Skip to main content

Interactive Route Personalization Using Regions of Interest

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Current Trends in Web Engineering (ICWE 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12451))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 282 Accesses

Abstract

There is an abundance of services and applications that find the most efficient route between two places, people are not always interested in efficiency; sometimes we just want a pleasant route. Such routes are subjective though, and may depend on contextual factors that route planners are oblivious to. One possible solution is to automatically learn what a user wants, but this requires behavioral data, leading to a cold start problem. An alternative approach is to let the user express their desires explicitly, effectively helping them create the most pleasant route themselves. In this paper we provide a proof of concept of a client-side route planner that does exactly that. We aggregated the Point of Interest information from OpenStreetMap into Regions of Interest, and published the results on the Web. These regions are described semantically, enabling the route planner to align the user’s input to what is known about their environment. Planning a 3 km long pedestrian route through a city center takes 5 s, but subsequent adjustments to the route require less than a second to compute. These execution times imply that our approach is feasible, although further optimizations are needed to bring this to the general public.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Available as Linked Data Fragments, e.g. at https://opoi.org/14/8411/5485/.

  2. 2.

    Using the H3 spatial index, see https://h3geo.org/.

References

  1. Algers, S., Hansen, S., Tegner, G.: Role of waiting time, comfort, and convenience in modal choice for work trip. Transp. Res. Rec. 534, 38–51 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Björneborn, L.: Three key affordances for serendipity. J. Doc. (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bozdag, E.: Bias in algorithmic filtering and personalization. Ethics Inf. Technol. 15(3), 209–227 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Colpaert, P., Abelshausen, B., Meléndez, J.A.R., Delva, H., Verborgh, R.: Republishing OpenStreetMap’s roads as linked routable tiles. In: Hitzler, P., et al. (eds.) ESWC 2019. LNCS, vol. 11762, pp. 13–17. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32327-1_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Debord, G.: Introduction to a Critique of Urban Geography. Praxis (e) press (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Funke, S., Storandt, S.: Personalized route planning in road networks. In: Proceedings of the 23rd SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, pp. 1–10 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Horowitz, A.J.: Subjective value of time in bus transit travel. Transportation 10(2), 149–164 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Jiang, R., Chiappa, S., Lattimore, T., György, A., Kohli, P.: Degenerate feedback loops in recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, pp. 383–390 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Niaraki, A.S., Kim, K.: Ontology based personalized route planning system using a multi-criteria decision making approach. Expert Syst. Appl. 36(2), 2250–2259 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pariser, E.: The Filter Bubble: How the New Personalized Web is Changing What We Read and How We Think. Penguin, Westminster (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Quercia, D., Schifanella, R., Aiello, L.M.: The shortest path to happiness: recommending beautiful, quiet, and happy routes in the city. In: Proceedings of the 25th ACM conference on Hypertext and Social Media, pp. 116–125 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Reviglio, U.: Serendipity as an emerging design principle of the infosphere: challenges and opportunities. Ethics Inf. Technol. 21(2), 151–166 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-018-9496-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Smets, A., Montero, E., Ballon, P.: Does the bubble go beyond? In: Proceedings of The 1st Workshop on the Impact of Recommender Systems with ACM RecSys 2019 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harm Delva .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Delva, H., Smets, A., Colpaert, P., Ballon, P., Verborgh, R. (2020). Interactive Route Personalization Using Regions of Interest. In: Ko, IY., Murillo, J.M., Vuorimaa, P. (eds) Current Trends in Web Engineering. ICWE 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12451. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65665-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65665-2_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-65664-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-65665-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics