Abstract
Since the 1990s, Danish - and Nordic - schools and education policy has been increasingly influenced by Anglo-American understandings of how to improve school and education. This was due to an interplay of influences: (1) postwar US economic and cultural dominance; (2) American led postwar transnational collaboration in Europe that gradually institutionalized into the OECD, the EU, the Bologna Process, and the IEA; (3) the hegemony of Anglo-American norms migrated from the realms of economics and geopolitics to school and education collaborations. This chapter explores five particularly influential themes of Anglo-American influence: (1) Human capital and rational choice theory impacted Danish schools and education policy as ‘knowledge economy’ and ‘competition state’ discourse raised the stakes. (2) The school effectiveness and improvement movement developed the ideas of ‘knowledge that works’ and school reform, which gained dominance in transnational policy collaborations. (3) The ‘evidence’ movement transformed policy conceptions of what works. (4) New Zealand and Ontario school reform policy impacted Danish schools due to their ‘softer’ low-stakes accountability approaches. English school policy chose a high-stakes accountability approach in education, which was influential in mediating ‘new public management’ and market-like approaches in education to Denmark. (5) The policies of the United States were agenda-setting for schools and education policy within the Anglo-American networks.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In Denmark a university college offers profession specific tertiary education and diploma courses (e.g. teachers, social workers and nurses).
References
Aabro, C. (2016). Koncepter i pædagogisk arbejde [Concepts in Educational Work]. Copenhagen, Denmark: Hans Reitzel.
Andersen, F.Ø. (2007). Finsk pædagogik, finsk folkeskole [Finnish Education, Finnish School]. Frederikshavn, Denmark: Dafolo.
Anderson, S. E., & Ben Jaafar, S. (2003). Policy Trends in Ontario Education: 1990–2003. Retrieved from Toronto: http://fcis.oise.utoronto.ca/~icec/policytrends.pdf
Ball, S. J. (2012). Global Education Inc.: New Policy Networks and the Neoliberal Imaginary. Abingdon, Oxon, UK: Routledge.
Becker, G. (1964). Human Capital. New York: Columbia University Press.
Biesta, G. (2010). Why ‘What Works’ Still Won’t Work: From evidence-based to value-based education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 29(5), 491–503.
Blossing, U., Imsen, G., & Moos, L. (2013). Progressive education and new governance in Denmark, Norway and Sweden. In U. Blossing, G. Imsen, & L. Moos (Eds.), The Nordic Education Model: ‘A school for all’ encounters neo-Liberal politics. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Burns, T., & Schuller, T. (Eds.). (2007). Evidence in Education: Linking reseach and policy. Paris: OECD/CERI.
Campbell Collaboration (2021). Campbell Collaboration. Retrieved from https://campbellcollaboration.org/.
Cerny, P. G., & Evans, M. (1999). New Labour, Globalization and the Competition State. Cambridge, MA: Minda de Gunzburg Center for European Studies, Harvard University.
Chitty, C. (1991). The Great Debate: The politics of the secondary school curriculum, 1976–88. PhD. University of London, London. Retrieved from http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/10018968/1/250102.pdf
Christensen, S. (2019). Excellence and Envy: The management of PISA success in Singapore. In F. Waldow & G. Steiner-Khamsi (Eds.), Understanding PISA’s Attractiveness: Critical analyses in comparative policy studies (pp. 199–217). London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Christensen, S., & Krejsler, J. B. (2015). Evidens – Kampen om viden der virker [Evidence and the Struggle about What Works]. Copenhagen, Denmark: FOA.
Christoffersen, D. D., & Petersen, K. S. (Eds.). (2019). Er der evidens for evidens? [Can Evidence Be Backed by Evidence?]. Frederiksberg, Denmark: Samfundslitteratur.
Cochrane, A. (1972). Effectiveness and Efficiency – Random reflections on health services. London: Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust.
Coleman, J., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D., et al. (1966). Equality of Educational Opportunity. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
Dafolo (2021). Dafolo (Education and skills training, digital solutions & logistic services). Retrieved from https://www.dafolo.dk
de Grazia, V. (2005). Irresistible Empire. America’s Advance through 20th Century Europe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
de la Fuente, Á., & Ciccione, A. (2003). Human Capital in a Global and Knowledge-Based Economy. Directorate-general for employment and social affairs. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Download from. https://www.antoniociccone.eu/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/humancapitalpolicy.pdf
DREAM (2021). Danish Research Institute for Economic Analysis and Modelling. Retrieved from https://www.dreamgroup.dk
Ekholm, M., Mortimore, P., Maria, D.-E., Laukkanen, R., & Valijarvi, J. (2004). OECD-rapport om grundskolen i Danmark [OECD Country Report on Danish School]. Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish Department of Education.
Elfert, M. (2019). The OECD, American Power and the Rise of ‘Economics of Education’ in the 1960s. In: C. Ydesen (Ed.), The OECD’s Historical Rise in Education. Kap. 3 (pp. 39–61). Cham, Switzerland: PalgraveMacmillan.
Enhedslistens Økonomiske Sekretariat. (2018). Den politiske regnemaskine: Rapport om finansministeriets økonomiske antagelser og deres politiske konsekvenser [The Political Calculator: Report on the budgetary assumptions of the Ministry of Finance and their political consequences]. Copenhagen, Denmark: Forlaget Solidaritet.
Friedman, J. (Ed.). (1996). The Rational Choice Controversy: Economic models of politics reconsidered. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Fullan, M., & Levin, B. (2009). The Fundamentals of Whole-System Reform. Education Week, 28(35), 30–31.
Gillard, D. (2018). Education in England: A history. Retrieved from www.educationengland.org.uk/history
Green, D. P., & Shapiro, I. (1994). Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A critique of applications in political science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Hamilton, L. S., Stecher, B. M., & Yuan, K. (2008). Standards-Based Reform in the United States: History, research, and future directions. Washington, DC: RAND Corporation. Retrieved from http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/reprints/2009/RAND_RP1384.pdf
Hammersley, M. (Ed.). (2007). Educational Research and Evidence-Based Practice. London: Sage. (In collaboration with Open University Press).
Hammersley, M. (2013). The Myth of Research-Based Policy and Practice. London: SAGE.
Hansen, M.S. (Ed.). (2015). Canadisk pædagogik i skolen [Canadian Pedagogy in School]. Aarhus, Denmark: VIA University College.
Hanushek, E. A. (1979). Conceptual and empirical issues in the estimation of educational production functions. Journal of Human Resources, 14(3 (Summer)), 351–388.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York: Routledge.
Hattie, J. (2013). Synlig læring – for lærere [Visible Learning – for teachers]. Frederikshavn, Denmark: Dafolo.
Helmke, A., Walter, C., Lankes, E.-M., Ditton, H., Eikenbusch, G., Pfiffner, M. et al. (2008). Hvad vi ved om god undervisning [What We Know about Good Teaching]. Frederikshavn, Denmark: Dafolo.
Henry, M., Lingard, B., Rizvi, F., & Taylor, S. (2001). The OECD, Globalisation and Education Policy. Oxford, UK: IAU Press & Elsevier Science Ltd.
Hood, C. (1995). The “New Public Management” in the 1980s: Variations on a theme. Accounting, Organizations & Society, 20, 93–109.
Hopmann, S. (2015). ‘Didaktik meets curriculum’ revisited: Historical encounters, systematic experience, empirical limits. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Science, 2015(1), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.3402/nstep.v1.27007
Korsgaard, O., Kristensen, J. E., & Jensen, H. S. (2017). Globalisering og livslang læring [Globalization and lifelong learning]. In O. Korsgaard, J. E. Kristensen, & H. S. Jensen (Eds.), Pædagogikkens idéhistorie [The History of Ideas of Pedagogy] (pp. 359–416). Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
Krejsler, J. B. (2013). ‘What Works’ in Education and Social Welfare?: A mapping of the evidence discourse and reflections upon consequences for professionals. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 57(1), 16–32.
Krejsler, J. B. (2017). Capturing the ‘Evidence’ and ‘What Works’ Agenda in Education: A truth regime and the art of manoeuvring floating signifiers. In M. Y. Eryaman & B. Schneider (Eds.), Evidence and Public Good in Educational Policy, Research and Practice (pp. 21–41). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Krejsler, J.B. (2018). EuroVisions in School Policy and the Knowledge Economy: A genealogy of the transnational turn in European school and teacher education policy. In N. Hobbel & B. Bales (Eds.), Navigating the Common Good in Teacher Education Policy: Critical and international perspectives. New York/London: Routledge.
Krejsler, J. B. (2019). The ‘Fear of Falling Behind Regime’ Embraces School Policy: State vs federal policy struggles in California and Texas. In D. Staunæs, K. Brøgger, & J. B. Krejsler (Eds.), Performative Approaches to Education Reforms: Exploring intended and non-intended effects of reforms morphing as they move (pp. 49–64). London/New York: Routledge.
Krejsler, J. B. (2020). Imagining School as Standards-Driven and Students as Career-Ready! A comparative genealogy of US federal and European transnational turns in education policy. In F. Guorui & T. S. Popkewitz (Eds.), Handbook of Education Policy Studies: School/University, curriculum, and assessment (Vol. 2, pp. 351–383). Singapore, Singapore: Springer. OA: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-981-13-8343-4_19.pdf
Krejsler, J. B., & Moos, L. (2016). Skolens sociale teknologier og styringslogikkerne der driver dem [Social Technologies in School and the Steering Logics that Drive Them]. In S. Larsen (Ed.), Pædagogik og lærerfaglighed [Education and Teacher Professionalism] (pp. 317–334). Copenhagen, Denmark: Hans Reitzel.
Larsen, S.N., Laursen, P.F., Rømer, T.A., Bjerre, J., Skovmand, K., & Møller, N. (2017). Hattie på dansk: evidenstænkningen i et kritisk og konstruktivt perspektiv [Hattie in Danish: Evidence in a critical and constructive perspective]. Copenhagen, Denmark: Hans Reitzel.
Lawn, M. (Ed.). (2013). The Rise of Data in Education Systems: Collection, visualisation and uses. Oxford, UK: Symposium Books.
Levin, B. (2007). A Strategy for Large-Scale Improvement in Education: The Ontario approach. Paper presented at the Australian curriculum conference 2007. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/125b/e60b686bfbcbc637f3186547df4750f6a16c.pdf
Levin, B. (2008). How to Change 5000 Schools: A practical and positive approach for leading change at every level. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
McGuinn, P. (2016). From No Child Left Behind To the Every Student Succeeds Act: Federalism and the education legacy of the Obama administration. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 24(June 2016). https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjw014.
Meyer, H. (2004). Was ist guter Unterricht? [What Is Good Teaching?] Berlin, Germany: Cornelsen, Scriptor.
Moos, L. (2016). Pædagogisk ledelse i en læringsmålstyret Skole? [Educational Leadership in a Learning Goal Steered School?]. Copenhagen, Denmark: Hans Reitzel.
Nannestad, P. (2009). Rational Choice/ Public Choice. In L. B. Kaspersen & J. Loftager (Eds.), Klassisk og moderne politisk teori [Classical and Modern Political Theory] (pp. 838–854). Copenhagen, Denmark: Hans Reitzel.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A Nation at Risk: The imperative for educational reform: A report to the nation and the secretary of education. Washington, DC: United States Department of Education.
Nielsen, H., Jensen, P., Bleses, D., Ostersen, J., Dybdal, L., & Breining, S. (2017). Forskningsbaseret evalueringsrapport om Fremtidens Dagtilbud [Research-Based Evaluation Report on Day Care Facilities of the Future]. Copenhagen, Denmark: Rambøll.
Nordic Cochrane (2021). Nordic Cochrane. Retrieved from https://nordic.cochrane.org/.
OECD/CERI. (2004). National Review on Educational R&D: Examiners’ report on Denmark. Paris: OECD/CERI.
Olsen, S. O. (1996). Verdens bedste folkeskole! Vi kan lære af det newzealandske skolesystem [The Best School in the World! We can learn from New Zealand’s school system]. Frederikshavn, Denmark: Dafolo.
Oxenford, M. (2016). The Evolution of US and European Monetary Policy after Bretton Woods: A historical overview and lessons for the future. London: Chatham House: The Royal Institute of International Affairs.
Pedersen, D. B., & Collin, F. (2018). Homo economicus. In D. B. Pedersen, F. Collin, & F. Stjernfelt (Eds.), Kampen om mennesket: Forskellige menneskebilleder og deres grænsestrid [The Struggle about Man: Different images of man and their boundary struggles] (pp. 31–64). Copenhagen, Denmark: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
Pedersen, O.K. (2011). Konkurrencestaten [The Competition State]. Copenhagen, Denmark: Hans Reitzel.
Productivity Commission. (2014). Det handler om velstand og velfærd – slutrapport [It Is All About Wealth and Welfare]. Copenhagen, Denmark: Produktivitetskommissionen.
Rasmussen, J., Bayer, M., & Brodersen, M. (2010). Komparativt studie af indholdet i læreruddannelser i Canada, Danmark, Finland og Singapore: (Rapport til Regeringens Rejsehold) [A Comparative Study of Content in Teacher Education Programs in Canada, Denmark, Finland, and Singapore]. Copenhagen, Denmark: Danmarks Pædagogiske Universitetsskole, Aarhus Universitet.
Rasmussen, J., Holm, C., & Rasch-Christensen, A. (Eds.). (2015). Folkeskolen – efter reformen [Danish School – After the reform]. Copenhagen, Denmark: Hans Reitzel.
Rhodes, J. H. (2012). An Education in Politics: The origin and evolution of No Child Left Behind. Ithaca, NY/London: Cornell University Press.
Rieper, O., & Hansen, H. F. (2007). Metodedebatten om evidens [The Methodological Debate about Evidence]. Copenhagen, Denmark: AKF.
Robinson, V. (2015). Elevcentreret undervisning [Student Centered Learning]. Frederikshavn, Denmark: Dafolo.
Robinson, V. (2018). Færre forandringer, flere forbedringer [Reduce Change to Increase Improvement]. Frederikshavn, Denmark: Dafolo.
Rutter, M., Maughan, B., Mortimore, P., & Ouston, J. (1979). Fifteen Thousand Hours: Secondary schools and their effects on children. Wells, UK: Open Books.
Sahlberg, P. (2011). Lessons from Finland. American Educator, 35(2), 32–36.
Sahlin-Andersson, K. (2001). National, International and Transnational Constructions of New Public Management. In T. Christensen & P. Lægreid (Eds.), New Public Management – The transformation of ideas and practice (pp. 43–72). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
Scheerens, J. (2013). What Is Effective Schooling? A review of current thought and practice. International Baccalaureate Organization.
Scheerens, J., & Creemers, B. P. M. (1989). Conceptualizing School Effectiveness. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(7), 691–706.
Schmidt, L. A. (1999, 1999-09-02 (kl. 00.00)). De andre kan noget, men hvad? New Zealand fremhæves ukritisk som stedet, hvor de rigtige metoder kan hentes [They Know Something, But What Is It? New Zealand is promoted uncritically as the place to find the right methods]. Folkeskolen. Retrieved from https://www.folkeskolen.dk/6008/de-andre-kan-noget-men-hvad
Schuller, T., Jochems, W., Moos, L., & Zanten, A. V. (2006). Evidence and Policy Research. European Educationa Research Journal, 5(1), 57–70.
Scott, J. (2000). Rational Choice Theory. I: Understanding Contemporary Society: Theories of The Present. (red.) G. Browning, A. Halcli, and F. Webster (pp. 126–138). London: Sage. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20090227085005/http:/privatewww.essex.ac.uk/~scottj/socscot7.htm
Simonds, D. (2018, 2018-08-30). What Other Countries Can Learn from Singapore’s Schools. Editorial. The Economist. Retrieved from https://www.economist.com/leaders/2018/08/30/what-other-countries-can-learn-from-singapores-schools
Skolens Rejsehold [The School’s Flying Squad]. (2010). Rapport B: Baggrundsrapport til Fremtidens folkeskole – én af verdens bedste. Anbefalinger fra Skolens Rejslehold [Background Report on School of the Future]. Copenhagen, Denmark: Styrelsen for Evaluering og Kvalitetsudvikling af Folkeskolen (Skolestyrelsen).
Slee, R., Weiner, G., & Tomlinson, S. (1998). School Effectiveness for Whom? Challenges to the school effectiveness and school improvement movements. London: Falmer Press.
Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2012). Understanding Policy Borrowing and Lending. Building comparative policy studies. In G. Steiner-Khamsi & F. Waldow (Eds.), World Yearbook of Education 2012. Policy borrowing and lending in education. New York: Routledge.
Tearney, F. (2016). History of Education in New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand: McGuinness Institute.
The Danish Government’s Modernization Program. (2003). Modernisering af den offentlige sektor – Praksis og perspektiver [Modernization of the Public Sector – Practice and Perspectives]. Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish Ministry of Finance.
The Danish Ministry of Education. (2013). Aftale mellem regeringen (Socialdemokraterne, radikale Venstre og Socialistisk Folkeparti), Venstre og Dansk Folkeparti om et fagligt løft af folkeskolen [Agreement between the Government, the Social Liberal Party, and the Socialist People’s Party on Improving Schools Academically]. Retrieved from https://www.altinget.dk/misc/130607_Endelig%20aftaletekst.pdf (2020-05-12).
Townsend, T. (Ed.). (2007). International Handbook of School Effectiveness and Improvement. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Tröhler, D. (2013). The OECD and the Cold War Culture: Thinking historically about PISA. In H.-D. Meyer & A. Benavot (Eds.), PISA, Power, and Policy: The emergence of global educational governance (pp. 141–162). Oxford, UK: Symposium Books.
Uljens, M., & Ylimaki, R. (Eds.). (2017). Bridging Educational Leadership, Curriculum Theory and Didaktik. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Whitty, G. (2000). Education Reform and Education Politics in England: A sociological analysis. Paper presented at the Education at the Crossroads: Education Reform and Education Politics in Japan and England, University of Tokyo. Retrieved from https://www.cddc.vt.edu/digitalfordism/fordism_materials/whitty.pdf
VIVE Campbell (2021). VIVE-Campbell –The Danish Center for Social Science Research. Retrieved from https://www.vive.dk/da/temaer/campbell/
Ydesen, C. (Ed.). (2019). The OECD’s Historical Rise in Education: The formation of a global governing complex. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Krejsler, J.B., Moos, L. (2021). Danish – and Nordic – School Policy: Its Anglo-American Connections and Influences. In: Krejsler, J.B., Moos, L. (eds) What Works in Nordic School Policies?. Educational Governance Research, vol 15. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66629-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66629-3_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-66628-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-66629-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)