Abstract
Problem formulation is one of the critical first steps in mathematical modeling (MM). This important step requires modelers to identify a problem that requires modeling. Our chapter examines how elementary teachers and students learn to be problem posers as they learn to enact mathematical modeling in their own classrooms. We collected data from teachers implementing MM in their classroom starting from their planning process to the enactment phases of mathematical modeling tasks. Data was collected from lesson studies and teacher interviews exploring the processes of mathematical modeling. We focused on better understanding how teachers involve elementary students in the problem formulation process as they co-construct the problem and how they work through making assumptions, building a solution or a model, and revising their model as they relate back to their problems. We also analyzed the context in which the problem formulation occurred: community-based, school-based, or curriculum-based contexts and how it impacted authentic learning.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Association of Childhood Education International (ACEI). (2007). Elementary Education Standards Olney, MD: Association for Childhood Education International.
Blanton, M., & Kaput, J. (2005). Characterizing a classroom practice that promotes algebraic reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36, 412–446.
Bliss, K. M., Fowler, K. R., & Galluzzo, B. (2014). Math modeling: Getting started and getting solutions. Philadelphia, PA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM).
Blum, W. (2002). ICMI study 14: Applications and modelling in mathematics education: Discussion document. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 51(1/2), 149–171. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.mutex.gmu.edu/stable/3483110
Blum, W., & Ferri, R. B. (2016). Advancing the teaching of mathematical modeling: Research-based concepts and examples. In C. R. Hirsch & A. R. Roth McDuffie (Eds.), Mathematical modeling and modeling mathematics (pp. 65–76). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Blum, W., Galbraith, P., Henn, H., & Niss, M. (2007). Modelling and applications in mathematics education: The 14th ICMI study (1st ed.). New York, NY: Springer.
Blum, W. (2011). Can modelling be taught and learnt? Some answers from empirical research. In G. Kaiser, B. Werner, R. B. Ferri, & G. Stillman (Eds.), Trends in teaching and learning of mathematical modeling (pp. 15–30). New York, NY: Springer.
Bryk, A., Gomez, L. M., Grunow, A., & LeMahieu, P. (2015). Learning to improve: How America’s schools can get better at getting better. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. (n.d.). Using improvement science to accelerate learning and address problems of practice. Retrieved from http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/our-ideas/
Caron, F., & Bélair, J. (2007). Exploring university students’ competencies in modeling. In C. Haines, P. Galbraith, W. Blum, & S. Khan (Eds.), Mathematical modeling: Education, engineering and economics (pp. 120–129). Chichester, UK: Horwood.
Cirillo, M., Pelesko, J., Felton-Koestler, M., & Rubel, L. (2016). Perspectives on modeling in school mathematics. In C. R. Hirsch & A. R. Roth McDuffie (Eds.), Mathematical modeling and modeling mathematics (pp. 3–16). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Consortium for Mathematics and Its Applications & Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. (2016). GAIMME: Guidelines for assessment & instruction in mathematical modeling education (S. A. Garfunkel & M. Montgomery, Eds.). Retrieved from http://www.siam.org/reports/gaimme-full_color_for_online_viewing.pdf
English, L. D. (2009). Promoting interdisciplinarity through mathematical modelling. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41(1–2), 161–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0106-z
English, L. D., Fox, J. L., & Watters, J. J. (2005). Problem posing and solving with mathematical modeling. Teaching Children Mathematics, 12(3), 156.
Galbraith, P. (2007a). Dreaming a ‘possible dream’: More windmills to conquer. In C. Haines, P. Galbraith, W. Blum, & S. Khan (Eds.), Mathematical modelling: Education, engineering and economics (pp. 44–62). Chichester, UK: Horwood.
Galbraith, P. (2007b). Assessment and evaluation – Overview. In W. Blum, P. Galbraith, H.-W. Henn, & M. Niss (Eds.), Modelling and applications in mathematics education (pp. 405–408). New York, NY: Springer.
Galbraith, P., Stillman, G., & Brown, J. (2013). Turning ideas into modeling problems. Modeling Students’ Mathematical Modeling Competencies: ICTMA, 13. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0561-1_11
Hirsch, C. R., & McDuffie, A. R. (Eds.). (2016). Mathematical modeling and modeling mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Julie, C. (2007). Learners’ context preferences and mathematical literacy. In C. Haines, P. Galbraith, W. Blum, & S. Khan (Eds.), Mathematical modelling: Education, engineering and economics (pp. 194–202). Chichester, UK: Horwood.
Jung, H., & Brady, C. (2016). Roles of a teacher and researcher during in situ professional development around the implementation of mathematical modeling tasks. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 19(2/3), 277–295. https://doi-org.mutex.gmu.edu/10.1007/s10857-015-9335-6
Kaiser, G. (2007). Modelling and modelling competencies in school. In C. Haines, P. Galbraith, W. Blum, & S. Khan (Eds.), Mathematical modelling: Education, engineering and economics (pp. 110–119). Chichester, UK: Horwood.
Kaiser, G., Blum, W., Borromeo Ferri, R., & Stillman, G. (2011). Trends in teaching and learning of mathematical modelling. New York, NY: Springer.
Lampert, M., Franke, M., Kazemi, E., Ghousseini, H., Turrou, A., Beasley, H., Cunard, A., & Crowe, K. (2013). Keeping it complex: Using rehearsals to support novice teacher learning of ambitious teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(3), 226–243.
Lesh, R., Cramer, K., Doerr, H. M., Post, T., & Zawojewski, J. S. (2003b). Model development sequences. In R. Lesh & H. M. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching (pp. 3–33). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lesh, R., & Doerr, H. M. (2003a). Foundations of a models and modeling perspective on mathematics teaching, learning, and problem solving. In R. Lesh & H. M. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching (pp. 3–33). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lesh, R., & Doerr, H. M. (2003b). In what ways does a models and modeling perspective move beyond constructivism. In R. Lesh & H. M. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning and teaching (pp. 519–556). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lesh, R., Doerr, H. M., Carmona, G., & Hjalmarson, M. (2003a). Beyond constructivism. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5(2–3), 211–233.
Lesh, R., Galbraith, P. L., Haines, C. R., & Hurford, A. (2010). Modeling Students’ mathematical modeling competencies: ICTMA13. New York, NY: Springer.
Lesh, R., & Zawojewski, J. S. (2007). Problem Solving and Modeling. In: Lester, F. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 763–802). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Lewis, C. (2002). Lesson study: A handbook of teacher-led instructional change. Philadelphia, PA: Research for Better Schools.
Lewis, C. (2015). What is improvement science? Do we need it in education? Educational Researcher, 44(1), 54–61.
Matson, K. M. (2018). Teachers perspective on how they learn mathematical modeling. Doctoral dissertation, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA.
McDonald, M., Kazemi, R., & Kavanaugh, S. S. (2013). Core practices and pedagogies of teachereducation: A call for a common language and collective activity. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(5), 378–386.
National Governors Association & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards. Washington, DC: NGA Center and CCSSO. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/Math/Practice/#CCSS.Math.Practice.MP4
National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics (Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
NCTM. (n.d.). Beginning to problem Solve with “I Notice, I Wonder”. Retrieved from https://www.nctm.org/Classroom-Resources/Problems-of-the-Week/I-Notice-I-Wonder/
Niss, M. (2013). Modeling a crucial aspect of students’ mathematical modeling. In R. Lesh, P. L. Galbraith, C. R. Haines, & A. Hurford (Eds.), Modeling students’ mathematical modeling competencies (pp. 43–59). New York, NY: Springer.
Notice and wonder. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://blog.mrmeyer.com/category/3acts/
OECD. (2018). PISA for development mathematics framework. In PISA for development assessment and analytical framework: Reading, mathematics and science. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264305274-5-en
Pollak, H. (1997). Solving problems in the real world. In L. A. Steen (Ed.), Why numbers count: Quantitative literacy for tomorrow’s America (pp. 91–105). New York, NY: The College Board.
Pollak, H. (2003). A history of the teaching of modeling. In G. M. A. Stanic & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), A history of school mathematics (Vol. 1, pp. 647–669). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Pollak, H. (2016). Forward. In C. R. Hirsch & A. R. McDuffie (Eds.), Mathematical modeling and modeling mathematics (pp. vii–viii). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Rasmussen, C., & Marrongelle, K. (2006). Pedagogical content tools: Integrating student reasoning and mathematics in instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(5), 388–420. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/30034860
Stillman, G. A., Blum, W., & Biembengut, M. S. (2015). Mathematical modelling in education research and practice: Cultural, social and cognitive influences. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Stillman, G. A., Kaiser, G, Blum, W. & Brown, J. P. (2013). Teaching mathematical modelling: Connecting to research and practice, Springer Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Suh, J. M. (2007). Tying it all together: Building mathematics proficiency for all students. Teaching Children Mathematics, 14(3), 163–169.
Suh, J. M. (n.d.). Modeling category cards. Retrieved from http://completemath.onmason.com/math-modeling/
Suh, J. M., Burke, L., Britton, K., Matson, K., Ferguson, L., Jamieson, S., & Seshaiyer, P. (2018). Every penny counts: Promoting community engagement to engage students in mathematical modeling. In R. Gutierrez & I. Goffney (Eds.), Annual perspectives in mathematics education: Rehumanizing mathematics for students who are black, indigenous, and/or Latin@ (pp. 63–78). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics: Reston, VA.
Suh, J. M., Matson, K., & Seshaiyer, P. (2017). Engaging elementary students in the creative process of mathematizing their world through mathematical modeling. Education Sciences, 7, 62. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7020062
Suh, J. M. & Seshaiyer, P. (2014). Examining teachers’ understanding of the mathematical learning progression through vertical articulation during Lesson Study. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 18(3), 217–229.
Suh, J. M., & Seshaiyer, P. (2017). Modeling mathematical ideas across the learning progressions. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishing.
Suh, J. M., & Seshaiyer, P. (2019). Co-designing and implementing PBL through Mathematical Modeling in STEM contexts (529–550). In M. Moallem, W. Hung, & N. Dabbagh (Eds.), Handbook of problem based learning. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing.
Three Act Math. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://blog.mrmeyer.com/category/3acts/
Verschaffel, L., De Corte, E., & Borghart, I. (1997). Pre-service teacher’s conceptions and beliefs about the role of real-world knowledge in mathematical modeling of school word problems. Learning and Instruction, 7, 339–359.
Zbiek, R., & Connor, A. (2006). Beyond motivation: Exploring mathematical modeling as a context for deepening students’ understandings of curricular mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(1), 89–112.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Suh, J.M. et al. (2021). Elementary Teachers’ Enactment of the Core Practices in Problem Formulation through Situational Contexts in Mathematical Modeling. In: Suh, J.M., Wickstrom, M.H., English, L.D. (eds) Exploring Mathematical Modeling with Young Learners. Early Mathematics Learning and Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63900-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63900-6_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-63899-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-63900-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)