Skip to main content

Farsighted Risk Mitigation of Lateral Movement Using Dynamic Cognitive Honeypots

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Decision and Game Theory for Security (GameSec 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 12513))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Lateral movement of advanced persistent threats has posed a severe security challenge. Due to the stealthy and persistent nature of the lateral movement, defenders need to consider time and spatial locations holistically to discover latent attack paths across a large time-scale and achieve long-term security for the target assets. In this work, we propose a time-expanded random network to model the stochastic service links in the user-host enterprise network and the adversarial lateral movement. We design cognitive honeypots at idle production nodes and disguise honey links as service links to detect and deter the adversarial lateral movement. The location of the honeypot changes randomly at different times and increases the honeypots’ stealthiness. Since the defender does not know whether, when, and where the initial intrusion and the lateral movement occur, the honeypot policy aims to reduce the target assets’ Long-Term Vulnerability (LTV) for proactive and persistent protection. We further characterize three tradeoffs, i.e., the probability of interference, the stealthiness level, and the roaming cost. To counter the curse of multiple attack paths, we propose an iterative algorithm and approximate the LTV with the union bound for computationally efficient deployment of cognitive honeypots. The results of the vulnerability analysis illustrate the bounds, trends, and a residue of LTV when the adversarial lateral movement has infinite duration. Besides honeypot policies, we obtain a critical threshold of compromisability to guide the design and modification of the current system parameters for a higher level of long-term security. We show that the target node can achieve zero vulnerability under infinite stages of lateral movement if the probability of movement deterrence is not less than the threshold.

Q. Zhu—This research is partially supported by awards ECCS-1847056, CNS-1544782, CNS-2027884, and SES-1541164 from National Science of Foundation (NSF), and grant W911NF-19-1-0041 from Army Research Office (ARO).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For example, we can use the user-computer authentication dataset from the Los Alamos National Laboratory enterprise network [29] to estimate the probability of user-host service links over a long period. The dataset is available at https://csr.lanl.gov/data/auth/.

  2. 2.

    The defender would avoid configuring honey links from the target node to the honeypot. If the attacker has not compromised the target node H3 as shown in stage \(k_0+1\), the honeypot cannot capture the attacker. If the attacker has compromised the target node as shown in stage \(k_0+3\), then the late detection cannot reduce the loss that has already been made.

  3. 3.

    Since we can compute \(g_{j_0}(\{n_i\} \cup v,\gamma ,\varDelta k-1)\) explicitly when v is empty, we can obtain a tighter upper bound by using the inequality \( g_{j_0}(\{n_i\}\cup v,\gamma , \varDelta k)\le 1, \forall v\in \mathscr {V}_{i,j_0}\setminus \emptyset \).

References

  1. Corporation, T.M.: Enterprise matrix (2020). https://attack.mitre.org/matrices/enterprise/

  2. Zhu, Q., Rass, S.: On multi-phase and multi-stage game-theoretic modeling of advanced persistent threats. IEEE Access 6, 13:958–13:971 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Legezo, D.: LuckyMouse hits national data center to organize country-level waterholing campaign, June 13, 2018. https://securelist.com/luckymouse-hits-national-data-center/86083/

  4. Spitzner, L.: Honeypots: Tracking Hackers. Addison-Wesley Reading, Boston (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Krawetz, N.: Anti-honeypot technology. IEEE Secur. Priv. 2(1), 76–79 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mitola, J., Maguire, G.Q.: Cognitive radio: making software radios more personal. IEEE Pers. Commun. 6(4), 13–18 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Khattab, S.M., Sangpachatanaruk, C., Mossé, D., Melhem, R., Znati, T.: Roaming honeypots for mitigating service-level denial-of-service attacks. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems 2004, pp. 328–337. IEEE (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Casteigts, A., Flocchini, P., Quattrociocchi, W., Santoro, N.: Time-varying graphs and dynamic networks. Int. J. Parallel Emergent Distrib. Syst. 27(5), 387–408 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu, Q., Stokes, J.W., Mead, R., Burrell, T., Hellen, I., Lambert, J., Marochko, A., Cui, W.: Latte: Large-scale lateral movement detection. In: MILCOM 2018–2018 IEEE Military Communications Conference (MILCOM), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tian, Z., Shi, W., Wang, Y., Zhu, C., Du, X., Su, S., Sun, Y., Guizani, N.: Real-time lateral movement detection based on evidence reasoning network for edge computing environment. IEEE Trans. Indust. Inform. 15(7), 4285–4294 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lah, A.A.A., Dziyauddin, R.A., Azmi, M.H.: Proposed framework for network lateral movement detection based on user risk scoring in siem. In: 2018 2nd International Conference on Telematics and Future Generation Networks (TAFGEN), pp. 149–154. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Noureddine, M.A., Fawaz, A., Sanders, W.H., Başar, T.: A game-theoretic approach to respond to attacker lateral movement. In: Zhu, Q., Alpcan, T., Panaousis, E., Tambe, M., Casey, W. (eds.) GameSec 2016. LNCS, vol. 9996, pp. 294–313. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47413-7_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Purvine, E., Johnson, J.R., Lo, C.: A graph-based impact metric for mitigating lateral movement cyber attacks. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Workshop on Automated Decision Making for Active Cyber Defense, pp. 45–52 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Huang, L., Zhu, Q.: A dynamic games approach to proactive defense strategies against advanced persistent threats in cyber-physical systems. Comput. Secur. 89, 101660 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Huang, L., Zhu, Q.: Adaptive strategic cyber defense for advanced persistent threats in critical infrastructure networks. ACM SIGMETRICS Perform. Eval. Rev. (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Alsaleh, M.N., Al-Shaer, E., Duan, Q.: Verifying the enforcement and effectiveness of network lateral movement resistance techniques (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shi, Y., Chang, X., Rodríguez, R.J., Zhang, Z., Trivedi, K.S.: Quantitative security analysis of a dynamic network system under lateral movement-based attacks. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safety 183, 213–225 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pawlick, J., Nguyen, T.T.H., Colbert, E., Zhu, Q.: Optimal timing in dynamic and robust attacker engagement during advanced persistent threats. In: 2019 International Symposium on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc, and Wireless Networks (WiOPT), pp. 1-8. IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Huang, L., Zhu, Q.: Adaptive honeypot engagement through reinforcement learning of semi-Markov decision processes. In: Alpcan, T., Vorobeychik, Y., Baras, J.S., Dán, G. (eds.) GameSec 2019. LNCS, vol. 11836, pp. 196–216. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32430-8_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Huang, L., Zhu, Q.: Analysis and computation of adaptive defense strategies against advanced persistent threats for cyber-physical systems. In: Bushnell, L., Poovendran, R., Başar, T. (eds.) GameSec 2018. LNCS, vol. 11199, pp. 205–226. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01554-1_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Huang, L., Zhu, Q.: Game of duplicity: a proactive automated defense mechanism by deception design (2020). arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.07942

  22. Goldberg, I., Kozloski, J.R., Pickover, C.A., Sondhi, N., Vukovic, M.: Cognitive honeypot. 31 Jan 2017, uS Patent 9,560,075

    Google Scholar 

  23. Horák, K., Bošanskỳ, B., Tomášek, P., Kiekintveld, C., Kamhoua, C.: Optimizing honeypot strategies against dynamic lateral movement using partially observable stochastic games. Comput. Secur. 87, 101579 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang, S., Lin, W., Yang, Y., Xiao, X., Zhou, S.: Efficient route planning on public transportation networks: a labelling approach. In: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, pp. 967–982 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jiang, C., Zhu, X.: Reinforcement learning based capacity management in multi-layer satellite networks. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Xu, S.: Cybersecurity dynamics: a foundation for the science of cybersecurity. In: Wang, C., Lu, Z. (eds.) Proactive and Dynamic Network Defense. Advances in Information Security, vol. 74, pp. 1–31. Springer, Cham (2019)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Kaynar, K.: A taxonomy for attack graph generation and usage in network security. J. Inform. Secur. Appl. 29, 27–56 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Chen, P.-Y., Choudhury, S., Rodriguez, L., Hero, A., Ray, I.: Enterprise cyber resiliency against lateral movement: a graph theoretic approach (2019). arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.01002

  29. Hagberg, A., Kent, A., Lemons, N., Neil, J.: Credential hopping in authentication graphs. In: 2014 International Conference on Signal-Image Technology Internet-Based Systems (SITIS). IEEE Computer Society (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mell, P., Scarfone, K., Romanosky, S.: Common vulnerability scoring system. IEEE Secur. Priv. 4(6), 85–89 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Nawrocki, M., Wählisch, M., Schmidt, T.C., Keil, C., Schönfelder, J.: A survey on honeypot software and data analysis (2016). arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.06249

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linan Huang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Huang, L., Zhu, Q. (2020). Farsighted Risk Mitigation of Lateral Movement Using Dynamic Cognitive Honeypots. In: Zhu, Q., Baras, J.S., Poovendran, R., Chen, J. (eds) Decision and Game Theory for Security. GameSec 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12513. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64793-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64793-3_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-64792-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-64793-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics