Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Drone Propeller Noise Under Static and Steady Inflow Conditions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Flinovia—Flow Induced Noise and Vibration Issues and Aspects-III (FLINOVIA 2019)

  • 601 Accesses

Abstract

Drone propeller noise under static and steady inflow conditions has been studied. A numerical model that couples a blade element momentum theory model with a frequency-domain acoustic model is presented. Experimental acoustic data for a 12-inch drone propeller under static and steady inflow are compared with the model. The model compares well against the experimental data for the fundamental tone and first 2–3 harmonics under steady inflow. Discrepancies at the higher harmonics are likely due to the point-loading assumption used to apply the aerodynamic loads in the acoustic model. Comparisons under static conditions are poor and this is thought to be caused by the limited nature of the aerodynamic model used. The results suggest that an accurate and versatile aerodynamics model is most important for accurate prediction of drone propeller noise over a wide range of operating conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. ABC News, Whining drones bringing burritos and coffee are bitterly dividing Canberra residents (2019), https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-11-09/noise-from-drone-delivery-service-divides-canberra-residents/10484044. Accessed 11 Mar 2019

  2. BBC News, Why your pizza may never be delivered by drone (2019), https://www.bbc.com/news/business-46483178. Accessed 11 Mar 2019

  3. N. Kloet, S. Watkins, R. Clothier, Acoustic signature measurement of small multi-rotor unmanned aircraft systems. Int. J. Micro Air Veh. 9(1), 3–14 (2017). February

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. S.E. Wright, The acoustic spectrum of axial flow machines. J. Sound Vib. 45(2), 165–223 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. J.E. Ffowcs Williams, D.L. Hawkings, Sound generation by turbulence and surfaces in arbitrary motion. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A Math. Phys. Sci. 264(1151), 321–342 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  6. M.J. Lighthill, On sound generated aerodynamically I. General theory. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A. Math. Phys. Sci. 211(1107), 564–587 (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  7. N. Curle, The influence of solid boundaries upon aerodynamic sound. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A. Math. Phys. Sci. 231(1187), 505–514 (1955)

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. Hanson, Helicoidal surface theory for harmonic noise of propellers in the far field. AIAA J. 18(10), 1213–1220 (1980)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. S. Glegg, W. Devenport, Aeroacoustics of Low Mach Number Flows (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. M.T. Kotwicz Herniczek, D. Feszty, S. Meslioui, J. Park, F. Nitzsche, Evaluation of acoustic frequency methods for the prediction of propeller noise. AIAA J. 57(6), 2465–2478 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. Hanson, Influence of propeller design parameters on far-field harmonic noise in forward flight. AIAA J. 18(11), 1313–1319 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. A. Leslie, K.C. Wong, D. Auld, Broadband noise reduction on a mini-UAV propeller. In 14th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (29th AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference), p. 3069 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Leslie, K.C. Wong, D. Auld, Experimental analysis of the radiated noise from a small propeller. In Proceedings of 20th International Congress on Acoustics, ICA (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. O. Gur, A. Rosen, Design of quiet propeller for an electric mini unmanned air vehicle. J. Propuls. Power 25(3), 717–728 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. G. Sinibaldi, L. Marino, Experimental analysis on the noise of propellers for small UAV. Appl. Acoust. 74(1), 79–88 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. N. Intaratep, W.N. Alexander, W.J. Devenport, S.M. Grace, A. Dropkin. Experimental study of quadcopter acoustics and performance at static thrust conditions. In 22nd AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, June 2016 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  17. C.E. Tinney, J. Sirohi, Multirotor drone noise at static thrust. AIAA J. 56(7), 2816–2826 (2018). July

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. N.S. Zawodny, D. Douglas Boyd Jr., C.L. Burley, Acoustic characterization and prediction of representative, small-scale rotary-wing unmanned aircraft system components (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  19. R. McKay, M.J. Kingan, Multirotor unmanned aerial system propeller noise caused by unsteady blade motion. In 25th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (2019), p. 2499

    Google Scholar 

  20. W.N. Alexander, J. Whelchel, N. Intaratep, A. Trani, Predicting community noise of sUAS. In 25th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (2019), p. 2686

    Google Scholar 

  21. W.N. Alexander, J. Whelchel, Flyover noise of multi-rotor sUAS. In 2INTER-NOISE 2019 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  22. T. Zhou, H. Jiang, Y. Sun, R.J. Fattah, X. Zhang, B. Huang, L. Cheng, Acoustic characteristics of a quad-copter under realistic flight conditions. In 25th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (2019), p. 2587

    Google Scholar 

  23. V. Bulusu, V. Polishchuk, L. Sedov, Noise estimation for future large-scale small UAS operations. In INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress and Conference Proceedings, vol. 254. Institute of Noise Control Engineering (2017), pp. 864–871

    Google Scholar 

  24. R.W. Paterson, R.K. Amiet, Noise of a model helicopter rotor due to ingestion of isotropic turbulence. J. Sound Vib. 85(4), 551–577 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Y. Yauwenas, J.R. Fischer, D. Moreau, C.J. Doolan, The effect of inflow disturbance on drone propeller noise. In 25th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (2019), p. 2663

    Google Scholar 

  26. O. Gur, A. Rosen, Comparison between blade-element models of propellers. Aeronaut. J. 112(1138), 689–704 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. C. Ostowari, D. Naik, Post-stall wind tunnel data for NACA 44XX series airfoil sections. Technical report, Texas A and M University, College Station (USA). Department of Aerospace Engineering (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  28. M. McCrink, J.W. Gregory, Blade element momentum modeling of low-re small UAS electric propulsion systems. In 33rd AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference (2015), p. 3296

    Google Scholar 

  29. C.J. Doolan, D. Moreau, M. Awasthi, C. Jiang, The UNSW anechoic wind tunnel. In Proceedings of WESPAC 2018, New Delhi, India (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  30. J.B. Brandt, R.W. Deters, G.K. Ananda, M.S. Selig, UIUC propeller database, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (2019), http://m-selig.ae.illinois.edu/props/propDB.html Accessed 24 Oct 2019

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Flow Noise Group, School of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Con Doolan, Yendrew Yauwenas & Danielle Moreau

Authors
  1. Con Doolan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yendrew Yauwenas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Danielle Moreau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Con Doolan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. CNR-INSEAN, Rome, Italy

    Elena Ciappi

  2. DII, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Italy

    Sergio De Rosa

  3. DII, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Italy

    Francesco Franco

  4. ARL, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA

    Stephen A. Hambric

  5. Dept of Mechanical Engineering, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong

    Randolph C. K. Leung

  6. École Centrale de Lyon, Écully, France

    Vincent Clair

  7. Laboratoire Vibrations Acoustique, University of Lyon, INSA-Lyon, Villeurbanne, France

    Laurent Maxit

  8. Laboratoire Vibrations Acoustique, University of Lyon, INSA-Lyon, Villeurbanne, France

    Nicolas Totaro

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Doolan, C., Yauwenas, Y., Moreau, D. (2021). Drone Propeller Noise Under Static and Steady Inflow Conditions. In: Ciappi, E., et al. Flinovia—Flow Induced Noise and Vibration Issues and Aspects-III. FLINOVIA 2019. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64807-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64807-7_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-64806-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-64807-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation