Abstract
The chapter analyses the digitalisation process as a driver of sustainable development in the cultural field, with particular attention to cultural heritage. Cultural heritage is among the most evident cases of relevance to sustainability; in fact, it risks a gradual extinction, at least in the units whose fragility may be irreversible (Macrì and Trimarchi 2015).
The exploratory research is divided into two phases: the first, on the desk, explores the theme of the digitalisation of cultural heritage in national and international literature as a tool to guide sustainable development. The second phase, on the job, analyses the management and growth of cultural heritage through the Europeana portal, as well as the contribution of a short interview with privileged observers from the sector.
This chapter helps improve the understanding and evaluation of digitalisation practices in the cultural heritage sector in Europe. We believe that our research may highlight some interesting elements that can contribute to the efficient use of technology in the cultural heritage sector.
This work is characterised by the offer of innovative profiles because the enhancement of cultural heritage through digitalisation represents an area of activity that, at present, does not find substantial systematisation in the Italian academic debate.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
The report that follows the work of the 1983 World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) chaired by Gro Harlem Brundtland.
- 2.
17 Goals: 1. No poverty; 2. Zero Hunger; 3. Good health and Well-Being; 4. Quality Education; 5. Gender Equality; 6. Clean Water and Sanitation; 7. Affordable and Clean Energy; 8. Decent work and Economic Growth; 9. Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure; 10. Reduced Inequality; 11. Sustainable Cities and Communities; 12. Responsible Consumption and Production; 13. Climate Action; 14. Life below Water; 15. Life on Land; 16. Pace and Justice Strong Institutions; 17. Partnerships to achieve the Goal.
- 3.
In addition to the first there are: digital cataloguing, digitalisation, digital presentation, digital backup, digital preservation.
- 4.
Group of 2500 cultural heritage professionals.
- 5.
Although Eureopena has other profiles on other social networks, in this work, only those that it advertises on the official website are considered. The data reported are related to the observations made in March 2019.
- 6.
It refers to the fact that the observation took place without direct intervention on social media; the collection of information was carried out through the study of posts, comments, photo and video galleries. No direct interaction with users and no intervention have been carried out on social channels.
- 7.
This assessment is largely covered by a cost-benefit analysis carried out by a research institute of the Faculty of Economics of the University of Amsterdam see, commissioned by Europeana to assess the socio-economic value of its action. see http://www.seo.nl/en/home/
- 8.
In order to simplify the reading of the interview results, from this point on, we refer to them as cultural heritage experts and digitalisation experts.
References
Amari, M. (2012). Manifesto per la sostenibilità culturale: e se, un giorno, un ministro dell’economia venisse incriminato per violazione dei diritti culturali? (Vol. 139). Milano: FrancoAngeli.
Bakhshi, H., & Throsby, D. (2012). New technologies in cultural institutions: Theory, evidence and policy implications. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 18(2), 205–222.
Bakirman, T., Bayram, B., Akpinar, B., Karabulut, M. F., Bayrak, O. C., Yigitoglu, A., & Seker, D. Z. (2020). Implementation of ultra-light UAV systems for cultural heritage documentation. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 44(7), 174–184.
Belfiore, E. (2006). The social impacts of the arts–myth or reality? Culture vultures: Is UK arts policy damaging the arts (pp. 20–37). London: Policy Exchange.
Bellini, O. E. (2015). Three new paradigms for student housing: Cost, time and quality. In “Abitareilfuturo” 3rd edition of “Inhabiting the future” the International Study Days-International Conference (pp. 972–985). Clean.
Bengtsson, R., Sverige, & Regeringskansliet. (2014). Rapport: Strategiskatrenderiglobaltperspektiv – 2025: enheltannanvärld? Kanslietförstrategiskanalys (SA). Stockholm: Regeringskansliet.
Bonacchi, C., Bevan, A., Keinan-Schoonbaert, A., Pett, D., & Wexler, J. (2019). Participation in heritage crowdsourcing. Museum Management and Curatorship, 34(2), 166–182.
Borissova, V. (2018). La digitalizzazione del patrimonio culturale e le questioni relative alla proprietà intellettuale. Giornale dei Beni Culturali, 34, 145–150.
Borowiecki, K. J., & Navarrete T., (2015) Digitization of heritage collections as indicator of innovation. Discussion papers on business and economics (No. 14). University of Southern Denmark.
Borowiecki, K. J., & Navarrete, T. (2017). Digitization of heritage collections as indicator of innovation. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 26(3), 227–246.
Brennen, J. S., & Kreiss, D. (2016). Digitization. In The international encyclopedia of communication theory and philosophy (pp. 1–11). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Campagna, D., Caperna, G., & Montalto, V. (2020). Does culture make a better citizen? Exploring the relationship between cultural and civic participation in Italy. Social Indicators Research, 1–30.
Carmagnola, F., Dinner, F., Cortassa, O., Gena, C., & Torre, I. (2007, July). Towards a tag-based user model: How can the user model take advantage of tags? In International conference on user modeling (pp. 445–449). Berlin: Springer.
Collin, J., Hiekkanen, K., Korhonen, J. J., Halén, M., Itälä, T., & Helenius, M. (2015). IT leadership in transition: the impact of digitisation on Finnish organisations. Research report. University of Aalto, Department of Informatics.
Concordia, C., Gradmann, S., & Siebinga, S. (2010). Not just another portal, not just another digital library: A portrait of Europeana as an application program interface. IFLA Journal, 36(1), 61–69.
Corbetta, P. (1999). Methodology and techniques of social research (pp. 405–435). Il Mulino, Editore.
Daniel, T. C., Muhar, A., Arnberger, A., Aznar, O., & Boyd, J. (2012). Cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Acts of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(23), 8812–8819.
Dietrich, D., & Pekel, J. (2012). Open data in cultural heritage institutions. European Public Sector Information Platform Topic Report No.4.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case studies. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.
ENUMERATE the Core Survey 4 Report. (2017). Make the case for investments in our digital activities. Europeana-pro.
Evrard, Y., & Krebs, A. (2017). The authenticity of the museum experience in the digital age: The case of the Louvre. Journal of Cultural Economics, 42, 1–11.
Flew, T., & Swift, A. (2013). Cultural policy. In R. Towse & C. Handke (Eds.), Handbook on the digital creative economy (pp. 155–161). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Gaskell, G. (2000). Individual and group interviews. In Qualitative research with text, images and sound (pp. 38–56). London: Sage.
Gražulevičiūtė, I. (2006). Cultural heritage in the context of sustainable development. Environmental Research, Engineering And Management, 37(3), 74–79.
Grossi, E., & Rvagnan, A. (2013). Cultura e Salute. Milano: Springer Editore. Isbn:978-88-470-2780-0.
Levy, P. (2002). Electronic mediation series. In Cyberculture (Vol. 4). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
Loulanski, T. (2006). The revision of the concept of cultural heritage: The subject of a functional approach. International Cultural Heritage Magazine, 13(2), 207–233.
Macri, E., & Trimarchi, M. (2015). The emerging non-profit for a sustainable economy. RevueEuropéennedudroit social, 5/2015. Special issue. issn:1843-679X.
Marchegiani, L., & Rossi, G. (2016). The technology applied to the cultural heritage sector has not (yet) surpassed our humanity. In Innovation and organizational change (pp. 53–62). Cham: Springer.
Marcum, D. B. (2007). Digitization for access and preservation strategies of the Library of Congress. First Monday, 12(7).
Marttila, S., & Botero, A. (2017). Infrastructure for common cultural heritage. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 26(1–2), 97–133.
Matarasso, F. (1997). Use or ornament. The social impact of participation in the arts (Vol. 4(2)). Stroud: Comedia.
Menard, G. (2016). Copyright, digital sharing and liberal order: Sociolegal constructions of intellectual property in the age of mass digitization. Information, Communication and Society, 19(8), 1061–1076.
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Favorite voices for systematic reviews and meta-analysis: The PRISMA declaration. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264–269.
Navarrete, T. (2013a). Digital cultural heritage. In I. Rizzo & A. Mignosa (Eds.), Handbook on the economics of cultural heritage (pp. 251–271). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Navarrete, T. (2013b). Museums. In R. Towse & C. Handke (Eds.), Handbook on the digital creative economy (pp. 330–343). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Paolini, P., & Di Blas, N. (2014). Story for the cultural heritage. In Tecnologie innovativi nella mappatura urbana (pp. 33–45). Cham: Springer.
Paolini, P., Mitroff Silvers, D., & Proctor, N. (2013). Technologies for cultural heritage. In I. Rizzo & A. Mignosa (Eds.), Handbook on the economics of cultural heritage (pp. 272–289). Cheltenham: Edward Elga.
Pavlidis, G., Koutsoudis, A., Arnaoutoglou, F., Tsioukas, V., & Chamzas, C. (2007). Methods for 3D digitization of cultural heritage. Journal of cultural heritage, 8(1), 93–98.
Preuss, U. (2016). Sustainable digitisation of cultural heritage—Report on initiatives and projects in Brandenburg, Germany. Sustainability, 8(9), 891.
Purday, J. (2009). Think about culture: Europeana. EU from concept to construction. BibliothekForschung und Praxis, 33(2), 170–180.
Report on Sustainable Development in the European Union Monitoring report on progress towards SDG in an EU context. (2019).
Rizzo, I. (2016). Technological perspectives for cultural heritage. In The artful economist (pp. 197–214). Cham: Springer.
Rypkema, D. (2005). Cultural heritage and sustainable economic and social development. European Cultural Heritage Forum, Cultural Heritage Counts for Europe, Brussels. http://www.europanostra.org/downloads/speeches/donova-rypkema_keynote_address_07dec_05.pdf
Salaun, J.-M. (2013). The immeasurable economy of libraries. In G. Rizzo Foam (2011) (Ed.), The value of art for business. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Seitsonen, O. (2017). Crowdsourcing cultural heritage: public participation and conflict legacy in Finland. Journal of Community Archaeology and Heritage, 4(2), 115–130.
Sinkovics, R. R., Richter, N. F., Ringle, C. M., & Schlaegel, C. (2016). A critical look at the use of SEM in international corporate research. International Marketing Review, 33(3), 376–404.
Throsby, D. (1999). Cultural capital. Journal of Cultural Economics, 23(1–2), 3–12.
Throsby, D. (2003). Determining the value of cultural goods: How much (or how little) does contingent valuation tell us? Journal of Cultural Economics, 27(3–4), 275–285.
Throsby, D. (2017). Culturally sustainable development: theoretical concept or practical policy tool? International Journal of Cultural Policy, 23(2), 133–147.
Tisdell, C. (2003). Ecological and environmental economics: Selected themes and policy responses. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Trimarchi, M. (2004). Regulation, integration and sustainability in the cultural sector. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 10(5), 401–415.
Vecco, M. (2010). Una definizione di patrimonio culturale: Dal tangibile all’intangibile. Giornale dei Beni Culturali, 11(3), 321–324.
Vrettakis, E., Kourtis, V., Katifori, A., Karvounis, M., Lougiakis, C., & Ioannidis, Y. (2019). Narralive-Create and experience mobile digital narration in cultural heritage. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, 15, e00114.
WCED, S. W. S. (1987). World commission on environment and development. Our Common Future, 17, 1–91.
Yilmaz, H. M., Yakar, M., Gulec, S. A., & Dulgerler, O. N. (2007). Importance of close-up digital photogrammetry in heritage documentation. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 8(4), 428–433.
Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Yin, R. (2002). Applications of case study research (2nd ed., pp. 1–92). London: Sage.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Professor Michele Trimarchi and Professor Rocco Reina for their contribution to this research work as privileged observers. The usual caveat applies.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Macrì, E., Cristofaro, C.L. (2021). The Digitalisation of Cultural Heritage for Sustainable Development: The Impact of Europeana. In: Demartini, P., Marchegiani, L., Marchiori, M., Schiuma, G. (eds) Cultural Initiatives for Sustainable Development. Contributions to Management Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65687-4_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65687-4_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-65686-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-65687-4
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)