Skip to main content

The Durability of Concrete with the Participation of Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Nanosilica Without and Within the Presence of Silica Fume and New Generation Superplasticizer

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Environmental Challenges in Civil Engineering (ECCE 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 122))

  • 252 Accesses

Abstract

In the paper the research was undertaken in order to determine the impact of hydrophilic nanosilica used in a form of aqueous colloidal solution with admixture of nano-silver, as well as hydrophobic nanosilica dissolved in ethanol and isopropanol on properties of the concrete without and with presence of silica fume and polycarboxylate based superplasticizer. Tests were conducted for concrete mixture (slump test, Vebe test, density, air content by the water column method) and hardened concretes (compressive strength after 1, 7, 14 and 28 days of curing, density, depth of penetration of water under pressure, water absorption, frost resistance). For mixture and hardened concrete without participation of silica fume, Portland cement 42.5 R was used in an amount of 549.7 kg/m3 for obtaining BWW high-quality concretes. Nano-additives were used in the amount of 0.5 and 1.5% in relation to the mass of cement. The silica fume was additionally added to concretes in the amount of 8% by mass. While as a chemical admixture in the amount of 2% in relation to the cement mass, a 40% solution of a superplasticizer based on a polycarboxylic ether (SP) was used. Pebble aggregate consisting of two fractions with a grain size of 2–8 and 8–16 mm was used and sand with a grain size of 2 mm. Properties of fresh concrete and hardened concrete were tested in the accredited Construction Material Laboratory of the Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture at the Opole University of Technology. Whereas the increase of nanoadditive amount to 1.5% by mass contributed to better improvement of concrete physical properties in the presence of hydrophobic nanosilica than in the presence of hydrophilic nanosilica. In that case particularly beneficial properties were demonstrated by “nano-concrete”, which apart from nanosilica also contained the silica fume and the superplasticizer, which to the most extent had the impact on the improvement of concrete properties, including its reduced absorptivity, higher compressive strength or higher freeze-thaw resistance compared to other concretes tested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Czarnecki L, Kurdowski W (2006) Tendencies shaping the future of concrete. In: Conference materials „Dni Betonu”, Wisła. pp 47–64

    Google Scholar 

  2. Raczkiewicz W (2012) Concrete—a construction material known for centuries. Przegląd Budowlany 83:13–18

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aı̈tcin P-C (2000) Cements of yesterday and today: concrete of tomorrow. Cem Concr Res 30:1349–1359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Czarnecki L (2011) Nanotechnology in construction. Przegląd Budowlany 82:40–53

    Google Scholar 

  5. Radomski W (1995) Global development trends of concrete technology. Przegląd Budowlany 8–9:23–29

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kurdowski W (2010) Cement and concrete chemistry. Wydawnictwo Polski Cement, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa, p 2010

    Google Scholar 

  7. Czarnecki L, Justnes H (2012) Sutainable and durable concrete. Cement Wapno Beton 17:341–362

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sobolev K, Gutiérrez MF (2005) How nanotechnology can change the concrete world. Am Ceram Soc Bull 84:14

    Google Scholar 

  9. Flores-Velez LM, Dominguez O (2002) Characterization and properties of Portland cement composites incorporating zinc-iron oxide nanoparticles. J Mater Sci 37:983–988

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Błaszczyński TZ (2012) Nanotechnologies in construction. In: Seminar “Nanotechnologies in construction”, international fair Budma, Poznań, pp 1–41

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nazari A, Riahi S, Shamekhi SF, Khademno A (2010) The effects of incorporation Fe2O3 nanoparticles on tensile and flexural strength of concrete. J Am Sci 6(4):90–93

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yang J, Mohseni E, Behforouz B, Khotbehsara MM (2015) An experimental investigation into the effects of Cr2O3 and ZnO2 nanoparticles on the mechanical properties and durability of self-compacting mortar. Int J Mater Res 106:886–892

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nazari A, Riahi S, Riahi S, Shamekhi SF, Khademno A (2010) Influence of Al2O3 nanoparticles on the compressive strength and workability of blended concrete. J Am Sci 6:6–9

    Google Scholar 

  14. Xiong G, XuL Deng M, Tang M (2006) Properties of cement-based composites by doping nano-TiO2. J Chin Ceram Soc 34:1158

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nazari A, Sh R, Sh R, Shamekhi SF, Khademno A (2010) Assessment of the effects of the cement paste composite in presence TiO2 nanoparticles. J Am Sci 6:43–46

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cwirzen A, Habermehl-Cwirzen K, Penttala V (2008) Surface decoration of carbon nanotubes and mechanical properties of cement/carbon nanotube composites. Adv Cement Res 20:65–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Raki L, Beaudoin J, Alizadeh R, Makar J, Sato T (2010) Cement and concrete nanoscience and nanotechnology. Materials 3:918–942

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Horszczaruk E, Mijowska E, Cendrowski K, Sikora P (2014) Influence of the new method of nanosilica addition on the mechanical properties of cement mortars. Cement Wapno Beton 18:308–316

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nazari A (2011) Nanoparticles in self compacting concrete. VDM

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ji T (2005) Preliminary study on the water permeability and microstructure of concrete incorporating nano-SiO2. Cement Concr Res 35(10):1943–1947

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Li Z, Wang H, Lu Y, Wang M (2006) Investigations on the preparation and mechanical properties of the nano-alumina reinforced cement composite. Mater Lett 60:356–359

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Janowska-Renkas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Janowska-Renkas, E., Matyjaszczyk, D. (2021). The Durability of Concrete with the Participation of Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Nanosilica Without and Within the Presence of Silica Fume and New Generation Superplasticizer. In: Zembaty, Z., Beben, D., Perkowski, Z., Rak, A., Bosco, G., Solanki, P. (eds) Environmental Challenges in Civil Engineering. ECCE 2020. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 122. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63879-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63879-5_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-63878-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-63879-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics