Abstract
The chapter gives an overview of the tracking and vertexing algorithms of two experiments not at the LHC, Belle II at SuperKEKB in Japan and CBM at FAIR in Germany.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download chapter PDF
1 Belle II
The Belle II experiment [1] started operation in late 2018. The following overview of the reconstruction methods reflects the status after a couple of months of running; further developments and adaptations that have been implemented in parallel to the rising luminosity of the SuperKEKB collider are documented in [2].
The tracking system of Belle II has two principal components, the vertex detector (VXD) and the central drift chamber (CDC); see Sect. 1.6.2.1 . The VXD consists of two parts: the PXD with two layers of DEPFET pixel sensors, and the SVD with four layers of double-sided silicon strip sensors. The overall design of the track reconstruction is shown in Fig. 11.1.
Track finding in the CDC starts with a filter, implemented as a boosted decision tree, that rejects background hits. This is followed by two track finders. The global track finder employs a Legendre transform (Sect. 5.1.4), to find complete tracks originating from the interaction region. Peak finding in the Legendre space is done by a fast iterative quadtree algorithm [3]. The local track finder builds segments from the hits in a superlayer. This is followed by a multi-stage combination and filter algorithm that connects valid segments and tracks, rejects fake segments, and outputs the final CDC track sample [4].
Stand-alone track finding in the SVD [5, 6] is based on a cellular automaton (CA) complemented by a sector map (Sect. 5.1.5) . The sector map stores prior information about which triplets of hits can be part of a track. The vertex position can be used as a virtual hit. Track segments that pass all cuts form the cells of the CA. Figure 11.2 shows the final state of the CA with a toy event, without background.
When the CA has finished, each track candidate is assigned a quality index, which is the p-value of a triplet fit (Sect. 6.1.5) , a circle fit, or a Riemann helix fit (Sect. 6.3). Finally, non-overlapping candidates are selected, either with a greedy algorithm or a Hopfield network (Sect. 5.3). At the time of writing, the triplet fit and the greedy algorithm are the defaults.
The merging of CDC and VXD tracks is based on a boosted decision tree that is trained on valid combinations of CDC and VXD tracks. It takes the track parameters as determined by a Deterministic Annealing Filter (DAF, Sect. 6.2.2 ) as input and returns a score in the interval (0, 1). Combinations above a threshold are accepted. CDC tracks, SVD tracks and combined tracks are extrapolated into the PXD to pick up hits by a combinatorial Kalman filter [7] , and then passed to the DAF. The implementation of the DAF is the one in GENFIT [8,9,10].
The B mesons produced by the decay of the Υ(4S) resonance are reconstructed hierarchically [11], and their decay chains are fitted by a tree fitter based on [12]. V0 decays are reconstructed by pairing positive and negative tracks and performing a vertex fit [13].
2 CBM
CBM is a heavy-ion experiment at FAIR [14], currently in the preparation phase. The first beam is expected in 2024. The interaction rate will be up to 10 MHz, with up to 1000 charged particles produced in a central collision. Full online event reconstruction and selection will be required [15]. This is the task of the First Level Event Selection Package (FLES, [16, 17]). The algorithms in FLES exploit vector instructions for intra-processor parallelism and parallelism between cores on the event level.
The FLES package consists of several modules: track finding, track fitting, short-lived particles finding, event building and event selection [18], see Fig. 11.3. CBM runs without a trigger; time-stamped data will be put into a buffer in time slices of a certain length instead. The association of tracker hits with events is performed by software [18], using the hit time information in the Silicon Tracking System (STS, see Sect. 1.6.2.2). The resolution of the hit time is 5 ns.
Flow diagram of the First Level Event Selection Package in CBM. (From [17], reproduced under License CC-BY-4.0)
Track finding in the STS (Sect. 1.6.2.2 ) is done by a 4D Cellular Automaton, where the fourth dimension is time [19, 20] . The cells of the CA are triplets of hits correlating in space and in time. The principle of the CA track finder is illustrated in Fig. 5.5 in Sect. 5.1.5. For track finding efficiencies, see [18].
The track candidates from the CA are sent to the Kalman Filter Track Fitter . The Kalman Filter is “SIMDized”, i.e., uses the Single-Instruction Multiple-Data features of the processors employed [21]. The extrapolation in the inhomogeneous magnetic field uses the approximate analytical method described in Sect. 4.3.2.2.
After the primary vertex fit with the Kalman Filter, tracks are sorted into primary and secondary tracks. The reconstruction of short-lived particles is done by the KFParticle package [22], also based on the Kalman Filter and designed to fit decay chains. The reconstruction of a short-lived particle is implemented iteratively. The KFParticle package starts with an initial approximation of the secondary vertex, adds particles one after another, refines the state vector and gives the optimal values after the last particle [16, 17]. Besides the geometrical constraints, mass constraints and topological constraints can be imposed on the secondary vertex.
Track reconstruction in the three stations of the transition radiation detector is done by a cellular automaton as well [23].
References
J. Kahn, in CERN-BINP Workshop for Young Scientists in e + e − Colliders, ed. by V. Brancolini, L. Linssen (2017). http://cds.cern.ch/record/2301997
V. Bertacchi, et al. Track Finding at Belle II (2020). https://arxiv.org/pdf/2003.12466.pdf. To appear in Computer Physics Communications
V. Trusov, Development of Pattern Recognition Algorithms for the Central Drift Chamber of the Belle II Detector. Ph.D. thesis, KIT, Karlsruhe (2016). https://publikationen.bibliothek.kit.edu/1000063754
T. Hauth, for the Belle II Collaboration. Pattern Recognition at Belle II (2016). https://docs.belle2.org/record/555. Talk given at the International Workshop on Future Linear Colliders, Morioka
J. Lettenbichler, Real-time pattern recognition in the central tracking detector of the Belle II Experiment. Ph.D. thesis, TU Wien (2016). http://repositum.tuwien.ac.at/obvutwhs/download/pdf/1656041
T. Bilka, et al., EPJ Web Conf. 150, 00007 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201715000007
N.L. Braun, Combinatorial Kalman Filter and High Level Trigger Reconstruction for the Belle II Experiment. Ph.D. thesis, KIT, Karlsruhe (2019). https://publikationen.bibliothek.kit.edu/1000089317
J. Rauch, T. Schlüter, GENFIT—a Generic Track-Fitting Toolkit (2016). https://arxiv.org/abs/1410.3698v2
GENFIT—a generic toolkit for track reconstruction for experiments in particle and nuclear physics. http://genfit.sourceforge.net
T. Bilka, et al., Submitted to Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. A (2019). https://arxiv.org/pdf/1902.04405.pdf
T. Keck, Machine learning algorithms for the Belle II experiment and their validation on Belle data. Ph.D. thesis, KIT, Karlsruhe (2017). https://publikationen.bibliothek.kit.edu/1000078149
W.D. Hulsbergen, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. A 552(3), 566 (2005)
T. Schlüter, PoS Vertex2014, 038 (2015). https://pos.sissa.it/227/038
P. Senger, the CBM Collaboration, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 50, 357 (2006). https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/50/1/048
I. Kisel, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. A 566(1), 85 (2006)
I. Kisel, I. Kulakov, M. Zyzak, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 60(5), 3703 (2013)
V. Akishina, I. Kisel, EPJ Web Conf. 173, 01002 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201817301002
V. Akishina, I. Kisel, EPJ Web Conf. 127, 00003 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201612700003
V. Akishina, I. Kisel, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 599(1), 012024 (2015). https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/599/1/012024
V. Akishina, I. Kisel, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 62(6), 3172 (2015)
S. Gorbunov, et al., Comput. Phys. Commun. 178(5), 374 (2008)
S.Gorbunov, I. Kisel, Reconstruction of decayed particles based on the Kalman filter. Technical Report CBM-SOFT-note-2007-003, STAR experiment, Brookhaven National Laboratory (2007). https://tinyurl.com/Gorbunov-KFParticle
A. Bubak, et al., Acta Phys. Pol. B 41, 3 (2010). https://www.actaphys.uj.edu.pl/fulltext?series=Reg&vol=41&page=3
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Frühwirth, R., Strandlie, A. (2021). Belle II and CBM. In: Pattern Recognition, Tracking and Vertex Reconstruction in Particle Detectors. Particle Acceleration and Detection. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65771-0_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65771-0_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-65770-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-65771-0
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)