Abstract
The aim of this research is to investigate, evaluate, and give representation to some of the characteristics of the social, cultural, and economic values generated by the activities of cultural institutions, such as the Taormina Arte Foundation, which was established in Taormina in 1983, with the aim of promoting and organizing prestigious cultural initiatives. Every year, the Taormina Arte Foundation organizes the internationally recognized Taormina Film Fest that takes place at the Greek Ancient Theater of Taormina, which has a variety of dramatic impacts as a rich cultural event in the northeast Sicilian territory.
The impact of cultural and artistic value that is generated within a territory cannot be expressed purely by economic value, as there are others, such as the social, aesthetic, educational, and symbolic, each of which contributes to the overall value that is given by the institution or cultural experience.
Therefore, cultural organizations need tools to measure their performances in terms of social impact.
From a methodological point of view, this work is based on a case study approach and focuses on the Taormina Film Fest 2017, and, according to some epistemological assumption coming from the relevant work of Edmund Husserl, we apply the SROI methodology in order to evaluate and represent the impact on the territory.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arvidson, M., et al. (2010). The ambitions and challenges of SROI. Third Sector Research Center, University of Birmingham.
Arvidson, M., et al. (2013). Valuing the social? The nature and controversies of measuring social return on investment (SROI). Voluntary Sector Review, 4(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1332/204080513X661554.
Biondi, L., Demartini, P., Marchegiani, L., & Marchioni, M. (2020). Management, participation and entrepreneurship in the cultural and creative sector: An introduction. In M. Piber (Ed.), Management, participation and entrepreneurship in the cultural and creative sector (pp. 1–8). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46796-8_1.
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1979). The inheritors: French students and their relations to culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Catalfo, P., & Giustra, M. (2020). The value of the relationship between architecture and social engagement: Imre Makovecz’s work within the Faluházak project. In M. Piber (Ed.), Management, participation and entrepreneurship in the cultural and creative sector (pp. 141–159). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46796-8_8.
Clark, K. (2000). From regulation to participation: Cultural heritage, sustainable development and citizenship. In Forward planning: The functions of cultural heritage in a changing Europe. Papers from an expert workshop on cultural heritage in Europe in 2000 to contribute to the 5th European conference of ministers in Slovenia. Council of Europe, pp. 103–113.
Clark, C., Rosenzweig, W., Long, D., & Olsen, S. (2004). Double bottom line project report: Assessing social impact. In Double bottom line ventures, methods catalog. University of California. http://repositories.cdlib.org/crb/wps/13
Colbert, F. (1994). Marketing culture and the arts. Montréal-Paris-Casablanca: Gaëtan Morin Éditeur ltée.
Cristofoli, D., Macció, L., & Meneguzzo, M. (2014). When civic culture meets strategy: exploring predictors of citizen engagement in participatory strategic plans in Italy. In P. Joyce & A. Drumaux (Eds.), Management in public organizations: Europeans practices and perspective. London: Routledge.
Daum, J. H. (2001). Intangible assets and value creation. Chichester: Wiley.
Durkeim, E. (1912). Les formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse. Paris: Alcan.
Emerson, J., Wachowicz, J., & Chun, S. (2000). Social return on investment: Exploring aspects of value creations in the non-profit sector. In Social purpose enterprise and venture philanthropy in the new millennium (Vol. 2). San Francisco: The Roberts Foundation.
Frey, B., & Pommerehne, W. (1989). Muses and markets: Explorations in the economics of the arts. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Hopwood, A. (1983). On trying to understand accounting in the context in which it operates, accounting. Organizations and Society, 8(2–3), 287–305.
Hopwood, A., & Miller, P. (1994). Accounting as social and institutional practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Husserl, E. (1912). Les formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse. Paris: Alcan.
Husserl, E. (1936). Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie: Eine Einleitung in die phänomenologische Philosophie (1st Edn.).
Longstaff, P. H., Armstrong, N. J., Perrin, K., Parker, W. M., & Hidek, M. A. (2010). Building resilient communities: A preliminary framework for assessment. Homeland and Security Affairs, VI(3), 1–23.
Lorusso, S., Cogo, G. M., & Natali, A. (2016). The protection and valorization of cultural and environmental heritage in the development process of territory. Conservation Science in Cultural Heritage Journal, 16. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1973-9494/7165.
Lorusso, S., Mari Braida, A., & Natali, A. (2018). Interdisciplinary studies in cultural and environmental heritage: History, protection, valorization, management. Conservation Science in Cultural Heritage, 18. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1973-9494/9234.
Meynhardt, T. (2009). Public value inside: What is public value creation? International Journal of Public Administration, 32(3–4), 192–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900690902732632.
Myles, J. F. (2004). From Doxa to experience: Issues in Bourdieu’s adoption of Husserlian phenomenology. Theory, Culture and Society, 21(2), 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276404042136.
Nicholls, J., et al. (2009). A guide to Social Return on Investment. London: SROI Network.
Peacock, A., & Rizzo, I. (2008). The heritage game: Economics, policy, and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Perrini, F., & Vurro, C. (2013). La valutazione degli impatti sociali: Approcci e strumenti applicativi. EGEA spa—CReSV.
Potter, B. (2005). Accounting as a social and institutional practice: Perspectives to enrich our understanding of accounting change. Abacus, 41(3), 265–289.
SROI. (2012). A guide to Social Return on Investment, HF. www.humanfoundation.com
UN-ECOSOC. (2008). Achieving sustainable development and promoting development cooperation. Dialogues at the Economic and Social Council. United Nations Publications. isbn:978-92-1-104587-1.
Watson, K. J., & Whitley, T. (2016). Applying Social Return on Investment (SROI) to the built environment. Building Research and Information, 2–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2016.1223486
Watson, K. J., et al. (2016). Capturing the social value of buildings: The promise of social return on investment (SROI). Building and Environment, 103, 289–301.
Zamagni, S., et al. (2015). Valutare l’impatto sociale. La questione della misurazione nelle imprese sociali. Rivista impresa sociale, 6, 77–97.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Catalfo, P., Giustra, M., Cardillo, A. (2021). Detecting the Social and Economic Impact of Cultural Initiatives: A Case Study of the Taormina Film Fest. In: Demartini, P., Marchegiani, L., Marchiori, M., Schiuma, G. (eds) Cultural Initiatives for Sustainable Development. Contributions to Management Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65687-4_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65687-4_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-65686-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-65687-4
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)