Abstract
In this paper we discuss the political value of the decision to adopt machine learning in the field of criminal justice. While a lively discussion in the community focuses on the issue of the social fairness of machine learning systems, we suggest that another relevant aspect of this debate concerns the political implications of the decision of using machine learning systems. Relying on the theory of Left realism, we argue that, from several points of view, modern supervised learning systems, broadly defined as functional learned systems for decision making, fit into an approach to crime that is close to the law and order stance. Far from offering a political judgment of value, the aim of the paper is to raise awareness about the potential implicit, and often overlooked, political assumptions and political values that may be undergirding a decision that is apparently purely technical.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
[25], p. 265.
- 2.
[25], p. 74.
- 3.
[25], p. 265.
- 4.
[25], p. 77.
- 5.
[25], p. 95.
- 6.
[25], pp. 11, 68.
- 7.
[25], p. 65.
- 8.
[25], p. 17.
- 9.
[25], p. 12.
- 10.
[25], p. 28.
- 11.
[25], p. 169.
- 12.
[25], p. 172.
- 13.
[25], p. 182.
- 14.
[25], p. 269.
- 15.
[25], p. 233.
- 16.
[25], p. 257.
- 17.
[25], p. 179.
- 18.
[25], p. 181.
- 19.
[25], p. 243.
- 20.
[25], p. 242.
References
Andrews, D.A., Bonta, J., Wormith, J.S.: The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime Delinq. 52(1), 7–27 (2006)
Angwin, J., Larson, J., Mattu, S., Kirchner, L.: Machine bias. ProPublica, 23 May 2016
Barabas, C., Dinakar, K., Virza, J.I., Zittrain, J., et al.: Interventions over predictions: reframing the ethical debate for actuarial risk assessment. arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.08238 (2017)
Barber, D.: Bayesian Reasoning and Machine Learning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012)
Berk, R.: Criminal Justice Forecasts of Risk: A Machine Learning Approach. Springer, New York (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3085-8
Berk, R., Heidari, H., Jabbari, S., Kearns, M., Roth, A.: Fairness in criminal justice risk assessments: the state of the art. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.09207 (2017)
Bishop, C.M.: Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer, New York (2006)
Brennan, T., Dieterich, W., Ehret, B.: Evaluating the predictive validity of the COMPAS risk and needs assessment system. Crim. Justice Behav. 36(1), 21–40 (2009)
Brennan, T., Oliver, W.L.: The emergence of machine learning techniques in criminology: implications of complexity in our data and in research questions. Criminol. Public Policy 12(3), 551–562 (2013)
Chouldechova, A.: Fair prediction with disparate impact: a study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments. Big Data 5(2), 153–163 (2017)
Citron, D.K., Pasquale, F.: The scored society: due process for automated predictions. Wash. L. Rev. 89, 1 (2014)
Corbett-Davies, S., Pierson, E., Feller, A., Goel, S., Huq, A.: Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairness. In: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 797–806. ACM (2017)
Courtland, R.: Bias detectives: the researchers striving to make algorithms fair. Nature 558(7710), 357–357 (2018)
Darwiche, A.: Human-level intelligence or animal-like abilities? arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.04327 (2017)
DeKeseredy, W.S., Donnermeyer, J.F.: Contemporary issues in left realism. Int. J. Crime Justice Soc. Democracy 5(3), 12–26 (2016)
Deng, L.: A tutorial survey of architectures, algorithms, and applications for deep learning. APSIPA Trans. Signal Inf. Process. 3 (2014)
Ensign, D., Friedler, S.A., Neville, S., Scheidegger, C., Venkatasubramanian, S.: Runaway feedback loops in predictive policing. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.09847 (2017)
Floridi, L.: The Philosophy of Information. OUP Oxford (2013). https://books.google.it/books?id=l8RoAgAAQBAJ
Floridi, L.: Infraethics-on the conditions of possibility of morality. Philos. Technol. 30(4), 391–394 (2017)
Hinton, G., et al.: Deep neural networks for acoustic modeling in speech recognition. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 29, 82–97 (2012)
Kleinberg, J., Lakkaraju, H., Leskovec, J., Ludwig, J., Mullainathan, S.: Human decisions and machine predictions. Q. J. Econ. 133(1), 237–293 (2017)
Kleinberg, J., Mullainathan, S., Raghavan, M.: Inherent trade-offs in the fair determination of risk scores. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.05807 (2016)
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Hinton, G.E.: Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 1097–1105 (2012)
Lea, J.: Left realism: a radical criminology for the current crisis. Int. J. Crime Justice Soc. Democracy 5(3), 53–65 (2016)
Lea, J., Young, J., et al.: What is to be done about law and order? (1984)
Lipton, Z.C.: The mythos of model interpretability. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.03490 (2016)
Liu, L.T., Dean, S., Rolf, E., Simchowitz, M., Hardt, M.: Delayed impact of fair machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.04383 (2018)
MacKay, D.J.: Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)
Murdoch, W.J., Singh, C., Kumbier, K., Abbasi-Asl, R., Yu, B.: Interpretable machine learning: definitions, methods, and applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.04592 (2019)
Pan, S.J., Yang, Q.: A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 22(10), 1345–1359 (2009)
Pearl, J.: Causality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)
Peters, J., Janzing, D., Schölkopf, B.: Elements of Causal Inference: Foundations and Learning Algorithms. MIT Press, Cambridge (2017)
Richardson, R., Schultz, J., Crawford, K.: Dirty data, bad predictions: how civil rights violations impact police data, predictive policing systems, and justice. New York University Law Review Online (2019, forthcoming)
Wick, M., Tristan, J.B., et al.: Unlocking fairness: a trade-off revisited. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 8780–8789 (2019)
Wu, Y., Zhang, L., Wu, X., Tong, H.: PC-fairness: a unified framework for measuring causality-based fairness. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 3399–3409 (2019)
Zliobaite, I.: A survey on measuring indirect discrimination in machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.00148 (2015)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Zennaro, F.M. (2020). A Left Realist Critique of the Political Value of Adopting Machine Learning Systems in Criminal Justice. In: Koprinska, I., et al. ECML PKDD 2020 Workshops. ECML PKDD 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1323. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65965-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65965-3_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-65964-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-65965-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)