Skip to main content

Are Video Resumes Preferred by Job Applicants? Information Technology in Recruitment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Re-imagining Diffusion and Adoption of Information Technology and Systems: A Continuing Conversation (TDIT 2020)

Abstract

In this work, we have analyzed the perceptions of Master of Business Administration (MBA) enrolled job-seekers towards video resumes along with determining the reasons for preference and non-preference for it. We administered 210 semi-structured self-designed questionnaires among MBA enrolled candidates looking for internships or final year placements of various Indian Universities. They were asked to use a video resume platform followed by filling up a semi-structured questionnaire focussed on gathering viewpoints about the perceived interface features, fairness, validity, privacy. Qualitative data analysis was also done to determine the reasons affecting user’s adoption of platform driven services. Video resumes hosted on video-sharing platforms offer a unique opportunity to both the sides concerned i.e. the job applicant as well as the recruiter. Research on determining video resumes from job applicants’ viewpoints is scarce and this study will add to the paucity of research pool on this topic. Moreover, this is the first study to highlight the issue of security and privacy of video resume platforms and, provide technical recommendations to these platforms from the applicants’ perspective. With this study we hope to reach out to recruiters (practitioners), job-seekers, researchers and information system application developers for better acceptability of the product.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Anderson, N.: Perceived job discrimination: toward a model of applicant propensity to case initiation in selection. Int. J. Sel. Assess. 19, 229–244 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bachiochi, P.D., Weiner, S.: Qualitative data collection and analysis. In: Rogelberg, S.G. (ed.) Handbook of Research Methods in Industrial and Organizational Psychology, pp. 161–183. Blackwell Publishers, Malden (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bauer, T.N., Truxillo, D.M., Paronto, M.E., Weekley, J.A., Campion, M.A.: Applicant reactions to different selection technology: face-to-face, interactive voice response, and computer-assisted telephone screening interviews. Int. J. Sel. Assess. 12, 135–148 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bertrand, M., Mullainathan, S.: Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. Am. Econ. Rev. 94, 991–1013 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828042002561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bowman, A., Wyman, J.F., Peters, J.: The operations manual: a mechanism for improving the research process. Nurs. Res. 51(2), 134–138 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bryman, A.: Social Research Methods, 5th edn. Oxford University Press, London (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chan, D., Schmitt, N.: Video-based versus paper-and-pencil method of assessment in situational judgment tests: subgroup differences in test performance and face validity perceptions. J. Appl. Psychol. 82, 143–159 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.1.143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cole, M.S., Rubin, R.S., Field, H.S., Giles, W.F.: Recruiters’ perceptions and use of applicant résumé information: screening the recent graduate. Appl. Psychol. Int. Rev. 56, 319–343 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2007.00288.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cole, M.S., Field, H.S., Giles, W.F., Harris, S.G.: Recruiters’ inferences of applicant personality based on résumé screening: do paper people have a personality? J. Bus. Psychol. 24, 5–18 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-008-9086-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Corbin, J., Strauss, A.: Grounded theory research: procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qual. Sociol. 13(1), 3–21 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Daft, R.L., Lengel, R.H.: Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Manag. Sci. 32(5), 554–571 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1287//mnsc.32.5.554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. DeGroot, T., Motowidlo, S.J.: Why visual and vocal interview cues can affect interviewers’ judgments and predict job performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 84, 986–993 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.6.986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Funder, D.C.: On the accuracy of personality judgment: a realistic approach. Psychol. Rev. 102(4), 652–670 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.4.652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gerald, L., William, E., Helmreich, R.: The strength of the halo effect in physical attractiveness research. J. Psychol. 107, 69–75 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gissel, A.L., Thompson, L.F., Pond, S.B.: A theory-driven investigation of prospective applicants’ intentions to submit video résumés. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 43(12), 2449–2461 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Heale, R., Forbes, D.: Understanding triangulation in research. Evid.-Based Nurs. 16(98), 98 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hiemstra, A.M.F.: Fairness in paper and video resume screening. Ph.D. thesis, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Netherlands (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hsieh, H.F., Shannon, S.: Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual. Health Res. 15(9), 1277–2005 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Huffcutt, A.I., Conway, J., Roth, P.L., Stone, N.J.: Identification and meta-analytic assessment of psychological constructs measured in employment interviews. J. Appl. Psychol. 86(5), 897–913 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lin, W.L., Yao, G.: Predictive validity. In: Michalos, A.C. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer, Dordrecht (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2241

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Madera, J.M., Hebl, M.R.: Discrimination against facially stigmatized applicants in interviews: an eye-tracking and face-to-face investigation. J. Appl. Psychol. 97, 317–330 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Palinkas, L.A., Horwitz, S.M., Green, C.A., Wisdom, J.P., Duan, N., Hoagwood, K.: Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Adm. Policy Ment. Health Ment. Health Serv. Res. 42(5), 533–544 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Quinn, K.A., Mason, M.F., Macrae, C.N.: Familiarity and person construal: individuating knowledge moderates the automaticity of category activation. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 39, 852–861 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Richman, W., Olson, J., Drasgow, F.: Examining the impact of administration medium on examinee perceptions and attitudes. J. Appl. Psychol. 85, 880–887 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.85.6.880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ryan, A.M., Ployhart, R.E.: Applicants’ perceptions of selection procedures and decisions: a critical review and agenda for the future. J. Manag. 26, 565–606 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Schmidt, F.L., Hunter, J.E.: The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychol. Bull. 124, 262–274 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Stoughton, J.W., Thompson, L.F., Meade, A.W.: Examining applicant reactions to the use of social networking websites in pre-employment screening. J. Bus. Psychol. 30(1), 73–88 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9333-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sundar, A., Kardes, F., Noseworthy, T.: Inferences on Negative Labels and the Horns Effect. Association for Consumer Research (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sylva, H., Mol, S.T.: E-recruitment: a study into applicant perceptions of an online application system. Int. J. Sel. Assess. 17, 311–323 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14682389.2009.00473.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Waung, M., Hymes, R.W., Beatty, J.E.: The effects of video and paper resumes on assessments of personality, applied social skills, mental capability, and resume outcomes. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 36(3), 238–251 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Westin, A.F.: Privacy and Freedom. Atheneum Books, New York (1967)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Apoorva Goel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Goel, A., Awasthy, R. (2020). Are Video Resumes Preferred by Job Applicants? Information Technology in Recruitment. In: Sharma, S.K., Dwivedi, Y.K., Metri, B., Rana, N.P. (eds) Re-imagining Diffusion and Adoption of Information Technology and Systems: A Continuing Conversation. TDIT 2020. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 618. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64861-9_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64861-9_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-64860-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-64861-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics