Skip to main content

Issues for the Future

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Don't Be Afraid of Physics
  • 847 Accesses

Abstract

The seven Chapters of Part 2 of this book reveal the extent of the unbelievable progress of physics since the beginning of the 20th Century. However, despite this success, there remain many open problems. Among these are the inconsistencies between QM and Relativity, the history of the early universe, the unknown nature of dark matter and dark energy, and the possible existence of a multiverse. In this Chapter, several plausible scenarios for future developments are proposed. Others, unheralded here, will also undoubtedly appear, as new ideas are explored by bright new minds in a future for physics that promises to be every bit as exciting as the past.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 24.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 32.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The bard was paraphrasing the much older: Nothing can be made from nothing—once we see that's so, already we are on the way to what we want to know.—Lucretius, De Rerum Natura, 1.148–156.

  2. 2.

    Exoplanets are planets that orbit a sun in another solar system, and not our sun.

References

  1. Alexander S (2016) The Jazz of physics. Basic Books

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shakespeare W, King lear, Act I, Scene I

    Google Scholar 

  3. Johnson S (2001) Emergence: the connected lives of ants, brains, cities and software. Allen Lane, The Penguin Press

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hossenfelder S (2018) Lost in math: how beauty leads physics astray. Basic Books

    Google Scholar 

  5. Liboff RL (1984) The correspondence principle revisited. Phys Today 37(2):50. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2916084. Accessed 21 June 2020

  6. Romero-Isart O, Juan ML, Quidant R, Cirac JI (2010) Toward quantum superposition of living organisms. New J Phys 12:033015. https://arxiv.org/pdf/0909.1469.pdf. Accessed 21 June 2020

  7. Moreau PA et al (2019) Imaging Bell-type nonlocal behavior. Sci Adv

    Google Scholar 

  8. Schrödinger E (1944) What is life?

    Google Scholar 

  9. https://www.physicscentral.com/explore/action/pia-entanglement.cfm. Accessed 13 Aug 2020

  10. Biello D. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/when-it-comes-to-photosynthesis-plants-perform-quantum-computation/. Accessed 13 Aug 2020

  11. Gilmore R (1995) Alice in Quantumland: an allegory of quantum physics. Copernicus Books

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wigner E (1960) The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences. Commun Pure Appl Math 13(I)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hamming RW (1980) The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics. Am Math Monthly 87(2):81–90

    Google Scholar 

  14. Breen PG, Foley CN, Boekholt T, Zwart SP (2019) Newton vs the machine: solving the chaotic three-body problem using deep neural networks (preprint, 2019). https://arxiv.org/pdf/1910.07291.pdf. Accessed 2 June 2020

  15. Abbott D (2013) The reasonable ineffectiveness of mathematics. Proc IEEE 101(10)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Birkhoff G, Von Neumann J (1936) The logic of quantum mechanics. Ann Math Second Series, 37(4):823–843

    Google Scholar 

  17. Putnam H [1968] (1975) The logic of quantum mechanics. In: Putnam H (ed) Philosophical papers, vol 1, Mathematics, matter and method. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 174–97

    Google Scholar 

  18. Putnam H (2006) A philosopher looks at quantum mechanics (Again). Brit J Phil Sci 56:615–634

    Google Scholar 

  19. Putnam H (1994) Michael redhead on quantum logic. In: Clark P, Hale B (eds) Reading Putnam. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 265–80

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tegmark M (2003) Parallel universes in science and ultimate reality: from quantum to cosmos, honoring John Wheeler’s 90th birthday. In: Barrow JD, Davies PCW, Harper CL (eds) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; also Scientific American May, 2003. https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0302131. Accessed 22 June 2020

  21. Davies P (2006) The Goldilocks Enigma: why is the universe just right for life? Allen Lane, London

    Google Scholar 

  22. Carr B, Ellis G (2008) Universe or multiverse? Astron Geophys 49(2):2.29–2.33. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4004.2008.49229.x. Accessed 22 June 2020

  23. Faulkner W, Requiem for a Nun

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wheeler JA (1986) Hermann Weyl and the unity of knowledge. Am Scientist 74(4):366–375. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27854250. Accessed 25 June 2020

  25. The Matrix (1999) The Matrix Reloaded (2003) and The Matrix Revolutions (2003) A fourth film of the series is currently under production

    Google Scholar 

  26. Vedovato F et al (2017) Extending wheeler’s delayed-choice experiment to space. Sci Adv 3(10):e1701180. https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/3/10/e1701180. Accessed 25 June 2020

  27. Manning AG, Khakimov RI, Dall RG, Truscott AG (2015) Wheeler's delayed-choice Gedanken experiment with a single atom. Nat Phys 11:539–542. https://www.nature.com/articles/nphys3343. Accessed 25 June 2020

  28. Fein YY et al (2019) Quantum superposition of molecules beyond 25 kDa. Nat Phys 15:1242–245. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-019-0663-9. Accessed 25 June 2020

  29. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/is-time-quantized-in-othe/. Accessed 4 July 2020

  30. https://journals.aps.org/pra/abstract/https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.100.062107. Accessed 4 July 2020

  31. Born M (1969) Physics in my generation. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. Aristotle Poetics (1454a33–1454b9)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Gurlyand I (1904) Reminiscences of A. P. Chekhov. Teatr i iskusstvo 28(11):521

    Google Scholar 

  34. Shakespeare W, As You Like It, Act 2, Scene 7

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ross Barrett .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Barrett, R., Delsanto, P.P. (2021). Issues for the Future. In: Don't Be Afraid of Physics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63409-4_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics