Abstract
LCA gathers and presents facts that can appeal to both those who aspire to save the planet while not materially impacting the financial bottom line.
Steady and relentless fact-based reporting can counteract the worst effects of climate denialism. Data-driven actions are especially effective when aligned with major stakeholder interests. LCA systems thinking is predicated on the quality and quantity of available foundational life cycle inventory (LCI) information. It is transparent in how it arrives at its conclusions and qualifies its findings. Thus, even a result with a relatively low level of certainty, when accurately stated, is superior to an unquantified assertion.
LCA data quality improvements in recent years create the foundation for a trustworthy evaluation system. More public and private service providers are leveraging statistically more accurate environmental impact reporting. Verified quality data provides a continuity that compensates for the vagaries of changing political decisions such as the funding or defunding of any particular nation’s environmental protection agency.
When armed with “good” data, designers are in a unique position to present options, early in decision-making stages, that simultaneously provide elegant solutions and improve the environmental profile of a project. Multiplying these effects by all of the projects of even a single designer who employs LCA over the course of a career creates a material environmental benefit. This chapter presents an overview of the LCI data and the environmental impact assessment tools available to designers working at the building scale.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Athena Sustainable Materials Institute (n.d.) www.athenasmi.org. Accessed June 2020
Bionova (n.d.) One Click LCA. www.oneclicklca.com. Accessed June 2020
Ciroth A, Muller S, Weidema B et al (2016) Empirically based uncertainty factors for the pedigree matrix in ecoinvent. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:1338–1348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0670-5
Curran MA (ed) (2012) Life cycle assessment handbook: a guide for environmentally sustainable products. Scrivener Publishing\Wiley, Salem\Hoboken, pp 105–106, 115
ecoinvent Centre (n.d.) https://www.ecoinvent.org. Accessed July 2020
Frischknecht R, Jungbluth N, Althaus HJ, et al (2005) The ecoinvent database: overview and methodological framework. Int J Life Cycle Assess 10:3–9. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2004.10.181.1
Grabowski A, Selke SEM, Auras R et al (2015) Life cycle inventory data quality issues for bioplastics feedstocks. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:584–596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0853-3
Hester J, Miller TR, Gregory J et al (2018) Actionable insights with less data: guiding early building design decisions with streamlined probabilistic life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23:1903–1915. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1431-7
Hofstetter P, Mettier TM (2003) What users want and may need: insights from a survey of a life-cycle tool. J Ind Ecol 7:79–101. https://doi.org/10.1162/108819803322564361
ISO (2006b) ISO 14044 Environmental Management: Life Cycle Assessment: Requirements and Guidelines. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva
Jolliet O, Saade-Sbeih M, Shaked S et al (2015) Environmental life cycle assessment. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 47–66
Kneifel J, O’Rear E (2018) Challenges and opportunities in quantifying and evaluating building sustainability. Technol: Archit + Des 2:160–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/24751448.2018.1497363
Kneifel J, Greig AL, Lavappa P, et al (2018a) Building for Environmental and Economic Sustainability (BEES) Online 2.0 technical manual. National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/TechnicalNotes/NIST.TN.2032.pdf. Accessed July 2020
Kneifel J, O’Rear E, Webb D, et al (2018b) Building Industry Reporting and Design for Sustainability (BIRDS) Building code-based residential database technical manual: update. National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/TechnicalNotes/NIST.TN.1999.pdf. Accessed July 2020
National Renewable Energy Laboratory - NREL (2009) U.S. LIFE CYCLE INVENTORY DATABASE ROADMAP. US Department of Energy. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy09osti/45153.pdf. Accessed July 2020
PRé Sustainability (n.d.) SimaPro. https://simapro.com/. Accessed July 2020
Reis L (2013) An exploration of materials taxonomies to support streamlined life cycle assessment. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Saade MRM, Gomes V, Silva MG et al (2018) Investigating transparency regarding ecoinvent users’ system model choices. Int J Life Cycle Assess 24:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1509-x
Saunders CL, Landis AE, Mecca LP et al (2013) Analyzing the practice of life cycle assessment: focus on the building sector. J Ind Ecol 17:777–788. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12028
Sphera (n.d.) GaBi Solutions. www.gabi-software.com. Accessed July 2020
Suh S, Leighton M, Tomar S et al (2016) Interoperability between ecoinvent ver. 3 and US LCI database: a case study. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:1290–1298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0592-2
van Ooteghem K, Xu L (2012) The life-cycle assessment of a single-storey retail building in Canada. Build Environ 49:212–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.09.028
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cays, J. (2021). LCI Data and Design. In: An Environmental Life Cycle Approach to Design. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63802-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63802-3_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-63801-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-63802-3
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)