Skip to main content

The Pampulha Modern Ensemble: Reflections on the Complexities and Contradictions for the Management of a World Heritage Cultural Landscape

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
World Heritage Patinas

Part of the book series: The Latin American Studies Book Series ((LASBS))

  • 138 Accesses

Abstract

The article presents a reflection on the complexities and contradictions of world heritage sites management processes, specifically in the Brazilian case of the Pampulha Modern Ensemble, which was inscribed in the cultural landscape typology in July 2016, on the World Heritage List of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization—UNESCO. The case study aims to demonstrate that the inscription of cultural landscapes located in urban areas on the World Heritage List is a recent phenomenon, and as such, requires a review of the concepts and methodologies previously in force in the field of urban cultural heritage management and conservation. In the midst of contemporary discussions about the management of cultural landscapes, the value-based approach and the concept of cultural significance stand out, as both deal with the “management of change” inherent in the field of cultural landscape conservation and management. In light of this background, the article aims to reflect on the following issues: (1) What are the developments and effects of the inscription of the Pampulha Modern Ensemble as a Cultural Landscape on the World Heritage List? (2) What are the contemporary methodological approaches for the conservation/management of a Cultural (Urban) Landscape? (3) What would be the limit of acceptable transformations in a world heritage cultural landscape without losing its O.U.V.—Outstanding Universal Value? The article intends to problematize and promote reflection on such questions, aiming to elucidate the transformations that have occurred both in the symbolic and conceptual dimensions, as well as in the policies and instruments of preservation of cultural heritage over time, and to discuss the concepts, theories and practices of conservation and management of cultural heritage, especially of world heritage cultural landscapes.

This text was originally published in the Annals of the 1st International Congress on Urban Heritage of Humanity/1st International Symposium on World Heritage of Minas Gerais in the international context. UFJF. 2020.

Luciana Rocha Féres—Member of the Brazilian Committee of the International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS / BRAZIL), Professor, Consultant and PhD. Candidate of the Doctoral Program in Built Environment and Sustainable Heritage of the Federal University of Minas Gerais, School of Architecture at UFMG - Rua Paraíba 697, sala 201. Cep: 30130-140, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Leonardo Barci Castriota—President of the Brazilian Committee of the International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS / BRAZIL), Full Professor at the Federal University of Minas Gerais. Federal University of Minas Gerais. Doctoral Program in Built Environment and Sustainable Heritage, School of Architecture at UFMG - Rua Paraíba 697, sala 201. Cep: 30130-140, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Mason 2008, p. 182.

  2. 2.

    The evaluation and judgment are carried out by groups of distinct experts, for natural heritage sites, the International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN); for cultural heritage sites, the International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS). (UNESCO 2015).

  3. 3.

    “Sustainable development (…) strictly speaking, the adjective should be divided into socially inclusive, environmentally sustainable and economically sustained over time. SACHS, I. in VEIGA, J.E., 2005, p. 10. “Development that seeks to satisfy the needs of the current generation, without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs”. What is sustainable development. Environmental Dictionary. ((o)) echo, Rio de Janeiro, Aug. 2014. Available at: https://www.oeco.org.br/dicionario-ambiental/28588-o-que-e-desenvolvimento-sustentavel/. Accessed: 20 July 2019.

  4. 4.

    Available at: http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/. Accessed: August 2019.

  5. 5.

    The term stakeholder is used in most documents, letters, recommendations and plans for managing cultural landscapes and places of interest for preservation. It means actors or agents involved and incorporates all interested parties in the process of conservation and management of a given cultural site.

  6. 6.

    El patrimonio es aquello en lo que los grupos o las personas convienen en entender como tal, y sus valores no son ya algo inherente, indiscutible u objetivo, sino algo que las personas proyectan sobre ellos. Viñas (2003), p. 152.

  7. 7.

    The “Burra Charter” is the popular name given to The Australia ICOMOS Charter for the conservation of Places of Cultural Significance, which was adopted by ICOMOS Australia from a meeting held in the city of Burra, Australia in 1979. It went through several revisions, and the last version was updated in 2013.

  8. 8.

    The Charter defines the meaning of place: “Place means a geographically defined area. It may include elements, objects, spaces and views. Place may have tangible and intangible dimensions.” (ICOMOS Australia 2013, p. 2).

  9. 9.

    Cultural significance means aesthetic, historic, scientific, social or spiritual value for past, present or future generations. Cultural significance is embodied in the place itself, its fabric, setting, use, associations, meanings, records, related places and related objects. Places may have a range of values for different individuals or groups (ICOMOS Australia 2013, p. 2).

References

  • AUSTRALIA ICOMOS (2013) The Burra Charter: The Australia ICOMOS Charter for Places of Cultural Significance. https://australia.icomos.org/wp-content/uploads/The-Burra-Charter-2013-Adopted-31.10.2013.pdf. Accessed 20 July 2019

  • Castriota LB (2017) Cultural landscape and heritage: challenges and perspectives. In: 1st Ibero-American Colloquium Cultural Landscape, Heritage and Project. 2010, Belo Horizonte. Proceedings of the 1st Ibero-American Colloquium Cultural Landscape, Heritage and Project. Brasília, DF: IPHAN; Belo Horizonte, MG: IEDS, pp 17–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Castriota LB (org.) (2009) Cultural heritage: concepts, policies, instruments. São Paulo: Annablume; Belo Horizonte: IEDS

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler PJ (2003) World heritage cultural landscapes 1992–2002. UNESCO, Paris, 133 p. (Word heritage papers, n. 6). http://whc.UNESCO.org/en/series/6/. Accessed 6 Nov 2016

  • ICOMOS, IUCN, WHC (2009) World heritage nominations for cultural properties: components for a resource manual for practitioners. ICOMOS and UNESCO, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • ICOMOS, International Council on Monuments and Sites (2016) Evaluation report of the nomination “Pampulha Modern Ensemble”. Brazil

    Google Scholar 

  • IPHAN (2004) National historical and artistic heritage institute (Brazil). Heritage letters. 3rd ed. rev. and aum. IPHAN, Rio de Janeiro

    Google Scholar 

  • IPHAN, Institute of National Historical and Artistic Heritage. http://portal.iphan.gov.br/pagina/detalhes/218. http://portal.iphan.gov.br/uploads/ckfinder/arquivos/Carta%20de%20Veneza%201964.pdf. Accessed 2 June 2016

  • Jerome P (2014) The values-based approach to cultural-heritage preservation. APT BULLETIN, vol 45, Nº2/3 Special Issue on Values-Based Preservation. (APT) Association for Preservation Technology International, pp 3–8. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23799521. Accessed 21 September 2016

  • Mason R (2002) Assessing values ​​in conservation planning: methodological issues and choices. In: De la Torre M (ed) Assessing the values ​​of cultural heritage - Research Report. The Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles, pp 5–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason R (2008) Management for cultural landscape preservation: insights from Australia. In: Longstreth R (ed) Cultural landscapes: balancing nature and heritage in preservation practice. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis/London, pp 180–196

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell PM (2004) Learning from world heritage: lessons from international preservation & stewardship of cultural & ecological landscapes of global significance, the 7th. US/ ICOMOS International Symposium. The George Wright Forum 21(3):41–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro RW (2007) Cultural landscape and heritage. IPHAN/COPEDOC, Rio de Janeiro

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro RW (2017) One concept, several visions: cultural landscape and UNESCO. In: Proceedings of the 1st Ibero-American colloquium cultural landscape, heritage and project, 2010. Vol. 1. Brasília: IPHAN; Belo Horizonte: IEDS, pp 29–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Riegl A (2006) The modern cult of monuments: their essence and their genesis. Goiânia: Ed. Of UCG

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith (2006) Laurajane. Uses of heritage. New York, Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (2009) World Heritage Center. World Heritage Cultural Landscapes. A handbook for conservation and Management. Nora Mitchell, Mechtild Rössler. P-M. Tricaud. (dirs). Unesco (Centre du Patrimoine Mondial), Paris, 2009, World Heritage Papers n° 26, 133p. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000187044

  • UNESCO (2011) Recommendation on the historic urban landscape adopted by the general conference at its 36th session. Paris, 10 November 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (2015) Operational guidelines fot the implementation of the World Heritage Convention. https://whc.unesco.org./en/guidelines/

  • UNESCO, WHC (2005) Vienna memorandum on world heritage and contemporary architecture – managing the historic urban landscape. Paris, UNESCO World Heritage Centre, 20 May, 2005. Disponível em: http://whc.unesco.org/archive/2005/whc05-15ga-inf7e.pdf

  • Viñas (2003) Salvador Muñoz. Teoria contemporánea de la Restauración. Madrid: Editora Sintesis

    Google Scholar 

  • WHITRAP (2016) World Heritage Institute of Training and Research for the Asia and Pacific Region under the auspices of UNESCO. The HUL Guidebook: managing heritage in a dynamic and constantly changing urban environment, A practical guide to the UNESCO Recommendation on the Historic Urban Landscape. https://unesdoc.unesco.org

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luciana Rocha Féres .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Féres, L.R., Castriota, L.B. (2021). The Pampulha Modern Ensemble: Reflections on the Complexities and Contradictions for the Management of a World Heritage Cultural Landscape. In: Christofoletti, R., Olender, M. (eds) World Heritage Patinas. The Latin American Studies Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64815-2_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics