Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Aligning IIoT and ISA-95 to Improve Asset Management in Process Industries

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
14th WCEAM Proceedings (WCEAM 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Despite standards such as International Standards Association (ISA-95) and Manufacturing Enterprise Solutions Association (MESA) International guiding operational process, asset automation and control for some time, the integration challenge remains for Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) that the strategies of converging Information Technology (IT) and Operational Technology (OT) domains remain disparate. IT systems prioritize data governance and reliability to ensure the needs of enterprise users are met while OT systems prioritize human safety and asset reliability to ensure that the production process remain safe and effective. These differing priorities lead to greater complexities in the design of convergent systems necessary to progress Industrial Internet of Things, coined more recently as Industry 4.0.

The gaps are between IoT computing layers and alignment to the ISA-95 automation layers plus the evolving constructs of Industry 4.0 and how in the future un/trusted data moves seamlessly between converged OT and IT domains. In doing so, the information governance links between technology, organizational processes, and people (TOP) across the ISA-95 and Manufacturing Operations Management (MOM) System stacks must be considered to provide true secure convergence of the OT and IT domains. This paper explores and builds upon the growing industrial manufacturing OT/IT/IoT convergence literature [1, 31], extending exploration of the role of TOP governance factors to RAMI4.0, suggesting a single OT/IT strategy for organizations to achieve Industry 4.0 initiatives.

The case study research method provides insights into emerging industry and standards convergence practices. Applying these standards and aligning the interdependence between OT and IT strategies with TOP constructs, are explored in the context of achieving Industry 4.0 objectives robustly and resiliently through applying a holistic Data Infrastructure Platform (DIP) in process-centric organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kuusk A, Gao J (2015) Consolidating people, process and technology to bridget the great wall of operational and information technologies. In: Engineering asset management: towards certification, Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lobov A (2018) Smart manufacturing systems: climbing the DIKW pyramid. In: IECON 2018 - 44th annual conference of the IEEE industrial electronics society, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wang L (2016) Big data in cyber-physical systems, digital manufacturing and industry 4.0. Int J Eng Manufact 6:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cisco (2018) Cisco global could index: forecast and methodology, 2016–2021 White Paper, 19 November 2018. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/service-provider/global-cloud-index-gci/white-paper-c11-738085.html. Accessed 7 May 2019

  5. Gartner (2018) Gartner identifies top 10 strategic IoT technologies and trends, 7 November. https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2018-11-07-gartner-identifies-top-10-strategic-iot-technologies-and-trends. Accessed 7 May 2019

  6. Shi W, Cao J, Zhang Q, Li Y, Xu L (2016) Edge computing: vision and challenges. IEEE Internet Things J 3(5):637–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bonomi F, Milito R, Zhu J, Addepalli S (2012) Fog computing and its role in the internet of things. In: MCC 2012 Proceedings of the first edition of the MCC workshop on mobile cloud computing, Helsinki, Finland

    Google Scholar 

  8. Breivold HP, Sandström K (2015 ) Internet of Things for industrial automation - challenges and technical solutions. In: IEEE international conference on data science and data intensive systems, Sydney, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stouffer K, Falco J, Scarfone K (2011) Guide to industrial control systems (ICS) security. National Institute of Standards & Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, MD, USA

    Google Scholar 

  10. Technical Review Middle East (2016) Schneider Electric introduces world’s first ePAC for IIoT in GCC, IT Section, 29 November 2016

    Google Scholar 

  11. Johnson RE (2010) Survey of SCADA security challenges and potential attack vectors. In: International Conference for Internet Technology and Secured Transactions, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  12. Agarwal N, Brem A (2015) Strategic business transformation through technology convergence: implications from general electric’s industrial internet initiative. Int J Tech Manage 67:196–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lorga M, Goren NS, Mahmoudi C (2018) Fog computing conceptual model, recommendations of the national institute of standards and technology, NIST, Gaithersburg, MD, USA

    Google Scholar 

  14. Liu H, Guo J, Yu W, Zhu L, Liu Y, Xia T, Sun R, Gardner RM (2016) The design and implementation of the enterprise level data platform and big data driven applications and analytics. In: IEEE/PES transmission and distribution conference and exposition (T&D), Dallas, TX, USA, 3–5 May 2016

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bikfalvi P, Kulcsár G, Forrai MK, Erdélyi F, Tóth T (2013) On some functions of the MES applications supporting production operations management. In: Applied information science, engineering and technology, Springer, Cham, pp. 103–129

    Google Scholar 

  16. Beath C, Sebastien I, Ross J, Beath C, Mocker M, Moloney K, Fonstad N (2017) How big old companies navigate digital transformation. MIS Q Executive 197–201 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Malli SS, Vijayalakshmi S, Balaji V (2017) Real time big data analytics to derive actionable intelligence in enterprise applications. In: Internet of Things and big data analytics toward next-generation intelligence. Studies in Big Data, vol. 30, Springer, pp 99–121

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ochs T, Riemann U (2018) Smart manufacturing in the Internet of Things era. In: Internet of Things and big data analytics toward next-generation intelligence, Springer, pp 199-217

    Google Scholar 

  19. McKinsey & Company (2015) The Internet of Things: mapping the value beyond the hype. McKinsey Global Institute

    Google Scholar 

  20. International Society of Automation, ISA95, Enterprise-Control System Integration. https://www.isa.org/isa95/

  21. International Organization for Standardization, Enterprise-control system integration. https://www.iso.org/standard/57308.html

  22. Koch R (2018) Draining the data swamp: an organization’s data lake is only as good as the preparation and maintenance planning that go into creating it, Strategic Finance, 1 June 2018

    Google Scholar 

  23. Radanliev P, Nicolescu R, Huth M, De Roure DC (2019) A reference architecture for integrating the Industrial Internet of Things in the Industry 4.0, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kosieradzka A (2017) Maturity model for production management. In: 7th international conference on engineering, project, and production management

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gill B, Shea T (2018) Industrial IoT brings benefits and opportunities for rotating equipment suppliers and plant operators. In: Asia turbo machinery & pump symposium, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  26. Schuh G, Anderl R, Gausemeier J, ten Hompel M, Wahlster W (2017) Industrie 4.0 Maturity index: managing the digital transformation, acatch, Munich, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hand A (2018) The value proposition of IIoT, Industry 4.0, Automation World, 16 June 2018

    Google Scholar 

  28. De Carolis A, Macchi M, Negri E, Terzi S (2017) A maturity model for assessing the digital readiness of manufacturing companies. In: Advances in production management systems, Part 1, Hamburg, Germany, 3–7 September 2017

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yamfashije J (2017) Capability maturity model integration, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburg, PA, USA, April 2017

    Google Scholar 

  30. Strother N, Ravens S (2019) Finding the ROI in digital transformation – case studies and analysis of the OSIsoft PI system, Navigant Research, Navigant Consulting Inc. pp 2–5, 26

    Google Scholar 

  31. Alcácer V, Cruz-Machado V (2019) Scanning the Industry 4.0: a literature review on technologies for manufacturing systems. Eng Sci Tech J. www.elsevier.com

  32. Lu Y, Morris KC (2016) Current standards landscape for smart manufacturing systems, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), US Dept of Commerce, Feb 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.8107

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. OSIsoft LLC, San Leandro, CA, USA

    Yong-Lip The

  2. University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes, SA, Australia

    Anastasia Govan Kuusk

Authors
  1. Yong-Lip The
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anastasia Govan Kuusk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yong-Lip The or Anastasia Govan Kuusk .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial Management, University of Seville, Seville, Spain

    Adolfo Crespo Márquez

  2. Hydro-Quebec, Varennes, QC, Canada

    Dragan Komljenovic

  3. Graduate School of Technology Management, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa

    Joe Amadi-Echendu

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

The, YL., Kuusk, A.G. (2021). Aligning IIoT and ISA-95 to Improve Asset Management in Process Industries. In: Crespo Márquez, A., Komljenovic, D., Amadi-Echendu, J. (eds) 14th WCEAM Proceedings. WCEAM 2019. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64228-0_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64228-0_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-64227-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-64228-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation