Abstract
Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) is a promising fluorescence-based fiber-optic imaging technique able to provide a microscopical assessment of tissues.
It was developed in 2007 and was first used to study histopathologic changes in bronchial and enteric tissue (Thiberville et al., Am J Respir Crit Care Med 175(1):22–31, 2007; Wang et al., Clin Gastroenterolo Hepatol 5:1300–5, 2007). In 2009 it was proposed that CLE could be used for real-time visualization of tissue microarchitecture and cellular morphology of the lower urinary tract, with improved diagnosis of urothelial carcinoma (Sonn et al., J Urol 182:1299–305, 2009) (i.e., tumor grading) and, more recently, CLE has been used in the upper urinary tract with similar purposes (Villa et al., J Endourol 30(2):237–42, 2016; Breda et al., Eur Urol Focus 4(6):954–959, 2018). Similarly, reflectance confocal microscopy has been introduced in 2007 in the field of dermatology to improve the diagnostic specificity when integrated with dermoscopy (Pellacani et al., J Invest Dermatol 127(12):2759–5, 2007; Guitera et al., J Invest Dermatol 132(10):2386–2394, 2012).
As far as prostate cancer is concerned, it has been used more recently to microscopically depict prostate tissue, distinguishing between cancerous and non-cancerous one; the real-time fashion of CLE makes it suitable for the intra-operative setting, to assess surgical margin status thus tailoring the correct plane of dissection (Puliatti et al., BJU Int 124(3):469–476, 2019; Lopez et al., J Urol 195(4 Pt 1):1110–1117, 2016).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Abbreviations
- CIS:
-
carcinoma in situ
- CLE:
-
confocal laser endomicroscopy
- CTU:
-
computed tomography urography
- EAU:
-
European Association of Urology
- FCM:
-
fluorescence confocal microscopy
- NVB:
-
neurovascular bundles
- OCT:
-
optical coherence tomography
- PDD:
-
photodynamic diagnosis
- RNU:
-
radical nephroureterectomy
- UTUC:
-
upper tract urinary carcinoma
- WLC:
-
white light cystoscopy
References
Dabbs T, Glass M. Single-mode fibers used as confocal microscope pinholes. Appl Opt. 1992 Feb 20;31(6):705–6.
Polglase AL, McLaren WJ, Skinner SA, et al. A fluorescence confocal endomicroscope for in vivo microscopy of the upper- and the lower-GI tract. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Nov;62(5):686–95.
Thiberville L, Moreno-Swirc S, Vercauteren T, et al. In vivo imaging of the bronchial wall microstructure using fibered confocal fluorescence microscopy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;175(1):22–31.
Chang TC, Liu J-J, Hsiao ST, et al. Interobserver agreement of confocal laser endomicroscopy for bladder cancer. J Endourol. 2013 May;27(5):598–603.
Wu K, Liu JJ, Adams W, et al. Dynamic real-time microscopy of the urinary tract using confocal laser endomicroscopy. Urology. 2011 Jul;78(1):225–31.
Chen SP, Liao JC. Confocal laser endomicroscopy of bladder and upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a new era of optical diagnosis? Curr Urol Rep. 2014 Sep;15(9):437.
Marien A, Rock A, Maadarani KE, et al. Urothelial tumors and dual-band imaging: a new concept in confocal laser endomicroscopy. J Endourol. 2017 May;31(5):538–44.
Minsky M. Memoir on inventing the confocal scanning microscope. Scanning. 1988:128–38.
Claxton NS, Fellers TJ, Davidson MW. Laser scanning confocal microscopy. Department of Optical Microscopy and Digital Imaging, National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Florida State University, https://www.ucc.ie/en/media/academic/anatomy/imagingcentre/imagegallery/confocalgallery/Laser-Scanning-Confocal-Microscopy-Introduction.pdf
Lucas FF. The architecture of the living cells – Recent advances in methods of biological research – Optical sectioning with the ultra-violet microscope. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1930;16(9):599–607.
Wallace MB, Meining A, Canto MI, et al. The safety of intravenous fluorescein for confocal laser endomicroscopy in the gastrointestinal tract. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Mar;31(5):548–52.
Kwan AS, Barry C, McAllister IL, Constable I. Fluorescein angiography and adverse drug reactions revisited: the Lions Eye experience. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006 Jan-Feb;34(1):33–8.
Yannuzzi LA, Rohrer KT, Tindel LJ, et al. Fluorescein angiography complication survey. Ophthalmology. 1986 May;93(5):611–7.
Hara T, Inami M, Hara T, et al. Efficacy and safety of fluorescein angiography with orally administered sodium fluoresceine. Am J Ophtalmol. 1998 Oct;126(4):560–4.
Antoni S, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Bladder cancer incidence and mortality: a global overview and recent trends. Eur Urol. 2017 Jan;71(1):96–108.
Beer E. Landmark article May 28, 1910: removal of neoplasm of the urinary bladder. By Edwin Beer JAMA. 1983 Sep 9;250(10):1324–5.
Palou J, Sylvester RJ, Faba OR, et al. Female gender and carcinoma in situ in the prostatic urethra are the prognostic factors for recurrence, progression, and disease-specific mortality in T1G3 bladder cancer patients treated with bacillus Calmette-Guerin. Eur Urol. 2012 Jul;62(1):118–25.
Palou J, Rodríguez Rubio F, Millán F, et al. Recurrence at three months and high-grade recurrence as prognostic factor of progression in multivariate analysis of T1G2 bladder tumors. Urology. 2009 Jun;73(6):1313–7.
Sonn GA, Mach KE, Jensen K, et al. Fibered confocal microscopy of bladder tumors: an ex vivo study. J Endourol. 2009 Feb;23(2):197–201.
Lee J, Jeh SU, Koh DH, et al. Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy during transurethral resection of bladder tumors improves the diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic efficacy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Apr;26(4):1158–65.
Kennedy JC, Pottier RH, Pross DC. Photodynamic therapy with endogenous protoporphyrin IX: basic principles and present clinical experience. J Photochem Photobiol B. 1990 Jun;6(1–2):143–8.
Wieser C, Jäger W, Salzer A, et al. Confocal laser endomicroscopy for the diagnosis of urothelial bladder neoplasia: a technology of the future? BJU Int. 2011 Feb;107(3):399–403.
Sonn GA, Jones S-NE, Tarin TV, et al. Optical biopsy of human bladder neoplasia with in vivo confocal laser endomicroscopy. J Urol. 2009;182:1299–305.
Adams W, Wu K, Liu JJ, et al. Comparison of 2.6- and 1.4-mm imaging probes for confocal laser endomicroscopy of the urinary tract. J Endourol. 2011 Jun;25(6):917–21.
Lopez A, Zlatev DV, Mach KE, et al. Intraoperative optical biopsy during robotic assisted radical prostatectomy using confocal endomicroscopy. J Urol. 2016 Apr;195(4 Pt 1):1110–7.
Aron M, Luthringer DJ, McKenney JK, et al. Utility of a triple antibody cocktail intraurothelial neoplasm-3 (IUN-3-CK20/CD44s/p53) and α-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) in the distinction of urothelial carcinoma in situ (CIS) and reactive urothelial atypia. Am J Surg Pathol. 2013 Dec;37(12):1815–23.
Wallace MB, Sharma P, Lightdale C, et al. Preliminary accuracy and interobserver agreement for the detection of intraepithelial neoplasia in Barrett’s esophagus with probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Jul;72(1):19–24.
Fritzsche C, Stachs O, Holtfreter MC, et al. Confocal laser scanning microscopy, a new in vivo diagnostic tool for schistosomiasis. PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e34869.
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Jan;67(1):7–30.
Margulis V, Shariat SF, Matin SF, et al. Outcomes of radical nephroureterectomy: a series from the Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Collaboration. Cancer. 2009 Mar 15;115(6):1224–33.
Rouprêt M, Babjuk M, Compérat E, et al. European Association of Urology Guidelines on upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: 2017 update. Eur Urol. 2018 Jan;73(1):111–22.
Elawdy MM, Taha DE, Elbaset MA, et al. Histopathologic characteristics of upper tract urothelial carcinoma with an emphasis on their effect on cancer survival: a single-institute experience with 305 patients with long-term follow-up. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2016 Dec;14(6):e609–15.
Tavora F, Fajardo DA, Lee TK, et al. Small endoscopic biopsies of the ureter and renal pelvis: pathologic pitfalls. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009 Oct;33(10):1540–6.
Smith AK, Stephenson AJ, Lane BR, et al. Inadequacy of biopsy for diagnosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: implications for conservative management. Urology. 2011 Jul;78(1):82–6.
Rouprêt M, Colin P, Yates DR. A new proposal to risk stratify urothelial carcinomas of the upper urinary tract (UTUCs) in a predefinitive treatment setting: low-risk vs high-risk UTUCs. Eur Urol. 2014 Aug;66(2):181–3.
Seisen T, Colin P, Rouprêt M. Risk-adapted strategy for the kidney-sparing management of the upper tract tumors. Nat Rev Urol. 2015 Mar;12(3):155–66.
Bui D, Mach KE, Zlatev DV, et al. A pilot study of in vivo confocal laser endomicroscopy of upper tract urothelial carcinoma. J Endourol. 2015 Dec;29(12):1418–23.
Villa L, Cloutier J, Cotè JF, et al. Confocal laser endomicroscopy in the managment of endoscopically treated upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma: preliminary data. J Endourol. 2016 Feb;30(2):237–42.
Breda A, Territo A, Gutilla A, et al. Correlation between confocal laser endomicroscopy (Cellvizio ®) and histological grading of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a step forward for a better selection of patients suitable for conservative management. Eur Urol Focus. 2018 Dec;4(6):954–9.
Freund JE, Liem EIML, Savci-Heijink CD, et al. Confocal laser endomicroscopy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: validation of the proposed criteria and proposal of a scoring system for real-time tumor grading. World J Urol. 2019 Oct;37(10):2155–64.
Alemozaffar M, Regan MM, Cooperberg MR, et al. Prediction of erectile function following treatment for prostate cancer. JAMA. 2011;306:1205.
Johansson E, Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, et al. Time, symptom burden, androgen deprivation, and self-assessed quality of life after radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting: the Randomized Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group Study Number 4 (SPCG-4) clinical trial. Eur Urol. 2009;55:422.
Hsu M, Gupta M, Su LM, et al. Intraoperative optical imaging and tissue interrogation during urologic surgery. Curr Opin Urol. 2014;24:66.
Swaan A, Mannaerts CK, Scheltema MJ, et al. Confocal Laser endomicroscopy and optical coherence tomography for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a needle-based, in vivo feasibility study protocol (IDEAL phase 2A). JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 May 21;7(5):e132.
Alarcon I, Carrera C, Palou J, et al. Impact of in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy on the number needed to treat melanoma in doubtful lesions. Br J Dermatol. 2014 Apr;170(4):802–8.
Pellacani G, Witkowski A, Cesinaro AM, et al. Cost-benefit of reflectance confocal microscopy in the diagnostic performance of melanoma. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2016 Mar;30(3):413–9.
Puliatti S, Bertoni L, Pirola GM, et al. Ex vivo fluorescence confocal microscopy: the first application for real-time pathological examination of prostatic tissue. BJU Int. 2019 Sep;124(3):469–76.
Becker A, Hessenius C, Licha K, et al. Receptor-targeted optical imaging of tumors with near-infrared fluorescent ligands. Nat Biotechnol. 2001;19(4):327–31.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Breda, A. et al. (2021). Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy. In: Veneziano, D., Huri, E. (eds) Urologic Surgery in the Digital Era. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63948-8_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63948-8_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-63947-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-63948-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)