Skip to main content

Maritime Surveillance and Information Sharing Systems for Better Situational Awareness on the European Maritime Domain: A Literature Review

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Digital Transformation, Cyber Security and Resilience of Modern Societies

Part of the book series: Studies in Big Data ((SBD,volume 84))

Abstract

This chapter concentrates on the principles and practices of the different ways of conducting maritime surveillance, and compares the advantages and disadvantages of different solutions. European maritime authorities aim at increasing situational awareness, and it is unlikely that any single system would fulfil all the tasks needed in maritime surveillance. To ensure safety and security on the maritime domain requires good situational awareness by the Member States of the European Union. The purpose of this study is to investigate maritime surveillance and information sharing systems and how they can improve maritime safety and security. The research questions are how maritime surveillance solutions enhance security and safety and how information sharing enhances awareness on the cyber situation in the European maritime domain? Current maritime surveillance solutions include coastal radars, satellite surveillance, boat patrolling, and both manned and unmanned aerial surveillance. The common information sharing environment for the EU maritime domain (CISE) is used for common situational awareness between European maritime authorities. Though an extensive and objective comparison of naval surveillance systems, based on public sources, is challenging because information from different sensors and providers is difficult to compare, the authors discuss advantages and barriers for various maritime surveillance systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Tikanmäki, I., Ruoslahti, H.: Increasing cooperation between the European Maritime Domain authorities. Int. J. Environ. Sci. 2, 392–399 (2017). ISSN: 2367–8941

    Google Scholar 

  2. RANGER: Radars for long distance maritime surveillance and SAR operations. The European Union’s H2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement no 700478 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Furuno Finland: Maritime surveillance system—FF-Coast. https://www.furuno.fi/eng/surveillance/surveillance_systems/ff_coast/. Accessed 15 Sept 2019

  4. Kongsberg: Coastal Surveillance. https://www.kongsberg.com/kda/about-us/knc-systems/knc-coastal-surveillance/. Accessed 1 Oct 2019

  5. Anschütz, R.: Maritime Surveillance and Offshore Safety/Security. https://www.raytheon-anschuetz.com/products-systems/c2surveillance-solutions/maritime-surveillance-and-offshore-safety-security/. Accessed 5 Sept 2019

  6. EUCISE2020.: EUropean test bed for the maritime Common Information Sharing Environment in the 2020 perspective. https://www.eucise2020.eu/. Accessed 22 Sept 2019

  7. MARISA: Improving maritime surveillance knowledge and capabilities through the MARISA toolkit. https://www.marisaproject.eu/. Accessed 27 Oct 2019

  8. BAE Systems: HF Over-The-Horizon Surface Wave Radar (HFSWR). https://products.rfsworld.com/rfs-and-bae-systems-collaborate-on-advanced-high-frequency-surface-wave-radar-coastal-surveillance-s,62,1,pressreleases,570.html. Accessed 12 Oct 2019

  9. Israel Aircraft Industry: ELM-2270 OTH Over-The-Horizon HF Coastal Surveillance Radar. https://www.iai.co.il/p/elm-2270-oth. Accessed 23 Sept 2019

  10. Raytheon: Next Generation High Frequency Surface Wave Radar (HFSWR). https://www.raytheon.com/capabilities/products/hfswr. Accessed 3 Sept 2019

  11. Raymarine: See and be seen. https://www.raymarine.com/ais.html. Assessed 8 Nov 2019

  12. Radartutorial “Scanter 2001”, “Scanter 6000.” https://www.radartutorial.eu/19.kartei/07.naval/. Assessed 8 Nov 2019

  13. Copernicus: Copernicus security service. https://www.copernicus.eu/en/services/security. Accessed 20 Oct 2019

  14. European Commission: Security service. https://www.copernicus.eu/sites/default/files/documents/Copernicus_Security_October2017.pdf. Accessed 20 Oct 2019

  15. European Maritime Safety Agency: Celebrating the CleanSeaNet Service: A ten year anniversary publication (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  16. International Civil Aviation Organization: Remotely Piloted Aircraft System (RPAS) concept of operations for international IFR operations. https://www.icao.int/safety/UA/Documents/ICAO%20RPAS%20Concept%20of%20Operations.pdf. Accessed 4 Nov 2019

  17. European Defence Agency: Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems—RPAS. https://www.eda.europa.eu/what-we-do/activities/activities-search/remotely-piloted-aircraft-systems---rpas. Accessed 2 Nov 2019

  18. Blyenbugh & Co.: RPAS: The global perspective. https://uvs-international.org/yearbook-description/. Accessed 18 Oct 2019

  19. European Maritime Safety Agency: Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS). https://www.emsa.europa.eu/operations/rpas.html. Accessed 17 Sept 2019

  20. Frontex: Frontex begins testing unmanned aircraft for border surveillance. https://frontex.europa.eu/media-centre/news-release/frontex-begins-testing-unmanned-aircraft-for-border-surveillance-zSQ26A. Accessed 3 Oct 2019

  21. Insta ILS: Insta ILS presentation 19 Sep 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cooper, R.: The return of the airship. The Week, February 19, 2019. https://theweek.com/articles/824018/return-airship. Accessed 1 Nov 2019

  23. Air Power Development Centre: Lighter than air and hybrid airships. Pathfinder, Issue 224, July 2014

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lockheed Martin: Lighter than air: Aerostats & Stratospheric Airships. https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/products/unmanned-aerostats-airships-and-lighter-than-air-technology.html. Accessed 2 Nov 2019

  25. Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering. Lighter than air vehicles. Report: OMB No. 0704-0188 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Boeing: Maritime Surveillance Aircraft Quick Facts. https://www.boeing.com/defense/maritime-surveillance/maritime-surveillance-aircraft/index.page. accessed 23 Oct 2019

  27. Saab 2019: Performance beyond limits. https://saab.com/air/airborne-solutions/airborne-surveillance/globaleye/?gclid=EAIaIQobChMIuqnB94Db5QIVio2yCh3MRApeEAAYASAAEgKYYvD_BwE. Accessed 8 Nov 2019

  28. Defence iQ: Maritime Patrol Aircraft. https://www.defenceiq.com/glossary/maritime-patrol-aircraft. Accessed 24 Oct 2019

  29. S. Writers: Boeing maritime surveillance aircraft demonstrator completes first flight. UPI Space Daily, 2014. https://search-proquest-com.nelli.laurea.fi/docview/1505377451?accountid=12003. Accessed 6 Sept 2019

  30. Lentoposti: Saab esitteli uuden GlobalEye AEW&C-monitoimivalvontakoneen (The roll-out of Saab new AEW&C surveillance system GlobalEye) (2018). https://www.lentoposti.fi/artikkelit/saab_esitteli_uuden_globaleye_aewc_monitoimivalvontakoneen. Accessed 28 Oct 2019

  31. Military.com: P-8A Poseidon. https://www.military.com/equipment/p-8a-poseidon. Accessed 23 Oct 2019

  32. Koola, P.M.: Cybersecurity—a systems perspective. In:Dynamic Positioning Conference, Marine Technology Society, pp. 1–12 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Tucci, A.E.: Cyber risks in the marine transportation system.In: Clark, R., Hakim, S. (eds.) Cyber-Physical Security. Protecting Critical Infrastructure at the State and Local Level, pp. 113–131. Springer (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Franke, U., Brynielsson, J.: Cyber situational awarenesse: a systematic review of the literature. Comput. Secur. 46, 18–31 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Munk, S.: Interoperability services supporting information exchange between cybersecurity organisations. AARMS 17(3), 131–148 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kokkonen, T.: Anomaly-based online intrusion detection system as a sensor for cyber security situational awareness system. University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Klump, R., Kwiatkowski, M.: Distributed IP watchlist generation for intrusion detection in the electrical smart grid.In: Moore, T., Shenoi, S. (eds.) Critical Infrastructure Protection IV. ICCIP 2010. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol. 342, pp. 113–126. Springer, Berlin (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Hennin, S.: Control system cyber incident reporting protocol. In:IEEE International Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security, pp. 463–468 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Brunner, M., Hofinger, H., Roblee, C., Schoo, P., Todt, S.: Anonymity and privacy in distributed early warning systems. In:CRITIS 2010: Critical Information Infrastructures Security, pp. 81–92 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  40. National Coordinator for Security and Counterterrorism, Netherlands, National Cyber Security Strategy 2 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Australian Government, Attorney-General’s Department: Cyber Security Strategy (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Cyber Security Strategy Committee, Ministry of Defence:Cyber Security Strategy (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Sedenberg, E.M., Dempsey, J.X.: Cybersecurity Information Sharing Governance Structures: An Ecosystem of Diversity, Trust, and Tradeoffs, 31 May 2018. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.12266. Accessed 30 March 2019

  44. Rajamäki, J., Knuuttila, J.: Cyber security and trust: tools for multi-agency cooperation between public authorities. In:Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Knowledge Management and Information Sharing—KMIS, pp. 397–404 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Harwood, M.: Lack of Trust Thwarts Cybersecurity Information Sharing. Security Management (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Seiffarth, O.: EUROSUR and Copernicus—a positive example of how to create synergies at EU level. In: BRIDGES—Window on Copernicus—Discover the Security dimension of Copernicus (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Bosilca, R.-L.: The use of satellite technologies for maritime surveillance: an overview of EU initiatives. Incas Bull. 8(1/2016), 153–161 (2016). ISSN 2066-8201

    Google Scholar 

  48. European Maritime Safety Agency: User-benefit analysis of RPAS operations in the maritime domain. Executive summary (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Kessler, G., Craiger, J., Haass, J.: A taxonomy framework for maritime cybersecurity: a demonstration using the automatic identification system. Int. J. Marine Navig. Safety Sea Transp. 12(3), 429–437 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study has received co-funding from the European Union’s H2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement no 700478 Radars for long distance maritime surveillance and SAR operations (RANGER).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ilkka Tikanmäki .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tikanmäki, I., Räsänen, J., Ruoslahti, H., Rajamäki, J. (2021). Maritime Surveillance and Information Sharing Systems for Better Situational Awareness on the European Maritime Domain: A Literature Review. In: Tagarev, T., Atanassov, K.T., Kharchenko, V., Kacprzyk, J. (eds) Digital Transformation, Cyber Security and Resilience of Modern Societies. Studies in Big Data, vol 84. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65722-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics