Abstract
This study has been prepared to take a look into the key areas in technology which will effect medicine in the future. Various amount of academic papers have been read and sifted to reach the best possible information. As our research is qualitative one, focused subjects were studied by different sources to come up with an objective writing. Distinct subheaders have been initiated and analyzed, then put into the research. Proofreading process and checking our sources of information have been cross-checked several times.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ritter F, et al., Medical image analysis. In IEEE Pulse, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 60–70, Nov.–Dec. 2011. [2].
Analoui, Alhosseini G. Computer-aided detection of prostate cancer. 2006 International Conference on Computational Inteligence for Modelling Control and Automation and International Conference on Intelligent Agents Web Technologies and International Commerce (CIMCA’06), Sydney, NSW, 2006, pp. 140–140, https://doi.org/10.1109/CIMCA.2006.75.
Yang W et al. Predicting CT image from MRI data through feature matching with learned nonlinear local descriptors. In IEEE transactions on medical imaging, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 977–987, April 2018.
Atalay HA, Ülker V, Alkan İ, Canat HL, Özkuvancı Ü, Altunrende F. Impact of three-dimensional printed pelvicaliceal system models on residents’ understanding of pelvicaliceal system anatomy before percutaneous nephrolithotripsy surgery: a pilot study. J Endourol. 2016;30(10):1132–7. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2016.0307.
Gu BK, Choi DJ, Park SJ, Kim YJ, Kim CH. 3D bioprinting technologies for tissue engineering applications. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1078:15–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0950-2_2.
Cai H, Liu Z, Wei F, Yu M, Xu N, Li Z. 3D printing in spine surgery. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1093:345–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1396-7_27.
Lui YS, Sow WT, Tan LP, Wu Y, Lai Y, Li H. 4D printing and stimuli-responsive materials in biomedical aspects. Acta Biomater. 2019;92:19–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.005.
Özgür BC, Ayyıldız A. 3D printing in urology: is it really promising? Turk J Urol. 2018;44(1):6–9. https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2018.20856.
Ebbing J, Jäderling F, Collins JW, et al. Comparison of 3D printed prostate models with standard radiological information to aid understanding of the precise location of prostate cancer: a construct validation study. PLoS One. 2018;13(6):e0199477. Published 2018 Jun 25. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199477
Zhang K, Fu Q, Yoo J, et al. 3D bioprinting of urethra with PCL/PLCL blend and dual autologous cells in fibrin hydrogel: an in vitro evaluation of biomimetic mechanical property and cell growth environment. Acta Biomater. 2017;50:154–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.12.008.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Aslan, H.İ., Şahin, K.E., Nilgounbakht, M., Huri, E. (2021). Artificial Intelligence. In: Veneziano, D., Huri, E. (eds) Urologic Surgery in the Digital Era. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63948-8_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63948-8_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-63947-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-63948-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)