Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Empathy Regulation in Crisis Scenario

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Empathy, Normalization and De-escalation

  • 1113 Accesses

Abstract

Empathic communication represents the first step of the “END” Communication procedure, which is followed by normalization and de-escalation communication. In this chapter, our view of empathy is conceived not only as an ability of inferring and representing the other one’s mental state but also all the interpersonal procedures and expressions given in a reciprocal and mutual communication. First, we focus on the theoretical aspects of empathic communication and even on practical aspects of this skill; that is not innate but can be learned. Then we present the neural basis of empathy, which are important for having a “neural guide” to address our communication procedures. In this chapter, we provide a number of case vignettes to better explain the difference between a “good/bad” communication and empathic communication and the different results in terms of compliance, therapeutic alliance and outcomes in crisis scenario. Furthermore, the chapter provides practical examples of “empathic” phrases that can be used by clinicians in emergency situations with psychiatric patients but even in other medical settings: the common fields of application of empathic communication basically involve all those contexts in which a healthcare professional-patient relationship is involved. Empathic communication has a cost for the clinician because if in several cases it is easy to represent the mental state of the other and tune in to it, in some cases it can be very difficult and constitute a considerable effort: that’s why we recommend a training and a careful supervision for clinicians and healthcare professionals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Pigman GW. Freud and the history of empathy. Int J Psychoanal. 1995;76(Pt 2):237–56.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. R. Vischer, Über das optische Formgefűhl, 1873

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lipps T. Ästhetik. Psychologie des Schönen und der Kunst. Hamburg, Leipzig: Voss; 1903/1906.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Freud S. Der Witz und seine Beziehung zum Umbewussten. Leipzig, Wien: Franz Deuticke; 1905.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Feshbach N. Parental empathy and child adjustment – maladjustment. In: Eisenberg N, Strayer J, editors. Empathy and its development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Blair RJR. Responding to emotion of others: dissociating forms of empathy trough the study of typical and psychiatric populations. Conscious Cogn. 2005;14:698–718.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Williams B, Beovich B. Psychometric properties of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy: a COSMIN systematic review protocol. Syst Rev. 2019;8(1):319.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Eisenberg N, Miller P. Empathy and prosocial behaviour. Psychol Bull. 1987;101:91–119.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Farrow TFD. Neuroimaging of empathy. In: Farrow T, Woodruff P, editors. Empathy in mental illness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Heyes C. Empathy is not in our genes. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018;95:499–507.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Völlm BA, Taylor AN, Richardson P, Corcoran R, Stirling J, McKie S, Deakin JF, Elliott R. Neuronal correlates of theory of mind and empathy: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in a nonverbal task. Neuroimage. 2006;29(1):90–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Brothers L. A biological perspective on empathy. Am J Psychiatry. 1989;146:10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dunbar RIM. The social brain hypothesis. Evol Anthropol. 1998;6:178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dunbar RIM. The social brain hypothesis and its implications for social evolution. Ann Hum Biol. 2009;36:562.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Frith CD. The social brain? Philos Trans R Soc B. 2007;362:671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Adolphs R. The social brain: neural basis of social knowledge. Annu Rev Psychol. 2009;60:693.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Blair RJR. The amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex: functional contributions and dysfunction in psychopathy. Philos Trans R Soc B. 2008;363:2557.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Blair RJR. Neurobiological basis of psychopathy. Br J Psychiatry. 2003;182:5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Marsh AA, Finger EC, Fowler KA, Adalio CJ, Jurkowitz TN, Schechter JC, Pine DS, Decety J, Blair RJR. Empathic responsiveness in amygdala and anterior cingulate cortex in youths with psychopathic traits. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2013;54:900.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Blair RJR. Traits of empathy and anger: implications for psychopathy and other disorders associated with aggression. Philos Trans R Soc B. 2018;373:20170155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee KH, Farrows TFD, Spence SA, Woodruff PWR. Social cognition, brain networks and schizophrenia. Psychol Med. 2004;34:391.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hobson PR. Empathy and autism. In: Empathy in mental illness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lombardo M, Chakrabarti B, Bullmore E, Sadek SA, Pasco G, Wheelwright SJ, Suckling J, M. A. Consortium, Baron-Cohen S. Atypical neural self-representation in autism. Brain. 2010;133:611.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Harlow JM. Recovery from the passage of an iron bar through the head. Waltham, MA: Massachusetts Medical Society; 1868.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shamay-Tsoory SG, Tomer R, Berger B, Aharon-Peretz J. Characterization of empathy deficits following prefrontal brain damage: the role of the right ventromedial prefrontal cortex. J Cogn Neurosci. 2003;15:324.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Batson CD. These things called empathy: eight related but distinct phenomena. In: The social neuroscience of empathy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Smith A. Cognitive empathy and emotional empathy in human behavior and evolution. Psychol Rec. 2006;56:3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shamay-Tsoory SG, Aharon-Peretz J, Perry D. Two systems for empathy: a double dissociation between emotional and cognitive empathy in inferior frontal gyrus versus ventromedial prefrontal lesions. Brain. 2009;132:617.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Baroh-Cohen S. Autism: the empathizing–systemizing (E-S) theory. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009;1156:68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Premack D, Woodruff G. Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behav Brain Sci. 1978;1:515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wimmer H, Perner J. Beliefs about beliefs: representation and constraircing function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition. 1983;13:103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Baron-Cohen S, Leslie A, Frith U. Does the autistic child have a theory of mind? Cognition. 1985;21:37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Happé FGE. An advanced test of theory of mind: understanding of story characters’ thoughts and feelings by able autistic, mentally handicapped, and normal children and adults. J Autism Dev Disord. 1994;24:129.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Baron-Cohen S, Wheelwright S, Joliffe T. Is there a “language of the eyes”? Evidence from normal adults, and adults with autism or Asperger Syndrome. Vis Cogn. 1997;4:311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Decety J. Empathy in medicine: what it is, and how much we really need it. Am J Med. 2020;133:561.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Blair J, Sellars C, Strickland I, Clark F, Williams A, Smith M, Jones L. Theory of mind in the psychopath. J Foren Psychiatry. 1996;7:15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Richell RA, Mitchell DGV, Newman C, Leonard A, Baron-Cohen S, Blair RJR. Theory of mind and psychopathy: can psychopathic individuals read the ‘language of the eyes’? Neuropsychologia. 2003;41:563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Shamay-Tsoory SG, Harari H, Aharon-Peretz J, Levkovitz Y. The role of the orbitofrontal cortex in affective theory of mind deficits in criminal offenders with psychopathic tendencies. Cortex. 2010;46:668.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Lehmann A, Bahçesular K, Brockmann EM, Biederbick S, Dziobek I, Gallinat J, Montag C. Subjective experience of emotions and emotional empathy in paranoid schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res. 2014;220:825.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Berger P, Bitsch F, Jakobi B, Nagels A, Straube B, Falkenberg I. Cognitive and emotional empathy in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders: a replication and extension study. Psychiatry Res. 2019;276:56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Tholen MG, Trautwein F-M, Böckler A. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) item analysis of empathy and theory of mind. Hum Brain Mapp. 2020;41:2611.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Bzdok D, Schilbach L, Vogeley K, Schneider L, Laird AR, Langner R, Eickhoff SB. Parsing the neural correlates of moral cognition: ALE meta-analysis on morality, theory of mind, and empathy. Brain Struct Funct. 2012;217:783.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Schurz M, Radua J, Aichhorn M, Richlan F, Perner J. Fractionating theory of mind: a meta-analysis of functional brain imaging studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014;42:9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Eres R, Decety J, Louis WR, Molenberghs P. Individual differences in local gray matter density are associated with differences in affective and cognitive empathy. Neuroimage. 2015;117:305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kanske P, Böckler A, Trautwein F-M, Singer T. Dissecting the social brain: introducing the EmpaToM to reveal distinct neural networks and brain – behavior relations for empathy and theory of mind. Neuroimage. 2015;122:6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. de Waal FBM, Preston SD. Mammalian empathy: behavioural manifestations and neural basis. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017;18:498.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Rizzolati G, Caruana F. Some considerations on de Waal and Preston review. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017;18:769.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Gallese V, Keysers C, Rizzolati G. A unifying view of the basis of social cognition. Trends Cogn Sci. 2004;8:396.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Rizzolatti G, Fabbri-Destro M, Cattaneo L. Mirror neurons and their clinical relevance. Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2009;5:24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Rizzolatti G, Fogassi L, Gallese V. Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001;2:661.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Rizzolati G, Craighero L. The mirror-neuron system. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2004;27:169.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Iacoboni M, Molnar-Szakacs M, Gallese V, Buccino G, Mazziotta JC. Grasping the intentions of others with one’s own mirror neuron system. PLoS Biol. 2005;3:e79.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Gallese V. The roots of empathy: the shared manifold hypothesis and the neural basis of intersubjectivity. Psychopathology. 2003;36:171.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Preston SD, de Wall FBM. Empathy: its ultimate and proximate bases. Behav Brain Sci. 2002;25:1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Marsh AA, Yu H, Pine DS, Blair RJR. Oxytocin improves specific recognition of positive facial expressions. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2010;209:225.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Hurlemann R, Patin A, Onur OA, Coehn MX, Baumgartner T, Metzler S, Dziobek I, Gallinat J, Wagner M, Maier W, Kendrik K. Oxytocin enhances amygdala-dependent, socially reinforced learning and emotional empathy in humans. J Neurosci. 2010;30:4999.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Fragkaki I, Cima M. The effect of oxytocin administration on empathy and emotion recognition in residential youth: a randomized, within-subjects trial. Horm Behav. 2019;114:104561.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Domes G, Ower N, von Dawans B, Spengler FB, Dziobek I, Bohus M, Matthies S, Philipsen A, Heinrichs M. Effects of intranasal oxytocin administration on empathy and approach motivation in women with borderline personality disorder: a randomized controlled trial. Transl Psychiatry. 2019;9:328.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Halverson T, Jarskog LF, Pedersen C, Penn D. Effects of oxytocin on empathy, introspective accuracy, and social symptoms in schizophrenia: a 12-week twice-daily randomized controlled trial. Schizophr Res. 2019;204:178.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Palgi S, Klein E, Shamay-Tsoory S. The role of oxytocin in empathy in PTSD. Psychol Trauma Theory Res Pract Policy. 2017;9:70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Geng Y, Zhao W, Zhou F, Ma X, Yao S, Hurlemann R, Becker B, Kendrick KM. Oxytocin enhancement of emotional empathy: generalization across cultures and effects on amygdala activity. Front Neurosci. 2018;12:512.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. de Vignemont F, Singer T. The empathic brain: how, when and why? Trends Cogn Sci. 2006;10:435.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Bernhardt BC, Singer T. The neural basis of empathy. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2012;35:1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Singer T, Lamm C. The social neuroscience of empathy. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009;1156:81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Jimenez KCB, Abdelgabar A, De Angelis L, McKay L, Keysers C, Gazzola V. Changes in brain activity following the voluntary control of empathy. Neuroimage. 2020;216:116529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Santamaría-García H, Baez S, García AM, Flichtentrei D, Prats M, Mastandueno R, Sigman M, Matallana D, Cetkovich M, Ibanez A. Empathy for others’ suffering and its mediators in mental health professionals. Sci Rep. 2017;7:6391.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Baile WF. Giving bad news. Oncologist. 2015;20(8):852–3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. I*CARE. Interpersonal communication and relationship enhancement. Basic principles. http://www.mdanderson.org/education-and-research/resources-for-professionals/professional-educational-resources/i-care/complete-library-of-communication-videos/basic-principles.html.

  69. Feshbach N. Empathy, empathy training and the regulation of aggression in elementary school children. In: Kaplan RM, Konecni VJ, Novaco RW, editors. Aggression in children and youth. The Hague; Boston, MA; Lancaster: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Rogers CR. Counselling and psychotherapy. New York, NY: Houghton Muffin; 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Ruesch J, Hammond DC, Barone DF, Hutchings PS, Kimmel HJ, Traub HL, Cooper JT, Marshall CM. Increasing empathic accuracy through practice and feedback in a clinical interviewing course. J Soc Clin Psychol. 2005;24(2):156–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Ruesch J. Therapeutic communication. New York, NY: Norton; 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Hammond DC, Hepworth DH, Smith VG. Improving therapeutic communication. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Laverdière O, Kealy D, Ogrodniczuk JS, Descôteaux J. Got empathy? A latent profile analysis of psychotherapists’ empathic abilities. Psychother Psychosom. 2019;88(1):41–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Human Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, SAPIENZA University of Rome, Rome, Italy

    Martina Valentini, Irene Pinucci & Massimo Pasquini

Authors
  1. Martina Valentini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Irene Pinucci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Massimo Pasquini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martina Valentini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy

    Massimo Biondi

  2. Department of Human Neuroscience, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy

    Massimo Pasquini

  3. Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy

    Lorenzo Tarsitani

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Valentini, M., Pinucci, I., Pasquini, M. (2021). Empathy Regulation in Crisis Scenario. In: Biondi, M., Pasquini, M., Tarsitani, L. (eds) Empathy, Normalization and De-escalation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65106-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65106-0_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-65105-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-65106-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation