Skip to main content

Applying the FITradeoff Method for Aiding Prioritization of Special Operations of Brazilian Federal Police

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Innovation for Systems Information and Decision (INSID 2020)

Abstract

This paper presents a broader view of the Flexible and Interactive Tradeoff (FITradeoff) multicriteria method and its practical applicability in a problem of prioritization of resources for special operations in Brazilian Federal Police. The FITradeoff method works based on partial information of decision makers (DMs), but keeps the whole axiomatic structure of the classical tradeoff procedure. Due to the reduction of the level of difficulty in the elicitation process for obtaining information from the DM, this tool has a great potential for application in practical real world decision situations. This paper brings up a decision-making problem in which the aim is to rank ten special police operations, which are evaluated with respect to fourteen criteria, with the main goal of prioritizing scarce resources allocation of the Brazilian Federal Police. The decision process is aided by graphical tools presented in FITradeoff Decision Support System (DSS), which enables the elicitation process to be shortened with a view to the flexibility of the method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Brasil: Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil de 1988. Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil: text promulgated on October 5, 1988, with the changes determined by the Constitutional Revisions Amendments 1 to 6/94, by the Constitutional Amendments 1/92 to 99/2017. Brasília/DF: Senado Federal, Coordenação de Edições Técnicas (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Belton, V., Stewart, T.: Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach. Springer, Berlin (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Camilo, D.G.G., de Souza, R.P., Frazão, T.D.C., da Costa Junior, J.F.: Multi-criteria analysis in the health area: selection of the most appropriate triage system for the emergency care units in natal. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 20(1), 1–16 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrillo, P.A.A., Roselli, L.R.P., Frej, E.A., de Almeida, A.T.: Selecting an agricultural technology package based on the flexible and interactive tradeoff method. Ann. Oper. Res. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-3020-y

  • De Almeida, A.T., Frej, E.A., Roselli, L.R.P.: Combining holistic and decomposition paradigms in preference modeling with the flexibility of FITradeoff. Cent. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2021). (forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  • De Almeida, A.T., Roselli, L.R.P.: NeuroIS to improve the FITradeoff decision-making process and decision support system. In: Proceedings of the NeuroIS Retreat 2020 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  • de Almeida, A.T., Roselli, L.R.P.: Visualization for decision support in FITradeoff method: exploring its evaluation with cognitive neuroscience. In: Linden, I., Liu, S., Colot, C. (eds.) ICDSST 2017. LNBIP, vol. 282, pp. 61–73. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57487-5_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • De Almeida, A.T., Almeida, J.A., Costa, A.P.C.S., Almeida-Filho, A.T.: A new method for elicitation of criteria weights in additive models: flexible and interactive tradeoff. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 250, 179–191 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • da Silva Monte, M.B., Morais, D.C.: A decision model for identifying and solving problems in an urban water supply system. Water Resour. Manag. 33(14), 4835–4848 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Macedo, P.P., Mota, C.M.D.M., Sola, A.V.H.: Meeting the Brazilian Energy Efficiency Law: a flexible and interactive multicriteria proposal to replace non-efficient motors. Sustain. Cities Soc. 41, 822–832 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dell’Ovo, M., Frej, E.A., Oppio, A., Capolongo, S., Morais, D.C., de Almeida, A.T.: Multicriteria decision making for healthcare facilities location with visualization based on FITradeoff method. In: Linden, I., Liu, S., Colot, C. (eds.) ICDSST 2017. LNBIP, vol. 282, pp. 32–44. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57487-5_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Federal Police: Portaria no. 4453/2014-DG/DPF, de 16 de Maio de 2014. Approves the update of the Strategic Plan 2012/2022, the Strategic Portfolio and the Federal Police’s Sartorial Map and takes other measures. Brasília/DF (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fossile, D.K., Frej, E.A., da Costa, S.E.G., de Lima, E.P., de Almeida, A.T.: Selecting the most viable renewable energy source for Brazilian ports using the FITradeoff method. J. Clean. Prod. 260, 121107 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frej, E.A., de Almeida, A.T., Costa, A.P.C.S.: Using data visualization for ranking alternatives with partial information and interactive tradeoff elicitation. Oper. Res. 19(4), 909–931 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  • Frej, E.A., Ekel, P., de Almeida, A.T.: A benefit-to-cost ratio based approach for portfolio selection under multiple criteria with incomplete preference information. Inf. Sci. 545, 487–498 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frej, E.A., Roselli, L.R.P., de Almeida, J.A., de Almeida, A.T.: A multicriteria decision model for supplier selection in a food industry based on FITradeoff method. Math. Probl. Eng. 2017, 1–9 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gusmão, A.P.H., Medeiros, C.P.: A model for selecting a strategic information system using the FITradeoff. Math. Probl. Eng. 2016, 7 (2016). Article ID 7850960

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, T.H.A., Soares Júnior, A.M.C., de Almeida, A.T.: Evaluating electric power generation technologies: a multicriteria analysis based on the FITradeoff method. Energy 165, 10–20 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R.L., Raiffa, H.: Decision Analysis with Multiple Conflicting Objectives. Wiley, New York (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R.L.: Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decision Making. Harvard University Press, London (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkwood, C.W., Sarin, R.K.: Ranking with partial information: a method and an application. Oper. Res. 33(1), 38–48 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendes, J.A.J., Frej, E.A., Almeida, A.T.D., Almeida, J.A.D.: Evaluation of flexible and interactive Tradeoff method based on numerical simulation experiments. Pesquisa Operacional 40 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-7438.2020.040.00231191

  • Pergher, I., Frej, E.A., Roselli, L.R.P., de Almeida, A.T.: Integrating simulation and FITradeoff method for scheduling rules selection in job-shop production systems. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 227, 107669 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poleto, T., Clemente, T.R.N., de Gusmão, A.P.H., Silva, M.M., Costa, A.P.C.S.: Integrating value-focused thinking and FITradeoff to support information technology outsourcing decisions. Manag. Decis. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-09-2019-1293

  • Rodrigues, L.V.S., Casado, R.S.G.R., Carvalho, E.N.D., Silva, M.M.: Using FITradeoff in a ranking problem for supplier selection under TBL performance evaluation: an application in the textile sector. Production 30 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.20190032

  • Reis Peixoto Roselli, L., de Almeida, A.T.: Analysis of graphical visualizations for multi-criteria decision making in FITradeoff method using a decision neuroscience experiment. In: Moreno-Jiménez, J.M., Linden, I., Dargam, F., Jayawickrama, U. (eds.) ICDSST 2020. LNBIP, vol. 384, pp. 30–42. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46224-6_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Roselli, L.R.P., de Almeida, A.T., Frej, E.A.: Decision neuroscience for improving data visualization of decision support in the FITradeoff method. Oper. Res. 19, 933–953 (2019a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Roselli, L.R.P., Pereira, L., da Silva, A., de Almeida, A.T., Morais, D.C., Costa, A.P.C.S.: Neuroscience experiment applied to investigate decision-maker behavior in the tradeoff elicitation procedure. Ann. Oper. Res. 289(1), 67–84 (2019b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salo, A.A., Hämäläinen, R.P.: Preference assessment by imprecise ratio statements. Oper. Res. 40(6), 1053–1061 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Economist: Corruption in Brazil, Weird Justice, December 10, 2015 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M.: Decision making with incomplete information. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 28(1), 44–57 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work had partial support from the Brazilian Research Council (CNPq).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eduarda Asfora Frej .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

da Cunha, C.P.C.B., de Miranda Mota, C.M., de Almeida, A.T., Frej, E.A., Roselli, L.R.P. (2020). Applying the FITradeoff Method for Aiding Prioritization of Special Operations of Brazilian Federal Police. In: de Almeida, A.T., Morais, D.C. (eds) Innovation for Systems Information and Decision. INSID 2020. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 405. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64399-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64399-7_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-64398-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-64399-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics