Abstract
Born as a military accounting tool and adopted by corporate America to increase efficiency, life cycle assessment has matured into an indispensable method for environmentalists to quantify ecological impacts.
Chapter 4 presented how in the 1950s the US Military employed a life cycle approach to optimize resource allocation by applying scientific scrutiny to the budgeting process. In the 1960s, Coca-Cola was the first corporation to implement similar techniques to include the consideration of environmental impacts as part of their strategic financial decision-making. Nearly 30 years later, the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) codified such techniques as life cycle assessment. The ISO published a concise definition of this complex and sprawling activity in the first formal global LCA standard in 1997.
Environmental LCA, which takes a life cycle view of a product or activity from gathering raw materials through end of life, is now a recognized formal scientific discipline and currently the purview of scientists, economists, and accountants. Specialized terms and methods, fundamental to the proper assessments carried out by these technical disciplines, continue to challenge LCA’s broad acceptance by the design community. Design professionals familiar with origins and fundamentals of LCA, however, can more thoroughly engage with these processes to actively shape a design’s ecological profile and provide additional value to their clients and the public. A working knowledge of the basics benefit the non-specialist. This chapter will focus on “goal and scope,” the first of the four primary LCA phases as an introduction to the three others that will be covered in later chapters.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
An Maria De Schryver (2010) Value choices in life cycle impact assessment. Phd thesis, Radboud University, Nijmegen
Curran MA (ed) (2012) Life cycle assessment handbook: a guide for environmentally sustainable products, 1st edn. Wiley-Scrivener, Hoboken
Frischknecht R (1998) Life cycle inventory analysis for decision-making: scope-dependent inventory system models and context-specific joint product allocation. ETH
Hauschild MZ, Rosenbaum RK, Olsen SI (2018) Life cycle assessment: theory and practice. Springer, Cham
Heijungs R, Suh S, Kleijn R (2005) Numerical approaches to life cycle interpretation - the case of the Ecoinvent’96 database (10 pp). Int J Life Cycle Assess 10:103–112. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2004.06.161
Ingwersen W, Flanagan W (2014) Communicating LCA results. In: Shenck R, White P (eds) Environmental life cycle assessment: measuring the environmental performance of products. American Center for Life Cycle Assessment (ACLCA), Vashon, p 236
ISO (2006a) ISO 14040 environmental management: life cycle assessment: principles and framework. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva
ISO (2006b) ISO 14044 environmental management: life cycle assessment: requirements and guidelines. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva
Jolliet O, Saade-Sbeih M, Shaked S et al (2015) Environmental life cycle assessment, 1st edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Klöpffer W (2006) The role of SETAC in the development of LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:116–122. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2006.04.019
Klöpffer W, Grahl B (2014) Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): a guide to best practice, 1st edn. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim
Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pörtner D, et al (2018) Summary for policymakers. In: Global warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty
Matthews HS, Hendrickson CT, Mathews D (2014) Life cycle assessment: quantitative approaches for decisions that matter. Open access textbook
NJDEP-Air Quality Management (2018) https://www.state.nj.us/dep/aqm/es/emstatpg.html. Accessed 18 Jul 2019
Rebitzer G, Ekvall T, Frischknecht R et al (2004) Life cycle assessment: part 1: framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications. Environ Int 30:701–720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2003.11.005
Rodriguez BX, Simonen K, Huang M, De Wolf C (2019) A taxonomy for Whole Building Life Cycle Assessment (WBLCA). Smart Sustain Built Environ 8:190–205. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-06-2018-0034
SETAC (1994) Guidelines for Life-Cycle Assessment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1:55–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02986927
Simonen K (2014) Life cycle assessment, 1st edn. Routledge, London/New York
Sullivan L (1896) The Tall Office building artistically reconsidered. Lippincott’s Magazine 403–409 US EPA O (2016) Understanding global warming potentials. In: US EPA. https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/understanding-global-warming-potentials. Accessed 27 Sep 2020
US EPA (2016) Understanding global warming potentials. In: US EPA. https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/understanding-global-warming-potentials
van Oers L, de Koning A, Guinée J, Huppes G (2002) Abiotic resource depletionin LCA: Improving characterisation factors for abiotic resource depletion as recommended in the new Dutch LCA Handbook
Weidema BP (2019) Consistency check for life cycle assessments. Int J Life Cycle Assess 24:926–934. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1542-9
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cays, J. (2021). Life Cycle Assessment. In: An Environmental Life Cycle Approach to Design. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63802-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63802-3_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-63801-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-63802-3
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)