Skip to main content

Combining Quality of Service and Quality of Experience to Visualize and Analyze City Services

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
14th WCEAM Proceedings (WCEAM 2019)

Abstract

Research is rich in analyzing performance and quality of city services (e.g., the frequency and timeliness of the), while the quality of experience is usually overlooked. This research combines the quality of service and the quality of experience into a single multi-faceted framework. The proposed framework incorporates visualizations and implements urban analytics to compare QoS and QoE. Discrete event simulations and Markov Chain Models are created to model city services’ behavior and simulate events. At the same time, resilience metrics are used to evaluate the quality of the service. Data mining of social media, natural language processing, and emotion analysis techniques are employed to measure the QoE. The framework is implemented to analyze how services react to different types of service disruptions (e.g., weather, maintenance, attacks) through time and their effect on customers. This research’s main findings are related to the differences in resilience of the services during disruptions, while QoE reveals additional issues associated with their use. The proposed framework is illustrated through transportation services, providing insights on their performability and customer’s perception of the service. Future work involves collecting data on other services to test the framework further, as well as improving the layers of superimposed data for explorations and visualizations, thereby creating a decision-making tool for stakeholders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Goldsmith S, Crawford S (2014) The responsive city: engaging communities through data-smart governance. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  2. Papazek P, Raidl GR, Rainer-Harbach M, Hu B (2013) A pilot grasp hybrid for the static balancing of public bicycle sharing systems. In: Computer aided systems theory-EUROCAST 2013. Springer, pp 372–379

    Google Scholar 

  3. Haider Z, Nikolaev A, Kang JE, Kwon C (2014) Inventory rebalancing through pricing in public bike-sharing systems

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nachlas JA (2017) Reliability engineering: probabilistic models and maintenance methods. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  5. Haas K (2006) Benefits of traffic incident management. National traffic incident management coalition

    Google Scholar 

  6. Li R, Guo M, Lu H (2017) Analysis of the different duration stages of accidents with hazard- based model. Int J Intell Transp Syst Res 15(1):7–16

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sheffi Y et al (2005) The resilient enterprise: overcoming vulnerability for competitive advantage. MIT Press Books, vol 1

    Google Scholar 

  8. Henry D, Ramirez-Marquez JE (2012) Generic metrics and quantitative approaches for system resilience as a function of time. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 99:114–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Erol O, Sauser BJ, Mansouri M (2010) A framework for investigation into extended enterprise resilience. Enterp Inf Syst 4(2):111–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Murray-Tuite PM (2006) A comparison of transportation network resilience under simulated system optimum and user equilibrium conditions. In: Proceedings of the 2006 winter simulation conference. IEEE, pp 1398–1405

    Google Scholar 

  11. Barker K, Ramirez-Marquez JE, Rocco CM (2013) Resilience-based network component importance measures. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 117:89–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Swindell D, Kelly J (2005) Performance measurement versus city service satisfaction: intra-city variations in quality? Soc Sci Q 86(3):704–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Collins C, Hasan S, Ukkusuri SV (2013) A novel transit rider satisfaction metric: rider sentiments measured from online social media data. J Public Transp 16(2):2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Musto C, Semeraro G, de Gemmis M, Lops P (2015) Developing smart cities services through semantic analysis of social streams. In: Proceedings of the 24th international conference on world wide web. ACM, pp 1401–1406

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gu Y, Qian ZS, Chen F (2016) From Twitter to detector: real-time traffic incident detection using social media data. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 67:321–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sasaki K, Nagano S, Ueno K, Cho K (2012) Feasibility study on detection of transportation information exploiting Twitter as a sensor. In: Sixth international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media

    Google Scholar 

  17. Krstajic M, Rohrdantz C, Hund M, Weiler A (2012) Getting there first: real-time detection of real-world incidents on Twitter

    Google Scholar 

  18. Atefeh F, Khreich W (2015) A survey of techniques for event detection in Twitter. Comput Intell 31(1):132–164

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Colneric N, Demsar J (2018) Emotion recognition on Twitter: comparative study and training a unison model. IEEE Trans Affect Comput

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gongora Svartzman G, Ramirez-Marquez JE (2019) Listen to the people! Comparing perceived and documented disruptions in public transportation, through quantitative quality of experience, the case study of NYC. In: IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics. IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gongora Svartzman G Ramirez-Marquez JE, Barker K (2020) Social media analytics to connect system performability and quality of experience, with an application to Citibike. Comput Ind Eng, 106146

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sakaki T, Okazaki M, Matsuo, Y (2010) Earthquake shakes Twitter users: real-time event detection by social sensors. Proceedings of the 19th international conference on world wide web

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ni M, He Q, Gao J (2016) Forecasting the subway passenger flow under event occurrences with social media. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 18(6):1623–1632

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sheffi Y (2005) The resilient enterprise: overcoming vulnerability for competitive advantage. MIT Press Books, vol 1

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ahmed KB, Radenski A, Bouhorma M, Ahmed MB (2016) Sentiment analysis for smart cities: state of the art and opportunities. In: Proceedings on the international conference on internet computing (ICOMP), p 55. The steering committee of the world congress in computer science, computer engineering and applied computing (WorldComp)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Giachanou A, Crestani F (2016) Like it or not: a survey of twitter sentiment analysis methods. ACM Comput Surv (CSUR) 49(2):1–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang Z, Ni M, He Q, Gao J, Gou J, Li X (2016) Exploratory study on correlation between twitter concentration and traffic surges. Transp Res Rec 2553(1):90–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mogaji E, Erkan I (2019) Insight into consumer experience on UK train transportation services. Travel Behav Soc 14:21–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Chakraborty P, Sharma A (2019) Public opinion analysis of the transportation policy using social media data: a case study on the delhi odd-even policy. Transp Dev Econ 5(1):5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mounica B, Lavanya K (February, 2020) Social Media data analysis for intelligent transportation systems. In: 2020 International conference on emerging trends in information technology and engineering (ic-ETITE). IEEE, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriela Gongora-Svartzman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gongora-Svartzman, G., Ramirez-Marquez, J.E. (2021). Combining Quality of Service and Quality of Experience to Visualize and Analyze City Services. In: Crespo Márquez, A., Komljenovic, D., Amadi-Echendu, J. (eds) 14th WCEAM Proceedings. WCEAM 2019. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64228-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64228-0_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-64227-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-64228-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics