Skip to main content

The Force of Things Unknown

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Phenomenology of the Object and Human Positioning

Part of the book series: Analecta Husserliana ((ANHU,volume 122))

  • 374 Accesses

Abstract

When strange forces impose on us and command our attention from the sky or oceanic depths, when they rustle invisibly or naked in the vegetation of a desolate grove, the sciences and humanities have different responses to the alterity of the encounter—the first presupposing a stable object or “content” that it seeks to identify, the latter presupposing an unstable meaning which it seeks to explicate. These complimentary modes of distinguishing phenomena, which epitomize the “two cultures” of academia, abruptly manifest their strengths and weaknesses when confronted by indeterminate forces of a predatory or polymorphic nature. By conducting selective readings of narratives by Edgar Allan Poe, Hermann Melville, Ambrose Bierce and Arthur Machen, the present study retraces the historically problematic explication of forces that breach norms of identity (such as gender, species, and appetite) by exposing protagonists to cosmic obscurities that destabilize visualization and embodiment, and hence, the self-understanding of both the individual and her community. In the late Victorian genre of weird tales, due to the technical difficulties of visualizing unknown forces, these narratives depended less on concrete depictions of objectively identifiable events than of disturbing encounters tinged with erotic, chthonic, and/or mystical sublimity. In its most extreme obscurity, to quote Arthur Machen’s The Great God Pan (1893) a force is “neither man nor beast, neither the living nor the dead, but all things mingled, the form of all things but devoid of all form” (188). Only in the twentieth century does the shapeshifting force of the alien encounter become fully visualized cinematically in horror masterpieces such as John Carpenter’s The Thing (1982).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allison, D. (Ed.). (1985). The new Nietzsche: Contemporary styles of interpretation. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierce, A. (1970). The damned thing. In The complete short stories of Ambrose Bierce (pp. 97–105). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brentano, F. (2002). The distinction between mental and physical phenomena. In D. Moran & T. Mooney (Eds.), The phenomenology reader (pp. 35–50). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairns, D. (1976). Conversations with Husserl and Fink. The Hague: Martinus Nijoff.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. W. (2009). Who goes there? Rocket Ride Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Quincey, T. (1975). Confessions of an English opium eater. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1990). Expressionism in philosophy: Spinoza. (M. Joughin, Trans.). New York: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1991). Bergsonism. (H. Tomlinson & B. Habberjam, Trans.). New York: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1978). Force and signification. In Writing and difference (A. Bass, Trans.) (pp. 3–30). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, M. (2016). The weird and the eerie. London: Repeater Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, A. (1999). The fabric of the affect in the psychoanalytic discourse (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildesheimer, W. (1986). Why I transformed myself into a nightingale. In D. Halpern (Ed.), The art of the tale (pp. 347–350). New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology (D. Carr, Trans.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1987). Critique of judgment (W. Pluhar, Trans.). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (2002). Theories of distinction (J. O’Neil & E. Schreiber, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machen, A. (2009). The great god Pan. In R. Lockhurst (Ed.), Late Victorian Gothic tales (pp. 183–233). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melville, H. (1992). Moby-Dick or the whale. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968). The visible and the invisible. (A. Lingis, Trans.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natanson, M. (1968). Phenomenology and the theory of literature. In Literature, philosophy, and the social sciences (pp. 86–100). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otto, R. (1958). The idea of the holy (J. H. Harvey, Trans.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poe, E. A. (1975). The narrative of Arthur Gordon Pym of Nantucket. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poe, E. A. (2003). The pit and the pendulum. In D. Galloway (Ed.), The fall of the house of Usher and other writings (pp. 212–227). New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sambursky, S. (1987). Physics of the stoics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Seneca, L. A. (2010). Natural questions (H. M. Hine, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theunissen, M. (1986). The other: Studies in the social ontology of Husserl, Heidegger, Sartre, and Buber (C. Macann, Trans.). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thévenaz, P. (1962). What is phenomenology? Chicago: Quadrangle Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulman, S. (1985). The return to cosmology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traherne, T. (1952). Centuries of meditations. In H. Read (Ed.), English prose style (pp. 149–150). New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigg, D. (2014). The thing: A phenomenology of horror. Winchester, UK: Zero Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. D. (2012). The cosmic viewpoint. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, C. (2010). What is posthumanism? Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher S. Schreiner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Schreiner, C.S. (2021). The Force of Things Unknown. In: Hornbuckle, C.A., Smith, J.S., Smith, W.S. (eds) Phenomenology of the Object and Human Positioning. Analecta Husserliana, vol 122. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66437-4_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics