Advertisement

Enhancing Whale Watching with Mobile Apps and Streaming Passive Acoustics

Conference paper
  • 353 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 12523)

Abstract

Whale watching is a prime example of ecotourism services reaching millions of people worldwide. In this paper, we describe a prototype of a mobile application designed to enhance the whale watching experience. Integrating eco-acoustics and entertainment components, the authors designed an App that enhances customer satisfaction even in the case of distant sighing, which helps preserve animal well-being in this growing ecotourism activity. This paper presents the design and preliminary evaluation of the system, which involves many different components, from usability and presence known scales. We asked 12 participants to conduct several activities, including (i) report a sighting, (ii) classify a cetacean vocal call, and (iii) gather a cetacean photo. Because of the system’s novelty, we report on an extensive evaluation framework, including usability and presence scales reported by 12 whale watchers. We discuss the implications of our findings on the design of future applications for ecotourism services.

Keywords

Whale watching Environmental sustainability Mobile entertainment User experience Ecotourism 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors recognize several grants which supported the study: (i) LARGESCALE, #32474 by FCT and PIDDAC; (ii) LARSyS, #UID/ EEA/50009/2019 by FCT; (iii) LARSyS - FCT Plurianual funding 2020-2023, by FCT; (iv) INTERTAGUA, #MAC2/1.1.a /385 by MAC INTERREG 2014-2020; and (v) MITIExcell, #M1420-01-01450FEDER0000002 by RAM.

References

  1. 1.
    Alves, F., Ferreira, R., Fernandes, M., Halicka, Z., Dias, L., Dinis, A.: Analysis of occurrence patterns and biological factors of cetaceans based on long-term and fine-scale data from platforms of opportunity: Madeira island as a case study. Marine Ecol. 39(2), e12499 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arts, K., van der Wal, R., Adams, W.M.: Digital technology and the conservation of nature. Ambio 44(4), 661–673 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0705-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Awori, K., et al.: Flytalk: social media to meet the needs of air travelers. In: CHI 2012 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA 2012, pp. 1769–1774. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2212776.2223707
  4. 4.
    Bangor, A., Kortum, P., Miller, J.: Determining what individual SUS scores mean: adding an adjective rating scale. J. Usab. Stud. 4(3), 114–123 (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bentz, J., Lopes, F., Calado, H., Dearden, P.: Enhancing satisfaction and sustainable management: whale watching in the azores. Tour. Manage. 54, 465–476 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Blok, A.: Actor-networking ceta-sociality, or, what is sociological about contemporary whales? Distinktion Scand. J. Soc. Theor. 8(2), 65–89 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Braun, B., Castree, N.: To modernise or ecologise? that is the question. In: Remaking Reality, pp. 232–253. Routledge (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brooke, J.: SUS: a “quick and dirty” usability. In: Usability Evaluation in Industry, p. 189 (1996)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Büscher, B.: Nature 2.0: exploring and theorizing the links between new media and nature conservation. New Media Soc. 18(5), 726–743 (2016)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chen, Y.Y., Cheng, A.J., Hsu, W.H.: Travel recommendation by mining people attributes and travel group types from community-contributed photos. IEEE Trans. Multimedia 15(6), 1283–1295 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cisneros-Montemayor, A.M., Sumaila, U.R., Kaschner, K., Pauly, D.: The global potential for whale watching. Marine Pol. 34(6), 1273–1278 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Claudet, J., et al.: A roadmap for using the un decade of ocean science for sustainable development in support of science, policy, and action. One Earth 2(1), 34–42 (2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Corkeron, P.J.: Whale watching, iconography, and marine conservation. Conser. Biol. 18(3), 847–849 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dinis, A., et al.: Spatial and temporal distribution of bottlenose dolphins, tursiops truncatus, in the madeira archipelago, ne atlantic. Arquipélago-Life Marine Sci. 33, 45–54 (2016)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dionisio, M., Nisi, V., Nunes, N., Bala, P.: Transmedia storytelling for exposing natural capital and promoting ecotourism. In: Nack, F., Gordon, A.S. (eds.) ICIDS 2016. LNCS, vol. 10045, pp. 351–362. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48279-8_31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dourish, P.: HCI and environmental sustainability: the politics of design and the design of politics. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, pp. 1–10 (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Edgar, G.J., et al.: Global conservation outcomes depend on marine protected areas with five key features. Nature 506(7487), 216–220 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fletcher, R.: Gaming conservation: nature 2.0 confronts nature-deficit disorder. Geoforum 79, 153–162 (2017)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Forlano, L., Ji, S.: Posthumanism and design. J. Des. Econ. Innov. 3(1), 16–29 (2017)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gaver, W., et al.: My naturewatch camera: disseminating practice research with a cheap and easy DIY design. In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–13 (2019)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hill, A.P., Prince, P., Piña Covarrubias, E., Doncaster, C.P., Snaddon, J.L., Rogers, A.: Audiomoth: evaluation of a smart open acoustic device for monitoring biodiversity and the environment. Meth. Ecol. Evol. 9(5), 1199–1211 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hoyt, E., Hvenegaard, G.T.: A review of whale-watching and whaling with applications for the Caribbean. Coast. Manage. 30(4), 381–399 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jepson, P., Ladle, R.J.: Nature apps: waiting for the revolution. Ambio 44(8), 827–832 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0712-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kareiva, P.: Ominous trends in nature recreation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105(8), 2757–2758 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kozak, M.: A critical review of approaches to measure satisfaction with tourist destinations. Tour. Anal. 5(2–3), 191–196 (2000)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Krause, B., Farina, A.: Using ecoacoustic methods to survey the impacts of climate change on biodiversity. Biol. Conserv. 195, 245–254 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lambert, E., Hunter, C., Pierce, G.J., MacLeod, C.D.: Sustainable whale-watching tourism and climate change: towards a framework of resilience. J. Sustain. Tour. 18(3), 409–427 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lavergne, S., Mouquet, N., Thuiller, W., Ronce, O.: Biodiversity and climate change: integrating evolutionary and ecological responses of species and communities. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 41, 321–350 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lawrence, T.B., Phillips, N.: From moby dick to free willy: macro-cultural discourse and institutional entrepreneurship in emerging institutional fields. Organization 11(5), 689–711 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lawrence, T.B., Phillips, N., Hardy, C.: Watching whale watching: exploring the discursive foundations of collaborative relationships. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 35(4), 479–502 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lee, J.J., Matamoros, E., Kern, R., Marks, J., de Luna, C., Jordan-Cooley, W.: Greenify: fostering sustainable communities via gamification. In: CHI 2013 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1497–1502. ACM (2013)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lewis, J.J.R., Sauro, J.: Revisiting the factor structure of the system usability scale. J. Usab. Stud. 12(4), 183–192 (2017) Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lewis, J.R., Sauro, J.: The factor structure of the system usability scale. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCD 2009. LNCS, vol. 5619, pp. 94–103. Springer, Heidelberg (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02806-9_12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Loureiro, P., Prandi, C., Nunes, N., Nisi, V.: Citizen science and game with a purpose to foster biodiversity awareness and bioacoustic data validation. In: Brooks, A.L., Brooks, E., Sylla, C. (eds.) ArtsIT/DLI -2018. LNICST, vol. 265, pp. 245–255. Springer, Cham (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06134-0_29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mann, C.: A study of the iphone app at kew gardens: improving the visitor experience. In: Electronic Visualisation and the Arts (EVA 2012), pp. 8–14 (2012)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Milton, K.: Loving Nature: Towards an Ecology of Emotion. Psychology Press, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Morganti, L., Pallavicini, F., Cadel, E., Candelieri, A., Archetti, F., Mantovani, F.: Gaming for earth: serious games and gamification to engage consumers in pro-environmental behaviours for energy efficiency. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 29, 95–102 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Neves, K.: Cashing in on cetourism: a critical ecological engagement with dominant E-NGO discourses on whaling, cetacean conservation, and whale watching 1. Antipode 42(3), 719–741 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Nisi, V., Cesario, V., Nunes, N.: Augmented reality museum’s gaming for digital natives: haunted encounters in the Carvalhal’s palace. In: van der Spek, E., Göbel, S., Do, E.Y.-L., Clua, E., Baalsrud Hauge, J. (eds.) ICEC-JCSG 2019. LNCS, vol. 11863, pp. 28–41. Springer, Cham (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34644-7_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Nisi, V., Prandi, C., Nunes, N.J.: Towards eco-centric interaction: urban playful interventions in the anthropocene. In: Nijholt, A. (ed.) Making Smart Cities More Playable. GMSE, pp. 235–257. Springer, Singapore (2020).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9765-3_11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Nunes, N., Ribeiro, M., Prandi, C., Nisi, V.: Beanstalk: a community based passive wi-fi tracking system for analysing tourism dynamics. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems, EICS 2017, pp. 93–98. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1145/3102113.3102142
  42. 42.
    Nunes, N.J., Nisi, V., Rennert, K.: beEco: co-designing a game with children to promote environmental awareness-a case study. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 718–727 (2016)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Oreskes, N.: The scientific consensus on climate change. Science 306(5702), 1686–1686 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Parsons, E.: The negative impacts of whale-watching. J. Marine Biol. 2012 (2012)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Potamitis, I.: Classifying insects on the fly. Ecol. Inf. 21, 40–49 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Radeta, M., Nunes, N.J., Vasconcelos, D., Nisi, V.: Poseidon-passive-acoustic ocean sensor for entertainment and interactive data-gathering in opportunistic nautical-activities. In: Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference, pp. 999–1011 (2018)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Ratter, B.M., Philipp, K.H., von Storch, H.: Between hype and decline: recent trends in public perception of climate change. Environ. Sci. Pol. 18, 3–8 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Redin, D., Vilela, D., Nunes, N., Ribeiro, M., Prandi, C.: Vitflow: A platform to visualize tourists flows in a rich interactive map-based interface. In: 2017 Sustainable Internet and ICT for Sustainability (SustainIT). pp. 1–2 (2017)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Sandbrook, C., Adams, W.M., Monteferri, B.: Digital games and biodiversity conservation. Conser. Lett. 8(2), 118–124 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sayigh, L., et al.: The watkins marine mammal sound database: an online, freely accessible resource. In: Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics 4ENAL, vol. 27, p. 040013. Acoustical Society of America (2016)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Schaal, S., Schaal, S., Lude, A.: Digital geogames to foster local biodiversity. Int. J. Transf. Res. 2(2), 16–29 (2015)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Silva, L.: How ecotourism works at the community-level: the case of whale-watching in the azores. Curr. Issues Tour. 18(3), 196–211 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Stinson, J.: Re-creating wilderness 2.0: or getting back to work in a virtual nature. Geoforum 79, 174–187 (2017)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Sueur, J., Farina, A.: Ecoacoustics: the ecological investigation and interpretation of environmental sound. Biosemiotics 8(3), 493–502 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Sullivan, B.L., Wood, C.L., Iliff, M.J., Bonney, R.E., Fink, D., Kelling, S.: eBird: a citizen-based bird observation network in the biological sciences. Biol. Conser. 142(10), 2282–2292 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Teixeira, J., Patrício, L., Nunes, N.J., Nóbrega, L.: Customer experience modeling: designing interactions for service systems. In: Campos, P., Graham, N., Jorge, J., Nunes, N., Palanque, P., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2011. LNCS, vol. 6949, pp. 136–143. Springer, Heidelberg (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23768-3_11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Teubner, G.: Rights of non-humans? electronic agents and animals as new actors in politics and law. J. Law Soc. 33(4), 497–521 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Tønnessen, J.N., Johnsen, A.O.: The History of Modern Whaling. Univ of California Press, Berkeley (1982)Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Usoh, M., Catena, E., Arman, S., Slater, M.: Using presence questionnaires in reality. Presence Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 9(5), 497–503 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Uzunboylu, H., Cavus, N., Ercag, E.: Using mobile learning to increase environmental awareness. Comput. Educ. 52(2), 381–389 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Vasconcelos, D., Nunes, N., Ribeiro, M., Prandi, C., Rogers, A.: Locomobis: a low-cost acoustic-based sensing system to monitor and classify mosquitoes. In: 2019 16th IEEE Annual Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2019)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Waterson, N., Saunders, M.: Delightfully lost: a new kind of wayfinding at kew. In: Museums and the Web (2012)Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Wearing, S., Buchmann, A., Jobberns, C.: Free willy: the whale-watching legacy. Worldwide Hospit. Tourism Themes 3(2), 127 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Wells, N.M., Lekies, K.S.: Nature and the life course: pathways from childhood nature experiences to adult environmentalism. Children Youth Environ. 16(1), 1–24 (2006)Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Witmer, B.G., Jerome, C.J., Singer, M.J.: The factor structure of the presence questionnaire. Presence Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 14(3), 298–312 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Witmer, B.G., Singer, M.J.: Measuring presence in virtual environments: a presence questionnaire. Presence 7(3), 225–240 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Yen, B.T., Mulley, C., Burke, M.: Gamification in transport interventions: another way to improve travel behavioural change. Cities 85, 140–149 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ITI/LARSySFunchalPortugal
  2. 2.Tecnico - University of LisbonLisbonPortugal
  3. 3.University of MadeiraFunchalPortugal

Personalised recommendations