporate diversification, and firm leverage. Journal of Law and Economics, 46(2), 653–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ang, S. H., Benischke, M. H., & Doh, J. P. (2015). The interactions of institutions on foreign market entry mode. Strategic Management Journal, 36(10), 1536–1553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arregle, J.-L., Duran, P., Hitt, M. A., & van Essen, M. (2017). Why is family firms’ internationalization unique? A meta-analysis. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 41(5), 801–831.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arregle, J.-L., Naldi, L., Nordqvist, M., & Hitt, M. A. (2012). Internationalization of family-controlled firms: A study of the effects of external involvement in governance. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 36(6), 1115–1143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B. (2001). Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research? Yes. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 41–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25(3), 258–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaumik, S., Dimova, R., Burkart, M., Panunzi, F. S., & Shleifer, A. (2014). Family firms. How Family Firms Differ, 58(5), 2167–2201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, B., Welsch, H., Astrachan, J. H., & Pistrui, D. (2002). Family business research: The evolution of an academic field. Family Business Review, 15(4), 337–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boellis, A., Mariotti, S., Minichilli, A., & Piscitello, L. (2016). Family involvement and firms’ establishment mode choice in foreign markets. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(8), 929–950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brouthers, K. D. (2013). Institutional, cultural and transaction cost influences on entry mode choice and performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(1), 14–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brouthers, K. D., Brouthers, L. E., & Werner, S. (2008). Resource-based advantages in an international context. Journal of Management, 34(2), 189–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cacciotti, G., & Hayton, J. C. (2015). Fear and entrepreneurship: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 17(2), 165–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calabrò, A., Torchia, M., Pukall, T. J., & Mussolino, D. (2013). The influence of ownership structure and board strategic involvement on international sales: The moderating effect of family involvement. International Business Review, 22(3), 509–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carney, M. (2005). Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family-controlled firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(3), 249–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, C., & Bateman, S. (2009). International strategy configurations of the world’s top family firms. Management International Review, 49(6), 733–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casillas, J. C., & Acedo, F. J. (2005). Internationalisation of Spanish family SMEs: An analysis of family involvement. International Journal of Globalisation and Small Business, 1(2), 134–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y.-C., Kao, M.-S., & Kuo, A. (2014). The influences of governance quality on equity-based entry mode choice: The strengthening role of family control. International Business Review, 23(5), 1008–1020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S.-F., & Hennart, J.-F. (2002). Japanese investors’ choice of joint ventures versus wholly-owned subsidiaries in the US: The role of market barriers and firm capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Sharma, P. (2005). Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(5), 555–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Steier, L. (2005). Sources and consequences of distinctive familiness: An introduction. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(3), 237–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., & Sharma, P. (1999). Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice Summer99, 23(4), 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claver, E., Rienda, L., & Quer, D. (2007). The internationalisation process in family firms: Choice of market entry strategies. Journal of General Management, 33(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claver, E., Rienda, L., & Quer, D. (2009). Family firms’ international commitment. Family Business Review, 2009(2), 125–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colli, A. (2003). The History of Family Business, 1850–2000. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Datta, D. K., Musteen, M., & Herrmann, P. (2009). Board characteristics, managerial incentives, and the choice between foreign acquisitions and international joint ventures. Journal of Management, 35(4), 928–953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Massis, A., Frattini, F., Majocchi, A., & Piscitello, L. (2018). Family firms in the global economy: Toward a deeper understanding of internationalization determinants, processes, and outcomes. Global Strategy Journal, 8(1), 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delios, A., & Henisz, W. J. (2003). Policy uncertainty and the sequence of entry by Japanese firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(3), 227–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, W. G. (2006). Examining the “family effect” on firm performance. Family Business Review, 19(4), 253–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faccio, M., & Lang, L. H. P. (2002). The ultimate ownership of Western European corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 65(3), 365–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Family Firm Institute. (2017). Global data points.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filatotchev, I., Strange, R., Piesse, J., & Lien, Y.-C. (2007). FDI by firms from newly industrialised economies in emerging markets: Corporate governance, entry mode and location. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4), 556–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatignon, H., & Anderson, E. (1988). The multinational corporation’s degree of control over foreign subsidiaries: An empirical test of a transaction cost explanation. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 4(2), 305–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gedajlovic, E. R., & Carney, M. (2010). Markets, hierarchies, and families: Toward a transaction cost theory of the family firm. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 34(6), 1145–1172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Cruz, C., Berrone, P., & De Castro, J. (2011). The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 37–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Haynes, K. T., Nunez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K. J. L., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González, M., Guzmán, A., Pombo, C., & Trujillo, M.-A. (2013). Family firms and debt: Risk aversion versus risk of losing control. Journal of Business Research, 66(11), 2308–2320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graves, C., & Thomas, J. (2006). Internationalization of Australian family businesses: A managerial capabilities perspective. Family Business Review, 19(3), 207–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habbershon, T. G. (2006). Commentary: A framework for managing the familiness and agency advantages in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(6), 879–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habbershon, T. G., Williams, M., & MacMillan, I. C. (2003). A unified systems perspective of family firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), 451–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habbershon, T. G., & Williams, M. L. (1999). A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms. Family Business Review, 12(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J.-F. (1982). A theory of multinational enterprise. University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J.-F. (2009). Down with MNE-centric theories! market entry and expansion as the bundling of MNE and local assets. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9), 1432–1454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J.-F., Sheng, H. H., & Pimenta, G. (2015). Local complementary inputs as drivers of entry mode choices: The case of US investments in Brazil. International Business Review, 24(3), 466–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. W. L., Hwang, P., & Kim, W. C. (1990). An eclectic theory of the choice of international entry mode. Strategic Management Journal, 11(2), 117–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kano, L., & Verbeke, A. (2018). Family firm internationalization: Heritage assets and the impact of bifurcation bias. Global Strategy Journal, 8(1), 158–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2004). Governance matters III: Governance indicators for 1996, 1998, 2000, and 2002. World Bank Economic Review, 18(2), 253–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kontinen, T., & Ojala, A. (2010). The internationalization of family businesses: A review of extant research. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 1(2), 97–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, A., Kao, M.-S., Chang, Y.-C., & Chiu, C.-F. (2012). The influence of international experience on entry mode choice: Difference between family and non-family firms. European Management Journal, 30(3), 248–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, J.-H., Chen, L.-Y., & Chang, S.-C. (2012). The board mechanism and entry mode choice. Journal of International Management, 18(4), 379–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laufs, K., & Schwens, C. (2014). Foreign market entry mode choice of small and medium-sized enterprises: A systematic review and future research agenda. International Business Review, 23(6), 1109–1126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, W.-T. (2012). Family ownership and internationalization processes: Internationalization pace, internationalization scope, and internationalization rhythm. European Management Journal, 30(1), 47–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majocchi, A., D’Angelo, A., Forlani, E., & Buck, T. (2018). Bifurcation bias and exporting: Can foreign work experience be an answer? Insight from European family SMEs. Journal of World Business, 53(2), 237–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makino, S., & Neupert, K. E. E. (2000). National Culture, transaction costs, and the choice between joint venture and wholly owned subsidiary. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(4), 705–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matta, E., & Beamish, P. W. (2008). The accentuated CEO career horizon problem: Evidence from international acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal, 29(7), 683–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Memili, E., Misra, K., Chrisman, J. J., & Welsh, D. H. B. (2017). Internationalisation of publicly traded family firms: A transaction cost theory perspective and longitudinal analysis. International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, 16(1–2), 80–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metsola, J., Leppäaho, T., Paavilainen-Mäntymäki, E., & Plakoyiannaki, E. (2020). Process in family business internationalisation: The state of the art and ways forward. International Business Review, 29(2), 101665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K. E., Estrin, S., Bhaumik, S. K., & Peng, M. W. (2009). Institutions, resources, and entry strategies in emerging economies. Strategic Management Journal, 30(1), 61–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., Minichilli, A., & Corbetta, G. (2013). Is family leadership always beneficial? Strategic Management Journal, 34(5), 553–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molly, V., Laveren, E., & Deloof, M. (2010). Family Business Succession and Its Impact on Financial Structure and Performance. Family Business Review, 23(2): 131–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musteen, M., Datta, D. K., & Herrmann, P. (2009). Ownership structure and CEO compensation: Implications for the choice of foreign market entry modes. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(2), 321–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mutinelli, M., & Piscitello, L. (1998). The entry mode choice of MNEs: An evolutionary approach. Research Policy, 27(5), 491–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naldi, L., Nordqvist, M., Sjöberg, K., & Wiklund, J. (2007). Entrepreneurial orientation, risk taking, and performance in family firms. Family Business Review, 20(1), 33–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oesterle, M.-J., Richta, H. N., & Fisch, J. H. (2013). The influence of ownership structure on internationalization. International Business Review, 22(1), 187–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pongelli, C., Caroli, M. G., & Cucculelli, M. (2016). Family business going abroad: The effect of family ownership on foreign market entry mode decisions. Small Business Economics, 47(3), 787–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pukall, T. J., & Calabrò, A. (2014). The internationalization of family firms: A critical review and integrative model. Family Business Review, 27(2), 103–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. (1992). A note on the transnational solution and the transaction cost theory of multinational strategic management. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(4), 761–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, W. M. G., & Carpenter, M. A. (2015). Internationalization and firm governance: The roles of CEO compensation, top team composition. and board structure. Academy of Management Journal, 41(2), 158–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sciascia, S., Mazzola, P., Astrachan, J. H., & Pieper, T. M. (2012). The role of family ownership in international entrepreneurship: Exploring nonlinear effects. Small Business Economics, 38(1), 15–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sestu, M. C., D’Angelo, A., & Majocchi, A. (2020). No Title. European Journal of International Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sestu, M. C., & Majocchi, A. (2020). Family firms and the choice between wholly owned subsidiaries and joint ventures: A transaction costs perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 44(2), 211–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, J. M. (2013). Do we really need more entry mode studies? Journal of International Business Studies, 44(1), 23–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (2007). A survey of corporate governance. Corporate Governance and Corporate Finance: A European Perspective, LII(2), 52–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slangen, A. H. L., & van Tulder, R. J. M. (2009). Cultural distance, political risk, or governance quality? Towards a more accurate conceptualization and measurement of external uncertainty in foreign entry mode research. International Business Review, 18(3), 276–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Surdu, I., Mellahi, K., & Glaister, K. W. (2019). Once bitten, not necessarily shy? Determinants of foreign market re-entry commitment strategies. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(3), 393–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbeke, A., & Kano, L. (2010). Transaction cost economics (TCE) and the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(6), 1173–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbeke, A., & Kano, L. (2012). The transaction cost economics theory of the family firm: Family-based human asset specificity and the bifurcation Bias. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 36(6), 1183–1205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbeke, A., Yuan, W., & Kano, L. (2019). A values-based analysis of bifurcation bias and its impact on family firm internationalization. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 37, 449–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1979). Transaction-cost economics: The governance of contractual relations. Journal of Law and Economics, 22(2), 233–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, relational contracting. Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, K., Hitt, M. A., & Miller, S. R. (2020). The ownership structure contingency in the sequential international entry mode decision process: Family owners and institutional investors in family-dominant versus family-influenced firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 51(2), 151–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A. (2003). International expansion of U.S. manufacturing family businesses: The effect of ownership and involvement. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), 495–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A. (2005). Entrepreneurial risk taking in family firms. Family Business Review, 18(1), 23–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., Hayton, J. C., & Salvato, C. (2004). Entrepreneurship in family vs. non-family firms: A resource-based analysis of the effect of organizational culture. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(4), 363–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., Neubaum, D. O., & Larraneta, B. (2007). Knowledge sharing and technological capabilities: The moderating role of family involvement. Journal of Business Research, 60(10), 1070–1079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zellweger, T. M., Kellermanns, F. W., Chrisman, J. J., & Chua, J. H. (2012). Family control and family firm valuation by family CEOs: The importance of intentions for transgenerational control. Organization Science, 23(3), 851–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, H., Luo, Y., & Suh, T. (2004). Transaction cost determinants and ownership-based entry mode choice: A meta-analytical review. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(6), 524–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Global Economics and Management, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands

    Maria Cristina Sestu

Authors
  1. Maria Cristina Sestu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Cristina Sestu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. LUT University, Lappeenranta, Finland

    Tanja Leppäaho

  2. House of Innovation, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm, Sweden

    Sarah Jack

  3. Lancaster University Management School, Lancaster, UK

    Sarah Jack

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sestu, M.C. (2021). An Integrative Framework of Family Firms and Foreign Entry Strategies. In: Leppäaho, T., Jack, S. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Family Firm Internationalization. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66737-5_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation