Abstract
In the decade since the emergence of PRP as a treatment option in sports medicine and dermatology, controversies surrounding the procedure have emerged. These primarily centre on conflicting accounts of its efficacy, a lack of standardization when it comes to PRP production and injection protocols and the potential for misleading the general public with celebrity endorsements of a procedure that may implicitly overstate the results that the treatment can achieve. The lack of robust clinical trial data assessing the efficacy of PRP has led to considerable skepticism of what is a highly lucrative procedure for most providers who offer it. Without the prioritization of unbiased quantitative evaluations of PRP, controversy surrounding it as a procedure built upon unsubstantiated hype is likely to continue.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Schwarz A. A promising treatment for athletes, in blood. New York Times. 2009.
Sclafani AP, Azzi J. Platelet preparations for use in facial rejuvenation and wound healing: a critical review of current literature. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2015;39(4):495–505.
Singh S. Role of platelet-rich plasma in chronic alopecia areata: our centre experience. Indian J Plast Surg. 2015;48(1):57–9.
Schiavone G, Raskovic D, Greco J, Abeni D. Platelet-rich plasma for androgenetic alopecia: a pilot study. Dermatol Surg. 2014;40(9):1010–9.
Mapar MA, Shahriari S, Haghighizadeh MH. Efficacy of platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of androgenetic (male-patterned) alopecia: a pilot randomized controlled trial. J Cosmet Laser Ther [Internet]. 2016;18(8):452–5. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/14764172.2016.1225963.
Alves R, Grimalt R. Randomized placebo-controlled, double-blind, half-head study to assess the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma on the treatment of androgenetic alopecia. Dermatol Surg. 2016;42(4):491–7.
Gupta AK, Carviel JL. Meta-analysis of efficacy of platelet-rich plasma therapy for androgenetic alopecia. J Dermatolog Treat. 2017;28(1):55–8.
Emer J. Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP): current applications in dermatology. Skin Therapy Lett. 2019;24(5):1–6.
Fadadu PP, Mazzola AJ, Hunter CW, Davis TT. Review of concentration yields in commercially available platelet-rich plasma (PRP) systems: a call for PRP standardization. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2018-100356.
Nazarian RS, Farberg AS, Hashim PW, Goldenberg G. Nonsurgical hair restoration treatment. Cutis. 2019;104(1):17–24.
Rachul C, Rasko JEJ, Caulfield T. Implicit hype? Representations of platelet rich plasma in the news media. PLoS One [Internet]. 2017;12(8):e0182496. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182496.
Bruce AJ, Pincelli TP, Heckman MG, Desmond CM, Arthurs JR, Diehl NN, et al. A randomized, controlled pilot trial comparing platelet-rich plasma to topical minoxidil foam for treatment of androgenic alopecia in women. Dermatol Surg. 2019;46:826.
Li H, Li B. PRP as a new approach to prevent infection: preparation and in vitro antimicrobial properties of PRP. J Vis Exp. 2013;74:50351.
BBC. Vampire facials: After HIV scare, is beauty fad actually safe? BBC News. 2019.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Syed, U., Shridharani, S.M. (2021). Controversies in PRP. In: Sadick, N.S. (eds) Platelet-Rich Plasma in Dermatologic Practice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66230-1_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66230-1_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-66229-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-66230-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)