Skip to main content

Participatory Event Platforms in the Urban Context: The Importance of Stakeholders’ Meaning of “Participation”

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cultural Initiatives for Sustainable Development

Part of the book series: Contributions to Management Science ((MANAGEMENT SC.))

Abstract

Event organizers tend to seek collaboration with different actors, both as a way to reach legitimization and as a possibility to reach out for resources that would otherwise be unavailable or too costly to achieve. In this chapter, we examine how participation is interpreted and enacted in iterative urban events. We argue that the institutional logics informing stakeholders’ views and meaning of participation affect the governance of participatory cultural events and the evolution of the activities proposed by event organizers. Based on the longitudinal analysis of an iterative participative cultural initiative (IPCI) taking place in Milano since 2012, our work contributes to the understanding of how IPCIs are structured and evolve. The emphasis on the interplay between different institutional logics associated with the meaning of participation and the governance and activities related to the cultural initiatives sheds light on the specificity and the intrinsic fragility of IPCI where participation becomes overtime a resource—if successfully managed—or liability in itself. At the same time, though, it highlights the incredible potential of participative models in creating distributed value across very different stakeholders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The drop in the number of events during 2015 was due to the presence of Expo in Milano and to the occupation of several locations with initiatives associated with it. 2012 opened with 437 events, which rose to 1600 in 2019.

  2. 2.

    Castello Sforzesco is a castle built in the fifteenth century by Francesco Sforza, Duke of Milan, on the remnants of a fourteenth-century fortification. Extensively rebuilt by Luca Beltrami in 1891–1905, it now houses several of the city’s museums and art collections.

  3. 3.

    There was a common agreement among interviewees on this narrative (Founder 1 and 2, Key actor 2, 3 and 5).

  4. 4.

    Here as well interviewees largely agreed (all founders and Key Actors 1 and 5).

  5. 5.

    Milano has been developing two formats for cultural events: “City” format is generally participatory in nature and involves many non-profit organisations. The benchmark has been Piano City, a concept of Berlin-based pianist Andreas Kern brought to Milano in 2012. “Week” format includes “off” initiatives around a relevant fair and the benchmark has been FuoriSalone. Born in the 1970s along with a few side initiatives organised during the annual design and furniture fair (Salone del Mobile) and held in the showrooms of very few furniture brands, FuoriSalone started growing in the 1980s and had a push in the 1990s.

  6. 6.

    Seehttps://web.comune.milano.it/wps/portal/ist/st/Patto_Milano/scopri_il_patto (10 June 2020).

  7. 7.

    Seehttps://en.unesco.org/creative-cities/milan (10 June 2020).

References

  • Agustí, L. B., Calvano, G., Carnelli, L., Dupin-Meynard, F., & Négrier, E. (2018). Be SpectACTive! Challenging participation in performing arts. Editoria & specttacolo, 425 p., 978-88-32068-01-6. ffhal-02154976f

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, T. D., & Getz, D. (2009). Festival ownership. Differences between public, nonprofit and private festivals in Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 9(2–3), 249–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battilana, J., & Lee, M. (2014). Advancing research on hybrid organizing—Insights from the study of social enterprises. The Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 397–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biondi, L., Demartini, P., Marchegiani, L., Marchiori, M., & Piber, M. (2020). Understanding orchestrated participatory cultural initiatives: Mapping the dynamics of governance and participation. Cities, 96, 102459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonet, L., & Négrier, E. (2018). The participative turn in cultural policy: Paradigms, models, contexts. Poetics, 66, 64–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comunian, R., Chapain, C., & Clifton, N. (2010). Location, location, location: Exploring the complex relationship between creative industries and place. Creative Industries Journal, 3(1), 5–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowther, P., & Orefice, C. (2014). Co-creative events: Analysis and illustrations. In Event design (pp. 138–152). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubini, P. (Ed.). (2016). Institutionalising fragility. Entrepreneurship in cultural organisations. Milano: Fondazione Feltrinelli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, A., & Gadde, L. E. (2002). Systematic combining: An abductive approach to case research. Journal of Business Research, 55(7), 553–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dul, J., & Hak, T. (2007). Case study methodology in business research. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fontana, A., & Frey, J. H. (1998). Interviewing—The art of science. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, M. A. (2000). When cymbals become symbols: Conflict over organizational identity within a symphony orchestra. Organization Science, 11(3), 285–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E. T., & Hall, M. R. (1990) Understanding cultural differences: Germans, French, and Americans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. (2008). Institutional entrepreneurship. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 198–217). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jakob, D. (2013). The eventification of place: Urban development and experience consumption in Berlin and New York City. European Urban and Regional Studies, 20(4), 447–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, C. (1963). The uses of the University. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraatz, M., & Block, E. (2008). Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 243–275). London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200387.n10.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lampel, J., Lant, T., & Shamsie, J. (2000). Balancing act: Learning from organizing practices in cultural industries. Organization Science, 11(3), 263–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, T., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organization studies (pp. 215–254). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Liedtka, J. (2000). In defense of strategy as design. California Management Review, 42(3), 8–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mair, J., & Weber, K. (2019). Event and festival research: A review and research directions. International Journal of Event and Festival Management, 10(3), 209–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16, 145–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pareschi, L., & Lusiani, M. (2020). What editors talk about when they talk about editors? A public discourse analysis of market and aesthetic logics. Poetics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2020.101444.

  • Pegoraro, M., & Zan, L. (2017). Life and death in audience development. The exhibition on Pompeii at the British museum, 2013. Museum Management and Curatorship, 32(3), 210–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piber, M., Demartini, P., & Biondi, L. (2019). The management of participatory cultural initiatives: Learning from the discourse on intellectual capital. Journal of Management and Governance, 23(2), 435–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Puerari, E., de Koning, J. I. J. C., Mulder, I. J., & Loorbach, D. (2017). Shaping spaces of interaction for sustainable transitions. In 30th Annual Aesop Congress 2017. Universidade de Lisboa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulh, M., Marteaux, S., & Mencarelli, R. (2008). Positioning strategies of cultural institutions: A renewal of the offer in the face of shifting consumer trends. International Journal of Arts Management, 10, 4–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, B. (2005). Arts festivals and the city. Urban Studies, 42(5–6), 927–943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, G. (2015). Events in the network society: The role of pulsar and iterative events. Event Management, 19(4), 553–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, G. (2017). From place branding to placemaking: The role of events. International Journal of Event and Festival Management, 8(1), 8–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, G. W., & Colombo, A. (2017). Rethinking the eventful city: Introduction. Event Management, 21(5), 527–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rindova, V., Dalpiaz, E., & Ravasi, D. (2011). A study of organizational use of new cultural resources in strategy formation. Organization Science, 22(2), 413–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2000). Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 25(1), 3–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, J. R., & Rubin, S. R. (2005). Qualitative interviewing: The art of interviewing. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, J. M. (2001). Ephemera, temporary urbanism and imaging. In L. J. Vale & S. B. Warner (Eds.), Imaging the City: Continuing Struggles and New Directions (pp. 361–396). New Brunswick, NJ: CUPR Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, M. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 801–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townley, B., Beech, N., & McKinlay, A. (2009). Managing in the creative industries: Managing the motley crew. Human Relations, 62, 939–962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (1976). Recommendation on participation by the people at large in cultural life and their contribution to it. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004164543.1-760.54

  • Wright, A. L., & Zammuto, R. F. (2013). Creating opportunities for institutional entrepreneurship: The Colonel and the Cup in English County Cricket. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(1), 51–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. (1984). Case study research. London: Sage Beverly Hills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zan, L., Baraldi, S. B., & Gordon, C. (2007). Cultural heritage between centralisation and decentralisation: Insights from the Italian context. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 13(1), 49–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors acknowledge the support of ASK research center—Università Bocconi.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paola Dubini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bertoni, A., Dubini, P., Monti, A. (2021). Participatory Event Platforms in the Urban Context: The Importance of Stakeholders’ Meaning of “Participation”. In: Demartini, P., Marchegiani, L., Marchiori, M., Schiuma, G. (eds) Cultural Initiatives for Sustainable Development. Contributions to Management Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65687-4_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics