Skip to main content

Outcome Luck Assessment and the Luck Equation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Luck Theory

Part of the book series: Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning ((LARI,volume 20))

Abstract

Luck—be it good or bad—enters when an uncertain, unforeseen outcome is beneficial (or detrimental) to someone. Its assessment is a matter of the extent to which unforeseeable developments impinge on people’s interests. The calculus of luck fuses the calculus of probability with value theory to provide a means for assessing the benefit (or detriment) that chancy evaluations provide for people. Any adequate account of the matter must determine not only whether and how it is that an agent is lucky or unlucky but must also enable us to tell to what extent this is so. It must, in sum, be quantitative. And the Calculus of Luck is the project of measuring extent to which the outcome of a chance eventuation represents good (or bad) luck for the individuals involved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Yet one certainly should not identify luck and chance, because most chance developments in nature exert no effect on anyone for good or for ill. Only with matters of chance where when someone’s interests are at stake does luck come into play.

  2. 2.

    The probabilities at issue in these expected-value assessments should, of course, be the prior probabilities obtaining in advance of the fact. The ex-post-facto probability that a head-yielding toss has yielded a tail is a here-irrelevant zero.

  3. 3.

    Recall that f(x) are g(x) are quasi-proportional when there are constants c and k such that f(x) = c × g(x) + k.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Question Appendix

Question Appendix

  • Question 1: Under what conditions are all of the possible outcomes of a chancy situations equally lucky?

    Answer: If λ{Oi} = c uniformly for all i, then uniformly |Oi| − E = c and thereby |Oi| = E + c = constant. Thus only when all outcome-yields are identical will all outcomes be equally lucky. Probabilities do not enter into it then.

  • Question 2: What is the sum total of outcome luck afforded by a chancy outcome situation?

    Answer: \( \sum \limits_{\mathrm{i}}^n\left(\left|{O}_{\mathrm{i}}\right|-E\right)=\sum \limits_{\mathrm{i}}\left|{O}_{\mathrm{i}}\right|-n\times E \). So when we have is a fair situation (E = 0), then the luck total will equal the yield total. Otherwise things get complicated.

  • Question 3: Can it happen that (a) Every outcome of a chancy situation is lucky, or (b) that no outcome is lucky.

    Answer: (a) Clearly not. It cannot be that λ{Oi} = |Oi| − E is always > 0. For this would require that all |Oi| are > E which is impossible given E’s definition. (b) However, when all outcomes have equal yield then none will be lucky.

  • Question 4: Can it happen that (a) Every outcome of a chancy situation is unlucky, or (b) that no outcome is unlucky?

    Answer: (a) clearly not. It cannot be that λ{Oi} = |Oi| − E is always < 0. For this would require that all |Oi| are < E which is impossible given E’s definition. (b) However, when all outcomes have equal yield then none will be lucky.

  • Question 5: Under what condition will an outcome-yield in a chancy situation equal the expectation of that situation itself?

    Answer: Consider a situation of the following format:

figure g

From the specification of E{S} it follows that E{S} = p × E{S} + (1 – p) × Z, and so: E{S} = Z. The value of p become irrelevant, and Z = E{S}. The answer to our question in thus: as long as all the outcomes of the situation are identical.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rescher, N. (2021). Outcome Luck Assessment and the Luck Equation. In: Luck Theory. Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, vol 20. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63780-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics