Abstract
Nonetheless, the many developments occasioned by and through information and communication technology (ICT), the plethora of debates on what ‘development’ means persist. Researchers, practitioners, policy makers and stakeholders of ICTs for Development (ICT4D) have a good understanding of ICT4D, yet their views differ when it comes to the ‘development’. The ICT (as an entity), do not get interrogated well enough as a research reality or phenomenon in itself. Differing opinions persist. Without a common understanding, diffusion and adoption of ICT4D will continue fragmented. In continuing the conversation, one area to reimagine is the ICT and digital technologies in ICT4D or information systems. This paper revisits Walsham’s (“ICT4D research: reflections on history and future agenda”) 2017 paper, as a backdrop to elucidate the emancipatory ethos of critical realism and introduce the conceptual CIPPUA model. Through explanatory stratified ontological review of the position, nature and identity of digital technologies/objects, this paper contributes to the ongoing discourse on critical realism in digital development, especially the connection of ICT to development. More so, this paper with the conceptual CIPPUA model, contributes in part to the discourse of operationalizing critical realism in practice.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
De, R., Pal, A., Sethi, R., Reddy, S.K., Chitre, C.: ICT4D research: a call for a strong critical approach. Inf. Technol. Dev. 24, 63–94 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2017.1286284
Thapa, D., Omland, H.O.: Four steps to identify mechanisms of ICT4D: a critical realismbased methodology. Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries. 84, e12054 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12054
Wessel, L., Baiyere, A., Ologeanu-Taddei, R., Cha, J., Jensen, T.B.: Unpacking the difference between digital transformation and IT-enabled organizational transformation. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. (2020)
Walsham, G.: ICT4D research: reflections on history and future agenda. Inf. Technol. Dev. 23, 18–41 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2016.1246406
Heeks, R.: ICT4D 3.0? Part 2—The patterns of an emerging “digital for development” paradigm. Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries. 86, e12123 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12123
Mungai, P.W.: Causal mechanisms and institutionalisation of open government data in Kenya. Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries. 84, e12056 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12056
Kuechler, W., Vaishnavi, V.: A framework for theory development in design science research: multiple perspectives. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 13, 395–423 (2012). https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00300
Ladel, S., Kortenkamp, U.: Artifact-centric activity theory—a framework for the analysis of the design and use of virtual manipulatives. In: Moyer-Packenham, P.S.S. (ed.) International Perspectives on Teaching and Learning Mathematics with Virtual Manipulatives. MEDE, vol. 7, pp. 25–40. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32718-1_2
Bennett, L.A.: Capturing information technology use by senior secondary school students in New Zealand. In: Proceedings of the 28th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS 2017). AAIS: Australasian Association for Information Systems, Hobart, Australia (2017)
Heeks, R., Wall, P.J.: Critical realism and ICT4D research. Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries. 84, e12051 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12051
Faulkner, P., Runde, J.: Technological objects, social positions, and the transformational model of social activity. MIS Q. 37, 803–818 (2013)
Fletcher, A.J.: Applying critical realism in qualitative research: methodology meets method. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 20, 181–194 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2016.1144401
Walsham, G.: Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 4, 74–81 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.1995.9
Bhaskar, R.: A Realist Theory of Science. Routledge, Oxon (2013)
Archer, M.S., Bhaskar, Roy, Collier, Andrew, Lawson, T., Norrie, A. (eds.) Critical Realism: Essential Readings. Routledge (2013). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315008592
Vandenberghe, F., (ed.): What’s Critical About Critical Realism?: Essays in Reconstructive Social Theory. Routledge, Oxon OX14 4RN (2013). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203798508
Bennett, L.A., Toland, J., Howell, B., Tate, M.: Revisiting hylomorphism: what can it contribute to our understanding of information systems? In: 30th Australasian Conference on Information Systems 2019 (ACIS 2019), pp. 173–179. Australasian Association for Information Systems, Fremantle, Perth, Western Australia, Australia (2019)
Faulkner, P., Runde, J.: Theorizing the digital object. Manag. Inf. Syst. Q. 43, 1279–1302 (2019). https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2019/13136
Saunders, M.N.K., Lewis, P., Thornhill, A.: Chapter 4: understanding research philosophy and approaches to theory development. In: Research Methods for Business Students, pp. 128–170. Pearson, Harlow, England (2019)
Arksey, H., O’Malley, L.: Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 8, 19–32 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
Archer, M.S.: The morphogenetic approach; critical realism’s explanatory framework approach. In: Róna, P., Zsolnai, L. (eds.) Agency and Causal Explanation in Economics. VE, vol. 5, pp. 137–150. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26114-6_9
Wright, G., Cairns, G., Bradfield, R.: Scenario methodology: new developments in theory and practice. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change. 80, 561–565 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.11.011
Price, L., Martin, L.: Introduction to the special issue: applied critical realism in the social sciences. J. Crit. Realis. 17, 89–96 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2018.1468148
Bhaskar, R.: Enlightened Common Sense: The Philosophy of Critical Realism. Ontological. Routledge, New York (2016). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315542942
Heeks, R., Thapa, D., Wall, P.J.: Critical realism and ICT4D: editorial introduction to the special issue of EJISDC. Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries. 84, e12050 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12050
Grover, V., Lyytinen, K.: New state of play in information systems research: the push to the edges. MIS Q. 39, 271–296 (2015). https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.2.01
Orlikowski, W.J., Iacono, C.S.: Research commentary: desperately seeking the “IT” in IT research—a call to theorizing the IT artifact. Inf. Syst. Res. 12, 121–134 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.12.2.121.9700
Noir, C., Walsham, G.: The great legitimizer: ICT as myth and ceremony in the Indian healthcare sector. Inf. Technol. People. 20, 313–333 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1108/09593840710839770
Adesemowo, A.K.: A rethink of the nature and value of IT assets – critical realism approach. In: Dwivedi, Y., Ayaburi, E., Boateng, R., Effah, J. (eds.) TDIT 2019. IAICT, vol. 558, pp. 402–414. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20671-0_27
Faulkner, P., Lawson, C., Runde, J.: Theorising technology. Cambridge. J. Econ. 34, 1–16 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bep084
Mingers, J., Mutch, A., Willcocks, L.: Critical realism in information systems research. MIS Q. 37, 795–802 (2013)
Hobbs, J.R.: Coherence and Coreference. Cogn. Sci. 3, 67–90 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0301_4
Durfee, E.H., Lesser, V.R., Corkill, D.D.: Coherent cooperation among communicating problem solvers. IEEE Trans. Comput. C-36, 1275–1291 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1109/TC.1987.5009468
Fjeld, M., Lauche, K., Bichsel, M., Voorhorst, F., Krueger, H., Rauterberg, M.: Physical and virtual tools: activity theory applied to the design of groupware. Comput. Support. Coop. Work 11, 153–180 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015269228596
Houston, S.: Prising open the black box. Qual. Soc. Work Res. Pract. 9, 73–91 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325009355622
Iannacci, F.: Routines, artefacts and technological change: investigating the transformation of criminal justice in england and wales. J. Inf. Technol. 29, 294–311 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2014.10
Njihia, J.M., Merali, Y.: The broader context for ICT4D projects: a morphogenetic analysis. MIS Q. 37, 881–905 (2013). https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.3.10
Rey-Moreno, C., Roro, Z., Tucker, W.D., Siya, M.J., Bidwell, N.J., Simo-Reigadas, J.: Experiences, challenges and lessons from rolling out a rural WiFi mesh network. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Symposium on Computing for Development - ACM DEV ’13, p. 1. ACM Press, New York (2013). https://doi.org/10.1145/2442882.2442897
Rey-Moreno, C., Blignaut, R., Tucker, W.D., May, J.: An in-depth study of the ICT ecosystem in a South African rural community: unveiling expenditure and communication patterns. Inf. Technol. Dev. 22, 101–120 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2016.1155145
Takavarasha Jr., S., Adams, C., Cilliers, L.: Community networks for addressing affordability of ICT access in African rural areas. In: Takavarasha Jr, S., Adams, C. (eds.) Affordability Issues Surrounding the Use of ICT for Development and Poverty Reduction, pp. 1–27. IGI Global (2018). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-3179-1.ch001
Mikroyannidis, A., Gómez-Goiri, A., Smith, A., Domingue, J.: PT Anywhere: a mobile environment for practical learning of network engineering. Interact. Learn. Environ., 1–15 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1541911
Adesemowo, A.K., Oyedele, Y., Oyedele, O.: Text-based sustainable assessment: a case of first-year information and communication technology networking students. Stud. Educ. Eval. 55, 1–8 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.04.005
Adesemowo, A.K., Msikinya, D., Nikitha, M., Darier, J., Tekeni, L.: L8 NetCalc: ICT network calculator. In: Remenyi, D. (ed.) The e-Learning Excellence Awards 2017: An Anthology of Case Histories, pp. 1–10. ACPIL: Academic Conferences and Publishing International, Porto (2017)
Njihia, J.M.: Critical realism and its prospects for African development research and policy. Thought Pract. A J. Philos. Assoc. Kenya. 3, 61–85 (2011). https://doi.org/10.4314/tp.v3i1.70985
Pourreau, L.: Technology, power, and leadership: recommendations for preserving faculty autonomy in the 21st century. Siegel Inst. J. Appl. Ethics. 5, 1–23 (2017)
Acknowledgements
The author acknowledges Profs Geoff Walsham, Khaled Abou El-Hossein for their feedback on earlier draft of the manuscript. The invaluable feedback of the anonymous reviewers is duly acknowledged. Many thanks to Desiree dos Santos for the linguistic four eyes review.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Adesemowo, A.K. (2020). CIPPUA: Towards Coherence and Impact in ICT4D/IS. In: Sharma, S.K., Dwivedi, Y.K., Metri, B., Rana, N.P. (eds) Re-imagining Diffusion and Adoption of Information Technology and Systems: A Continuing Conversation. TDIT 2020. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 617. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64849-7_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64849-7_30
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-64848-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-64849-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)