Skip to main content

Examining the Factors Affecting the Adoption of IoT Platform Services Based on Flipped Learning Model in Higher Education

Part of the Studies in Systems, Decision and Control book series (SSDC,volume 335)

Abstract

The current status of the 4th industrial revolution has offered some sophisticated technological tools for higher education institutions. One of these technologies is distance learning based on Internet of Things tools and cloud computing, that make the student the main pillar of learning, through engaging in Flipped Learning Model (FLM). For successful IT integration in higher education, designing a distance-learning training platform is vital. Although research has identified the factors that can directly determine the behavioral intention to use technology, little is known about the effects of these factors on the successful design of a distance-training platform. Therefore, this study examines the effects of these factors in determining the successful design and use of IoT-applications through distance learning platform based on FLM for higher education within the context of Oman technological colleges. This would be implemented by developing a conceptual framework in scope of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), and literature review. Data will be collected from employees at these colleges, and analyzed using partial least squares—structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), in addition to the Importance-Performance Map Analysis (IPMA).

Keywords

  • Internet of things
  • Cloud computing
  • Flip learning model (FLM)
  • Importance-performance map analysis (IPMA)

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-64987-6_9
  • Chapter length: 23 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-030-64987-6
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Ali, M., et al.: IoTFLiP: IoT-based flipped learning platform for medical education. Digit. Commun. Netw. 3(3), 188–194 (2017)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  2. Gilboy, M.B., Heinerichs, S., Pazzaglia, G.: Enhancing student engagement using the flipped classroom. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 47(1), 109–114 (2015)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  3. Abowd, G.D., Tech, G.: Beyond Weiser: from ubiquitous to collective computing. Computer 49(1), 17–23 (2016)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  4. Patel, P., Cassou, D.: Enabling high-level application development for the Internet of Things. J. Syst. Softw. 103, 62–84 (2015)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  5. Leal, J.R.D.S.: Explaining organizational adoption of technology: the case of cloud platforms for Internet of Things. Master’s thesis, Dept. Information Systems Science, University of Jyväskylä (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Karen Rose, L.C., Eldridge, S.: The Internet of Things: an overview. The Internet Society, vol. 80, pp. 1–50 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cavalcante, E., et al.: On the interplay of Internet of Things and Cloud Computing: a systematic mapping study. Comput. Commun. 89–90, 17–33 (2016)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  8. Davalos, A.G., Marquez, J., Villanueva, J., Solarte, Z.: IoT in education: integration of objects with virtual academic communities. Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput. 445(115), V–VI (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Selinger, M., Sepulveda, A., Buchan, J.: Education and the internet of everything. Int. Bus. Manag. 10(18), 4301–4303 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ervin, R.: How Digital Textbooks, Tech-Friendly Furniture, and Better Data Are Boosting Engagement at Community Colleges—EdSurge News. EdSurge (2017) [online]. Available at: https://www.edsurge.com/news/2017-01-30-how-digital-textbooks-tech-friendly-furniture-and-better-data-are-boosting-engagement-at-community-colleges

  11. The Statistics Portal: Internet of Things (IoT) connected devices installed base worldwide from 2015 to 2025 (in billions). © Statista 2018 (2016) [online]. Available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/471264/iot-number-of-connected-devices-worldwide/

  12. The Cisco Portal: The Internet of Everything in Higher Education (2013) [online]. Available at: http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en_us/solutions/industries/education/us_education/c ampusconnection_100814_ioe.pdf

  13. Demirer, V., Aydin, B., Çelik, S.B.: Exploring the educational potential of Internet of Things (IoT) in seamless learning. The Internet of Things: Breakthroughs in Research and Practice, pp. 1–15 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Movahed, H., Bagheri, M.: The effect of the Internet of Things (IoT) on education business model the effect of the Internet of Things (IoT) on education business model. In: 2016 12th International Conference on Signal-Image Technology & Internet-Based Systems (SITIS), Naples, 2016, pp. 435–441

    Google Scholar 

  15. Satu, S., Roy, S., Akhter, F.: IoLT: an IoT based collaborative blended learning platform in higher education. In: 2018 International Conference on Innovation in Engineering and Technology (ICIET), pp. 1–6 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Förster, A., Dede, J., Könsgen, A., Udugama, A., Zaman, I.: Teaching the Internet of Things. GetMobile: Mob. Comput. Commun. 20(3), 24–28 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lai, C., Hwang, G.: A self-regulated flipped classroom approach to improving students’ learning performance in a mathematics course. Comput. Educ. 100, 126–140 (2016)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  18. Gros, B., López, M.: Students as co-creators of technology-rich learning activities in higher education. Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ. 13(28) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Strawser, M.G. (ed.): New Media and Digital Pedagogy: Enhancing the Twenty-First-Century Classroom (Studies in New Media). Lexington Books (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Veeramanickam, M.R.M., Mohanapriya, M.: IOT enabled Futurus Smart Campus with effective E-learning: i-Campus. GSTF J. Eng. Technol. 3(4), 81–87 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gao, L., Bai, X.: A unified perspective on the factors influencing consumer acceptance of internet of things technology. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 26(2), 211–231 (2014)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  22. Accenture: The Internet of Things: The Future of Consumer Adoption (2014) [online]. Available at: https://www.accenture.com/t20150624T211456__w__/us-en/_acnmedia/Accenture/Conversion-Assets/DotCom/Documents/Global/PDF/Technology_9/Accenture-Internet-Things.pdf

  23. Al-Momani, A.M., Mahmoud, M.A., Ahmad, S.M.: Modeling the adoption of internet of things services: a conceptual framework. Int. J. Appl. Res. 2(5), 361–367 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., Warshaw, P.R.: User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag. Sci. 35(8), 982–1003 (1989)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  25. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., Davis, F.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27(3), 425–478 (2003)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  26. El-Masri, M., Tarhini, A.: Erratum to: Factors affecting the adoption of e-learning systems in Qatar and USA: extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 (UTAUT2). Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 65(3), 765–767 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9508-8

  27. Lee, Y.K., Park, J.H., Chung, N., Blakeney, A.: A unified perspective on the factors influencing usage intention toward mobile financial services. J. Bus. Res. 65(11), 1590–1599 (2012)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  28. Long, T.: Development and initial validation of a flipped classroom adoption inventory in higher education. Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. Graduate School, University of Tennessee (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Svendsen, G.B., Johnsen, J.A.K., Almås-Sørensen, L., Vittersø, J.: Personality and technology acceptance: the influence of personality factors on the core constructs of the Technology Acceptance Model. Behav. Inf. Technol. 32(4), 323–334 (2013)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  30. Al-Momani, A.M., Mahmoud, M.A., Ahmad, M.S.: Factors that influence the acceptance of internet of things services by customers of telecommunication companies in Jordan. J. Organ. End User Comput. 30(4), 51–63 (2018)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  31. Alghatrifi, I., Khalid, H.: A systematic review of UTAUT and UTAUT2 as a baseline framework of information system research in adopting new technology: a case study of IPV6 adoption. In: 2019 6th International Conference on Research and Innovation in Information Systems (ICRIIS), Johor Bahru, Malaysia, 2019, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/icriis48246.2019.9073292

  32. Marchewka, J., Liu, C., Kostiwa, K.: An application of the UTAUT model for understanding student perceptions using course management software. Commun. IIMA 7(2), 93 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J., Xu, X.: Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Q. 36(1), 157–178 (2012)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  34. Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of Innovations, 5th edn. Simon and Schuster, Canada (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Al-Qeisi, K., Dennis, C., Alamanos, E., Jayawardhena, C.: Website design quality and usage behavior: Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. J. Bus. Res. 67(11), 2282–2290 (2014)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  36. Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., Dwivedi, Y.K.: Acceptance and use predictors of open data technologies: drawing upon the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Gov. Inf. Q. 32(4), 429–440 (2015)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  37. Mutlu, H.M., Der, A.: Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: the adoption of mobile messaging application. Megatrend Rev. 14(1), 169–186 (2017)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  38. Davis, F.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319–340 (1989)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  39. Sanny, L.: Analysis of online purchase behavior intention in SME in Indonesia. In: 2017 3rd International Conference on Information Management (ICIM), Chengdu, pp. 6–10 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Chong, A.Y.L., Chan, F.T.S., Ooi, K.B.: Predicting consumer decisions to adopt mobile commerce: cross country empirical examination between China and Malaysia. Decis. Support Syst. 53(1), 34–43 (2012)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  41. Taherdoost, H.: A review of technology acceptance and adoption models and theories. Procedia Manuf. 22, 960–967 (2018)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  42. Al Mansoori, K.A.: Use of a modified UTAUT model to investigate Emirati Citizens’ adoption of e-Government in Abu Dhabi. Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. Faculty of Business, University of Wollongong in Dubai (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Gupta, A., Dogra, N.: Tourist adoption of mapping apps: a UTAUT2 perspective of smart travellers. Tour. Hosp. Manag. 23(2), 145–161 (2017)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  44. Han, B., Wu, Y., Windsor, J.: User’s adoption of free third-party security apps. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 54(3), 77–86 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Al-Emran, M., Salloum, S.A.: Students’ attitudes towards the use of mobile technologies in e-Evaluation. Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol. 11(5), 195–202 (2017)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  46. Al-Emran, M., Malik, S.I.: The impact of Google apps at work: higher educational perspective. Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol. 10(4), 85–88 (2016)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  47. Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M.: A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). SAGE, Inc., Thousand Oaks (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Hair, J.F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., Kuppelwieser, V.G.: Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): an emerging tool in business research. Eur. Bus. Rev. 26(2), 106–121 (2014)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  49. Whitehead, A.L., Julious, S.A., Cooper, C.L., Campbell, M.J.: Estimating the sample size for a pilot randomised trial to minimise the overall trial sample size for the external pilot and main trial for a continuous outcome variable. Stat. Methods Med. Res. 25(3), 1057–1073 (2015)

    MathSciNet  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  50. Chin, W.W.: The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Mod. Methods Bus. Res. 295(2), 295–336 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Morrison, L.C.L.M.K.: Research Methods in Education, 6th edn. Taylor & Francis Group, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Cooper, D.R., Wittenberg, P.S.S.: Business Research Methods, 12th edn. McGraw-Hill Education, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Garson, G.D.: Partial Least Squares: Regression & Structural Equation Models. Statistical Associates Publishers, Asheboro, NC (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., Thornhill, A.: Research Methods for Business Students, 5th edn. Pearson, London (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Babbie, E.R.: The Basics of Social Research, 6th edn. Cengage Learning, Belmont, CA (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M.: A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 43(1), 115–135 (2015)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  57. Fritz, M.S., Mackinnon, D.P.: Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychol. Sci. 18(3), 233–239 (2010)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  58. Preacher, K.J., Hayes, A.F.: Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav. Res. Methods 40(3), 879–891 (2008)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  59. Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M.: Gain more insight from your PLS-SEM results the importance-performance map analysis. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 116(9), 1865–1886 (2016)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali S. Al-Musawi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Al-Musawi, A.S., Alghatrifi, I. (2021). Examining the Factors Affecting the Adoption of IoT Platform Services Based on Flipped Learning Model in Higher Education. In: Al-Emran, M., Shaalan, K. (eds) Recent Advances in Technology Acceptance Models and Theories. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol 335. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64987-6_9

Download citation