Skip to main content

Interface Design for HCI Classroom: From Learners’ Perspective

Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNIP,volume 12510)


Having a good Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) design is challenging. Previous works have contributed significantly to fostering HCI, including design principle with report study from the instructor view. The questions of how and to what extent students perceive the design principles are still left open. To answer this question, this paper conducts a study of HCI adoption in the classroom. The studio-based learning method is adapted to teach 83 graduate and undergraduate students in 16 weeks long with four activities. A standalone presentation tool for instant online peer feedback during the presentation session is developed to help students justify and critique other’s work. Our tool provides a sandbox, which supports multiple application types, including Web-applications, Object Detection, Web-based Virtual Reality (VR), and Augmented Reality (AR). After presenting one assignment and two projects, our results shows that students acquired a better understanding of the Golden Rules principle over time, which is demonstrated by the development of visual interface design. The Wordcloud reveals the primary focus was on the user interface and sheds light on students’ interest in user experience. The inter-rater score indicates the agreement among students that they have the same level of understanding of the principles. The results show a high level of guideline compliance with HCI principles, in which we witness variations in visual cognitive styles. Regardless of diversity in visual preference, the students present high consistency and a similar perspective on adopting HCI design principles. The results also elicit suggestions into the development of the HCI curriculum in the future.


  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Instant online peer feedback
  • Interface design
  • Learners’ perspective
  • User study design
  • Inter-rater measurement

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-64559-5_43
  • Chapter length: 13 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-030-64559-5
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.


  1. Aalberg, T., Lorås, M.: Active learning and student peer assessment in a web development course. In: Norsk IKT-konferanse for forskning og utdanning (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Albano, A.: Introduction to educational and psychological measurement using R (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carter, A.S., Hundhausen, C.D.: A review of studio-based learning in computer science. J. Comput. Sci. Coll. 27(1), 105–111 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Churchill, E.F., Bowser, A., Preece, J.: Teaching and learning human-computer interaction: past, present, and future. Interactions 20(2), 44–53 (2013)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  5. Cicchetti, D.V.: Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol. Assess. 6(4), 284 (1994)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  6. Dang, T., Nguyen, H.N., Pham, V.: WordStream: interactive visualization for topic evolution. In: Johansson, J., Sadlo, F., Marai, G.E. (eds.) EuroVis 2019 - Short Papers. The Eurographics Association (2019).

  7. Dang, T., Pham, V., Nguyen, H.N., Nguyen, N.V.: AgasedViz: visualizing groundwater availability of Ogallala Aquifer, USA. Environ. Earth Sci. 79(5), 1–12 (2020)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  8. Figl, K., Bauer, C., Kriglstein, S.: Students’ view on instant online feedback for presentations. In: Proceedings of the AMCIS 2009, p. 775 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gehringer, E.F.: Electronic peer review and peer grading in computer-science courses. ACM SIGCSE Bull. 33(1), 139–143 (2001)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  10. Greenberg, S.: Teaching human computer interaction to programmers. Interactions 3(4), 62–76 (1996)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  11. Hatziapostolou, T., Paraskakis, I.: Enhancing the impact of formative feedback on student learning through an online feedback system. Electron. J. E-learn. 8(2), 111–122 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hewett, T.T., et al.: ACM SIGCHI Curricula for Human-Computer Interaction. ACM, New York (1992)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  13. Interaction Design Foundation: What is Human-Computer Interaction (HCI)? (2019). Accessed 1 July 2020

  14. Kulkarni, C.E., Bernstein, M.S., Klemmer, S.R.: PeerStudio: rapid peer feedback emphasizes revision and improves performance. In: Proceedings of the Second (2015) ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale, pp. 75–84 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Le, D.D., Pham, V., Nguyen, H.N., Dang, T.: Visualization and explainable machine learning for efficient manufacturing and system operations. Smart Sustain. Manuf. Syst. 3(2), 127–147 (2019)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  16. Ma, X., Yu, L., Forlizzi, J.L., Dow, S.P.: Exiting the design studio: leveraging online participants for early-stage design feedback. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, pp. 676–685 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Magrabi, F., Coiera, E.W., Westbrook, J.I., Gosling, A.S., Vickland, V.: General practitioners’ use of online evidence during consultations. Int. J. Med. Inf. 74(1), 1–12 (2005)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  18. McGraw, K.O., Wong, S.P.: Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychol. Methods 1(1), 30 (1996)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  19. Nguyen, H.N., Dang, T.: EQSA: Earthquake situational analytics from social media. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST 2019), pp. 142–143 (2019).

  20. Nichols, T.R., Wisner, P.M., Cripe, G., Gulabchand, L.: Putting the kappa statistic to use. Qual. Assur. J. 13(3–4), 57–61 (2010)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  21. Shannon, A., Hammer, J., Thurston, H., Diehl, N., Dow, S.: PeerPresents: A wab-based system for in-class peer feedback during student presentations. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, DIS 2016, pp. 447–458. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2016).

  22. Shneiderman, B., Plaisant, C., Cohen, M., Jacobs, S., Elmqvist, N., Diakopoulos, N.: Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction. Pearson, London (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sims, R.: Interactivity: a forgotten art? Comput. Hum. Behav. 13(2), 157–180 (1997)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  24. Nguyen, V.T., Hite, R., Dang, T.: Web-based virtual reality development in classroom: from learner’s perspectives. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Virtual Reality (AIVR 2018), pp. 11–18 (2018).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huyen N. Nguyen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Nguyen, H.N., Nguyen, V.T., Dang, T. (2020). Interface Design for HCI Classroom: From Learners’ Perspective. In: , et al. Advances in Visual Computing. ISVC 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12510. Springer, Cham.

Download citation

  • DOI:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-64558-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-64559-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)