Skip to main content

Preparing for the Future of Work and the Development of Expertise

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Expertise at Work

Abstract

Expertise is vital to any organization’s competitive advantage in the highly competitive landscape. However, as technology continues to evolve and emerge, organizations find themselves in a near-constant state of transformation. Moreover, the rapid pace of technological innovation is outpacing any previous era and contributes to an already complex transforming workplace. As the transformation continues to unfold, the workforce must be equipped to perform in the new operational environment. In other words, the workforce must also transform to keep pace with the workplace. Unfortunately, current methods used to develop expertise are inefficient and consequently require a tremendous amount of time and effort. For example, scholars agree that reaching an expert level of mastery requires more than 10,000 hours and up to ten years to achieve. Therefore, developing expertise within the workforce for the transformed workplace requires Human Resource Development professions to design and implement innovative solutions capable of overcoming these and other challenges created by ever-present transformation. Moreover, innovative and emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence, are quickly being adopted in the workplace, including in the fields of medicine (Allen, 2018; Harrington & Johnson, 2019) and business (Schneider & Leyer, 2019). These highly complex and emerging technologies provide organizations the power to push beyond the limitations of human performance. Likewise, these technologies provide the potential to outpace the ongoing technological evolution. Human Resource Development professionals must employ innovative strategies that transcend disciplines to harness the power offered by machines as well as circumvent the extremely long lead times to efficiently develop expertise. These innovations must fundamentally disrupt the current methods of expertise development to increase efficiency. Consequently, this begs the question: As humans traverse toward and through the continually transforming workplace, how is the needed expertise developed to equip humans to interact and help organizations establish and maintain their competitive advantage? This question is at the heart of this chapter as the author addresses what is known about developing expertise, innovative and emerging technology, and the possibilities of greater connectedness in the digitally transformed workplace.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, B. (2018). How Structured Use Cases Can Drive the Adoption of Artificial Intelligence Tools in Clinical Practice. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 15(12), 1758–1760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2018.09.002.

  • Cabanero-Johnson, P. S., & Berge, Z. (2009). Digital natives: Back to the future of microworlds in a corporate learning organization. The Learning Organization, 16(4), 290–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnevale, A., Ridley, N., Cheah, B., Strohl, J., & Peltier Campbell, K. (2019). Upskilling and downsizing in American manufacturing. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavanagh, T., Chen, B., Lahcen, R. A. M., & Paradiso, J. R. (2020). Constructing a design framework and pedagogical approach for adaptive learning in higher education: A practitioner’s perspective. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 21(1), 172–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandramouli, M., Zahraee, M., & Winer, C. (2014, 5–7 June). A fun-learning approach to programming: An adaptive Virtual Reality (VR) platform to teach programming to engineering students. Paper presented at the IEEE International Conference on Electro/Information Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chermack, T. (2003). Decision-making expertise at the core of human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 5(4), 365–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chermack, T., & Walton, J. S. (2006). Scenario planning as a development and change intervention. International Journal of Agile Systems and Management, 1(1), 46–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, B. C. K., & Pak, A. W. P. (2006). Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 1. Definitions, objectives, and evidence of effectiveness. Clinical & Investigative Medicine, 29(6), 351–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M., Raynor, M., & McDonald, R. (2015). What is disruptive innovation? Harvard Business Review, 93(12), 44–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results (Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, V. E., & Minnis, S. E. (2017). Military veterans’ transferable skills: An HRD practitioner dilemma. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 19(1), 6–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Bruyne, E., & Gerritse, D. (2018). Exploring the future workplace: Results of the futures forum study. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 20(3), 196–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dittes, S., Richter, S., Richter, A., & Smolnik, S. (2019). Toward the workplace of the future: How organizations can facilitate digital work. Business Horizons, 62(5), 649–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A. (2008). Deliberate practice and acquisition of expert performance: A general overview. Academic Emergency Medicine, 15(11), 988–994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2016). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 254–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulmer, W. E. (2000). Shaping the adaptive organization: Landscapes, learning, and leadership in volatile times. New York: AMACOM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerwitz, R. J. (2016). Modern strategy for operational excellence: Building agile and adaptive organizations. Journal of Healthcare Protection Management: Publication of the International Association for Hospital Security, 32(2), 121–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladwell, M. (2008). Outliers: The story of success. New York: Hachette Audio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gratton, L. (2019). New frontiers in re-skilling and upskilling. MITSloan Review. Retrieved from https://sloanreview-mit-edu.srv-proxy1.library.tamu.edu/article/new-frontiers-in-re-skilling-and-upskilling/

  • Grenier, R. S., & Germain, M.-L. (2014). Expertise through the HRD lens: Research trends and implications. In N. F. Chalofsky, T. Rocco, & M. L. Morris (Eds.), Handbook of human resource development (pp. 183–200). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gromb, D., & Martimort, D. (2007). Collusion and the organization of delegated expertise. Journal of Economic Theory, 137(1), 271–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guinan, P. J., Parise, S., & Langowitz, N. (2019). Creating an innovative digital project team: Levers to enable digital transformation. Business Horizons, 62(6), 717–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, S. G., & Johnson, M. K. (2019). The FDA and Artificial Intelligence in Radiology: Defining New Boundaries. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 16(5), 743–744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2018.09.057.

  • Holbeche, L. (2019). Designing sustainably agile and resilient organizations. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 36(5), 668–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, M. J. (1999). Genius explained. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, N., & Barrow, J. (2020, March 27). Adapting for adaptive learning with Area9 Lyceum [Audio podcast]. https://www.learningsharks.com/ltt-blog/adapting-for-adaptive-learning

  • Howe, N., & Barrow, J. (Hosts). (2020, March 27). Adapting for adaptive learning [Audio Podcast].

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, A., & Haenlein, M. (2019). Digital transformation and disruption: On big data, blockchain, artificial intelligence, and other things. Business Horizons, 62(6), 679–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapp, K. M., & Defelice, R. A. (2019). Microlearning: Short and sweet. Alexandria, VA: American Society for Training and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, M., & Associates. (1984). Andragogy in action (1st ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwartowitz, D. M., Herrell, S. D., & Galloway, R. L. (2007). Update: Toward image-guided robotic surgery: Determining the intrinsic accuracy of the daVinci-S robot. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 1(5), 301–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. Y., Rocco, T. S., & Shuck, B. (2020). What is a resource: Toward a taxonomy of resources for employee engagement. Human Resource Development Review, 19(1), 5–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A., & Larsen, K. R. T. (2003). The technology acceptance model: Past, present, and future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 12, 752–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitin, D. J. (2006). This is your brain on music: The science of a human obsession. New York: Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marlow, S. L., Lacerenza, C. N., Reyes, D., & Salas, E. (2017). The science and practice of simulation-based training in organizations. In K. G. Brown (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of workplace training and employee development (pp. 256–277). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Marquardt, M. J. (2011). Building the learning organization: Achieving strategic advantage through a commitment to learning. Boston: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsick, V., Watkins, K., Callahan, M. W., & Volpe, M. (2006). Reviewing theory and research on informal and incidental learning. Paper presented at Academy of Human Resource Development International Conference, Columbus, OH. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED492754.pdf

  • Marsick, V. J., & Watkins, K. E. (1997). Lessons from informal and incidental learning. In J. Burgoyne & M. Reynolds (Eds.), Management learning: Integrating perspectives in theory and practice (pp. 295–311). London/Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, M. (2014). Time to kill the tech job-killing myth. Retrieved from https://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/technology/219224-time-to-kill-the-tech-job-killing-myth

  • McGurn, L., & Prevou, M. (2012). Rethinking the role of the instructor: Teaching 21st century learners. Paper presented at the Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference (I/ITSEC) 2012, Orlando, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B., & Bierema, L. L. (2014). Adult learning: Linking theory and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messmann, G., Segers, M., & Dochy, F. J. R. C. (2018). Informal learning at work: Triggers, antecedents, and consequences. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moats, J. B. (2013). A close look at technology acceptance: A phenomenological study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moats, J. B. (2015). Influences on the acceptance of innovative technologies used in learning opportunities: A theoretical perspective. In F. M. Nafukho & B. J. Irby (Eds.), Innovative technology in higher education (Vol. 1, 1st ed., p. 20). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moats, J. B., Chermack, T., & Dooley, L. M. (2008). Using scenarios to develop crisis managers: Applications of scenario planning and scenario-based training. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 10(3), 397–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modestino, A. S., Shoag, D., & Ballance, J. (2015). Upskilling: Do employers demand greater skill when skilled workers are plentiful? Working Paper Series (Federal Reserve Bank of Boston), 14(17), 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, A. (2018). The human focus: Organizations can prepare for the future by reskilling employees and updating their workforce designs(1). Retrieved from https://www.td.org/magazines/td-magazine/the-human-focus

  • Mwambe, O. O., Tan, P. X., & Kamioka, E. (2020). Bioinformatics-based adaptive system towards real-time dynamic e-learning content personalization. Education Sciences, 10. Retrieved from http://proxy.library.tamu.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ1245599&site=eds-live

  • Oblinger, D. (2003). Boomers, gen-xers & millennials: Understanding the new students. EDUCASE Review, 37–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavera, J., Walkera, D. A., & Hunga, W.-C. (2014). Adjunct faculty characteristics that may predict intention to integrate technology into instruction. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 38(10), 859–872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M. A. (2017). Technological unemployment: Educating for the fourth industrial revolution. Journal of Self-Governance & Management Economics, 5(1), 25–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pol, E., & Reveley, J. (2017). Robot induced technological unemployment: Towards a youth-focused coping strategy. Psychosociological Issues in Human Resource Management, 5(2), 169–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigby, D., Elk, S., & Berez, S. (2020). The Agile c-suite. Harvard Business Review, 98(3), 64–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasangohar, F., Moats, J., Mehta, R., & Peres, S. C. (2020). Disaster ergonomics: Human factors in COVID-19 pandemic emergency management. Human Factors, 62(7), 1061–1068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, S., & Leyer, M. (2019). Me or information technology? Adoption of artificial intelligence in the delegation of personal strategic decisions. Managerial and Decision Economics, 40(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.2982.

  • Schwab, K. (2015). The fourth industrial revolution: What it means and how to respond. Foreign Affairs. Retrieved from https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2015-12-12/fourth-industrial-revolution

  • Schwab, K. (2016). The fourth industrial revolution: A Davos reader. Council on Foreign Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • SHRM. (2016). The new talent landscape: Recruiting difficulty and skills shortages. Retrieved from Alexandria, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuck, B., Adelson, J. L., & Reio, T. G. (2017). The employee engagement scale: Initial evidence for construct validity and implications for theory and practice. Human Resource Management, 56(6), 953–977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simone, P., Zenobia, T., & Richard, N. (2018). The health benefits of autonomous vehicles: Public awareness and receptivity in Australia. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, (5), 480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbings, C., Sethi, B., & Brown, J. (2019). Talent Trends 2019. Retrieved from https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/ceo-survey/2019/Theme-assets/reports/talent-trends-report.pdf

  • Swanson, R. (2007). Analysis for improving performance: Tools for diagnosing organizations and documenting workplace expertise. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tah, S. (2018). Upskilling workforce for the digital age. Dataquest, 36(6), 87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi, N. (1987). Design of adaptive organizations: Models and empirical research. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tanklevska, N. S., Kyrylov, Y. Y., & Zaitseva, О. I. (2017). Management of conscious adaptive organizations in the context of socioeconomic changes and financial turbulence. Scientific Bulletin of Polissia, 12(4,Part1), 36–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, L. (2019, April 22). Why Companies are Failing at Reskilling. Wall Street Journal, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yen, D. C., Wu, C.-S., Cheng, F.-F., & Huang, Y.-W. (2010). Determinants of users’ intention to adopt wireless technology: An empirical study by integrating TTF with TAM. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 906–915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yousafzai, S., Foxall, G. R., & Pallister, J. G. (2007). Technology acceptance: A meta-analysis of the TAM: Part 1. Journal of Modeling in Management, 2(3), 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., & West, R. E. (2020). Designing microlearning instruction for professional development through a competency based approach. TechTrends, 64(2), 310–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jason Moats .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Moats, J. (2021). Preparing for the Future of Work and the Development of Expertise. In: Germain, ML., Grenier, R.S. (eds) Expertise at Work. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64371-3_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics