Skip to main content

Abstract

With the expeditious growth of technology, robotics seems to be the new literature of the world. The idea of digitalizing machines, automation and computers is making robotics to grow at a faster velocity. In accordance with the Internet of things (IoT) and cyber-physical system (CPS), a new hypothesis of robotics is emerging. IoT cooperates with devices through wireless or wired medium to create new applications and gadgets to reach specific goals. If CPS is the viaduct for the emerging advancement of technology, then IoT is an upright for the technology. There are numerous amounts of fields where convergence is evident, such as driverless cars, decision-making, agriculture and many more. This chapter focuses on how two different aspects IoT and CPS converge together in the robotics industry making it more efficient and pleasing to adapt by other organizations, institutions, etc.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acatech. (2011). Cyber-physical systems driving force for innovation in mobility, health, energy and production. Position paper. Munich, Germany: National Academy of Science and Engineering.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anavangot, V., Menon, V. G., & Nayyar, A. (2018). Distributed big data analytics in the Internet of signals. In International Conference on System Modeling & Advancement in Research Trends (SMART) (pp. 73–77).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, K. (2009). That ‘Internet of Things’ thing. RFID Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atzori, L., Lera, A., & Morabito, G. (2010). The Internet of Things: A survey. Computer Networks, 54, 2787–2805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batth, R. S., Nayyar, A., & Nagpal, A. (2018). Internet of robotic things: Driving intelligent robotics of future-concept, architecture, applications and technologies. In 4th International Conference on Computing Sciences (ICCS) (pp. 151–160).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyber-Physical Systems—Virtual Organizations. Internet of things & cyber-physical systems. https://cps-vo.org/group/iot.

  • De Roever, W., Langmaack, H., & Pnueli, A. (1998). Compositionality: The significant difference. Papers from the International Symposium on Compositionality COMPOS’97. Berlin, Heidelber: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubey, S., Singh, P., Yadav, P., & Singh, K. K. (2020). Household waste management system using IoT and machine learning. Procedia Computer Science, 167, 1950–1959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Electronics Tutorial. Sensors and transducers. https://www.electronicstutorials.ws/io/io_1.html.

  • Gupta, R., Tanwar, S., Al-Turjman, F., Italiya, P., Nauman, A., & Kim, S. W. (2020). Smart contract privacy protection using AI in cyber-physical systems: Tools, techniques and challenges. IEEE Access, 8, 24746–24772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horvath, I., & Gerritsen, B. (2012). Cyber-physical systems: Concepts, technologies and implementation principles. In Proceedings of the Tools and Methods of Competitive Engineering (pp. 7–11). Karlsruhe, Germany: Delft University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra-Esquer, J., González-Navarro, F., Flores-Rios, B., Burtseva, L., & Astorga-Vargas, M. (2017). Tracking the evolution of the internet of things concept across different application domains. Sensors, 17(6), 1379, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEEE. IEEE Standard Computer Dictionary: A compilation of IEEE standard computer glossaries. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/182763.

  • IEEE Technical Committee on Cyber-Physical Systems. https://www.ieeesystemscouncil.org/pages/cyber-physical-systemstechnical-committee.

  • Kim, K. D., & Kumar, P. R. (2012). Cyber-physical systems: A perspective at the centennial. In Proceedings of the IEEE 100 (Special Centennial Issue) (Vol. 100, pp. 1287–1308). IEEE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koreshoff, T., Robertson, T., & Leong, T. (2013). Internet of Things: a review of literature and products. In OzCHI ‘13 Proceedings of the 25th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference: Augmentation, Application, Innovation, Collaboration (pp. 335–344). Adelaide, Australia: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E. (2006). Cyber-physical systems—Are computing foundations adequate? Position paper. In NSF Workshop on Cyber-Physical Systems: Research Motivation, Techniques and Roadmap, Austin, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E. (2010). CPS foundations. In DAC ‘10 Proceedings of the 47th Design Automation Conference (pp. 737–742). Anaheim, CA: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, S., Xu, L., & Zhao, S. (2015). The Internet of Things: A survey. Information Systems Frontiers, 17, 243–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manyika, J., Chui, M., Bisson, P., Woetzel, J., Dobbs, R., Bughin, J., & Aharon, D. The internet of things: Mapping the value beyond the hype. https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Business%20Functions/McKinsey%20Digital/Our%20Insights/The%20Internet%20of%20Things%20The%20value%20of%20digitizing%20the%20physical%20world/The-Internet-of-things-Mapping-the-value-beyond-the-hype.ashx.

  • McClelland, D., & Rumelhart, J. (1986). Parallel distributed processing (12th ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, A Bradford Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam-Webster. Actuator. https://www.merriamwebster.com/dictionary/actuator.

  • Minerva, R., Biru, A., & Rotondi, D. (2015). Towards a definition of the Internet of Things (IoT). IEEE Internet of Things, 1–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2013). Foundations for Innovation in Cyber Physical Systems Workshop Summary Report. Prepared by Energetics Incorporated Columbia, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (1995). Expanding the vision of sensor materials. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation. Cyber-physical systems (CPS). https://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=503286.

  • Nayyar, A., & Puri, V. (2016). A review of Arduino board’s, Lilypad’s & Arduino shields. In 2016 3rd International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom) (pp. 1485–1492).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayyar, A., Puri, V., & Le, D. N. (2017). Internet of nano things (IoNT): Next evolutionary step in nanotechnology. Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, 7(1), 4–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padikkapparambil, J., Ncube, C., Singh, K. K., & Singh, A. (2020). Internet of Things technologies for elderly health-care applications. In Emergence of Pharmaceutical Industry Growth with Industrial IoT Approach (pp. 217–243).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallás-Areny, R., & Webster, J. (2001). Sensors and signal conditioning (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • PICASSO Opportunity Report. Towards enhanced EU-US ICT pre-competitive collaboration (European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme funded PICASSO). http://www.picasso-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/PICASSO-OpportunityReport_March-2017_revMar19.pdf.

  • Pratt, D., Ragusa, L., & Von der, L. (1999) Composability as an architecture driver. In Proceedings of the 1999 Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation and Education Conference (p. 96). Orlando, FL: National Training Systems Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajkumar, R., Lee, I., Sha, L., & Stankovic, J. (2010). Cyber-physical systems: The next computing revolution. In Proceedings of the 47th Design Automation Conference (pp. 731–736). Anaheim, CA: IEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanislav, T., & Miclea, L. (2012). Cyber-physical systems—Concept, challenges and research areas. Journal of Control Engineering and Applied Informatics, 14(2), 28–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarma, S., Brock, D. L., & Ashton, K. (2000). White paper: The networked physical world: Proposals for engineering the next generation of computing, commerce & automatic-identification. Cambridge, MA: MIT Auto-ID Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sehgal, A., Agrawal, R., Bhardwaj, R., & Singh, K. K. (2020). Reliability analysis of wireless link for IOT applications under shadow-fading conditions. Procedia Computer Science, 167, 1515–1523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, J., Wan, J., Yan, H., & Suo, H. (2011). Survey of cyber-physical systems. In Proceedings of 2011 International Conference on Wireless Communications and Signal Processing. Nanjing, China: IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, P., Nayyar, A., Kaur, A., & Ghosh, U. (2020a). Blockchain and fog based architecture for internet of everything in smart cities. Future Internet, 12(4), 61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A. K., Firoz, N., Tripathi, A., Singh, K. K., Choudhary, P., & Vashist, P. C. (2020b). Internet of Things: From hype to reality. An industrial IoT approach for pharmaceutical industry growth (Vol. 2, p. 191).

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, M., Sachan, S., Singh, A., & Singh, K. K. (2020c). Internet of Things in pharma industry: Possibilities and challenges. In Emergence of Pharmaceutical Industry Growth with Industrial IoT Approach (pp. 195–216).

    Google Scholar 

  • Solanki, A., & Nayyar, A. (2019). Green internet of things (G-IoT): ICT technologies, principles, applications, projects, and challenges. In Handbook of research on big data and the IoT (pp. 379–405). IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stojmenovic, I., & Zhang, F. (2015). Forward: Inaugural issue of ‘cyber-physical systems’. Cyber Physical Systems, 1(1), 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanwar, S. (2020). Fog data analytics for IoT applications—Next generation process model with state of the art technologies. Studies in big data (Vol. 76, pp. 1–497). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitmore, A., Agarwal, A., & Xu, L. (2015). The Internet of Things—A survey of topics and trends. Information Systems Frontiers, 17(2), 261–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodside, A., & Sood, S. (2016). Vignettes in the two-step arrival of the internet of things and its reshaping of marketing management’s service-dominant logic. Journal of Marketing Management, 33(1–2), 98–110.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Parita Jain .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jain, P., Aggarwal, P.K., Chaudhary, P., Makar, K., Mehta, J., Garg, R. (2021). Convergence of IoT and CPS in Robotics. In: Singh, K.K., Nayyar, A., Tanwar, S., Abouhawwash, M. (eds) Emergence of Cyber Physical System and IoT in Smart Automation and Robotics. Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66222-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics