Skip to main content

The Digital University

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
On the Possibility of a Digital University

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Education ((BRIEFSEDUCAT))

Abstract

This chapter describes two different practices which attempted to enact a digital university: MOOCs and videoconferencing apps used for lecturing. I show how regular MOOCs show little potential for mediatic displacement, since there is only one source of sensory input which tends to capture and overwhelm the students’ attention, hence very little potential for study gestures. However, I also describe a new and experimental MOOC format, the bMOOC, that showed a possibility to stirr occasions for thought by disrupt the linearity of the classical MOOCs, by disorienting the student and by refusing to deliver some ‘content’ to be learned. Meanwhile, using videoconferencing apps to enact an online lecture cannot yet be an instance of a digital university since the collective experiences of attention-making were subverted by the individualising logic of the screen. The promise of the digital university seems to remain aspirational until we figure out how to enact the techniques of mediatic displacement currently flourishing at the physical university.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1389115469384&uri=CELEX:52013DC0654.

  2. 2.

    http://joinlearningcurve.org/mooc/.

  3. 3.

    See for example: https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20190123080937857.

  4. 4.

    See https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexkonrad/2017/12/20/coursera-goes-corporate-to-keep-alive-promise-of-moocs/.

  5. 5.

    Source: https://www.class-central.com/report/moocs-stats-and-trends-2017.

  6. 6.

    See for example Peter Adamson’s History of Philosophy Without Any Gaps (HoP), a well-known philosophy podcast with educational relevance.

  7. 7.

    http://bmooc.be/.

  8. 8.

    Note: Several of the gestures described in this section were uncovered while discussing with the students of the class on “Pedagogische cinematheek en theorievorming” during a seminar activity at KU Leuven. I am grateful to Benedikte Custers and Joris Vlieghe for giving me the opportunity to teach this seminar and learn from the student’s own experiences with the online university.

  9. 9.

    Software used included: Youtube, Skype, Zoom, Google Hangouts, BlueButton, as well as custom educational platforms such as Canvas, Blackboard, Brightspace, Toledo, Moodle, etc.

References

  • Ariko, M., & Sun, J. (2018). A phenomenological inquiry into student’s experience of critical thinking while participating in MOOCs. Master’s thesis, KU Leuven, Leuven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bali, M. (2014). MOOC pedagogy: Gleaning good practice from existing MOOCs. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R., &Kent, M. (2017). Massive open online courses and higher education: What went right, what went wrong and what next? New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W. (2006). Academic charisma and the origins of the research university. Chicago, IL, Bristol: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decuypere, M. (2015). Academic practice: Digitizing, relating, existing. PhD. KU Leuven, Leuven.

    Google Scholar 

  • EADTU. (2014). Porto Declaration on European MOOCs. Porto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flusser, V. (2011). Does writing have a future? (N. A. Roth, Trans.) (Electronic mediations, Vol. 33). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friesen, N. (2017). Telepresence and the posthuman: Pedagogical tact and the limits of representability. Philosophy of Education Archive, pp. 640–655.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friesen, N. (2020). 4 weird things that happen when you videoconference. The Conversation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H.-G. (2004). Truth and method (2nd ed., Continuum impacts). London, New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godwin-Jones, R. (2014). Global reach and local practice: The promise of MOOCs. Language Learning and Technology, 18(3), 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, P. J., Kim, J., & Rubin, R. (2014). How video production affects student engagement. In M. Sahami, A. Fox, M. A. Hearst, & M. T. Chi (Eds.), The first ACM conference, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 04.03.2014–05.03.2014 (pp. 41–50). New York: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556325.2566239.

  • Israel, M. J. (2015). Effectiveness of integrating MOOCs in traditional classrooms for undergraduate students. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(5), 102–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, A. (2013). Two cheers for web U!. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/21/opinion/sunday/grading-the-mooc-university.html.

  • Johnston, B., MacNeill, S., & Smyth, K. (2018). Conceptualising the digital university: The intersection of policy, pedagogy and practice (Digital education and learning). Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knox, J. (2014). Posthumanism and the massive open online course: Contaminating the subject of global education. PhD, The University of Edinburgh. https://www.era.lib.ed.ac.uk/handle/1842/15895.

  • Maciejewski, M., & Gouardères, F. (2019). Digital agenda for Europe. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/factsheets/en/sheet/64/digital-agenda-for-europe.

  • Oakeshott, M. (2004). The idea of a university. Academic Questions, 17(1), 23–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ong, W. J. (2000). The presence of the word: Some prolegomena for cultural and religious history (2nd ed., Academic studies in religion and the social order). Binghamton, NY: Global Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrulis, J. (2020). Teaching a large lecture class remotely, due to coronavirus. https://genderstudies.hku.hk/pedagogies/teaching-remotely/. Accessed 14 Mar 2020.

  • Rivard, R. (2013). Measuring the MOOC dropout rate. Inside Higher Ed, 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storme, T., Vansieleghem, N., Devleminck, S., Masschelein, J., & Simons, M. (2016). The emerging pedagogy of MOOCs, the educational design of technology and practices of study. Journal of Computers in Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-016-0070-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandendorpe, C. (2009). From papyrus to hypertext: Toward the universal digital library (Topics in the digital humanities). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vansieleghem, N. (2017). MOOC pedagogy—The bMOOC experiment. Leuven.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Marin, L. (2021). The Digital University. In: On the Possibility of a Digital University. SpringerBriefs in Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65976-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65976-9_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-65975-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-65976-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics