Skip to main content

Detecting the Social and Economic Impact of Cultural Initiatives: A Case Study of the Taormina Film Fest

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cultural Initiatives for Sustainable Development

Abstract

The aim of this research is to investigate, evaluate, and give representation to some of the characteristics of the social, cultural, and economic values generated by the activities of cultural institutions, such as the Taormina Arte Foundation, which was established in Taormina in 1983, with the aim of promoting and organizing prestigious cultural initiatives. Every year, the Taormina Arte Foundation organizes the internationally recognized Taormina Film Fest that takes place at the Greek Ancient Theater of Taormina, which has a variety of dramatic impacts as a rich cultural event in the northeast Sicilian territory.

The impact of cultural and artistic value that is generated within a territory cannot be expressed purely by economic value, as there are others, such as the social, aesthetic, educational, and symbolic, each of which contributes to the overall value that is given by the institution or cultural experience.

Therefore, cultural organizations need tools to measure their performances in terms of social impact.

From a methodological point of view, this work is based on a case study approach and focuses on the Taormina Film Fest 2017, and, according to some epistemological assumption coming from the relevant work of Edmund Husserl, we apply the SROI methodology in order to evaluate and represent the impact on the territory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arvidson, M., et al. (2010). The ambitions and challenges of SROI. Third Sector Research Center, University of Birmingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arvidson, M., et al. (2013). Valuing the social? The nature and controversies of measuring social return on investment (SROI). Voluntary Sector Review, 4(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1332/204080513X661554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biondi, L., Demartini, P., Marchegiani, L., & Marchioni, M. (2020). Management, participation and entrepreneurship in the cultural and creative sector: An introduction. In M. Piber (Ed.), Management, participation and entrepreneurship in the cultural and creative sector (pp. 1–8). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46796-8_1.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1979). The inheritors: French students and their relations to culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catalfo, P., & Giustra, M. (2020). The value of the relationship between architecture and social engagement: Imre Makovecz’s work within the Faluházak project. In M. Piber (Ed.), Management, participation and entrepreneurship in the cultural and creative sector (pp. 141–159). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46796-8_8.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, K. (2000). From regulation to participation: Cultural heritage, sustainable development and citizenship. In Forward planning: The functions of cultural heritage in a changing Europe. Papers from an expert workshop on cultural heritage in Europe in 2000 to contribute to the 5th European conference of ministers in Slovenia. Council of Europe, pp. 103–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C., Rosenzweig, W., Long, D., & Olsen, S. (2004). Double bottom line project report: Assessing social impact. In Double bottom line ventures, methods catalog. University of California. http://repositories.cdlib.org/crb/wps/13

  • Colbert, F. (1994). Marketing culture and the arts. Montréal-Paris-Casablanca: Gaëtan Morin Éditeur ltée.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cristofoli, D., Macció, L., & Meneguzzo, M. (2014). When civic culture meets strategy: exploring predictors of citizen engagement in participatory strategic plans in Italy. In P. Joyce & A. Drumaux (Eds.), Management in public organizations: Europeans practices and perspective. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daum, J. H. (2001). Intangible assets and value creation. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkeim, E. (1912). Les formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse. Paris: Alcan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, J., Wachowicz, J., & Chun, S. (2000). Social return on investment: Exploring aspects of value creations in the non-profit sector. In Social purpose enterprise and venture philanthropy in the new millennium (Vol. 2). San Francisco: The Roberts Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B., & Pommerehne, W. (1989). Muses and markets: Explorations in the economics of the arts. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, A. (1983). On trying to understand accounting in the context in which it operates, accounting. Organizations and Society, 8(2–3), 287–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, A., & Miller, P. (1994). Accounting as social and institutional practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1912). Les formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse. Paris: Alcan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1936). Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie: Eine Einleitung in die phänomenologische Philosophie (1st Edn.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Longstaff, P. H., Armstrong, N. J., Perrin, K., Parker, W. M., & Hidek, M. A. (2010). Building resilient communities: A preliminary framework for assessment. Homeland and Security Affairs, VI(3), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorusso, S., Cogo, G. M., & Natali, A. (2016). The protection and valorization of cultural and environmental heritage in the development process of territory. Conservation Science in Cultural Heritage Journal, 16. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1973-9494/7165.

  • Lorusso, S., Mari Braida, A., & Natali, A. (2018). Interdisciplinary studies in cultural and environmental heritage: History, protection, valorization, management. Conservation Science in Cultural Heritage, 18. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1973-9494/9234.

  • Meynhardt, T. (2009). Public value inside: What is public value creation? International Journal of Public Administration, 32(3–4), 192–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900690902732632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myles, J. F. (2004). From Doxa to experience: Issues in Bourdieu’s adoption of Husserlian phenomenology. Theory, Culture and Society, 21(2), 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276404042136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, J., et al. (2009). A guide to Social Return on Investment. London: SROI Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacock, A., & Rizzo, I. (2008). The heritage game: Economics, policy, and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Perrini, F., & Vurro, C. (2013). La valutazione degli impatti sociali: Approcci e strumenti applicativi. EGEA spa—CReSV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, B. (2005). Accounting as a social and institutional practice: Perspectives to enrich our understanding of accounting change. Abacus, 41(3), 265–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SROI. (2012). A guide to Social Return on Investment, HF. www.humanfoundation.com

  • UN-ECOSOC. (2008). Achieving sustainable development and promoting development cooperation. Dialogues at the Economic and Social Council. United Nations Publications. isbn:978-92-1-104587-1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, K. J., & Whitley, T. (2016). Applying Social Return on Investment (SROI) to the built environment. Building Research and Information, 2–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2016.1223486

  • Watson, K. J., et al. (2016). Capturing the social value of buildings: The promise of social return on investment (SROI). Building and Environment, 103, 289–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zamagni, S., et al. (2015). Valutare l’impatto sociale. La questione della misurazione nelle imprese sociali. Rivista impresa sociale, 6, 77–97.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pierluigi Catalfo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Catalfo, P., Giustra, M., Cardillo, A. (2021). Detecting the Social and Economic Impact of Cultural Initiatives: A Case Study of the Taormina Film Fest. In: Demartini, P., Marchegiani, L., Marchiori, M., Schiuma, G. (eds) Cultural Initiatives for Sustainable Development. Contributions to Management Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65687-4_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics