Skip to main content

A Struggle of Capitals Over the Identity and the Cultural Offering of Festivaletteratura: The Organizational Impact of Audience Development

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cultural Initiatives for Sustainable Development

Part of the book series: Contributions to Management Science ((MANAGEMENT SC.))

  • 678 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, we explore the case of Festivaletteratura, the most important Italian literary festival, which in the last few years experienced an internal struggle over its cultural offering and cultural identity. Part of the organizational staff, fearing an ageing of the audience, started an audience development project aimed at using the knowledge acquired as a source of cultural capital. Conversely, those organizational bodies not willing to change the cultural offering of the festival relied on symbolic capitals acquired over the years. We make sense of the moves and countermoves of the agents involved in this symbolic struggle through the concept of institutional work, aimed at maintaining or disrupting existing institutions, and show that the most relevant institution in this case is composed by the programme meetings, where the actual cultural offering of each edition of the festival is defined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    More details on the questionnaire, the items and the procedure followed for the survey are not included in the paper due to space limits, and as they are not the focus of the work. Yet, they are available under request.

  2. 2.

    Interviews were anonymized, but we indicate the organizational role of the interviewee: AO is administrative office, OC is organizing committee, and C means consultant.

  3. 3.

    We used Nvivo to perform a wordcount.

  4. 4.

    Interview with Ernest.

References

  • Abdallah, C., Lusiani, M., & Langley, A. (2019). Performing process research. In B. Boyd, T. Russell Crook, J. K. Lê, & A. D. Smith (Eds.), Standing on the shoulders of giants: Traditions and innovations in research methodology (pp. 91–113). Bingley: Emerald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abfalter, D., Stadler, R., & Müller, J. (2012). The organization of knowledge sharing at the Colorado Music Festival. International Journal of Arts Management, 14(3), 4–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, K., & Shaw, P. (2000). Festivals mean business. The shape of arts festivals in the UK. London: British Arts Festivals Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anand, N., & Peterson, R. A. (2000). When market information constitutes fields: Sensemaking of markets in the commercial music industry. Organisation Science, 11, 270–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audience development and marketing, Grants for the Arts. (2018). Arts Council England. Retrieved from https://www.artscouncil.org.uk/sites/default/files/download-file/Information_sheets_Audience_development_marketing_Project_grants_170518.pdf on 2018/10/31

  • Barlow, M., & Shibli, S. (2007). Audience development in the arts: A case study of chamber music. Managing Leisure, 12, 102–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollo, A. (2012). Il marketing della cultura. Roma: Carocci.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1991a). Le champ littéraire. actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 89(1), 3–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1991b). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1993). Sociology in question. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (2005). The political field, the social science field and the journalistic field. In R. Benson & E. Neeveu (Eds.), Bourdieu and the journalistic field (pp. 29–47). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (2009). Ragioni Pratiche. Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves, R. E. (2000). Creative industries: Contracts between art and commerce. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y.-C. (2020). Creating value through the performing arts festival: The multi-stakeholder approach. Journal of Macromarketing, 40(2), 185–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DCMS. (2001). Creative industries mapping document 2001. UK Department for Culture, Media and Sport.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desai, P., & Thomas, A. (1998). Cultural diversity: Attitudes of ethnic minority populations towards museums and galleries. BMRB/Museums and Galleries Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L. G. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment (pp. 3–22). Cambridge: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Gay, P., & Pryke, M. (2002). Cultural economy: Cultural analysis and commercial life. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eikhof, D. R., & Haunschild, A. (2006). Lifestyle meets market: Bohemian entrepreneurs in creative industries. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15, 234–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eikhof, D. R., & Haunschild, A. (2007). For art’s sake! Artistic and economic logics in creative production. Journal of Organisational Behavior, 28, 523–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2015). Glossary to Study on Audience Development—How to place audiences at the centre of cultural organizations. Directorate-General for Education and Culture Creative Europe programme. Retrieved October 31, 2018, from https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/creative-europe/sites/creative-europe/files/documents/news/audience-development-study-glossary_en.pdf

  • Fligstein, N. (2001). Social skill and the theory of fields. Sociological Theory, 19, 105–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franssen, T., & Kuipers, G. (2013). Coping with uncertainty, abundance and strife: Decision-making processes of Dutch acquisition editors in the global market for translations. Poetics, 41(1), 48–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232–266). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of a theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerzoni, G. (2012). Effettofestival 2012. Firenze: Fondazione Florens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadley, S. (2017). European Commission final report: Study on audience development—How to place audiences at the Centre of cultural organisations. Cultural Trends, 26(3), 275–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. (2008). Institutional entrepreneurship. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 198–217). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Harlow, B. (2014). The road to results. Effective practices for building arts audiences. New York: Wallace Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, D., & Slater, A. (2002). Rethinking the ‘missionary position’—The quest for sustainable audience development strategies. Managing Leisure, 7(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hesmondhalgh, D. (2002). The cultural industries. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesmondhalgh, D., & Pratt, A. C. (2005). Cultural industries and cultural policy. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 11, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, L., Bridgwood, A., & Dust, K. (2004). Research at Arts Council England. Cultural Trends, 13(4), 41–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Istat. (2016). Italia in cifre. Retrieved October 31, 2018, from https://www.istat.it/it/archivio/194899

  • Istat. (2017). La produzione e la lettura di libri in Italia. Retrieved October 31, 2018, from https://www4.istat.it/it/archivio/207939

  • Jones, C., & Townley, B. (2016). Misfits, mavericks and mainstreams: Drivers of innovation in the creative industries. Organisation Studies, 37(6), 751–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawashima, N. (2006). Audience development and social inclusion in Britain. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 12(1), 55–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, R. (2020). Canada comes to CARIFESTA: The Caribbean International Festival of the Arts, Trinidad and Tobago, 2019 August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampel, J., Lant, T., & Shamsie, J. (2000). Balancing act: Learning from organizing practices in cultural industries. Organisation Science, 11, 263–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24, 691–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, T., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organization studies (pp. 215–254). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, S., Hardy, C., & Lawrence, T. B. (2004). Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 657–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maitland, H. (1997). A guide to audience development. London: Arts Council of England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maitland, H. (2005). Researching audience development: Literature review. Arts Research Digest, 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Drawing valid meaning from qualitative data: Towards a shared craft. Educational Researcher, 13, 20–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montanari, F., Scapolan, A., & Codeluppi, E. (2013). Identity and social media in an art festival. In Tourism social media: Transformations in identity, community and culture (Tourism social science series) (Vol. 18, pp. 207–225). Bingley: Emerald Group.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16, 145–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C. (1992). The antecedents of deinstitutionalization. Organization Studies, 13, 563–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmi, P. (2010). L’identificazione del prodotto culturale con il territorio: il festival. In P. Palmi (Ed.), La Governance dello spettacolo dal vivo. Evoluzione manageriale e competitività: tre sfide organizzative (pp. 161–201). Bari: Cacucci.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parente, R., & El Tarabishy, A. (2020). Giffoni film festival: How to morph a rural area in an innovation cluster in the digital arts production. In SAGE business cases. London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529722567.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pareschi, L., & Lusiani, M. (2020). What editors talk about when they talk about editors? A public discourse analysis of market and aesthetic logics. Poetics, 81, 101444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2020.101444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pegoraro, M., & Zan, L. (2017). Life and death in audience development. The exhibition on Pompeii at the British museum 2013. Museum Management and Curatorship, 32(3), 210–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peltoniemi, M. (2014). Cultural industries: Product-market characteristics, management challenges and industry dynamics. International Journal of Management Reviews, 17, 41–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R., & Kern, R. (1996). Changing highbrow taste: From snob to omnivore. American Sociological Review, 61(5), 900–907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polettini, P. (2012). Il sistema cultura. In Storia di Mantova. Tra presente e futuro. Mantova: Tre Lune edizioni.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, D. (2002). Cultural industries in Sweden: An assessment of their place in the Swedish economy. Economic Geography, 78, 103–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rindova, V., Dalpiaz, E., & Ravasi, D. (2011). A study of organizational use of new cultural resources in strategy formation. Organization Science, 22(2), 413–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santoro, M. (2009). Introduction. In P. Bourdieu (Ed.), Ragioni Pratiche (pp. 7–21). Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassatelli, M. (2011). Urban festivals and the cultural public sphere. In G. Delanty, L. Giorgi, & M. Sassatelli (Eds.), Festivals and the cultural public sphere. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scollen, R. (2009). Talking theatre is more than a test drive: Two audience development methodologies under review. International Journal of Arts Management, 12(1), 4–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sicca, L. M. (1998). Organizzare i processi nella produzione lirica. Il caso Rossini Opera Festival. AIDEA, La gestione e la valorizzazione dei beni artistici e culturali nella prospettiva aziendale, atti convegno di Siena, pp. 30–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. (1993). Interpreting qualitative data. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. B. (2010). Merchants of culture: The publishing business in the twenty-first century. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P., Jones, M., & Warhurst, C. (2007). From conception to consumption: Creativity and the missing managerial link. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 28, 625–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry 1958–1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 801–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toraldo, M.-L., & Islam, G. (2019). Festival and organization studies. Organization Studies, 40(3), 309–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townley, B., Beech, N., & McKinlay, A. (2009). Managing in the creative industries: Managing the motley crew. Human Relations, 62, 939–962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, J. (2004). Opportunity to participate: Model of audience development. International Journal of Arts Management, 7(1), 22–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luca Pareschi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pareschi, L., Ponzoni, N. (2021). A Struggle of Capitals Over the Identity and the Cultural Offering of Festivaletteratura: The Organizational Impact of Audience Development. In: Demartini, P., Marchegiani, L., Marchiori, M., Schiuma, G. (eds) Cultural Initiatives for Sustainable Development. Contributions to Management Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65687-4_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics