Skip to main content

Counting a Random Event: Traditional Approach and New Perspectives

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Counting Statistics for Dependent Random Events

Abstract

The goal of this chapter is to recover the distribution function of a counting random variable representing a countable event defined on a set of multidimensional variables, whose dependence structure is known. After a review of the existing main contributions in counting statistics, we will introduce our new approach to the problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This family is a set of probability distributions that represents a generalization of the natural exponential family. A lot of very common probability distributions belong to the class of exponential dispersion family, among them are normal distribution, binomial distribution, Poisson distribution, negative-binomial distribution, gamma distribution, inverse Gaussian distribution, and Tweedie distribution.

  2. 2.

    We refer to \(\hat {D}(i,k)\) as the number of the ways in which one can distribute the integer i into k groups without taking into account the order of the groups (c.ds for short). If we take into account the groups’ cardinalities, then we refer to \(\hat {D}^c(i,k)\) as the number of the compatible (for cardinalities’ groups) combinatorial distributions.

  3. 3.

    Following this calling order, the c.c.d. considered here is the second one, i.e. j = 2.

  4. 4.

    The concept of compatibility allows to restrict our interest to the scenarios distributing a number of events that doesn’t exceed the cardinality of the group itself.

  5. 5.

    The rule which explains how the coordinates are generated is presented in the following Corollary.

  6. 6.

    In the case of empty set, we delete the correspondent vector element. For example, if the set of elements equal to one into the s-th group and for the j-th c.c.d. is empty, we correspond only \(u_{s,2}^j\) to \(u_{s,w}^j,\forall w\) and \(v_{s,2}^j\) to \(v_{s,w}^j,\forall w\).

  7. 7.

    We assume that this c.c.ds are compatibles with the equivalent cardinalities of groups determined by the clustering method and then compensated for the homogeneous assumption.

  8. 8.

    The representation has been done smoothing and interpolating the points process, for graphical convenience.

References

  1. Bernardi, E., & Romagnoli, S. (2011). Computing the volume of an high-dimensional semi-unsupervised hierarchical copula. International Journal of Computer Mathematics, 88(12), 2591–2607.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Bernardi, E., & Romagnoli, S. (2013). A clusterized copula-based probability distribution of a counting variable for high-dimensional problems. The Journal of Credit Risk, 9(2), 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bortkiewicz, L. J. (1898). The Law of Small Numbers. Leipzig: B.G. Teubner.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (1998). Regression Analysis of Count Data. (Econometric Society Monograph, Vol. 30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Consul, P. C., & Jain, G. C. (1973). A generalization of the Poisson distribution. Technometrics, 15(4), 791–799.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Davis, M., & Lo, V. (2001). Infectious defaults. Quantitative Finance, 1, 382–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Driessen, J. (2005). Is default event risk priced in corporate bonds? Review of Financial Studies, 18, 165–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Duffee, G. R. (1999). Estimating the price of default risk. The Review of Financial Studies, 12(1), 197–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Duffie, D., & Singleton, K. (1999). Simulating correlated defaults. Stanford University, working paper.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Elizalde, A. (2005). Credit Risk Models I: Default Correlation in Intensity Models. working paper.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Greenwood, M., & Yule, G. U. (1920). An inquiry in to the nature of frequency distributions of multiple happenings, with particular reference to the occurrence of multiple attacks of disease or repeated accidents. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 83, 255–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jarrow, R., & Yu, F. (2001). Counterparty risk and the pricing of defaultable securities. Journal of Finance, 56, 1765–1799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Joe, H., & Zhu, R. (2005). Generalized Poisson distribution: The property of mixture of Poisson and comparison with negative binomial distribution. Biometrical Journal, 47, 219–229.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Jørgensen, B., & De Souza, M. C. P. (1994). Fitting Tweedie’s compound Poisson model to insurance claims data. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 1994, 69–93.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Kemp, C. D. (1967). Stuttering-Poisson distributions. Journal of the Statistical Enquiry of Ireland, 21(5), 151–157.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lomnitz, C. (1994). Fundamentals of Earthquake Prediction. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mack, T. (1997). Measuring the variability of chain ladder reserve estimates. CCasualty Actuarial Society Forum, Spring 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  18. McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1989). Generalized Linear Models. London: Chapman and Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Poisson, S. D. (1837). Probabilité des jugements en matière criminelle et en matière civile, précédées des règle générales du calcul des probabilitiés. Paris: Bachelier.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Renshaw, A. E., & Verrall, R. J. (1998). A stochastic model underlying the chain-ladder technique. British Actuarial Journal, 4, 903–923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Revfeim, K. J. A. (1984). An initial model of the relationship between rainfall events and daily rainfalls. Journal of Hydrology, 75, 357–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Thompson, C. S. (1984). Homogeneity analysis of a rainfall series: An application of the use of a realistic rainfall model. Journal of Climatology, 4, 609–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tweedie, M. C. K. (1984). An index which distinguishes between some important exponential families. In J. K. Ghosh & J. Roy (Eds.), Applications and New Directions. Proceeding of the Indian Statistical Golden Jubilee International Conference (pp. 579–604). Calcutta: Indian Statistical Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wüthrich, M. V. (2003). Claims reserving using Tweedie’s compound Poisson model. Astin Bulletin, 33(2), 331–346.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Zang, F. X. (2003). What did the credit market expect of Argentina default? Evidence from Default Swap Data. working paper, Federal Reserve Board, Division of Research and Statistics, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bernardi, E., Romagnoli, S. (2021). Counting a Random Event: Traditional Approach and New Perspectives. In: Counting Statistics for Dependent Random Events. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64250-1_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics