Skip to main content

Climate Negotiations: The Science of a Big Deal?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Climate Change and Economics

Abstract

Why have climate negotiators failed to achieve a global climate treaty even with 3 decades’ arduous efforts? Is there a big deal on climate change in the offing? This chapter provides a wide-ranging review of the global negotiations on climate change. The negotiations on and the contents of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, the Kyoto Protocol, the Copenhagen Accord, the Paris Agreement, and the Green Climate Fund are explained. The biggest hurdle for a global warming treaty continues to be the strong disagreements between developed country parties and developing country parties on who should bear the costly burden of abating greenhouse gases for the Planet. The Green Climate Fund is emerging as a central mechanism of the UNFCCC parties designed to bridge the two parties by transferring the funds collected from the rich countries to the selected projects proposed by the developing country parties. Considering the repeated failures for a global deal, it might be opportune to explore a novel path based on individuals’ choices that strive to adapt, do forward-looking in their choices, and continually innovate their technological options.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arrhenius, S.A. 1889. U¨ ber die Dissociationsw¨arme und den EinfluĂź der Temperatur auf den Dissociationsgrad der Elektrolyte. Zeitschrift fĂĽr Physikalische Chemie 4, 96–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (EC). 2016. EU ETS Handbook. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green Climate Fund (GCF). 2011. Governing Instrument for the Green Climate Fund. Songdo, ROK: GCF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green Climate Fund (GCF). 2020a. Status of Pledges and Contributions Made to the Green Climate Fund, Status Date: 31 July 2020. Songdo, ROK: GCF. Accessed from https://www.greenclimate.fund/document/status-pledges-all-cycles.

  • Green Climate Fund (GCF). 2020b. Project Portfolio. Songdo, ROK: GCF. Accessed from https://www.greenclimate.fund/projects.

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 1990a. Climate Change: The IPCC Scientific Assessment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 1990b. Climate Change: The IPCC Impacts Assessment. Canberra, AU: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2018. Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5 °C. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manne, Alan S., and Richard G. Richels. 1999. The Kyoto Protocol: A Cost-effective Strategy for Meeting Environmental Objectives? The Energy Journal 20 (Special Issue): 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, William. 2001. Global Warming Economics. Science 294: 1283–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, William. 2010. Economic Aspects of Global Warming in a Post-Copenhagen Environment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States 107 (26): 11721–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, William D., and Joseph G. Boyer. 1999. Requiem for Kyoto: An Economic Analysis of the Kyoto Protocol. Energy Journal 20 (Special Issue): 93–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revelle, R., and H.E. Suess. 1957. Carbon Dioxide Exchange Between Atmosphere and Oceanand the Question of an Increase of Atmospheric CO2 During the Past Decades. Tellus 9, 18–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seo, S. Niggol. 2015. Helping Low-latitude Poor Countries with Climate Change. Regulation. Winter 2015–2016: 6–8. Cato Institute, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seo, S.Niggol. 2017a. The Behavioral Economics of Climate Change: Adaptation Behaviors, Global Public Goods, Breakthrough Technologies, and Policy-making. Amsterdam, NL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seo, S.Niggol. 2017b. Beyond the Paris Agreement: Climate Change Policy Negotiations and Future Directions. Regional Science Policy & Practice 9 (2): 121–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seo, S.Niggol. 2019a. The Economics of Global Allocations of the Green Climate Fund: An Assessment from Four Scientific Traditions of Modeling Adaptation Strategies. Cham, CH: Springer Nature.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Seo, S.Niggol. 2019b. Economic Questions on Global Warming During the Trump Years. Journal of Public Affairs 19 (1): e1914. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seo, S.Niggol. 2020. The Economics of Globally Shared and Public Goods. Amsterdam, NL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • South China Morning Post (SCMP). 2020. COP25 Summit: Expected to be Cooling Influence at UN Climate Conference, China Instead Lets Brazil Heat Up. Hongkong: SCMP. Accessed from https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3041901/cop25-summit-expected-be-cooling-influence-un-climate.

  • United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). 2017. The Emissions Gap Report 2017: A UN Environment Synthesis Report. Nairobi, KE: UNEP.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). 1992. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. New York, NY: UNFCCC.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). 1997. Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. New York, NY: UNFCCC.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). 2009. Copenhagen Accord. Geneva: UNFCCC.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). 2011. The Durban platform for enhanced action. New York: UNFCCC.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). 2015. The Paris Agreement. Conference of the Parties (COP) 21. New York, NY: UNFCCC.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). 2016. Key Decisions Relevant for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries (REDD +). New York, NY: UNFCCC.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2020. Inventory of US Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990–2018. Washington, DC: USEPA.

    Google Scholar 

  • White House. 2017. Statement by President Trump on the Paris Climate Accord. Washington, DC: White House.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Niggol Seo .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Seo, S.N. (2021). Climate Negotiations: The Science of a Big Deal?. In: Climate Change and Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66680-4_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66680-4_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-66679-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-66680-4

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics