Skip to main content

Expression of Grounded Affect: How Much Emotion Can Arousal Convey?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Towards Autonomous Robotic Systems (TAROS 2020)

Abstract

In this paper we consider how non-humanoid robots can communicate their affective state via bodily forms of communication (kinesics), and the extent to which this influences how humans respond to them. We propose a simple model of grounded affect and kinesic expression before presenting the qualitative findings of an exploratory study (N = 9), during which participants were interviewed after watching expressive and non-expressive hexapod robots perform different ‘scenes’. A summary of these interviews is presented and a number of emerging themes are identified and discussed. Whilst our findings suggest that the expressive robot did not evoke significantly greater empathy or altruistic intent in humans than the control robot, the expressive robot stimulated greater desire for interaction and was also more likely to be attributed with emotion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bartneck, C., Kulić, D., Croft, E., Zoghbi, S.: Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 1(1), 71–81 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bethel, C., Murphy, R.: Survey of non-facial/non-verbal affective expressions for appearance-constrained robots. Trans. Sys. Man Cyber Part C 38(1), 83–92 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cañamero, L., Avila-García, O.: A bottom-up investigation of emotional modulation in competitive scenarios. In: Paiva, A.C.R., Prada, R., Picard, R.W. (eds.) ACII 2007. LNCS, vol. 4738, pp. 398–409. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74889-2_35

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Carney, D., Hall, J., LeBeau, L.: Beliefs about the nonverbal expression of social power. J. Nonverbal Behav. 29(2), 105–123 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Colombetti, G.: From affect programs to dynamical discrete emotions. Philos. Psychol. 22, 407–425 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Darwin, C.: The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. John Murray, London (1872)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Dennett, D.: The Intentional Stance. MIT Press, Cambridge (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ekman, P., Friesen, W.: Head and body cues in the judgment of emotion: a reformulation. Percept. Mot. Skills 24(3), 711–724 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Goffman, E.: Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Harper Colophon Books, Northeastern University Press, New York (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Heider, F., Simmel, M.: An experimental study of apparent behaviour. Am. J. Psychol. 57(2), 243–259 (1944)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hickton, L., Lewis, M., Koay, K., Cañamero, L.: Does expression of grounded affect in a hexapod robot elicit more prosocial responses? In: UKRAS20 Conference: “Robots into the Real World” Proceedings, pp. 40–42 (2020). https://doi.org/10.31256/Hz3Ww4T

  12. Jung, M.: Affective grounding in human-robot interaction. In: Proceedings 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 263–273. ACM Press, New York (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Koay, K.L., et al.: Hey! There is someone at your door. a hearing robot using visual communication signals of hearing dogs to communicate intent. In: 2013 IEEE Symposium on Artificial Life (ALife), pp. 90–97 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/ALIFE.2013.6602436

  14. Krichmar, J.: A neurorobotic platform to test the influence of neuromodulatory signaling on anxious and curious behavior. Front. Neurorobot. 7, 1–17 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lewis, M., Cañamero, L.: Are discrete emotions useful in human-robot interaction? Feedback from motion capture analysis. In: Proceedings - 2013 Humaine Association Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction, ACII 2013, pp. 97–102 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lhommet, M., Marsella, S.: Expressing Emotion Through Posture and Gesture, pp. 273–285. Oxford University Press, Cham (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Martelaro, N., Nneji, C., Ju, W., Hinds, P.: Tell me more: designing HRI to encourage more trust, disclosure, and companionship. In: 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pp. 181–188 (03 2016)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nomura, T., Kanda, T., Kidokoro, H.: Why do children abuse robots? Interact. Stud. 17(3), 347–369 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pfeifer, R.: Building “Fungus Eaters”: design principles of autonomous agents. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior SAB96 (From Animals to Animats), pp. 3–12 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Roether, C., Omlor, L., Christensen, A., Giese, M.: Critical features for the perception of emotion from gait. J. Vis. 9(6), 15.1–32 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Saerbeck, M., Bartneck, C.: Perception of affect elicited by robot motion. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 53–60. ACM, IEEE Press, New Jersey (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Scherer, K.: What are emotions? And how can they be measured? Soc. Sci. Inf. 44(4), 695–729 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tremoulet, P., Feldman, J.: Perception of animacy from the motion of a single object. Perception 29(8), 943–951 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wallbot, H.: Bodily expression of emotion. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 28, 879–896 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wilson, S.: The Animat Path to AI. In: From Animals to Animats: Proceedings First International Conference on the Simulation of Adaptive Behaviour, vol. 1, pp. 15–21. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1991)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Luke Hickton is supported by a PhD studentship of the University of Hertfordshire. We would like to express our gratitude to Kheng Lee Koay, and to Alessandra Rossi for her help in conducting the interviews.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luke Hickton .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hickton, L., Lewis, M., Cañamero, L. (2020). Expression of Grounded Affect: How Much Emotion Can Arousal Convey?. In: Mohammad, A., Dong, X., Russo, M. (eds) Towards Autonomous Robotic Systems. TAROS 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12228. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63486-5_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63486-5_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-63485-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-63486-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics