Skip to main content

Land Property Data Logging on Blockchain Ledger

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Dynamics of Disasters

Abstract

Occurrences of disaster lead to problems in information retrieval about damaged land properties as it is a time-consuming task, and one that entails a lot of bureaucracy. In this paper we will discuss a specific method using blockchain technology and specialized equipment to collect and register land property information. That information is critical for individuals, governments as well as insurance companies for evaluating risk associated with disasters. For reasons of data integrity and transparency, all of this information is available in a form on a public blockchain ledger.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. https://geodata.grid.unep.ch/

  2. https://ethereum.github.io/yellowpaper/paper.pdf

  3. https://github.com/alex-z-charalampidis/smart-contract-dod19

  4. Saveen A Abeyratne and Radmehr P Monfared. “Blockchain ready manufacturing supply chain using distributed ledger”. In: International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology 5.9 (2016). Data Accessedd in January 2019, pp. 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Georg Becker. “Merkle signature schemes, merkle trees and their cryptanalysis”. In: Ruhr-University Bochum, Tech. Rep (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Martha Liliana Carreño, Omar Dario Cardona, and Alex H Barbat. “A disaster risk management performance index”. In: Natural Hazards 41.1 (2007), pp. 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Martha-Liliana Carreño, Omar D Cardona, and Alex H Barbat. “Urban seismic risk evaluation: a holistic approach”. In: Natural Hazards 40.1 (2017), pp. 137–172.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rachel Davidson. “EERI annual student paper award a multidisciplinary urban earthquake disaster risk index”. In: Earthquake Spectra 13.2 (1997), pp. 211–223.

    Google Scholar 

  9. D Eckstein, V Künzel, and L Schäfer. Global climate risk index 2018. Germanwatch, 33. 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Farin Fatemi et al. “Social vulnerability indicators in disasters: Findings from a systematic review”. In: International journal of disaster risk reduction 22 (2017), pp. 219–227.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Valentina Gatteschi et al. “Blockchain and smart contracts for insurance: Is the technology mature enough?” In: Future Internet 10.2 (2018), p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Anne Goes and Jerry R Skees. Financing natural disaster risk using charity contributions and ex ante index insurance. Tech. rep. 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lars Hakanson. “An ecological risk index for aquatic pollution control. A sedimentological approach”. In: Water research, 14.8 (1980), pp. 975–1001.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sven Harmeling. “Global Climate Risk Index 2009”. In: Weather (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mohammed Shariful Islam, Mohammad Shahidul Hasan Swapan, and Shamim Mahabubul Haque. “Disaster risk index: How far should it take account of local attributes?” In: International journal of disaster risk reduction 3 (2013), pp. 76–87.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hyong S Kim and Ke Wang. “Immutability measure for different blockchain structures”. In: 2018 IEEE 39th Sarnoff Symposium. IEEE. 2018, pp. 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sönke Kreft et al. “Global climate risk index 2014”. In: Who suffers most from extreme weather events 1 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Regio A Michelin et al. “SpeedyChain: A framework for decoupling data from blockchain for smart cities”. In: Proceedings of the 15th EAI International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Computing, Networking and Services. 2018, pp. 145–154

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pedcris M Orencio and Masahiko Fujii. “A localized disaster-resilience index to assess coastal communities based on an analytic hierarchy process (AHP)”. In: International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 3 (2013), pp. 62–75.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kazım Rıfat Özyılmaz and Arda Yurdakul. “Work-in-progress: integrating low-power IoT devices to a blockchain-based infrastructure”. In: 2017 International Conference on Embedded Software (EMSOFT). IEEE. 2017, pp. 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pascal Peduzzi et al. “Assessing global exposure and vulnerability towards natural hazards: the Disaster Risk Index”. In: Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 9.4 (2009), p. 1149.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters. “EM-DAT: the international disaster database”. In: Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters Brussels. 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pradip Kumar Sharma, Mu-Yen Chen, and Jong Hyuk Park. “A software defined fog node based distributed blockchain cloud architecture for IoT”. In: Ieee Access 6 (2017), pp. 115–124.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Peijun Shi et al. “World atlas of natural disaster risk”. In: World Atlas of natural disaster risk. Springer, 2015, pp. 309–323.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Chung-Hung Tsai and Cheng-Wu Chen. “The establishment of a rapid natural disaster risk assessment model for the tourism industry”. In: Tourism Management 32.1 (2011), pp. 158–171.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hoang Tam Vo et al. “Blockchain-based data management and analytics for micro-insurance applications”. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 2017, pp. 2539–2542.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Shuai Wang et al. “An overview of smart contract: architecture, applications, and future trends”. In: 2018 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV). IEEE. 2018, pp. 108–113.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Web3. web3.js - Ethereum Javascript. Data Accessed in January 2019. Mar. 2019. https://web3js.readthedocs.io/.

  29. Muhammad Saqib Niaz and Gunter Saake. “Merkle Hash Tree based Techniques for Data Integrity of Outsourced Data”. In: GvD. (2015), pp. 66–71.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Papangelou, S., Charalampidis, Z.A. (2021). Land Property Data Logging on Blockchain Ledger. In: Kotsireas, I.S., Nagurney, A., Pardalos, P.M., Tsokas, A. (eds) Dynamics of Disasters. Springer Optimization and Its Applications, vol 169. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64973-9_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics