Skip to main content

A Type-2 Fuzzy TOPSIS-Based Methodology for the Analysis of Investment Decisions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Progress in Intelligent Decision Science (IDS 2020)

Abstract

From the beginning of human history to today, all of the decisions that human beings have made in order to make their assets more efficient and valuable can be considered as investment decisions. The aim is always to maximize the return. For this purpose, researchers have developed a wide range of investment theories and decision methodologies. Multi-Attribute Decision Making techniques have found effective use for mathematical optimization to obtain both theoretical and practical results for researchers. In recent years, many extensions have been proposed that use Type-2 fuzzy sets for classical mathematical optimization techniques to address the uncertainty in nature. In this study, we used the Type-2 fuzzy TOPSIS method for the evaluation of alternative stocks in an investment decision. And a case study for the stocks selected from Borsa Istanbul (BIST) is performed to show the applicability of the proposed methodology. The results of the case study are examined, and suggestions for future studies are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Markowitz, H.M.: Portfolio Selection/Harry Markowitz. J. Finan. 7(1), 77–91 (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alexander, G.J., Sharpe, W.F., Bailey, J.V.: Fundamentals of Investments/Fundamentos de inversiones. Pearson Educación, Prentice Hall (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tiryaki, F., Ahlatcioglu, B.: Fuzzy portfolio selection using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Inf. Sci. 179(1–2), 53–69 (2009)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Tanaka, H., Guo, P.: Portfolio selection based on upper and lower exponential possibility distributions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 114(1), 115–126 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Xia, Y., Liu, B., Wang, S., Lai, K.K.: A model for portfolio selection with order of expected returns. Comput. Oper. Res. 27(5), 409–422 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Tanaka, H., Guo, P., Türksen, I.B.: Portfolio selection based on fuzzy probabilities and possibility distributions. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 111(3), 387–397 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Inuiguchi, M., Tanino, T.: Portfolio selection under independent possibilistic information. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 115(1), 83–92 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Parra, M.A., Terol, A.B., Urıa, M.R.: A fuzzy goal programming approach to portfolio selection. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 133(2), 287–297 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Ong, C.S., Huang, J.J., Tzeng, G.H.: A novel hybrid model for portfolio selection. Appl. Math. Comput. 169(2), 1195–1210 (2005)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Tiryaki, F., Ahlatcioglu, M.: Fuzzy stock selection using a new fuzzy ranking and weighting algorithm. Appl. Math. Comput. 170(1), 144–157 (2005)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Lacagnina, V., Pecorella, A.: A stochastic soft constraints fuzzy model for a portfolio selection problem. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 157(10), 1317–1327 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Huang, J.J., Tzeng, G.H., Ong, C.S.: A novel algorithm for uncertain portfolio selection. Appl. Math. Comput. 173(1), 350–359 (2006)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Bilbao-Terol, A., Pérez-Gladish, B., Arenas-Parra, M., Rodríguez-Uría, M.V.: Fuzzy compromise programming for portfolio selection. Appl. Math. Comput. 173(1), 251–264 (2006)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Giove, S., Funari, S., Nardelli, C.: An interval portfolio selection problem based on regret function. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 170(1), 253–264 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang, W.G., Wang, Y.L., Chen, Z.P., Nie, Z.K.: Possibilistic mean–variance models and efficient frontiers for portfolio selection problem. Inf. Sci. 177(13), 2787–2801 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Li, X., Qin, Z., Kar, S.: Mean-variance-skewness model for portfolio selection with fuzzy returns. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 202(1), 239–247 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Bhattacharyya, R., Kar, S., Majumder, D.D.: Fuzzy mean–variance–skewness portfolio selection models by interval analysis. Comput. Math Appl. 61(1), 126–137 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Li, X., Guo, S., Yu, L.: Skewness of fuzzy numbers and its applications in portfolio selection. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 23(6), 2135–2143 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhou, X., Wang, J., Yang, X., Lev, B., Tu, Y., Wang, S.: Portfolio selection under different attitudes in fuzzy environment. Inf. Sci. 462, 278–289 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen, C.T., Hung, W.Z., Yu, L.: A new decision-making method for stock portfolio selection based on computing with linguistic assessment. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Decision Sciences 2009, 32 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Ece, O., Uludag, A.S.: Applicability of fuzzy TOPSIS method in optimal portfolio selection and an application in BIST. Int. J. Econ. Finan. 9(10), 107–127 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen, S.M., Lee, L.W.: Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on the interval type-2 TOPSIS method. Expert Syst. Appl. 37(4), 2790–2798 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kahraman, C., Öztayşi, B., Sarı, İ.U., Turanoğlu, E.: Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process with interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Knowl. -Based Syst. 59, 48–57 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Abdullah, L., Zulkifli, N.: Integration of fuzzy AHP and interval type-2 fuzzy DEMATEL: An application to human resource management. Expert Syst. Appl. 42(9), 4397–4409 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sang, X., Liu, X.: An analytical solution to the TOPSIS model with interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Soft. Comput. 20(3), 1213–1230 (2016)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Celik, E., Akyuz, E.: An interval type-2 fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS methods for decision-making problems in maritime transportation engineering: the case of ship loader. Ocean Eng. 155, 371–381 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zadeh, L.A.: The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning. In: Learning systems and intelligent robots, pp. 1–10. Springer, Boston, MA (1974)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research has been supported by Yildiz Technical University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Department. Project Number: FBA-2017-3073.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hale Gonce Kocken .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kocken, H.G., Ozkok, B.A. (2021). A Type-2 Fuzzy TOPSIS-Based Methodology for the Analysis of Investment Decisions. In: Allahviranloo, T., Salahshour, S., Arica, N. (eds) Progress in Intelligent Decision Science. IDS 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1301. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66501-2_29

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics