Abstract
The “Transboundary Aquifer” concept envisaged in the United Nations Resolution 63/124 “The Law of Transboundary Aquifers” has had a significant impact on the evaluation of transboundary aquifers around the world. In the Mexico–U.S.A. case, it has not been possible to officially determine the total number of shared aquifers, therefore, the evaluation of the systemic functioning of “Transboundary Groundwater” is to be settled; it represents an absent concept in the international transboundary water enactments. This work carries out an analysis based on scientific evidence and legal documents to determine the nature of the current conceptual discrepancies between the scientific definitions of “Transboundary Aquifer” and “Transboundary Groundwater.” Results support the need to incorporate a systemic vision of the functioning of groundwater, as well as the scientific homologation of concepts and methodologies applied by those states interested in jointly assessing groundwater as to avoid water conflicts in the context of its incipient integrated management.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Agnew J (2002) Making political geography. Routledge
Arciniega S, Breña A, Hernández J A, Pedrozo A (2017) Balance hídrico en acuíferos transfronterizos basado en percepción remota. In: IAP, F.G.R.A. Libro de Resúmenes del I Congreso Latinoamericano and V Congreso Nacional de Manejo de Cuencas Hidrográficas
Arizona Revised Status (2020) Title 45 “Waters”, Chapter 2 “Groundwater”, Article 9: §45–561
Bredehoeft JD, Papadopulus SS, Cooper HH (1982) The water budget myth. In: Scientific basis of water resource management, Studies in Geophysics. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp 51–57
Brooks DB, Linton J (2011) Governance of transboundary aquifers: balancing efficiency, equity and sustainability. Int J Water Resour Dev 27(3):431–462
Burchi S (2018) Legal frameworks for the governance of international transboundary aquifers: pre-and post-ISARM experience. J Hydrol Reg Stud 20:15–20
California Water Code (2020) Division 13 “California water districts”, Chapter 1, general provisions, § 37900 (1)
Callegary JB, Megdal SB, Villaseñor ET, Petersen-Perlman JD, Sosa IM, Monreal R, Noriega FG (2018) Findings and lessons learned from the assessment of the Mexico-United States transboundary San Pedro and Santa Cruz aquifers: the utility of social science in applied hydrologic research. J Hydrol Reg Stud 20:60–73
Callegary JB, Minjárez Sosa I, Tapia Villaseñor EM, dos Santos P, Monreal Saavedra, R, Grijalva Noriega FJ, Huth AK, Gray F, Scott CA, Megdal SB, Oroz Ramos LA, Rangel MM, Leenhouts JM (2016) San Pedro River aquifer binational Report: international boundary and water commission, p 170
Carmona LMC, Carrillo-Rivera JJ, Hatch-Kuri Gonzalo, Huizar-Álvarez R, Ortega-Guerrero M (2017) Ley del agua subterránea: una propuesta. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, México
Carrillo-Rivera JJ, Peñuela L, Huizar-Álvarez AR, Ortega-Guerrero A, Vallejo J, Hatch-Kuri G (2016) Capítulo 10. Conflictos por el agua subterránea. Geografía de México. Una reflexión espacial contemporánea 1, pp 151–166
Carrillo-Rivera JJ, Ouysse S (2013) Evaluation of groundwater flow system functioning in Mexico to reduce drought impacts. Drought in Arid and Semi-Arid Regions. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 269–280
Freeze RA (1969) The mechanism of natural ground-water recharge and discharge: one-dimensional, vertical, unsteady, unsaturated flow above a recharging or discharging ground-water flow system. Water Resour Res 5(1):153–171
Freeze RA, Cherry JA (1979) Hydrogeology. Prentice-Hall Publications, p 604
Garza G, Carrillo-Rivera JJ, Huizar-Álvarez R (2018) Coloquios sobre el agua subterránea en México, Senado de la República, LXIII Legislatura, p 155
Han Z, He J, Niu L (2010) Transboundary aquifers in the Great Mekong River Basin. International conference “Transboundary aquifers: challenges and new directions” (ISARM2010). UNESCO-IAH-UNEP Conference, Paris
Hatch-Kuri G (2017) Paso del Norte: La competencia por las aguas transfronterizas. El Colegio de Chihuahua-Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez, Ciudad Juárez, México
Hatch-Kuri G (2018) A joint management of transboundary aquifers: from asymmetries to environmental protection. Frontera norte 30(59):129–154
Hatch-Kuri G (2019a) Cumbre Binacional Sobre Aguas Subterráneas Transfronterizas México-Estados Unidos. TecH20 Center, El Paso, Texas, 10 y 11 Abril Investigaciones Geográficas, No. 99, jul. 2019
Hatch-Kuri G (2019b) Toward comprehensive groundwater management in Mexico. Dossier Water, Voices of Mexico, 108, Summer: 57–58
Hatch-Kuri G, Carrillo-Rivera JJ, Huizar-Álvarez R (2019) Evaluación crítica del acuífero transfronterizo río San Pedro. Reg Cohes 9(1):61–85
IGRAC (2018) Population and aerial statistics for 199 Transboundary Aquifers. IGRAC, Delft
Linton J, Budds J (2014) The hydrosocial cycle: defining and mobilizing a relational-dialectical approach to water. Geoforum 57:170–180
Moreira R (2010) Para onde vai o pensamento geográfico? por uma epistemologia crítica. Edit, Contexto
New Mexico Statutes Water Law (2016) Chapter 72 “Water Law”, Section 72, Article 5A Groundwater Storage and Recovery, § 72-5A-3
Norma Oficial Mexicana 011-CONAGUA (2015) Conservación del recurso agua-Que establece las especificaciones para determinar la disponibilidad media anual de las aguas nacionales, DOF: 27/03/2015, SEGOB México
Pétré MA, Rivera A (2015) Synthesis of knowledge of the Milk River Transboundary Aquifer (Alberta. Natural Resources Canada, Canada-Montana, USA)
Pétré MA, Rivera A, Lefebvre R (2015) 3D unified geological model of the Milk River Transboundary Aquifer. Alberta, Canada-Montana, USA
Ribeiro WC (2010) Geografia política e gestão internacional dos recursos naturais. Estudos avançados 24(68):69–80
Ribeiro WC (2012) Soberania: conceito e aplicação para a gestão da água. Scripta Nova. Rev Electrón Geogr Cienc Soc 16(418):28
Rivera A (2015) Transboundary aquifers along the Canada–USA border: Science, policy and social issues. J Hydrol Reg Stud 4:623–643
Rivera A (2019). What is the future of the Groundwater? Groundwater 57(5):661–662. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12902
Rivera A, Candela L (2018) Fifteen-year experiences of the internationally shared aquifer resources management initiative (ISARM) of UNESCO at the global scale. J Hydrol Reg Stud 20:5–14
Russell HF, Priebe EH Comp (2017) Regional-scale Groundwater Geoscience in Southern Ontario: Ontario Geological Survey, Geological Survey of Canada, and Conservation Ontario open house. http://doi.org/10.4095/299750. Report number: OF 8212
Sánchez R, Eckstein G (2017) Aquifers shared between Mexico and the United States: management perspectives and their transboundary nature. Groundwater 55(4):495–505
Sánchez R, Eckstein G (2020) The path towards groundwater management in the borderlands of Mexico and Texas. Wiley Interdisc Rev Water 7(1):e1399
Sánchez R, López V, Eckstein G (2016) Identifying and characterizing transboundary aquifers along the Mexico–US border: an initial assessment. J Hydrol 535:101–119
Sánchez R, Rodríguez L, Tortajada C (2018) The transboundariness approach and prioritization of transboundary aquifers between Mexico and Texas. Ambio 47(7):760–770
Swyngedouw E (2009) The political economy and political ecology of the hydro-social cycle. J Contemp Water Res Educ 142(1):56–60
Talledos E (2014) La geografía: un saber político. Espiral 21(61):15–49
Texas Administrative Code (1977) Water Code, §330.3(8) and §335.1(8)
Tóth J (1999) Groundwater as a geologic agent: an overview of the causes, processes, and manifestations. Hydrogeol J 7(1):1–14
United Nations General Assembly Resolution 51/229 (1997) Convention on the Law of the Non-navigational Uses of International Watercourses (08 July 1997). Retrieved from https://treaties.un.org/doc/source/docs/A_RES_51_229-Eng.pdf
United Nations General Assembly Resolution 63/124 (2008a) The law of transboundary aquifers (11 December 2008). Retrieved from http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/63/124&Lang=S
United Nations General Assembly Resolution 63/124 (2008b) Water, peace and security: transboundary water cooperation (04 March 2010). Retrieved from https://undocs.org/pdf?symbol=en/A/64/692
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) (1992) Convention on the Protection and use of transboundary watercourses and international lakes (17 March) https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/env/water/pdf/watercon.pdf
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) (2014) Model provisions on transboundary groundwaters. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Geneva
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO-IHP) (2015) Estrategia regional para la evaluación y gestión de los Sistemas Acuíferos Transfronterizos en las Américas. UNESCO, Montevideo, Uruguay
Ward RC (1967) Principles of Hydrology. McGraw Hill. ISBN 10: 0070940479; p 403
Wolf A, Kramer A, Carius A, Dabelko G (2005) Gestionando conflictos por el agua y cooperación. In: Renner M, French H, Assadourian E (Eds.), La situación del mundo 2005: Redefiniendo la seguridad mundial. Informe Anual del Worldwatch Institute sobre el progreso hacia una sociedad sostenible, Barcelona, Icaria, Centro de Investigación para la Paz, 155–178
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hatch-Kuri, G., Carrillo-Rivera, J.J. (2021). Groundwater Flow Systems and Their Importance in the Assessment of Transboundary Groundwater: The Mexico–U.S.A. Case. In: Alconada-Magliano, M.M. (eds) Intensified Land and Water Use. Springer Earth System Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65443-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65443-6_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-65442-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-65443-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)