Skip to main content

Sludge Hygienisation—A Novel Technology for Urban Areas to Deal with Incursion of COVID-19 Viral Particles in Wastewater

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Green Societies

Abstract

The ongoing pandemic of viral infections due to the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is known to have affected about 8,240,000 people globally and approximately 3,67,000 people in India as of June 19, 2020. The pandemic being quite persistent in nature, timely planning for novel and adaptive interventions are required for dealing with it, with a view to detecting the early signs of infection, as well as, controlling the spread of the outbreak towards the uninfected population residing at comparatively safer zones. In general, the coronaviruses belong to a group of RNA viruses that are known to infect a wide range of hosts including humans, other mammals and birds, with the clinical courses in the infected hosts ranging from being asymptomatic to showing acute symptoms in the respiratory, digestive and genital organs. Although the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) is reported to spread primarily through inter-personal physical contacts rather than the faecal-oral route, evidence of gastrointestinal symptoms caused by SARS-CoV-2 infections accompanied by the detection of viral RNA in the faeces of infected individuals, with high probability of their presence in wastewater samples, makes an important case for the thorough characterization and quantification of the pathogenic materials present in the municipal sludge generated in urban centres. This becomes even more important in the case of the metro cities and dense urban centres, where the chance of the medical wastes from the COVID hospital facilities coming into the municipal sewage stream is highly likely. However, the pathogens in the municipal sewage stream become concentrated in the sludge, providing an opportunity to treat the separated sludge from the wastewater stream using a technology of irradiation called ‘sludge hygienisation’ to curb the outbreak of the virus. The present work provides an assessment of the sludge hygienisation technology for its suitability as an option to eradicate the viral particles accumulated in the sludge samples from urban environments that are presumably infected through the faecal deposition, as well as, due to uncurbed release of untreated biomedical wastes. Such an intervention will provide suitable means to control rapid viral outbreak that might be attributed to the high volumetric flow rate of the municipal sewage. Investment in such novel interventions, given the current circumstances, will be important to contain present and future outbreaks, ensuring that the community healthcare systems are saved from being pushed to the limits owing to the increasing pressure on the infrastructure that arises from the rapidly growing number of infected individuals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. McLaren RG, Smith CJ (1996) Issues in the disposal of industrial and urban wastes. In: Naidu R, Kookana RS, Oliver DP, Rogers S, McLaughlin MJ (eds) Contaminants and the soil environment in the Australasia–Pacific region (717 pages); pp 183–212. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1626-5_6

  2. Saravanane R, Ranade VV, Bhandari VM, Rao AS (2014) Urban wastewater treatment for recycling and reuse in industrial applications: Indian scenario. In: Chapter 7: Industrial wastewater treatment, recycling and reuse (576 pages); pp. 283–322. Elsevier Ltd

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wastewater Management: A UN-Water Analytical Brief (2017) Download from: https://www.unwater.org/app/uploads/2017/05/UNWater_Analytical_Brief_Wastewater_Management.pdf. Accessed 18 July 2020

  4. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision, Economics & Social Affairs, United Nations. Download from: https://population.un.org/wup/Publications/Files/WUP2018-KeyFacts.pdf. Accessed 15 July 2020

  5. Urbanisation. https://www.teriin.org/resilient-cities/urbanisation.php. Accessed 15 July 2020

  6. Urban wastewater treatment for 21st century challenges, European Environment Agency (EEA) (July 2020) https://www.eea.europa.eu/themes/water/european-waters/water-use-andenvironmental-pressures/uwwtd/urban-waste-water-treatment. Accessed 20 July 2020

  7. Wastewater management and sustainable development (Greenfacts), https://www.greenfacts.org/en/wastewater-management/index.htm. Accessed 20 July 2020

  8. Gwalior – India (SFDs Worldwide). https://sfd.susana.org/about/worldwide-projects/city/21-gwalior. Accessed 20 July 2020

  9. Lusaka - Zambia (SFDs Worldwide). https://sfd.susana.org/about/worldwide-projects/city/46-lusaka. Accessed 20 July 2020

  10. Jeffrey N (November 2018) The devastating impact of poor wastewater management, Water and Sanitation for the Urban Poor (WSUP). https://www.wsup.com/blog/thedevastating-impact-of-poor-wastewater-management/. Accessed 20 July 2020

  11. Collection and disposal of wastewater. Download from: https://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/medicalwaste/130to134.pdf. Accessed 20 July 2020

  12. Thornton I et al (February 2001) Pollutants in urban wastewater and sewage sludge, Report Prepared by ICON (I.C. Consultants Ltd), London (UK), for Directorate-General Environment. Download from:https://www.ec.europa.eu/environment/archives/waste/sludge/pdf/sludge_pollutants.pdf

  13. Benneouala M (2017) Biodegradation of slowly biodegradable organic matter in wastewater treatment plant (WWTP): In depth analysis of physical and biological factors affecting hydrolysis of large particles. Chemical and process engineering. INSA de Toulouse, English. NNT: 2017ISAT0003. Download from: https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01549254/document

  14. Henze M, Comeau Y (2008) Wastewater characterization; Chapter 3 In: Henze M, van Loosdrecht MCM, Ekama GA, Brdjanovic D (eds) Biological wastewater treatment: principles modelling and design, IWA Publishing, London, UK. ISBN: 9781843391883

    Google Scholar 

  15. Health risks associated with wastewater use, http://www.fao.org/3/w5367e/w5367e04.htm. Accessed 20 July 2020

  16. Bibby K, Peccia J (2013) Prevalence of respiratory adenovirus species B and C in sewage sludge. Environ Sci Process Impacts 15(2):336–338. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2em30831b

  17. Carr R (2001) Excreta-related infections and the role of sanitation in the control of transmission; Chapter 5 In: Fewtrell L, Bartram J (eds) Water quality: guidelines, standards and health. World Health Organization (WHO). IWA Publishing, London, UK. ISBN: 1 900222 28 0

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mateo-Sagasta J, Zadeh SM, Turral H (2017) Water pollution from agriculture: a global review (Executive summary), Published jointly by Published by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations (UN) Rome and the International Water Management Institute (IWMI), Colombo. Download from: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i7754e.pdf

  19. World Water Development Report (WWDR) (2014) United Nations World Water Assessment Programme (WWAP). ISBN:978-92-3-104259-1

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sanctis MD, Moro GD, Chimienti S, Ritelli P, Levantesi C, Di Iaconi C (2017) Removal of pollutants and pathogens by a simplified treatment scheme for municipal wastewater reuse in agriculture. Sci Total Environ 580:17–25

    Google Scholar 

  21. Liberti L, Notarnicola M (1999) Advanced treatment and disinfection for municipal wastewater reuse in agriculture. Water Sci Technol 40:235–245

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cui B, Liang S (2019) Monitoring opportunistic pathogens in domestic wastewater from a pilot-scale anaerobic biofilm reactor to reuse in agricultural irrigation. Water 11:1283. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11061283

  23. Use of Reclaimed Water and Sludge in Food Crop Production (1996) Chapter 2 In: Municipal wastewater, sewage sludge, and agriculture; water science and technology board commission on geosciences, environment, and resources. National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C. https://www.nap.edu/read/5175/chapter/4. Accessed 20 July 2020

  24. Strauch D (1991) Survival of pathogenic micro-organisms and parasites in excreta, manure and sewage sludge. Rev sci Tech Off Int Epiz 10(3):813–846

    Google Scholar 

  25. Carrington EG (2001) Evaluation of sludge treatments for pathogen reduction, report submitted to the European Commission Directorate-General Environment, 45 pages. Report No.: CO 5026/1. Download from: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/archives/waste/sludge/pdf/sludge_eval.pdf

  26. Al-Gheethi AA, Efaq AN, Bala JD, Norli I, Abdel-Monem MO, Abdel-Kadir MO (2018) Removal of pathogenic bacteria from sewage-treated effluent and biosolids for agricultural purposes. Appl Water Sci 8, Article no. 74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-018-0698-6

  27. EPA Guidelines for Water Reuse (1992) Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., USA, 247 pages. Publication ID: EPA 625/R-92/004

    Google Scholar 

  28. Industrial Wastewater Management and Disposal (2009) Water quality protection note, Department of Water, Government of Australia. Download from: https://www.water.wa.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/4040/89343.pdf. Accessed 20 July 2020

  29. Polprasert C, Kittipongvises S (2011) Water-quality engineering: In: Wilderer P (ed) Treatise on water science, 2102 pages. Hardcover ISBN: 9780444531933

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jungclaus GA, Lopez-Avila V, Hites RA (1978) Organic compounds in an industrial wastewater: a case study of their environmental impact. Environ Sci Technol 88–96. American Chemical Society, Download from: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/es60137a015

  31. Ramírez N, Marcé RM, Borrull F (2011) Determination of volatile organic compounds in industrial wastewater plant air emissions by multi-sorbent adsorption and thermal desorption-gas chromatography-massspectrometry. Int J Environ Anal Chem 91(10):911–928

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hjortenkrans DST, Bergbäck BG, Häggerud AV (2007) Metal emissions from brake linings and tires: case studies of stockholm, Sweden 1995/1998 and 2005. Environ Sci Technol 41(15):5224–5230. Download from: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/es070198o

  33. Wang Q, Feng Y, Huang XHH, Griffith SM, Zhang T, Zhang Q, Wu D, Yu JZ (2016) Nonpolar organic compounds as PM 2.5 source tracers: investigation of their sources and degradation in the Pearl River Delta, China. J Geophys Res Atmos 121:11862–11879. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025315

  34. Loos R et al (2012) EU wide monitoring survey on waste water treatment plant effluents, JRC Scientific and Policy Reports, European Commission, 138 pages. Download from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.819.3420&rep=rep1&type=pdf

  35. Lindholm-Lehto PC, Ahkola HSJ, Knuutinen JS (2017) Procedures of determining organic trace compounds in municipal sewage sludge-a review, Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:4383–4412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-8202-z

  36. Minzatu V, Negrea P, Negrea A, Ciopec M, Bumbu B, Golban A, Vasile A (2016) Removal of organic compounds from industrial wastewater using physico-chemical methods. WIT Trans Ecol Environ 209:185–195. https://doi.org/10.2495/WP160171

  37. Regulated Medical Waste, Guidelines for Environmental Infection Control in Health-Care Facilities (2003) https://www.cdc.gov/infectioncontrol/guidelines/environmental/background/medical-waste.html. Accessed 20 July 2020

  38. Biomedical Waste Guidelines. Download from: https://www.ehs.uci.edu/programs/enviro/Bio-Waste%20Guidelines.pdf. Accessed 20 July 2020

  39. Datta P, Mohi GK, Chander J (2018) Biomedical waste management in India: critical appraisal. J Lab Physicians 10(1):6–14. PMID: 29403196

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kaur B (December 2019) Biomedical waste in Delhi: what monitoring without figures, asks report. https://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/waste/biomedical-waste-in-delhi-whatmonitoring-without-figures-asks-report-68474. Accessed 22 July 2020

  41. Safe management of wastes from health-care activities Second edition (2014) World Health Organization. https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0012/268779/Safemanagement-of-wastes-from-health-care-activities-Eng.pdf. Accessed 22 July 2020

  42. Kappan R (July 2020) Straight to the landfills: Bengaluru’s waste management takes a hit amidst pandemic. https://www.deccanherald.com/specials/point-blank/straight-to-thelandfills-bengalurus-waste-management-takes-a-hit-amidst-pandemic-862621.html. Accessed 22 July 2020

  43. Kearney TE, Larkin MJ, Levett PN (1994) Metabolic activity of pathogenic bacteria during semicontinuous anaerobic digestion. Appl Environ Microbiol 60:3647–3652

    Google Scholar 

  44. Sahlström L (2003) A review of survival of pathogenic bacteria in organic waste used in biogas plants. Bioresour Technol 87:161–166

    Google Scholar 

  45. Weiss SR, Navas-Martin S (2005) Coronavirus pathogenesis and the emerging pathogen severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 69(4):635–664. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.69.4.635-664.2005

  46. Kitajima M, Ahmed W, Bibby K, Carducci A, Gerba CP, Hamilton KA, Haramoto E, Rose JB (2020) SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater: state of the knowledge and research needs. Sci Total Environ 739, Article 139076

    Google Scholar 

  47. Gu J, Han B, Wang J (2020) COVID-19: gastrointestinal manifestations and potential fecal-oral transmission. Gastroenterology 158(6):1518–1519. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2020.02.054

  48. Rokkas T (2020) Gastrointestinal involvement in COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals Gastroenterol 33:1–11. https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2020.0506

  49. Xiao F, Sun J, Xu Y, Li F, Huang X, Li H, Zhao J, Huang J, Zhao J (2020) Infectious SARS-CoV-2 in feces of patient with severe COVID-19, Research Letter in Emerging Infectious Diseases (EID), 26(8). Download from: https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/8/20-0681_article

  50. Jiang FC, Jiang XL, Wang ZG, Meng ZH, Shao SF, Anderson BD, Ma MJ (September 2020) Detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 RNA on surfaces in quarantine rooms, Research Letter in Emerging Infectious Diseases (EID), 26(9). Download from: https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/9/20-1435_article

  51. Transmission of SARS-CoV-2: implications for infection prevention precautions (July 2020), Scientific Brief; https://www.who.int/news-room/commentaries/detail/transmissionof-sars-cov-2-implications-for-infection-prevention-precautions. Accessed 22 July 2020

  52. Bakker E, Worsham K (June 2020) Treating medical waste during COVID-19 in the global south. https://www.ircwash.org/blog/treating-medical-waste-during-covid-19-globalsouth. Accessed 4 September 2020

  53. Jiang RD et al (July 2020) Pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 in transgenic mice expressing human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. Cell 182(1):50–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.027

  54. Aw T (2018) Environmental aspects and features of critical pathogen groups. In: Rose JB, Jiménez-Cisneros B (eds) Part 1: The health hazards of excreta: theory and control, Michigan State University, E. Lansing, MI, UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.14321/waterpathogens.2

  55. de Graaf M et al (2017) Sustained fecal-oral human-to-human transmission following a zoonotic event. Curr Opin Virol 22:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coviro.2016.11.001, PMID: 27888698, PMCID: PMC7102779

  56. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation Report-32 (February 2020), World Health organization (WHO). Download from: https://www.who.int/docs/defaultsource/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200221-sitrep-32-covid-19.pdf. Accessed 22 July 2020

  57. Q&A: similarities and differences - COVID-19 and influenza, https://www.who.int/news-room/q-a-detail/q-a-similarities-and-differences-covid-19-and-influenza. Accessed 22 July 2020

  58. Dutt A (March 2020) From throat to lungs and blood: how coronavirus impacts the human body. https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/how-coronavirus-impacts-the-humanbody/story-0VTwWF8NjZzNvZ7Ut9pfuN.html. Accessed 22 July 2020

  59. Karamitros T, Papadopoulou G, Bousali M, Mexias A, Tsiodras S, Mentis A (March 2020) SARS-CoV-2 exhibits intra-host genomic plasticity and low-frequency polymorphic quasispecies, bioRxiv preprint. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.27.009480

  60. Song P, Li W, Xie J, Hou Y, You C (October 2020) Cytokine storm induced by SARS-CoV-2. Clin Chim Acta 509:280–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2020.06.017

  61. Ong SWX, Tan YK, Chia PY, Lee TH, Ng OT, Wong MSY, Marimuthu K (April 2020) Air, surface environmental, and personal protective equipment contamination by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) from a symptomatic patient. JAMA 323(16):1610–1612. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.3227

  62. How to choose your waste management technology to treat COVID-19 waste; COVID-19 waste management factsheet (UNEP). Download from: https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/32778/FS3.pdf. Accessed 2 September 2020

  63. Keller U (1983) Technology of sewage sludge hygienisation. Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B 178(1–2):111–141. PMID: 6649988

    Google Scholar 

  64. Breer C (1983) Bacteriological control of various methods of sewage sludge hygienisation. Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B 178(1–2):155–157. PMID: 6649990

    Google Scholar 

  65. Lessel T (1997) Disinfection of sewage sludge by gamma radiation, electron beams and alternative methods (IAEA-TECDOC-971), Proceedings of Consultants’ Meetings: Sewage Sludge and Wastewater for Use in Agriculture, Vienna, pp 29–45. Download from: https://www.osti.gov/etdeweb/servlets/purl/592126

  66. Irradiated sewage sludge for application to cropland (October 2002); Report of FAO-IAEA Joint Research Project, Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture; Report no. IAEA-TECDOC-1317. Download from: https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/te_1317_web.pdf. Accessed 22 July 2020

  67. Sabbagh S, El-Mahmoudi AS, Al-Dakheel YY (2014) Waste water sterilization by cobalt Co-60 for the agricultural irrigation: a case study. Int J Water Resour Arid Environ 3(1):11–18. ISSN 2079-7079

    Google Scholar 

  68. Gautam S, Shah MR, Sabharwal S, Sharma A (2005) Gamma irradiation of municipal sludge for safe disposal and agricultural use. Water Environ Res 77(5):472–479

    Google Scholar 

  69. Swinwood JF, Waite TD, Kruger P, Rao SM (1994) Radiation technologies for waste treatment: a global perspective. IAEA Bulletin 36:11–15

    Google Scholar 

  70. Lavale DS, Shah MR, Rawat KP, George JR (1997) Sewage sludge irradiators: batch and continuous flow, Invited paper (IAEA-SM-350/56), pp 289–301. Download from: https://www.osti.gov/etdeweb/servlets/purl/644028

  71. Graino JG (2001) Radiation technology for sewage sludge treatment: the argentine project, use of irradiation for chemical and microbial decontamination of water, wastewater and sludge, Vienna, Paper ID: IAEA-TECDOC-1225, pp 163–179. Download from: https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/32/037/32037236.pdf

  72. Kaushik H (March 2019) Ahmedabad: sludge treatment plant is operational now. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/ahmedabad/sludge-treatment-plant-is-operationalnow/articleshow/68237506.cms. Accessed 22 July 2020

  73. New sludge gamma irradiator in India. https://iiaglobal.com/news/new-sludge-gamma-irradiator-india/. Accessed 22 July 2020

  74. Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation’s sludge-to-fertilizer plant ready. https://www.dnaindia.com/ahmedabad/report-ahmedabad-municipal-corporation-s-sludge-to-fertilizer-plantready-2725521. Accessed 22 July 2020

  75. KC Valley, a unique project in the country. https://www.thehansindia.com/posts/index/Latest-News/2018-12-17/KC-Valley-a-unique-project-in-the-country/460292. Accessed 22 July 2020

  76. Why domestic wastewater from Bengaluru is being sent to Kolar and Chikkaballapur. https://scroll.in/article/944539/why-domestic-wastewater-from-bengaluru-is-being-sent-tokolar-and-chikkaballapur. Accessed 22 July 2020

  77. A silver lining to the KC Valley project. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/karnataka/a-silver-lining-to-the-kc-valley-project/article29956197.ece. Accessed 22 July 2020

  78. Varthur lake in Bengaluru catches fire again, migratory birds at risk. https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/varthur-lake-bengaluru-fire-migratory-birds-risk-1435322-2019-01-21. Accessed 22 July 2020

  79. Varthur lake spills toxic foam again; here’s why ‘chemical snowfall’ is overflowing from Bengaluru lake. https://www.india.com/news/india/varthur-lake-spills-toxic-foam-againheres-why-chemical-snowfall-is-overflowing-from-bengaluru-lake-2179643/. Accessed 22 July 2020

  80. About 85 per cent of Bengaluru’s water bodies severely polluted: study. https://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/water/about-85-per-cent-of-bengaluru-s-water-bodies-severelypolluted-study-59189. Accessed 22 July 2020

  81. NGT report (December 06, 2018; M.A. No. 96/2018), Karnataka Pollution Control Board (KPCB), Download from: http://www.greentribunal.gov.in/Writereaddata/Downloads/125-2017(PB-I)OA6-12-18.pdfhttp://www.greentribunal.gov.in/Writereaddata/Downloads/125-2017(PB-I)OA6-12-18.pdf. Accessed 22 July 2020

  82. BWSSB Draws up Rs 2,500-cr plan to upgrade STPs. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/bwssb-draws-up-rs-2500-cr-plan-to-upgradestps/articleshow/67879750.cms. Accessed 22 July 2020

  83. Why Bengaluru’s sewage treatment plants may never be enough for the city. https://www.thenewsminute.com/article/why-bengalurus-sewage-treatment-plants-may-never-beenough-city-93663. Accessed 22 July 2020

  84. Wattiez AL (2000) Mineralization of nitrogen from pelletized sewage sludge - a laboratory incubation study. Graduate Thesis in Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Forest Ecology. ISSN 1104-1870, ISRN SLU-SEKOL-STL-59-SE

    Google Scholar 

  85. Chander G et al (2016) Soil mapping and variety-based entry-point interventions for strengthening agriculture-based livelihoods - Exemplary Case of ‘Bhoochetana’ in India. Curr Sci 110(9):1683–1691

    Google Scholar 

  86. Sahu P (January 2021) DBT scheme for fertiliser subsidy may be rolled out in FY22. https://www.financialexpress.com/economy/dbt-scheme-for-fertiliser-subsidy-may-be-rolled-outin-fy22/2174500/. Accessed 2 September 2021

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to extend sincere gratitude to Dr. Virendra Kumar (Head, AMS, RTDD, BARC) and to Shri Sudhir Dave (Consultant, AMC) for their invaluable inputs and words of advice. The author is also grateful to the officials of the two STPs in Bengaluru (KC Valley STP and Kadubeesanahalli STP), as well as, the Pirana Road STP in Ahmedabad for the cordial interactions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rudrodip Majumdar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Majumdar, R. (2021). Sludge Hygienisation—A Novel Technology for Urban Areas to Deal with Incursion of COVID-19 Viral Particles in Wastewater. In: Chakraborty, C., Roy, S., Sharma, S., Tran, T.A. (eds) The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Green Societies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66490-9_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics