Abstract
Biocatalytic transformations are of growing interest due to their high chemo-, regio-, and enantioselectivity, sustainability, and biocompatibility. In order to build on these advantages, to reinforce them, and not to weaken them, as well as to ensure the fulfillment of economic framework conditions, it is important to harmonize the reaction with its best suitable reactor and operation mode. In this chapter, three ideal reactor types and their biocatalytic conversion equations are presented for different inhibition scenarios, facilitating the proper bioreactor selection. Important aspects in the implementation of an enzymatic cascade are discussed and the introduced equations are exemplarily illustrated for a cascade reaction. In order to highlight different emerging approaches for cascade engineering, miniaturized flow bioreactors are discussed, and examples of recent publications are presented.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abu R, Woodley JM (2015) Application of enzyme coupling reactions to shift thermodynamically limited biocatalytic reactions. ChemCatChem 7(19):3094–3105
Jaeger K-E, Liese A, Syldatk C (2018) EinfĂĽhrung in die enzymtechnologie. Springer-Verlag GmbH, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-57619-9
Illanes A, Wilson L, Vera C (2013) Problem solving in enzyme biocatalysis. Wiley, New York. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118341742
Tamborini L, Fernandes P, Paradisi F, Molinari F (2018) Trends Biotechnol 36:73–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.09.005
Thompson MP, Peñafiel I, Cosgrove SC, Turner NJ (2019) Org Process Res Dev 23:9–18. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.8b00305
Britton J, Majumdar S, Weiss GA (2018) Chem Soc Rev 47:5891–5918. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CS00906B
Sheldon RA, Woodley JM (2018) Chem Soc Rev 118:801–838. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00203
Adamo A, Beingessner RL, Behnam M, Chen J, Jamison TF, Jensen KF, Monbaliu J-CM, Myerson AS, Revalor EM, Snead DR, Stelzer T, Weeranoppanant N, Wong SY, Zhang P (2016) Science 352:61–67. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf1337
Chapman MR, Cosgrove SC, Turner NJ, Kapur N, Blacker J (2018) Angew Chem Int Ed 57:10535–10539. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201803675
Plutschack MB, Pieber B, Gilmore K, Seeberger PH (2017) Chem Rev 117:11796–11893. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00183
Bana P, Örkenyi R, Lövei K, Lakó A, Túrós GI, Éles J, Faigl F, Greiner I (2017) Bioorg Med Chem 25:6180–6189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2016.12.046
Bolivar JM, Nidetzky B (2013) Chimica Oggi-Chem Today 31:50–54
Žnidaršič-Plazl P (2014) Chimica Oggi-Chem Today 32:54–60
Hugentobler KG, Rasparini M, Thompson LA, Jolley KE, Blacker AJ, Turner NJ (2017) Org Process Res Dev 21:195–199. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.6b00346
De Santis P, Meyer LE, Kara S (2020) React Chem Eng 5:2155–2184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/D0RE00335B
O'Mahony RM, Lynch D, Hayes HLD, Thuama EN, Donnellan P, Jones RC, Glennon B, Collins SG, Maguire AR (2017) Eur J Org Chem 2017:6533–6539. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejoc.201700871
Ringborg RH, Pedersen AT, Woodley J (2017) ChemCatChem 9:3285–3288. https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201700811
Tomaszewski B, Schmid A, Buehler K (2014) Org Process Res Dev 18:1516–1526. https://doi.org/10.1021/op5002116
Znidarsic-Plazl P (2014) Chimica Oggi-Chem Today 32:54–60
Zheng M-M, Chen F-F, Li H, Li C-X, Xu J-H (2018) Chembiochem 19:347–353. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.201700415
Brahma A, Musio B, Ismayilova U, Nikbin N, Kamptmann SB, Siegert P, Jeromin GE, Ley SV, Pohl M (2016) Synlett 27:262–266. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1560644
Luckarift HR, Ku BS, Dordick JS, Spain JC (2007) Biotechnol Bioeng 98:701–705. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.21447
Bhattacharya S, Schiavone M, Gomes J, Bhattacharya SK (2004) J Biotechnol 111:203–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2004.04.002
Vejvoda V, Kaplan O, Kubáč D, KĹ™en V, MartĂnková L (2006) Biocatal Biotransformation 24:414–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242420601033910
Strompen S, Weiß M, Gröger H, Hilterhaus L, Liese A (2013) Adv Synth Catal 355:2391–2399. https://doi.org/10.1002/adsc.201300236
Burgahn T, Pietrek P, Dittmeyer R, Rabe KS, Niemeyer CM (2020) ChemCatChem 12:2452–2460. https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.202000145
Scherkus C, Schmidt S, Bornscheuer UT, Gröger H, Kara S, Liese A (2016) ChemCatChem 8:3446–3452. https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201600806
Scherkus C, Schmidt S, Bornscheuer UT, Gröger H, Kara S, Liese A (2017) Biotechnol Bioeng 114:1215–1221. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.26258
Srinivasamurthy VST, Böttcher D, Engel J, Kara S, Bornscheuer UT (2020) Process Biochem 88:22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2019.10.009
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Petermeier, P., Kara, S. (2021). Enzyme Cascade Reaction Engineering. In: Kara, S., Rudroff, F. (eds) Enzyme Cascade Design and Modelling. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65718-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65718-5_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-65717-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-65718-5
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)