Skip to main content

Abstract

Nonetheless, the many developments occasioned by and through information and communication technology (ICT), the plethora of debates on what ‘development’ means persist. Researchers, practitioners, policy makers and stakeholders of ICTs for Development (ICT4D) have a good understanding of ICT4D, yet their views differ when it comes to the ‘development’. The ICT (as an entity), do not get interrogated well enough as a research reality or phenomenon in itself. Differing opinions persist. Without a common understanding, diffusion and adoption of ICT4D will continue fragmented. In continuing the conversation, one area to reimagine is the ICT and digital technologies in ICT4D or information systems. This paper revisits Walsham’s (“ICT4D research: reflections on history and future agenda”) 2017 paper, as a backdrop to elucidate the emancipatory ethos of critical realism and introduce the conceptual CIPPUA model. Through explanatory stratified ontological review of the position, nature and identity of digital technologies/objects, this paper contributes to the ongoing discourse on critical realism in digital development, especially the connection of ICT to development. More so, this paper with the conceptual CIPPUA model, contributes in part to the discourse of operationalizing critical realism in practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. De, R., Pal, A., Sethi, R., Reddy, S.K., Chitre, C.: ICT4D research: a call for a strong critical approach. Inf. Technol. Dev. 24, 63–94 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2017.1286284

  2. Thapa, D., Omland, H.O.: Four steps to identify mechanisms of ICT4D: a critical realismbased methodology. Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries. 84, e12054 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wessel, L., Baiyere, A., Ologeanu-Taddei, R., Cha, J., Jensen, T.B.: Unpacking the difference between digital transformation and IT-enabled organizational transformation. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Walsham, G.: ICT4D research: reflections on history and future agenda. Inf. Technol. Dev. 23, 18–41 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2016.1246406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Heeks, R.: ICT4D 3.0? Part 2—The patterns of an emerging “digital for development” paradigm. Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries. 86, e12123 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12123

  6. Mungai, P.W.: Causal mechanisms and institutionalisation of open government data in Kenya. Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries. 84, e12056 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kuechler, W., Vaishnavi, V.: A framework for theory development in design science research: multiple perspectives. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 13, 395–423 (2012). https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00300

  8. Ladel, S., Kortenkamp, U.: Artifact-centric activity theory—a framework for the analysis of the design and use of virtual manipulatives. In: Moyer-Packenham, P.S.S. (ed.) International Perspectives on Teaching and Learning Mathematics with Virtual Manipulatives. MEDE, vol. 7, pp. 25–40. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32718-1_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Bennett, L.A.: Capturing information technology use by senior secondary school students in New Zealand. In: Proceedings of the 28th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS 2017). AAIS: Australasian Association for Information Systems, Hobart, Australia (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Heeks, R., Wall, P.J.: Critical realism and ICT4D research. Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries. 84, e12051 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Faulkner, P., Runde, J.: Technological objects, social positions, and the transformational model of social activity. MIS Q. 37, 803–818 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fletcher, A.J.: Applying critical realism in qualitative research: methodology meets method. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 20, 181–194 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2016.1144401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Walsham, G.: Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 4, 74–81 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.1995.9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bhaskar, R.: A Realist Theory of Science. Routledge, Oxon (2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Archer, M.S., Bhaskar, Roy, Collier, Andrew, Lawson, T., Norrie, A. (eds.) Critical Realism: Essential Readings. Routledge (2013). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315008592

  16. Vandenberghe, F., (ed.): What’s Critical About Critical Realism?: Essays in Reconstructive Social Theory. Routledge, Oxon OX14 4RN (2013). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203798508

  17. Bennett, L.A., Toland, J., Howell, B., Tate, M.: Revisiting hylomorphism: what can it contribute to our understanding of information systems? In: 30th Australasian Conference on Information Systems 2019 (ACIS 2019), pp. 173–179. Australasian Association for Information Systems, Fremantle, Perth, Western Australia, Australia (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Faulkner, P., Runde, J.: Theorizing the digital object. Manag. Inf. Syst. Q. 43, 1279–1302 (2019). https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2019/13136

  19. Saunders, M.N.K., Lewis, P., Thornhill, A.: Chapter 4: understanding research philosophy and approaches to theory development. In: Research Methods for Business Students, pp. 128–170. Pearson, Harlow, England (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Arksey, H., O’Malley, L.: Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 8, 19–32 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Archer, M.S.: The morphogenetic approach; critical realism’s explanatory framework approach. In: Róna, P., Zsolnai, L. (eds.) Agency and Causal Explanation in Economics. VE, vol. 5, pp. 137–150. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26114-6_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Wright, G., Cairns, G., Bradfield, R.: Scenario methodology: new developments in theory and practice. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change. 80, 561–565 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.11.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Price, L., Martin, L.: Introduction to the special issue: applied critical realism in the social sciences. J. Crit. Realis. 17, 89–96 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2018.1468148

  24. Bhaskar, R.: Enlightened Common Sense: The Philosophy of Critical Realism. Ontological. Routledge, New York (2016). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315542942

  25. Heeks, R., Thapa, D., Wall, P.J.: Critical realism and ICT4D: editorial introduction to the special issue of EJISDC. Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries. 84, e12050 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Grover, V., Lyytinen, K.: New state of play in information systems research: the push to the edges. MIS Q. 39, 271–296 (2015). https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.2.01

  27. Orlikowski, W.J., Iacono, C.S.: Research commentary: desperately seeking the “IT” in IT research—a call to theorizing the IT artifact. Inf. Syst. Res. 12, 121–134 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.12.2.121.9700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Noir, C., Walsham, G.: The great legitimizer: ICT as myth and ceremony in the Indian healthcare sector. Inf. Technol. People. 20, 313–333 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1108/09593840710839770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Adesemowo, A.K.: A rethink of the nature and value of IT assets – critical realism approach. In: Dwivedi, Y., Ayaburi, E., Boateng, R., Effah, J. (eds.) TDIT 2019. IAICT, vol. 558, pp. 402–414. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20671-0_27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Faulkner, P., Lawson, C., Runde, J.: Theorising technology. Cambridge. J. Econ. 34, 1–16 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bep084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mingers, J., Mutch, A., Willcocks, L.: Critical realism in information systems research. MIS Q. 37, 795–802 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hobbs, J.R.: Coherence and Coreference. Cogn. Sci. 3, 67–90 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0301_4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Durfee, E.H., Lesser, V.R., Corkill, D.D.: Coherent cooperation among communicating problem solvers. IEEE Trans. Comput. C-36, 1275–1291 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1109/TC.1987.5009468

  34. Fjeld, M., Lauche, K., Bichsel, M., Voorhorst, F., Krueger, H., Rauterberg, M.: Physical and virtual tools: activity theory applied to the design of groupware. Comput. Support. Coop. Work 11, 153–180 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015269228596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Houston, S.: Prising open the black box. Qual. Soc. Work Res. Pract. 9, 73–91 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325009355622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Iannacci, F.: Routines, artefacts and technological change: investigating the transformation of criminal justice in england and wales. J. Inf. Technol. 29, 294–311 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2014.10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Njihia, J.M., Merali, Y.: The broader context for ICT4D projects: a morphogenetic analysis. MIS Q. 37, 881–905 (2013). https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.3.10

  38. Rey-Moreno, C., Roro, Z., Tucker, W.D., Siya, M.J., Bidwell, N.J., Simo-Reigadas, J.: Experiences, challenges and lessons from rolling out a rural WiFi mesh network. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Symposium on Computing for Development - ACM DEV ’13, p. 1. ACM Press, New York (2013). https://doi.org/10.1145/2442882.2442897

  39. Rey-Moreno, C., Blignaut, R., Tucker, W.D., May, J.: An in-depth study of the ICT ecosystem in a South African rural community: unveiling expenditure and communication patterns. Inf. Technol. Dev. 22, 101–120 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2016.1155145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Takavarasha Jr., S., Adams, C., Cilliers, L.: Community networks for addressing affordability of ICT access in African rural areas. In: Takavarasha Jr, S., Adams, C. (eds.) Affordability Issues Surrounding the Use of ICT for Development and Poverty Reduction, pp. 1–27. IGI Global (2018). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-3179-1.ch001

  41. Mikroyannidis, A., Gómez-Goiri, A., Smith, A., Domingue, J.: PT Anywhere: a mobile environment for practical learning of network engineering. Interact. Learn. Environ., 1–15 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1541911

  42. Adesemowo, A.K., Oyedele⁠, Y., Oyedele, O.: Text-based sustainable assessment: a case of first-year information and communication technology networking students. Stud. Educ. Eval. 55, 1–8 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.04.005

  43. Adesemowo, A.K., Msikinya, D., Nikitha, M., Darier, J., Tekeni, L.: L8 NetCalc: ICT network calculator. In: Remenyi, D. (ed.) The e-Learning Excellence Awards 2017: An Anthology of Case Histories, pp. 1–10. ACPIL: Academic Conferences and Publishing International, Porto (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Njihia, J.M.: Critical realism and its prospects for African development research and policy. Thought Pract. A J. Philos. Assoc. Kenya. 3, 61–85 (2011). https://doi.org/10.4314/tp.v3i1.70985

  45. Pourreau, L.: Technology, power, and leadership: recommendations for preserving faculty autonomy in the 21st century. Siegel Inst. J. Appl. Ethics. 5, 1–23 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author acknowledges Profs Geoff Walsham, Khaled Abou El-Hossein for their feedback on earlier draft of the manuscript. The invaluable feedback of the anonymous reviewers is duly acknowledged. Many thanks to Desiree dos Santos for the linguistic four eyes review.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Kayode Adesemowo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Adesemowo, A.K. (2020). CIPPUA: Towards Coherence and Impact in ICT4D/IS. In: Sharma, S.K., Dwivedi, Y.K., Metri, B., Rana, N.P. (eds) Re-imagining Diffusion and Adoption of Information Technology and Systems: A Continuing Conversation. TDIT 2020. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 617. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64849-7_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64849-7_30

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-64848-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-64849-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics