Skip to main content

Configuring Systems Based on Petri Nets, Logic-Probabilistic, and Simulation Models

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cyber-Physical Systems: Modelling and Intelligent Control

Abstract

The presented conceptual solution enables the design of a complex system configuration and risk analysis using the example of a cargo port. A formal description of Petri net configuration graphs is presented. The sequential construction of risk scenarios, L-models, and B-models for each strategic goal is shown. The solution is based on the formal technique of goals definition, logical management of the sequence of operations, selection and issuance of management decisions, formalization of risk scenarios, and their interpretation based on the results of simulation modeling. The simulation model will make it possible to obtain a reasonable quantitative assessment of the risk of failure to achieve a strategic goal for making management decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Mintzberg, H.: Die Ableitung von Konfigurationen: Kombination der Basismerkmale von Organisationen. In: Mintzberg über Management. Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-91041-7_7

  2. Orlova, E.: Approach for economic risks modeling and anti-risk decision making in a transport company (2019). https://doi.org/10.2991/cmdm-18.2019.8

  3. Jensen, K., Kristensen, L.M.: In: Coloured Petri Nets–Modelling and Validation of Concurrent Systems. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/b95112

  4. Dworzański, L.W., Lomazova, I.A.: CPN tools-assisted simulation and verification of nested Petri nets. Aut. Control Comp. Sci. 47, 393–402 (2013). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0146411613070201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhao, J., Chen, Z., Liu, Z.: A novel matrix approach for the stability and stabilization analysis of colored Petri nets. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 62, 192202 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-018-9562-y

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Solozhentsev, E.: Logic and probabilistic risk models for management of innovations system of country. Int. J. Risk Assessment Manage. 18(3-4), 237-255 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJRAM.2015.071211

  7. Solozhentsev, E., Mityagin, S.: Logical and probabilistic risk models for assessment and analysis of the drug addiction problem in a region. Int. J. Risk Assessment Manage. 18(1–20) (2015). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJRAM.2015.068153

  8. Durán, J.M.: What is a simulation model?. Minds and Mach. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09520-z

  9. Protalinskiy, O., Andryushin, A., Shcherbatov, I., Khanova, A., Urazaliev, N.: Strategic decision support in the process of manufacturing systems management. In: Eleventh International Conference Management of Large-Scale System Development, pp. 1–4. MLSD, Moscow (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1109/MLSD.2018.8551760

  10. Niven, Paul R.: The balanced scorecard step by step: the maximum increase of efficiency and fixing received results. Balance Business Books (in Russian), Moscow (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rigby, D., Barbara, B.: In: Management Tools and Trends (2018). https://www.bain.com/contentassets/f8361c5cd99e4f40bbbf83c17d6a91b9/bain_brief-management_tools_and_trends.pdf. Last Access 16 Aug 2020

  12. Kaplan, R.: Conceptual foundations of the balanced scorecard. Handbooks of Manage. Accounting Res. 3, 1253–1269 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1751-3243(07)03003-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Bus. Rev. 74(1), 75–85 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yuditskii, S.A.: Operational-objective modeling of dynamics of organizational systems development via Petri nets. Autom. Remote Control 69, 105–113 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0005117908010104

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Theriou, N.G., Demitriades, E., Chatzoglou, P.: A proposed framework for integrating the balanced scorecard into the strategic management process. Oper. Res. Int. J. 4, 147 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02943607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Strohhecker, J.: Factors influencing strategy implementation decisions: an evaluation of a balanced scorecard cockpit, intelligence, and knowledge. J. Manage. Control 27, 89–119 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-015-0225-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sandkuhl, K., Seigerroth, U.: Method engineering in information systems analysis and design: a balanced scorecard approach for method improvement. Softw. Syst. Model. 18, 1833–1857 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-018-0692-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Solozhentsev, E., Karaseva, E.: Data structures, logical-probabilistic models and digital management of the safety and quality of systems in the economics. Int. J. Risk Assessment Manage. 23(1), 27–53 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJRAM.2020.106162

  19. Orlova, E.: In: Synergetic Synthesis of the Mechanisms and Models for Coordinated Control in Production and Economic System. pp. 783–788 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/CSCMP45713.2019.8976801

  20. Solozhentsev, E., Karasev, V.: Hybrid logical and probabilistic models for management of socioeconomic safety. Int. J. Risk Assess. Manag. 21(1–2), 89–110 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJRAM.2018.090258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Parygin, D., Malikov, V., Golubev, A., Sadovnikova, N., Petrova, T., Finogeev, A.: Categorical data processing for real estate objects valuation using statistical analysis. IOP Conf. Series: J. Phys. Conf. Series 1015, 032102 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1015/3/032102

  22. Ramírez-Nafarrate, A., González-Ramírez, R.G., Smith, N.R., et al.: Impact on yard efficiency of a truck appointment system for a port terminal. Ann. Oper. Res. 258, 195–216 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-016-2384-0

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Protalinsky, O.M., Khanova, A.A., Bondareva, I.O.: Simulation model of technological processes of cargo port. Vestnik of Saratov State Technical University 4(50), 134–144 (2010). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The chapter was prepared using the results of the project with the support of the RFBR grant No. 20-010-00465.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irina Bondareva .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bondareva, I., Khanova, A., Khanova, Y. (2021). Configuring Systems Based on Petri Nets, Logic-Probabilistic, and Simulation Models. In: Kravets, A.G., Bolshakov, A.A., Shcherbakov, M. (eds) Cyber-Physical Systems: Modelling and Intelligent Control. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol 338. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66077-2_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66077-2_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-66076-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-66077-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics