Abstract
In this work, we have analyzed the perceptions of Master of Business Administration (MBA) enrolled job-seekers towards video resumes along with determining the reasons for preference and non-preference for it. We administered 210 semi-structured self-designed questionnaires among MBA enrolled candidates looking for internships or final year placements of various Indian Universities. They were asked to use a video resume platform followed by filling up a semi-structured questionnaire focussed on gathering viewpoints about the perceived interface features, fairness, validity, privacy. Qualitative data analysis was also done to determine the reasons affecting user’s adoption of platform driven services. Video resumes hosted on video-sharing platforms offer a unique opportunity to both the sides concerned i.e. the job applicant as well as the recruiter. Research on determining video resumes from job applicants’ viewpoints is scarce and this study will add to the paucity of research pool on this topic. Moreover, this is the first study to highlight the issue of security and privacy of video resume platforms and, provide technical recommendations to these platforms from the applicants’ perspective. With this study we hope to reach out to recruiters (practitioners), job-seekers, researchers and information system application developers for better acceptability of the product.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson, N.: Perceived job discrimination: toward a model of applicant propensity to case initiation in selection. Int. J. Sel. Assess. 19, 229–244 (2011)
Bachiochi, P.D., Weiner, S.: Qualitative data collection and analysis. In: Rogelberg, S.G. (ed.) Handbook of Research Methods in Industrial and Organizational Psychology, pp. 161–183. Blackwell Publishers, Malden (2004)
Bauer, T.N., Truxillo, D.M., Paronto, M.E., Weekley, J.A., Campion, M.A.: Applicant reactions to different selection technology: face-to-face, interactive voice response, and computer-assisted telephone screening interviews. Int. J. Sel. Assess. 12, 135–148 (2004)
Bertrand, M., Mullainathan, S.: Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. Am. Econ. Rev. 94, 991–1013 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828042002561
Bowman, A., Wyman, J.F., Peters, J.: The operations manual: a mechanism for improving the research process. Nurs. Res. 51(2), 134–138 (2002)
Bryman, A.: Social Research Methods, 5th edn. Oxford University Press, London (2016)
Chan, D., Schmitt, N.: Video-based versus paper-and-pencil method of assessment in situational judgment tests: subgroup differences in test performance and face validity perceptions. J. Appl. Psychol. 82, 143–159 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.1.143
Cole, M.S., Rubin, R.S., Field, H.S., Giles, W.F.: Recruiters’ perceptions and use of applicant résumé information: screening the recent graduate. Appl. Psychol. Int. Rev. 56, 319–343 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2007.00288.x
Cole, M.S., Field, H.S., Giles, W.F., Harris, S.G.: Recruiters’ inferences of applicant personality based on résumé screening: do paper people have a personality? J. Bus. Psychol. 24, 5–18 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-008-9086-9
Corbin, J., Strauss, A.: Grounded theory research: procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qual. Sociol. 13(1), 3–21 (1990)
Daft, R.L., Lengel, R.H.: Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Manag. Sci. 32(5), 554–571 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1287//mnsc.32.5.554
DeGroot, T., Motowidlo, S.J.: Why visual and vocal interview cues can affect interviewers’ judgments and predict job performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 84, 986–993 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.6.986
Funder, D.C.: On the accuracy of personality judgment: a realistic approach. Psychol. Rev. 102(4), 652–670 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.4.652
Gerald, L., William, E., Helmreich, R.: The strength of the halo effect in physical attractiveness research. J. Psychol. 107, 69–75 (1981)
Gissel, A.L., Thompson, L.F., Pond, S.B.: A theory-driven investigation of prospective applicants’ intentions to submit video résumés. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 43(12), 2449–2461 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12191
Heale, R., Forbes, D.: Understanding triangulation in research. Evid.-Based Nurs. 16(98), 98 (2013)
Hiemstra, A.M.F.: Fairness in paper and video resume screening. Ph.D. thesis, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Netherlands (2013)
Hsieh, H.F., Shannon, S.: Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual. Health Res. 15(9), 1277–2005 (2016)
Huffcutt, A.I., Conway, J., Roth, P.L., Stone, N.J.: Identification and meta-analytic assessment of psychological constructs measured in employment interviews. J. Appl. Psychol. 86(5), 897–913 (2001)
Lin, W.L., Yao, G.: Predictive validity. In: Michalos, A.C. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer, Dordrecht (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2241
Madera, J.M., Hebl, M.R.: Discrimination against facially stigmatized applicants in interviews: an eye-tracking and face-to-face investigation. J. Appl. Psychol. 97, 317–330 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025799
Palinkas, L.A., Horwitz, S.M., Green, C.A., Wisdom, J.P., Duan, N., Hoagwood, K.: Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Adm. Policy Ment. Health Ment. Health Serv. Res. 42(5), 533–544 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
Quinn, K.A., Mason, M.F., Macrae, C.N.: Familiarity and person construal: individuating knowledge moderates the automaticity of category activation. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 39, 852–861 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.596
Richman, W., Olson, J., Drasgow, F.: Examining the impact of administration medium on examinee perceptions and attitudes. J. Appl. Psychol. 85, 880–887 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.85.6.880
Ryan, A.M., Ployhart, R.E.: Applicants’ perceptions of selection procedures and decisions: a critical review and agenda for the future. J. Manag. 26, 565–606 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600308
Schmidt, F.L., Hunter, J.E.: The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychol. Bull. 124, 262–274 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.262
Stoughton, J.W., Thompson, L.F., Meade, A.W.: Examining applicant reactions to the use of social networking websites in pre-employment screening. J. Bus. Psychol. 30(1), 73–88 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9333-6
Sundar, A., Kardes, F., Noseworthy, T.: Inferences on Negative Labels and the Horns Effect. Association for Consumer Research (2014)
Sylva, H., Mol, S.T.: E-recruitment: a study into applicant perceptions of an online application system. Int. J. Sel. Assess. 17, 311–323 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14682389.2009.00473.x
Waung, M., Hymes, R.W., Beatty, J.E.: The effects of video and paper resumes on assessments of personality, applied social skills, mental capability, and resume outcomes. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 36(3), 238–251 (2014)
Westin, A.F.: Privacy and Freedom. Atheneum Books, New York (1967)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Goel, A., Awasthy, R. (2020). Are Video Resumes Preferred by Job Applicants? Information Technology in Recruitment. In: Sharma, S.K., Dwivedi, Y.K., Metri, B., Rana, N.P. (eds) Re-imagining Diffusion and Adoption of Information Technology and Systems: A Continuing Conversation. TDIT 2020. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 618. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64861-9_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64861-9_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-64860-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-64861-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)