Skip to main content

Is Higher Level of Trust in Organizations Always Positively Correlated with Higher Economic Results? Evidence from Estonian Farms

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Eurasian Business Perspectives

Part of the book series: Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics ((EBES,volume 16/2))

Abstract

Social capital and economic performance, especially the connection between social capital and economic success, has been a challenging subject since the 1980s. The researchers mostly agree that a high level of social capital impacts the economy positively. According to the OECD study (OECD, 2015), it is suggested that an increase in social capital can be the driver of economic growth in Estonia. Trust is considered an essential factor of both social capital and organizational success. The objective of the study was to investigate the relationship of trust and organizational performance as well as the financial results of the organizations based on Estonian farms. A sample of 89 farms was studied. To investigate trust and organizational performance, the instrument with three parts, management trust (MT), organizational trust (OT), and organizational performance (OP), was used. The measures of MT, OT, and OP integrated a Likert-type scale. The data of annual reports were used as indicators of economic results. Both MT and OT positively contributed to organizational performance, but no positive correlation was found between trust indices and economic indicators. The additional study was carried out among the farmers of 32 companies to indicate the possible reasons for no correlation. The main causes pointed out were connected with external conditions like weather, political events (sanctions to Russia), and price level at the stock market.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Algan, Y., & Cahuc, P. (2010). Inherited trust and growth. American Economic Review, 100, 2060–2092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armour, M. (2007). Leadership and the power of trust. Creating a high-trust peak-performance organization. Dallas: Life Themes Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjørnskov, C. (2009). How does social trust affect economic growth? Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus School of Business, University of Arhus.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brower, H. H., Lester, S. W., Korsgaard, M. A., & Dineen, B. (2009). A closer look at trust between managers and subordinates: Understanding the effects of both trusting and being trusted on subordinate outcomes. Journal of Management, 35(2), 327–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1994). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA; London; England: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, J., & Wall, T. (1980). New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need nonfulfillment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 53(1), 39–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covey, S. M. R., & Merrill, R. R. (2008). The speed of trust. New York: Free Press. A Division of Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Early, P. C. (1986). Trust, perceived importance of praise and criticism, and work performance: An examination of feedback in the United States and England. Journal of Management, 12, 457–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edelman. (2019). Trust barometer 2019 [online]. Retrieved July 20, 2019, from https://www.edelman.com/trust-barometer.

  • Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. London: Hamish Hamilton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaasa, A. (2009). Effects of different dimensions of social capital on innovative activity: Evidence from Europe at the regional level. Technovation [e-journal], 29(3), 218–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.01.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knack, S., & Keefer, P. (1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1251–1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knorr, H. (2016). What goes around, comes around: Trust in the Context of Multicultural Leadership: An empirical interpretative study of trust as a situated relational process between leaders and their employees with bicultural backgrounds [pdf]. Aalborg Universitetsforlag. Ph.d.-serien for Det Humanistiske Fakultet [online]. Retrieved July 20, 2019, from http://vbn.aau.dk/files/243384083/PHD_Heidrun_Knorr_E_pdf.pdf.

  • Knorr, H. (2018). When is trust bad for us? Science Nordic, Aalborg University [online]. Retrieved July 20, 2019, from http://sciencenordic.com/when-trust-bad-us.

  • Kramer, R. M., & Cook, K. S. (Eds.). (2004). Trust and distrust in organizations. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeves, G. D. (2014). Increasing returns to education and the impact on social capital. Education Economics [e-journal], 22(5), 449–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2012.660133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, P. (1996). Trust and the bottom line Francis Fukuyama: Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. The Review of Politics [e-journal], 58(04), 829–831. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0034670500020556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2015). OECD economic surveys: Estonia 2015, OECD Publishing [online]. Retrieved July 20, 2019, from https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_surveys-est-2015-en.

  • Paliszkiewicz, J. (2013). The importance of Building and Rebuilding Trust in organizations. w: Proceedings of 2013 International Conference on Technology Innovation and Industrial Management, 29–31 May 2013 Phuket, Thailand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paliszkiewicz, J., Goluchowski, J., Koohang, A., & Nord, J. H. (2014a). Management trust, organizational trust and organizational performance: Advancing and measuring a theoretical model. Management and Production Engineering Review, 5(1), 32–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paliszkiewicz, J., & Koohang, A. (2013). Organizational trust as a foundation for knowledge sharing and its influence on organizational performance. Online Journal of Applied Knowledge Management., 1(2), 116–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paliszkiewicz, J., Koohang, A., Goluchowski, J., & Nord, J. H. (2014b). Management trust, organizational trust, and organizational performance: Empirical validation of an instrument. Online Journal of Applied Knowledge Management [e-journal], 2(1), 28–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J. B. (1972). Generalized expectations for interpersonal trust. American Psychologist, 26(5), 443–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabellini, G. (2010). Culture and institutions: Economic development in the regions of Europe. Journal of the European Economic Association, 8, 677–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, I. (2017). Inspiring trust in business—A responsible business perspective. Birmingham Business School Blog [online]. Retrieved July 6, 2019, from https://blog.bham.ac.uk/business-school/2017/11/06/inspiring-trust-in-business-a-responsible-business-perspective/.

  • Westlund, H., & Adam, F. (2010). Social capital and economic performance: A meta-analysis of 65 studies. European Planning Studies, 18(6), 893–919. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654311003701431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zak, P. J., & Knack, S. (2001). Trust and growth. The Economic Journal [e-journal], 111, 295–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mare Kurvits .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendices

1.1 Appendix 1: The Positive Impact of Trust on the Organization’s Performance

No.

Connection of Trust with the organization’s performance

1.

Interpersonal Trust between managers and subordinates improves performance and productivity.

2.

Interpersonal Trust between managers and subordinates influences high organizational commitment and morale; and low turnover and absenteeism.

3.

Improving behavior and enhancing the quality of communication are other positive characteristics when interpersonal trust between managers and subordinates is present.

4.

Trust is crucial to successful knowledge sharing, and it appears to influence organizational performance.

5.

Trust is enhanced when quality relationships are present among leaders and workers.

6.

Organizational Trust is very important for effective leadership.

7.

Organizational Trust is a very important factor in shaping employees’ engagement.

8.

There is a positive connection between organizational trust and knowledge sharing.

9.

Organizational Trust is faith in the positive intentions of others.

10.

Described organizational trust as a belief that employers will follow the rules.

11.

Trust in organizations involves employees’ willingness to be vulnerable to their organization’s actions.

12.

An important source of information is the employee’s immediate social environment, which largely comprises co-workers.

13.

People can trust only others who also are willing to trust them.

14.

Lack of interpersonal Trust in an organization will give rise to higher supervision costs.

15.

Trust is related to quality relationships, clear communication, knowledge sharing, and a clear understanding of expectations.

16.

Reported a causal, positive effect of trust on growth and economic development.

17.

Increased trust has a positive effect on productivity.

18.

Trust has a positive effect on investment and the accumulation of physical capital.

19.

When subordinates trust their managers, they should be more willing to provide benefits in the form of extra effort toward job performance.

20.

When managers trust their subordinates, the subordinates are likely to be the recipient of more favorable benefits and to experience feelings of self-esteem.

21.

As a result, subordinates should be motivated to perform well and should be more committed to the exchange relationship.

  1. Sources: Paliszkiewicz et al. (2014a, 2014b); Bjørnskov (2009) and Brower, Lester et al. (2009); Compiled by the authors

1.2 Appendix 2: The Basis of Grouping Companies According to the EMTAK Code

Type of production

EMTAK code

EMTAK code explanation

Number of enterprises

Field crops

01111

Growing of cereals (except rice), leguminous crops, and oilseeds

30

01199

Growing of fodder crops and grasses and other non-perennial crops

1

Horticulture + permanent crops

01131

Growing of vegetables (including gourds), roots, and tubers, including mushrooms

6

01281

Growing of spices, aromatic, drug, and pharmaceutical crops

1

01301

Plant propagation

2

01241

Growing of pome fruits and stone fruits

1

01251

Growing of other tree and bush fruits and nuts

3

01291

Growing of other perennial crops

1

Milk production

01411

Raising of dairy cattle

23

Grazing livestock + pig and poultry farming + others

01421

Raising of other cattle and buffaloes

7

01461

Raising of swine/pigs

9

01471

Raising of poultry

2

01491

Beekeeping

2

01501

Mixed farming

1

  1. Source: compiled by the authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kurvits, M., Jarvis, A. (2021). Is Higher Level of Trust in Organizations Always Positively Correlated with Higher Economic Results? Evidence from Estonian Farms. In: Bilgin, M.H., Danis, H., Demir, E., Vale, S. (eds) Eurasian Business Perspectives. Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, vol 16/2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65085-8_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics