Skip to main content

Introduction to Pipeline Pedagogy: Teaching About Energy and Environmental Justice Contestations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Pipeline Pedagogy: Teaching About Energy and Environmental Justice Contestations

Abstract

This chapter describes our motivations for assembling this volume, as well as the structure of the sections and key content of each chapter of the work. In this introduction to the volume we highlight the varied author perspectives, disciplinary and interdisciplinary, academic and activist, that illuminate the usefulness of pipeline controversies, and other kinds of energy contestations, in teaching that connects our students with the communities surrounding their colleges. In this chapter, we introduce the means by which this volume considers issues of environmental justice, legitimacy, and inclusion in terms of types of knowledge which count as evidence and in terms of power relations in the struggle over fossil fuel pipelines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Blok A, Nakazora M, Winthereik BR (2016) Infrastructuring environments. Sci Cult 25(1):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brown A (2018, January 9) Five spills, six months in operation: dakota access track record highlights unavoidable reality—pipelines leak. The Intercept. Retrieved from https://theintercept.com/2018/01/09/dakota-access-pipeline-leak-energy-transfer-partners/

  3. Bullard RD (1994) Dumping in Dixie: race, class, and environmental quality. Westview Press, Boulder CO

    Google Scholar 

  4. Burns W (2017) The case for case studies in confronting environmental issues. Case Stud Environ 1(1):1–4. https://doi.org/10.1525/cse.2017.sc.burns01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dempsey S (2010) Critiquing community engagement. Manag Commun Q 24(3):359–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Estes N (2019) Our history is the future: standing rock versus the Dakota access pipeline, and the long tradition of Indigenous resistance. Verso Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. Estes N, Dhillon J (eds) (2019) Standing with standing rock: voices from the #NoDAPL movement. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  8. Finley-Brook M, Williams TL, Caron-Sheppard JA, Jaromin MK (2018) Critical energy justice in US natural gas infrastructuring. Energy Res Soc Sci 41:176–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Freire P (1970) Pedagogy of the oppressed. Seabury Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Halper E (2017, July 14) A pipeline cutting through the iconic appalachian trail sparks a fight over natural gas expansion. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved from https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-pipeline-appalachian-trail-201707-htmlstory.html

  11. Hodges HE, Stocking G (2016) A pipeline of tweets: environmental movements’ use of Twitter in response to the keystone XL pipeline. Environ Polit 25(2):223–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kahn R (2010) Critical pedagogy, ecoliteracy and planetary crisis. Peter Lang Publishing, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kinne BE, Finewood MH, Yoxtheimer D (2014) Making critical connections through interdisciplinary analysis: Exploring the impacts of Marcellus shale development. J Environ Stud Sci 4:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lerner S (2010) Sacrifice zones: the front lines of toxic chemical exposure in the United States. MIT Press, Cambridge MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Levin S, Woolf N (2016, Oct. 31) A million people ‘check in’ at standing rock on Facebook to support Dakota pipeline protesters. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/31/north-dakota-acc esspipeline-protest-mass-facebook-check-in

  16. Maldonado JK (2013) The impact of climate change on tribal communities in the US: displacement, relocation, and human rights. Clim Change 120(3):601–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. McAdam D, Schaffer Boudet H, Davis J, Orr RJ, Scott WR, Levitt RE (2010) ‘Site fights’: explaining opposition to pipeline projects in the developing world. Sociol Forum 25(3):401–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. National Center for Case Study Teaching in Science (2014). Retrieved from http://sciencecases.lib.buffalo.edu/cs/

  19. Ordner JP (2017) Community action and climate change. Nat Clim Chang 7:161–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Partridge MD, Betz MR, Lobao L (2013) Natural resource curse and poverty in Appalachian America. Am J Agric Econ 95(2):449–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pellow DN (2018) What is critical environmental justice? Polity, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  22. Porfilio BJ, Ford DR (eds) (2015) Leaders in critical pedagogy: narratives for understanding and solidarity. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  23. Putnam RD (2001) Bowling alone. Simon and Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sachs JD (2017) Building the new American economy: smart, fair and sustainable. Columbia University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Siler-Evans K, Hanson A, Sunday C, Leonard N, Tumminello M (2014) Analysis of pipeline accidents in the United States from 1968 to 2009. Int J CritAl Infrastruct Prot 7(4):257–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sobel D (2004) Place-based education: connecting communities and classrooms. The Orion Society, Roxbury

    Google Scholar 

  27. Surface JL (2016) Place-based learning: instilling a sense of wonder. Publications of the rural futures institute 10 http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/rfipubs/10

  28. Tuck E, Yang, KW (2012) Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indig, Educ Soc 1(1):1–40

    Google Scholar 

  29. Veltmeyer H, Bowles P (2014) Extractivist resistance: the case of the enbridge oil pipeline project in Northern British Columbia. Extr Ind Soc 1(1):59–68

    Google Scholar 

  30. Whyte K (2017) The Dakota access pipeline, environmental injustice, and U.S. colonialism. Red Ink: Int J Indig Lit, Arts, HumIties 19(1) https://ssrn.com/abstract=2925513

  31. Yadav A, Lundeberg M, DeSchryver M, Dirkin K, Schiller NA, Maier K, Herreid CF (2007) Teaching science with case studies: a national survey of faculty perceptions of the benefits and challenges of using cases. J Coll Sci Teach 37(1):34–38

    Google Scholar 

  32. van der Hel, S (2016) New science for global sustainability? The institutionalisation of knowledge co-production in Future Earth. Environ Sci & Policy 61:165–175

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valerie Banschbach .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Banschbach, V., Rich, J.L. (2021). Introduction to Pipeline Pedagogy: Teaching About Energy and Environmental Justice Contestations. In: Banschbach, V., Rich, J.L. (eds) Pipeline Pedagogy: Teaching About Energy and Environmental Justice Contestations. AESS Interdisciplinary Environmental Studies and Sciences Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65979-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics